{"id":798020,"date":"2026-05-01T06:06:28","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:06:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T06:06:28","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:06:28","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018, 498\/12-CO n\u00b0 19 – Repr\u00e9sentation en justice"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : Notification de jugement \u2013 mandataire agr\u00e9e \u2013 Appel \u2013 R\u00e9gularit\u00e9 \u2013 OUI<\/p>\n

La Cour d\u2019Appel a fait une exacte application de la loi en d\u00e9clarant r\u00e9gulier en la forme l\u2019appel interjet\u00e9 par un mandataire agr\u00e9e d\u2019une partie.<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat n\u00b019 du 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018<\/p>\n

Dossier : 498\/12-CO<\/p>\n

NOTIFICATION DE JUGEMENT \u2013 MANDATAIRE AGREE \u2013 APPEL \u2013 REGULARITE (OUI)<\/p>\n

\u00ab La Cour d\u2019Appel a fait une exacte application de la loi en d\u00e9clarant r\u00e9gulier en la forme l\u2019appel interjet\u00e9 par un mandataire agr\u00e9e d\u2019une partie. \u00bb<\/p>\n

REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n

CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE ET SOCIALE<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile commerciale et sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi treize f\u00e9vrier deux mille dix-huit, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l\u2019arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi de I.L., demeurant \u00e0 (adresse) contre l'arr\u00eat n\u00b0 008-CIV\/12 rendu le 15 mai 2012 par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d'Appel de Toliara dans la proc\u00e9dure qui l'oppose \u00e0 M.F ;<\/p>\n

Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande ;<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen unique de cassation \u00e0 deux branches pris de la violation des articles 124 \u00e0 127 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile, de 146 et 392-09 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile pour violation de la loi :<\/p>\n

En ce que l'arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l'appel de I.L. irrecevable pour avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 fait hors d\u00e9lai, alors que la notification du jugement entrepris a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite non pas \u00e0 sa personne mais \u00e0 son conseil ; (deuxi\u00e8me branche)<\/p>\n

En ce que l'arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a dit " selon les t\u00e9moins entendus, le terrain litigieux appartient \u00e0 M.F. ", alors que les pi\u00e8ces du dossier, dont le certificat de d\u00e9p\u00f4t d'acquisition de terrain domanial la d\u00e9cision n\u00b0 09-FAR\/DS\/CAE\/DOM, le plan croquis, le proc\u00e8s-verbal du Fokonolona du FRS de Sampona attestent que ce terrain appartient \u00e0 la famille de I.L. ; (premi\u00e8re branche)<\/p>\n

Attendu que la notification du jugement entrepris a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite, non pas \u00e0 I.L. en personne, mais \u00e0 son mandataire, agr\u00e9e ; que l'article 28 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile dispose que la constitution d'un mandataire vaut \u00e9lection de domicile chez celui-ci s'il a lui-m\u00eame domicile \u00e9lu ou r\u00e9el dans le ressort, tel le cas d'esp\u00e8ce ; que l'article 29 du m\u00eame Code \u00e9dicte que le mandat donn\u00e9 pour repr\u00e9senter une partie dans une instance comporte le droit de faire appel des jugements rendus ; qu'il est reconnu par le mandataire et non contest\u00e9 par I.L. que la notification du jugement entrepris a \u00e9t\u00e9 faite \u00e0 ce mandataire le 24 octobre 1997 ; que cette notification est r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et valable ; que l'appel qui n'a \u00e9t\u00e9 interjet\u00e9 que le 24 octobre 1997 a \u00e9t\u00e9 bien fait hors d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal ;<\/p>\n

Qu'en statuant comme elle l'a fait, la Cour d'Appel a fait une exacte application de la loi ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que l'arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 n'a pas statu\u00e9 sur le fond du litige mais uniquement en la forme ; que le moyen manque en fait ne peut \u00eatre accueilli ;<\/p>\n

REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n

Condamne le demandeur \u00e0 l'amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Notification de jugement \u2013 mandataire agr\u00e9e \u2013 Appel \u2013 R\u00e9gularit\u00e9 \u2013 OUI La Cour d\u2019Appel a fait une exacte application de la loi en d\u00e9clarant r\u00e9gulier en la forme l\u2019appel interjet\u00e9 par un mandataire agr\u00e9e d\u2019une partie. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat n\u00b019 du…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[49056],"kji_year":[47917],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,8457,9055,48966,8268],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-798020","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-et-sociale","kji_year-47917","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-fevrier","kji_keyword-justice","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-representation","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018, 498\/12-CO n\u00b0 19 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018, 498\/12-CO n\u00b0 19 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Notification de jugement \u2013 mandataire agr\u00e9e \u2013 Appel \u2013 R\u00e9gularit\u00e9 \u2013 OUI La Cour d\u2019Appel a fait une exacte application de la loi en d\u00e9clarant r\u00e9gulier en la forme l\u2019appel interjet\u00e9 par un mandataire agr\u00e9e d\u2019une partie. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat n\u00b019 du...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018, 498\\\/12-CO n\u00b0 19 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T04:06:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018, 498\\\/12-CO n\u00b0 19 – Repr\u00e9sentation en justice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018, 498\/12-CO n\u00b0 19 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018, 498\/12-CO n\u00b0 19 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Notification de jugement \u2013 mandataire agr\u00e9e \u2013 Appel \u2013 R\u00e9gularit\u00e9 \u2013 OUI La Cour d\u2019Appel a fait une exacte application de la loi en d\u00e9clarant r\u00e9gulier en la forme l\u2019appel interjet\u00e9 par un mandataire agr\u00e9e d\u2019une partie. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet Arr\u00eat n\u00b019 du...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018, 498\/12-CO n\u00b0 19 - Repr\u00e9sentation en justice - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T04:06:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-13-fevrier-2018-498-12-co-n-19-representation-en-justice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 13 f\u00e9vrier 2018, 498\/12-CO n\u00b0 19 – Repr\u00e9sentation en justice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/798020","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798020"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=798020"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=798020"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=798020"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=798020"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=798020"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=798020"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=798020"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}