{"id":795745,"date":"2026-05-01T04:25:47","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T02:25:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T04:25:47","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T02:25:47","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 mars 2018, 407\/10-SOC n\u00b0 39 &#8211; Proc\u00e9dure"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Licenciement<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Licenciement \u00e9conomique (Non) \u2013 Licenciement individuel pour faute (Oui) \u2013 respect de la formalit\u00e9 d\u2019ordre public<\/p>\n<p>Il ne s\u2019agit pas d\u2019un licenciement \u00e9conomique mais d\u2019un licenciement individuel qui doit respecter les formalit\u00e9s d\u2019ordre public au licenciement. <\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Sociale<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 39 du 2 mars 2018<\/p>\n<p>Dossier N407\/10-SOC<\/p>\n<p>LICENCIEMENT ECONOMIQUE (NON) \u2013 LICENCIEMENT INDIVIDUEL POUR FAUTE (OUI) \u2013 RESPECT DE LA FORMALITE D\u2019ORDRE PUBLIC<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Il ne s\u2019agit pas d\u2019un licenciement \u00e9conomique mais d\u2019un licenciement individuel qui doit respecter les formalit\u00e9s d\u2019ordre public au licenciement. \u00bb <\/p>\n<p>La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 XXX<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n<p>CHAMBRE CIVILE, COMMERCIALE ET SOCIALE<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile, commerciale et sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi deux mars deux mille dix-huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit:<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 XXX sise \u00e0 adresse ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre Frederic Rakotoarivony avocat au barreau de Madagascar, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b070 du 1 Avril 2010 rendu par la Chambre Sociale de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo dans le litige l\u2019opposant \u00e0 R.V.G.;<\/p>\n<p> Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur les premier et deuxi\u00e8me moyens de cassation r\u00e9unis tir\u00e9s de I&#039; article 26 de la loi organique n\u00b02004-036 du 1er Octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame et pris de la violation des articles 21,22,25,27 et 28 du Code de travail pour d\u00e9naturation des faits et fausse application de la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a qualifi\u00e9 de probl\u00e8me \u00e9conomique la raison du licenciement de R.V.G., alors que pour d\u00e9faut de client\u00e8le, la Boulangerie a d\u00fb r\u00e9organiser le travail en supprimant le travail de nuit ; qu\u2019elle n\u2019avait plus de chauffeur sp\u00e9cial ; qu\u2019il ne s\u2019agit pas de compression de personnel ; que l\u2019article 25 du Code de Travail n&#039;est pas applicable dans le cas d\u2019esp\u00e8ces (1er moyen)<\/p>\n<p>En ce que la Cour d&#039;Appel a qualifi\u00e9 de licenciement pour motif \u00e9conomique le licenciement de R.V.G. alors qu&#039;il s&#039;agit d&#039;un licenciement individuel car seul le poste de chauffeur a \u00e9t\u00e9 supprim\u00e9 et non ce d&#039;un groupe de travailleurs ;<\/p>\n<p> Vu les textes vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le licenciement en question est motiv\u00e9 par la perte de client\u00e8le cons\u00e9cutive \u00e0 la mauvaise qualit\u00e9 des produits entra\u00eenant la cessation de toutes les activit\u00e9s de production de nuit ;<\/p>\n<p>Que de tels motifs rev\u00eatent un aspect d\u2019ordre \u00e9conomique sans qu&#039;aucune faute n&#039;a \u00e9t\u00e9 reproch\u00e9e au travailleur licenci\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que l\u2019employeur n&#039;a pas respect\u00e9 les formalit\u00e9s d\u2019ordre public pr\u00e9alable au licenciement pr\u00e9vu par l\u2019article 25 et suivant du Code du travail ;<\/p>\n<p> Qu\u2019en statuant comme elle l\u2019a fait, aucune d\u00e9naturation de fait ne peut \u00eatre reproch\u00e9e \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019Appel ; D&#039;o\u00f9 il suit que les moyens ne sont pas fond\u00e9s<\/p>\n<p> REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n<p> La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS68389AFFE70C4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS68389AFFE70C4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Licenciement Mots cl\u00e9s : Licenciement \u00e9conomique (Non) \u2013 Licenciement individuel pour faute (Oui) \u2013 respect de la formalit\u00e9 d\u2019ordre public Il ne s\u2019agit pas d\u2019un licenciement \u00e9conomique mais d\u2019un licenciement individuel qui doit respecter les formalit\u00e9s d\u2019ordre public au licenciement. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Sociale Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 39 du&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[16504],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,12224,48966,48968],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-795745","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-licenciement","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 mars 2018, 407\/10-SOC n\u00b0 39 - Proc\u00e9dure - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 mars 2018, 407\/10-SOC n\u00b0 39 - Proc\u00e9dure\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Licenciement Mots cl\u00e9s : Licenciement \u00e9conomique (Non) \u2013 Licenciement individuel pour faute (Oui) \u2013 respect de la formalit\u00e9 d\u2019ordre public Il ne s\u2019agit pas d\u2019un licenciement \u00e9conomique mais d\u2019un licenciement individuel qui doit respecter les formalit\u00e9s d\u2019ordre public au licenciement. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Sociale Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 39 du...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 mars 2018, 407\\\/10-SOC n\u00b0 39 - Proc\u00e9dure - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T02:25:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 mars 2018, 407\\\/10-SOC n\u00b0 39 &#8211; Proc\u00e9dure\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 mars 2018, 407\/10-SOC n\u00b0 39 - Proc\u00e9dure - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 mars 2018, 407\/10-SOC n\u00b0 39 - Proc\u00e9dure","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Licenciement Mots cl\u00e9s : Licenciement \u00e9conomique (Non) \u2013 Licenciement individuel pour faute (Oui) \u2013 respect de la formalit\u00e9 d\u2019ordre public Il ne s\u2019agit pas d\u2019un licenciement \u00e9conomique mais d\u2019un licenciement individuel qui doit respecter les formalit\u00e9s d\u2019ordre public au licenciement. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Sociale Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 39 du...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 mars 2018, 407\/10-SOC n\u00b0 39 - Proc\u00e9dure - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T02:25:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-mars-2018-407-10-soc-n-39-procedure\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 mars 2018, 407\/10-SOC n\u00b0 39 &#8211; Proc\u00e9dure"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/795745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=795745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=795745"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=795745"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=795745"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=795745"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=795745"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=795745"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=795745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}