{"id":798199,"date":"2026-05-01T06:15:22","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:15:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T06:15:22","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T04:15:22","slug":"acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/","title":{"rendered":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 28562\/17.6T8LSB.L2-6 \u2013 2026-04-16"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Relator: ANT?NIO SANTOS. Sumariando, dir-se-? que (cfr. n?7, do art? 663?, do CPC): 4.1 – O erro total na forma de processo, a que se refere a al b) do art 577? quando a? se reporta ? nulidade de todo o processo enquanto excep??o dilat?ria, pressup?e que o autor utilize processo especial em vez do comum ou vice versa, e que, mesmo assim, o mesmo n?o se mostre supr?vel nos termos do n? 1 do art 193?,do CPC; 4.2 – Em face do referido em 4.1., n?o existe erro na forma do processo quando um credor demanda em ac??o declarativa com processo comum os gerentes de uma sociedade j? julgada insolvente e peticionando a sus condena??o – por inobserv?ncia das disposi??es legais destinadas a proteger os interesse dos credores , nos termos dos arts. 64.? e 78.? do CSC e 164.?, n.? 2 do CC – em indemniza??o pecuni?ria ; 4.3. ? A n?o apresenta??o na insolv?ncia do requerimento a que se refere o art? 188?,n?1, do CIRE [ para efeitos de qualifica??o da insolv?ncia como culposa ] n?o faz precludir a propositura pelo credor da insolvente da ac??o identificada em 4.2. ;<\/p>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a><\/p>\n

Portails officiels portugais (DGSI \/ Tribunal Constitucional). Republication en metadata_only par prudence licencielle ; consulter la source officielle pour le texte authentique.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Relator: ANT?NIO SANTOS. Sumariando, dir-se-? que (cfr. n?7, do art? 663?, do CPC): 4.1 – O erro total na forma de processo, a que se refere a al b) do art 577? quando a? se reporta ? nulidade de todo o processo enquanto excep??o dilat?ria, pressup?e que o autor utilize processo especial em vez do comum ou vice versa, e que, mesmo assim, o mesmo n?o se mostre supr?vel nos termos do n? 1 do art 193?,do CPC; 4.2 – Em face do referido em 4.1., n?o existe erro na forma do processo quando um credor demanda em ac??o declarativa com processo comum os gerentes de uma sociedade j? julgada insolvente e peticionando a sus condena??o – por inobserv?ncia das disposi??es legais destinadas a proteger os interesse dos credores , nos termos dos arts. 64.? e 78.? do CSC e 164.?, n.? 2 do CC – em indemniza??o pecuni?ria ; 4.3. ? A n?o apresenta??o na insolv?ncia do requerimento a que se refere o art? 188?,n?1, do CIRE [ para efeitos de qualifica??o da insolv?ncia como culposa ] n?o faz precludir a propositura pelo credor da insolvente da ac??o identificada em 4.2. ;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_crdt_document":""},"kji_country":[7762],"kji_court":[51416],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[7772,17729,7771,51417,7636],"kji_language":[7770],"class_list":["post-798199","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-portugal","kji_court-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-acordao","kji_keyword-lisboa","kji_keyword-processo","kji_keyword-relacao","kji_keyword-tribunal","kji_language-pt"],"yoast_head":"\nAc\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 28562\/17.6T8LSB.L2-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 28562\/17.6T8LSB.L2-6 \u2013 2026-04-16\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Relator: ANT?NIO SANTOS. Sumariando, dir-se-? que (cfr. n?7, do art? 663?, do CPC): 4.1 - O erro total na forma de processo, a que se refere a al b) do art 577? quando a? se reporta ? nulidade de todo o processo enquanto excep??o dilat?ria, pressup?e que o autor utilize processo especial em vez do comum ou vice versa, e que, mesmo assim, o mesmo n?o se mostre supr?vel nos termos do n? 1 do art 193?,do CPC; 4.2 - Em face do referido em 4.1., n?o existe erro na forma do processo quando um credor demanda em ac??o declarativa com processo comum os gerentes de uma sociedade j? julgada insolvente e peticionando a sus condena??o - por inobserv?ncia das disposi??es legais destinadas a proteger os interesse dos credores , nos termos dos arts. 64.? e 78.? do CSC e 164.?, n.? 2 do CC - em indemniza??o pecuni?ria ; 4.3. ? A n?o apresenta??o na insolv?ncia do requerimento a que se refere o art? 188?,n?1, do CIRE [ para efeitos de qualifica??o da insolv?ncia como culposa ] n?o faz precludir a propositura pelo credor da insolvente da ac??o identificada em 4.2. ;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 28562\\\/17.6T8LSB.L2-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T04:15:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 28562\\\/17.6T8LSB.L2-6 \u2013 2026-04-16\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/Logo-2-1.webp\",\"width\":2114,\"height\":1253,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 28562\/17.6T8LSB.L2-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 28562\/17.6T8LSB.L2-6 \u2013 2026-04-16","og_description":"Relator: ANT?NIO SANTOS. Sumariando, dir-se-? que (cfr. n?7, do art? 663?, do CPC): 4.1 - O erro total na forma de processo, a que se refere a al b) do art 577? quando a? se reporta ? nulidade de todo o processo enquanto excep??o dilat?ria, pressup?e que o autor utilize processo especial em vez do comum ou vice versa, e que, mesmo assim, o mesmo n?o se mostre supr?vel nos termos do n? 1 do art 193?,do CPC; 4.2 - Em face do referido em 4.1., n?o existe erro na forma do processo quando um credor demanda em ac??o declarativa com processo comum os gerentes de uma sociedade j? julgada insolvente e peticionando a sus condena??o - por inobserv?ncia das disposi??es legais destinadas a proteger os interesse dos credores , nos termos dos arts. 64.? e 78.? do CSC e 164.?, n.? 2 do CC - em indemniza??o pecuni?ria ; 4.3. ? A n?o apresenta??o na insolv?ncia do requerimento a que se refere o art? 188?,n?1, do CIRE [ para efeitos de qualifica??o da insolv?ncia como culposa ] n?o faz precludir a propositura pelo credor da insolvente da ac??o identificada em 4.2. ;","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/","name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 28562\/17.6T8LSB.L2-6 \u2013 2026-04-16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T04:15:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/acordao-tribunal-da-relacao-de-lisboa-processo-28562-17-6t8lsb-l2-6-2026-04-16\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o Tribunal da Rela\u00e7\u00e3o de Lisboa \u2013 Processo 28562\/17.6T8LSB.L2-6 \u2013 2026-04-16"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Logo-2-1.webp","width":2114,"height":1253,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/798199","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=798199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=798199"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=798199"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=798199"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=798199"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=798199"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=798199"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=798199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}