{"id":794888,"date":"2026-05-01T03:40:16","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T01:40:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T03:40:16","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T01:40:16","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 845\/13-CO n\u00b0 72 &#8211; Jugement suppl\u00e9tif"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Etat civil<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Jugement suppl\u00e9tif \u2013 absence de validit\u00e9 en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un acte de naissance<\/p>\n<p>La production d\u2019une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9cisive ouvre droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate civile. Un jugement suppl\u00e9tif de naissance ne peut exister en la pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un acte de naissance. <\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 72 du 13 mars 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 845\/13-CO<\/p>\n<p>JUGEMENT SUPPLETIF \u2013 ABSENCE DE VALIDITE EN PRESENCE D\u2019UN ACTE DE NAISSANCE<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab La production d\u2019une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9cisive ouvre droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate civile. Un jugement suppl\u00e9tif de naissance ne peut exister en la pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un acte de naissance. \u00bb <\/p>\n<p>H\u00e9ritiers R.R. et consorts<\/p>\n<p>H\u00e9ritiers R.R.L.<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n<p>CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE ET SOCIALE<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile Commerciale et Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi treize mars deux mille dix huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit:<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi;<\/p>\n<p> Statuant en suite du pourvoi des h\u00e9ritiers R.R., demeurant [adresse] , ayant pour conseil Me Razafindramiadana Soafara, Avocat \u00e0 la Cour, contre un arr\u00eat n\u00b0 279 du 10 mars 2010 rendu par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d&#039;Appel d&#039;Antananarivo, dans le litige l&#039;opposant aux h\u00e9ritiers R.R.L.:<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique de cassation tir\u00e9 de l&#039;article26 de la loi 2004-036 du 01 octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame pour violation de la loi, d\u00e9naturation des faits, manque de base l\u00e9gale, insuffisance de motifs, en ce que la Cour d&#039;Appel a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 que le jugement suppl\u00e9tif de naissance au nom de R.R.L. est opposable aux tiers tant qu&#039;il n&#039;ait \u00e9t\u00e9 annul\u00e9 par d\u00e9cision judiciaire malgr\u00e9 la d\u00e9couverte d&#039;une pi\u00e8ce combattant la sinc\u00e9rit\u00e9 dudit jugement suppl\u00e9tif, alors que la d\u00e9couverte d&#039;une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9cisive combattant la sinc\u00e9rit\u00e9 du jugement suppl\u00e9tif suffit pour \u00e9carter R.R.L. de la succession de R.F. ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que la production d&#039;une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9cisive ouvre droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate civile que le juge saisi d&#039;une requ\u00eate civile doit statuer sur la recevabilit\u00e9 de ladite pi\u00e8ce comme moyen de preuve et de le mettre en rapport avec toutes les autres pi\u00e8ces vers\u00e9es au dossier que la production de l&#039;acte de naissance de R.R.L. devrait conduire le juge \u00e0 le confronter au jugement suppl\u00e9tif et d\u00e9cider du sort de ces pi\u00e8ces apparemment contradictoires; qu&#039;un jugement suppl\u00e9tif de naissance ne peut exister en la pr\u00e9sence d&#039;un acte de naissance; qu&#039;en ne r\u00e9pondant pas \u00e0 la question, la Cour d&#039;Appel a insuffisamment motiv\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision; Que le moyen est fond\u00e9 et la cassation encourue;<\/p>\n<p> CASSE ET ANNULE l&#039;arr\u00eat n\u00b0279 du 10 mars 2010 de la Cour d&#039;Appel d\u2019Antananarivo ;<\/p>\n<p>Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction mais autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Ordonne la restitution de l&#039;amende de cassation ; Condamne le d\u00e9fendeur aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile Commerciale et Sociale, en son audience publique, les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur, et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFE7E6C\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFE7E6C\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Etat civil Mots cl\u00e9s : Jugement suppl\u00e9tif \u2013 absence de validit\u00e9 en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un acte de naissance La production d\u2019une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9cisive ouvre droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate civile. Un jugement suppl\u00e9tif de naissance ne peut exister en la pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un acte de naissance. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[49056],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,23061,48966,48968,51045],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-794888","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-et-sociale","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-jugement","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-suppletif","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 845\/13-CO n\u00b0 72 - Jugement suppl\u00e9tif - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 845\/13-CO n\u00b0 72 - Jugement suppl\u00e9tif\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Etat civil Mots cl\u00e9s : Jugement suppl\u00e9tif \u2013 absence de validit\u00e9 en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un acte de naissance La production d\u2019une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9cisive ouvre droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate civile. Un jugement suppl\u00e9tif de naissance ne peut exister en la pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un acte de naissance. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 845\\\/13-CO n\u00b0 72 - Jugement suppl\u00e9tif - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T01:40:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 845\\\/13-CO n\u00b0 72 &#8211; Jugement suppl\u00e9tif\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 845\/13-CO n\u00b0 72 - Jugement suppl\u00e9tif - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 845\/13-CO n\u00b0 72 - Jugement suppl\u00e9tif","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Etat civil Mots cl\u00e9s : Jugement suppl\u00e9tif \u2013 absence de validit\u00e9 en pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un acte de naissance La production d\u2019une pi\u00e8ce d\u00e9cisive ouvre droit \u00e0 la requ\u00eate civile. Un jugement suppl\u00e9tif de naissance ne peut exister en la pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un acte de naissance. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 845\/13-CO n\u00b0 72 - Jugement suppl\u00e9tif - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T01:40:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-mars-2018-845-13-co-n-72-jugement-suppletif\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 mars 2018, 845\/13-CO n\u00b0 72 &#8211; Jugement suppl\u00e9tif"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/794888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=794888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=794888"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=794888"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=794888"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=794888"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=794888"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=794888"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=794888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}