{"id":798190,"date":"2026-05-01T06:15:12","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:15:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T06:15:12","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:15:12","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 606\/26.8YRLSB-6 \u2013 2026-04-16"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<p class=\"kji-summary\">Relator: ELSA MELO. Sum?rio: I. ? sempre poss?vel ao tribunal na aprecia??o interpretativa das clausulas do contrato apreciar se, juridicamente, alguma delas ? ou n?o excessivamente limitativa da cobertura aparentemente dada pelo contrato de seguro celebrado (e, portanto, abusiva), porquanto essa tarefa cabe no ?mbito dos poderes de conhecimento do tribunal, sendo de natureza oficiosa; II. A delimita??o contratual do risco n?o pode contrariar a boa-f? nem frustrar as leg?timas expectativas do tomador, sob pena de se tornar materialmente abusiva, nos termos do disposto nos art,?s 762? n.? 2 e 227? n.? 1 ambos do C?digo Civil e dos art.?s 15? e 21? ambos do DCCG (DL 446\/85). III. Nos termos do art.?. 15.? do DCCG, s?o proibidas as cl?usulas contr?rias ? boa f?. A estipula??o de um limite t?cnico mais elevado do que o padr?o meteorol?gico reconhecido frustra as leg?timas expectativas do tomador do seguro, configurando um desequil?brio manifesto entre as partes. IV. A formula??o de pedidos il?quidos ou a prola??o de senten?as il?quidas n?o pode servir de instrumento ou meio para escamotear a aus?ncia de alega??o e de prova de danos concretos e verific?veis, ? data da peti??o inicial ou ? data da senten?a, ainda que eles possam n?o ser ainda determin?veis ou quantific?veis.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dgsi.pt\/jtrl.nsf\/33182fc732316039802565fa00497eec\/b8ca64d2e1a003aa80258de200341830?OpenDocument&#038;ExpandSection=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Relator: ELSA MELO. Sum?rio: I. ? sempre poss?vel ao tribunal na aprecia??o interpretativa das clausulas do contrato apreciar se, juridicamente, alguma delas ? ou n?o excessivamente limitativa da cobertura aparentemente dada pelo contrato de seguro celebrado (e, portanto, abusiva), porquanto essa tarefa cabe no ?mbito dos poderes de conhecimento do tribunal, sendo de natureza oficiosa; II. A delimita??o contratual do risco n?o pode contrariar a boa-f? nem frustrar as leg?timas expectativas do tomador, sob pena de se tornar materialmente abusiva, nos termos do disposto nos art,?s 762? n.? 2 e 227? n.? 1 ambos do C?digo Civil e dos art.?s 15? e 21? ambos do DCCG (DL 446\/85). III. Nos termos do art.?. 15.? do DCCG, s?o proibidas as cl?usulas contr?rias ? boa f?. A estipula??o de um limite t?cnico mais elevado do que o padr?o meteorol?gico reconhecido frustra as leg?timas expectativas do tomador do seguro, configurando um desequil?brio manifesto entre as partes. IV. A formula??o de pedidos il?quidos ou a prola??o de senten?as il?quidas n?o pode servir de instrumento ou meio para escamotear a aus?ncia de alega??o e de prova de danos concretos e verific?veis, ? data da peti??o inicial ou ? data da senten?a, ainda que eles possam n?o ser ainda determin?veis ou quantific?veis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[51416],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,17729,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-798190","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lisboa","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.5 (Yoast SEO v27.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 606\/26.8YRLSB-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 606\/26.8YRLSB-6 \u2013 2026-04-16\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ELSA MELO. Sum?rio: I. ? sempre poss?vel ao tribunal na aprecia??o interpretativa das clausulas do contrato apreciar se, juridicamente, alguma delas ? ou n?o excessivamente limitativa da cobertura aparentemente dada pelo contrato de seguro celebrado (e, portanto, abusiva), porquanto essa tarefa cabe no ?mbito dos poderes de conhecimento do tribunal, sendo de natureza oficiosa; II. A delimita??o contratual do risco n?o pode contrariar a boa-f? nem frustrar as leg?timas expectativas do tomador, sob pena de se tornar materialmente abusiva, nos termos do disposto nos art,?s 762? n.? 2 e 227? n.? 1 ambos do C?digo Civil e dos art.?s 15? e 21? ambos do DCCG (DL 446\/85). III. Nos termos do art.?. 15.? do DCCG, s?o proibidas as cl?usulas contr?rias ? boa f?. A estipula??o de um limite t?cnico mais elevado do que o padr?o meteorol?gico reconhecido frustra as leg?timas expectativas do tomador do seguro, configurando um desequil?brio manifesto entre as partes. IV. A formula??o de pedidos il?quidos ou a prola??o de senten?as il?quidas n?o pode servir de instrumento ou meio para escamotear a aus?ncia de alega??o e de prova de danos concretos e verific?veis, ? data da peti??o inicial ou ? data da senten?a, ainda que eles possam n?o ser ainda determin?veis ou quantific?veis.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 606\\\/26.8YRLSB-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T04:15:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 606\\\/26.8YRLSB-6 \u2013 2026-04-16\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 606\/26.8YRLSB-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 606\/26.8YRLSB-6 \u2013 2026-04-16","og_description":"Relator: ELSA MELO. Sum?rio: I. ? sempre poss?vel ao tribunal na aprecia??o interpretativa das clausulas do contrato apreciar se, juridicamente, alguma delas ? ou n?o excessivamente limitativa da cobertura aparentemente dada pelo contrato de seguro celebrado (e, portanto, abusiva), porquanto essa tarefa cabe no ?mbito dos poderes de conhecimento do tribunal, sendo de natureza oficiosa; II. A delimita??o contratual do risco n?o pode contrariar a boa-f? nem frustrar as leg?timas expectativas do tomador, sob pena de se tornar materialmente abusiva, nos termos do disposto nos art,?s 762? n.? 2 e 227? n.? 1 ambos do C?digo Civil e dos art.?s 15? e 21? ambos do DCCG (DL 446\/85). III. Nos termos do art.?. 15.? do DCCG, s?o proibidas as cl?usulas contr?rias ? boa f?. A estipula??o de um limite t?cnico mais elevado do que o padr?o meteorol?gico reconhecido frustra as leg?timas expectativas do tomador do seguro, configurando um desequil?brio manifesto entre as partes. IV. A formula??o de pedidos il?quidos ou a prola??o de senten?as il?quidas n?o pode servir de instrumento ou meio para escamotear a aus?ncia de alega??o e de prova de danos concretos e verific?veis, ? data da peti??o inicial ou ? data da senten?a, ainda que eles possam n?o ser ainda determin?veis ou quantific?veis.","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 606\/26.8YRLSB-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T04:15:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-606-26-8yrlsb-6-2026-04-16\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 606\/26.8YRLSB-6 \u2013 2026-04-16"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/798190","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=798190"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=798190"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=798190"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=798190"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=798190"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=798190"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=798190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}