{"id":810767,"date":"2026-05-01T22:44:44","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T20:44:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-01T22:44:44","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T20:44:44","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 24 octobre 2017, 130\/15 CO n\u00b0 739 &#8211; Devoir du juge"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u2013 Droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u2013 Juge du deuxi\u00e8me degr\u00e9 \u2013 Motifs insuffisants \u2013 Contradiction motifs &#8211; Effet<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 s\u2019est content\u00e9 de dire que le premier juge a bien jug\u00e9 en consid\u00e9rant les pi\u00e8ces du dossier cit\u00e9es fondant les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 du d\u00e9fendeur au pourvoi sans examiner en tant que juge du deuxi\u00e8me degr\u00e9 que le motif du jugement sont insuffisants et qu\u2019il y a contradiction de motifs.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 739 du 24 octobre 2017<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 130\/15 CO<\/p>\n<p>PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 DROITS DE PROPRI\u00c9T\u00c9 \u2013 JUGE DU DEUXI\u00c8ME DEGR\u00c9 \u2013 MOTIFS INSUFFISANTS \u2013 CONTRADICTION MOTIFS \u2013 EFFET<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab L\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 s\u2019est content\u00e9 de dire que le premier juge a bien jug\u00e9 en consid\u00e9rant les pi\u00e8ces du dossier cit\u00e9es fondant les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 du d\u00e9fendeur au pourvoi sans examiner en tant que juge du deuxi\u00e8me degr\u00e9 que le motif du jugement sont insuffisants et qu\u2019il y a contradiction de motifs. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>T.S repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par T.V<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi vingt-quatre octobre deux mille dix-sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit:<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de T. et consorts, ayant comme Conseil Ma\u00eetre Alexandre RAKOTONDRAZAFY, Avocat au Barreau de Madagascar, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0214 rendu le 21 mai 2014 par la Cour d&#039;Appel de Mahajanga dans le litige qui les oppose \u00e0 T.S repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par T.V;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le premier moyen de cassation, tir\u00e9 des articles 25 et 26 alin\u00e9a 6 de la loi n\u00b02004-036 du 1 octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant pour violation de la loi, et pris de la violation de l&#039;article 180 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile, pour insuffisance de motifs, manque de base l\u00e9gale rendant la Cour de Cassation dans l&#039;impossibilit\u00e9 d&#039; exercer son contr\u00f4le ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel, en \u00e9non\u00e7ant que \u00ab le premier Juge a bien jug\u00e9 en consid\u00e9rant les pi\u00e8ces dessus cit\u00e9es, fondant les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 de T.S sur le terrain Anjozorobe \u00bb n&#039;a pas motiv\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision et ne met pas la Cour de Cassation en mesure de contr\u00f4ler la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 de la d\u00e9cision ;<\/p>\n<p>Alors que le jugement confirm\u00e9 lui-m\u00eame est aussi laconique ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0214 attaqu\u00e9 s\u2019est content\u00e9 effectivement de dire que le premier Juge a bien jug\u00e9 en consid\u00e9rant les pi\u00e8ces dessus cit\u00e9es fondant les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 de T.S \u00bb sans examiner en tant que Juge du deuxi\u00e8me degr\u00e9, que les motifs du jugement sont insuffisants et qu\u2019il y a contradiction de motifs ; 1&#039; arr\u00eat n\u00b0214 encourt les griefs du moyen et m\u00e9rite cassation sur la base de ce premier moyen, sans qu\u2019il soit besoin d\u2019examiner le deuxi\u00e8me moyen ;<\/p>\n<p>Casse et annule l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0214 rendu le 21 mai 2014 par la Cour d\u2019Appel de Mahajanga ;<\/p>\n<p>Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame Cour autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne les d\u00e9fendeurs aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS6806DD1E1B584\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS6806DD1E1B584\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u2013 Droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u2013 Juge du deuxi\u00e8me degr\u00e9 \u2013 Motifs insuffisants \u2013 Contradiction motifs &#8211; Effet L\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 s\u2019est content\u00e9 de dire que le premier juge a bien jug\u00e9 en consid\u00e9rant les pi\u00e8ces du dossier cit\u00e9es fondant les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 du d\u00e9fendeur au pourvoi sans examiner&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[16504],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,51055,48966,48968,8598],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-810767","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-devoir","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-octobre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 24 octobre 2017, 130\/15 CO n\u00b0 739 - Devoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 24 octobre 2017, 130\/15 CO n\u00b0 739 - Devoir du juge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u2013 Droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u2013 Juge du deuxi\u00e8me degr\u00e9 \u2013 Motifs insuffisants \u2013 Contradiction motifs - Effet L\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 s\u2019est content\u00e9 de dire que le premier juge a bien jug\u00e9 en consid\u00e9rant les pi\u00e8ces du dossier cit\u00e9es fondant les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 du d\u00e9fendeur au pourvoi sans examiner...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 24 octobre 2017, 130\\\/15 CO n\u00b0 739 - Devoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T20:44:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 24 octobre 2017, 130\\\/15 CO n\u00b0 739 &#8211; Devoir du juge\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 24 octobre 2017, 130\/15 CO n\u00b0 739 - Devoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 24 octobre 2017, 130\/15 CO n\u00b0 739 - Devoir du juge","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u2013 Droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u2013 Juge du deuxi\u00e8me degr\u00e9 \u2013 Motifs insuffisants \u2013 Contradiction motifs - Effet L\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 s\u2019est content\u00e9 de dire que le premier juge a bien jug\u00e9 en consid\u00e9rant les pi\u00e8ces du dossier cit\u00e9es fondant les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 du d\u00e9fendeur au pourvoi sans examiner...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 24 octobre 2017, 130\/15 CO n\u00b0 739 - Devoir du juge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T20:44:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-24-octobre-2017-130-15-co-n-739-devoir-du-juge-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 24 octobre 2017, 130\/15 CO n\u00b0 739 &#8211; Devoir du juge"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/810767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=810767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=810767"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=810767"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=810767"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=810767"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=810767"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=810767"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=810767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}