{"id":794884,"date":"2026-05-01T03:40:02","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T01:40:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T03:40:02","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T01:40:02","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 232\/15-CO n\u00b0 76 – Tierce opposition"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : Tierce opposition – condition d\u2019exercice<\/p>\n

Ne peuvent former tierce opposition les parties appel\u00e9es au proc\u00e8s quand bien m\u00eame elles n\u2019ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 touch\u00e9es pour convocation ou assignation <\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat n\u00b076 du 13 mars 2018<\/p>\n

Dossier : 232\/15-CO<\/p>\n

TIERCE OPPOSITION – CONDITION D\u2019EXERCICE<\/p>\n

\u00ab Ne peuvent former tierce opposition les parties appel\u00e9es au proc\u00e8s quand bien m\u00eame elles n\u2019ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 touch\u00e9es pour convocation ou assignation. \u00bb<\/p>\n

REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n

CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE ET SOCIALE<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile commerciale et sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi treize mars deux mille dix-huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l\u2019arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi des h\u00e9ritiers R. repr\u00e9sent\u00e9s par Z.D.F.A., demeurant [adresse] , Antananarivo, ayant pour conseil Me Ranoharison Sitraka Faniry, Avocat \u00e0 la Cour, contre un arr\u00eat n\u00b0 1435 du 25 novembre 2014 de la Chambre civile de la Cour d'Appel d'Antananarivo, dans le litige les ayant oppos\u00e9 \u00e0 R.A. ;<\/p>\n

Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n

Sur l'unique moyen de cassation tir\u00e9 de l'article 26 de la loi 2004-036 du 01 octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame, pour violation de la loi, exc\u00e8s de pouvoir, fausse application de la loi, en ce que l'arr\u00eat a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la tierce opposition irrecevable, alors que l'article 434 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile donne latitude \u00e0 toute partie pour lesquelles la d\u00e9cision porte pr\u00e9judice et qui n'ont \u00e9t\u00e9 appel\u00e9es ni repr\u00e9sent\u00e9es au proc\u00e8s ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que la port\u00e9e de l'article 434 implique que ne peuvent former tierce opposition les parties appel\u00e9es au proc\u00e8s quand bien m\u00eame elles n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 touch\u00e9es par convocation ou assignation que seules ceux qui n'ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 cit\u00e9s \u00e0 \u00eatre dans un proc\u00e8s ont cette possibilit\u00e9 ; que les h\u00e9ritiers R. sont parties au proc\u00e8s et ont \u00e9t\u00e9 convoqu\u00e9es ou assign\u00e9es ; que la Cour d'Appel a fait une bonne application de la loi ;<\/p>\n

Que le moyen n'est pas fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n

Condamne le demandeur \u00e0 l'amende et aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile Commerciale et Sociale, en son audience publique, les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur, et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Tierce opposition – condition d\u2019exercice Ne peuvent former tierce opposition les parties appel\u00e9es au proc\u00e8s quand bien m\u00eame elles n\u2019ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 touch\u00e9es pour convocation ou assignation Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat n\u00b076 du 13 mars 2018 Dossier : 232\/15-CO TIERCE OPPOSITION – CONDITION…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[49056],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,48966,48968,50475,44421],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-794884","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-et-sociale","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-opposition","kji_keyword-tierce","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 232\/15-CO n\u00b0 76 - Tierce opposition - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 232\/15-CO n\u00b0 76 - Tierce opposition\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Tierce opposition - condition d\u2019exercice Ne peuvent former tierce opposition les parties appel\u00e9es au proc\u00e8s quand bien m\u00eame elles n\u2019ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 touch\u00e9es pour convocation ou assignation Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat n\u00b076 du 13 mars 2018 Dossier : 232\/15-CO TIERCE OPPOSITION - CONDITION...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 232\\\/15-CO n\u00b0 76 - Tierce opposition - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T01:40:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 232\\\/15-CO n\u00b0 76 – Tierce opposition\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 232\/15-CO n\u00b0 76 - Tierce opposition - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 232\/15-CO n\u00b0 76 - Tierce opposition","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Tierce opposition - condition d\u2019exercice Ne peuvent former tierce opposition les parties appel\u00e9es au proc\u00e8s quand bien m\u00eame elles n\u2019ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 touch\u00e9es pour convocation ou assignation Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat n\u00b076 du 13 mars 2018 Dossier : 232\/15-CO TIERCE OPPOSITION - CONDITION...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 232\/15-CO n\u00b0 76 - Tierce opposition - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T01:40:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-232-15-co-n-76-tierce-opposition\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 232\/15-CO n\u00b0 76 – Tierce opposition"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/794884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=794884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=794884"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=794884"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=794884"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=794884"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=794884"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=794884"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=794884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}