{"id":812079,"date":"2026-05-02T01:11:12","date_gmt":"2026-05-01T23:11:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T01:11:12","modified_gmt":"2026-05-01T23:11:12","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 26 septembre 2017, 360\/08-CO n\u00b0 661 – Indivision"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Foncier<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : INDIVISION- VENTE DE QUOTE PART : OUI- EFFETS<\/p>\n

En mati\u00e8re de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 indivise, la vente d\u2019une quote-part est valable, \u00e0 charge pour les autres copropri\u00e9taires d\u2019en demander, en cas de contestation, l\u2019annulation apr\u00e8s le partage.<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 661 du 26 septembre 2017<\/p>\n

Dossier : 360\/08-CO<\/p>\n

INDIVISION \u2013 VENTE DE QUOTE PART : OUI \u2013 EFFETS<\/p>\n

\u00ab En mati\u00e8re de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 indivise, la vente d\u2019une quote-part est valable, \u00e0 charge pour les autres copropri\u00e9taires d\u2019en demander, en cas de contestation, l\u2019annulation apr\u00e8s le partage. \u00bb<\/p>\n

Me Allain RAJOELINA<\/p>\n

R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

—————–<\/p>\n

Cour de Cassation<\/p>\n

Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi vingt six septembre deux mille dix sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l'arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.L.V, domicili\u00e9e au [Adresse 1] Ampefiloha Antananarivo, ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre Allain RAJOELINA, avocat, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 84 du 28 janvier 2008 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo, rendu dans le litige l\u2019opposant \u00e0 R.E ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen unique de cassation tir\u00e9 de l\u2019article 26 de la loi organique 2004.036 du 1er octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant, pour violation de la loi, fausse interpr\u00e9tation de la loi, d\u00e9naturation des faits, manque de base l\u00e9gale, absence de motifs en ce que la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e en confirmant le jugement entrepris qui a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la demanderesse au pourvoi et bas\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision sur l\u2019absence de l\u2019inscription des droits des vendeurs sur le livre foncier alors qu\u2019il a \u00e9t\u00e9 soutenu par la demanderesse que les vendeurs n\u2019ont vis\u00e9 que leur droit revenant \u00e0 la succession de R.Z, propri\u00e9taire inscrit sur le livre foncier ;<\/p>\n

Vu les textes de droit vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il ressort des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la proc\u00e9dure que la Cour d\u2019Appel a fond\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision sur le caract\u00e8re indivis de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 litigieuse et sur l\u2019absence de partage de ce bien indivis ;<\/p>\n

Attendu cependant qu\u2019en mati\u00e8re de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 indivise la vente d\u2019une quote-part est valable, \u00e0 charge pour les autres copropri\u00e9taires d\u2019en demander, en cas de contestation l\u2019annulation apr\u00e8s le partage ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il s\u2019en suit que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 ayant d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la demanderesse pour d\u00e9faut de partage au moment de la conclusion de la vente encourt la cassation ; <\/p>\n

CASSE ET ANNULE l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 84 du 28 janvier 2008 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo, en toutes ses dispositions ;<\/p>\n

Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction, autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende de cassation ;<\/p>\n

Condamne les d\u00e9fendeurs aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n

-RAKETAMANGA Odette, Pr\u00e9sident de Chambre, Pr\u00e9sident ;<\/p>\n

-RAZAIARISOA Zafimanitra Vololonirina J., Conseiller – Rapporteur ;<\/p>\n

– RALANTOMAHEFA, Conseiller, RAFENOMANANIONY Eliana Blandine, Conseiller, RAZAFINDRAMARO Haja Jacqueline, Conseiller, tous membres ;<\/p>\n

-RAKOTOJAONA Jean Pierrot, Avocat G\u00e9n\u00e9ral ;<\/p>\n

-TAFARA Elyss\u00e8re Rakotonindrainy ;<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : INDIVISION- VENTE DE QUOTE PART : OUI- EFFETS En mati\u00e8re de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 indivise, la vente d\u2019une quote-part est valable, \u00e0 charge pour les autres copropri\u00e9taires d\u2019en demander, en cas de contestation, l\u2019annulation apr\u00e8s le partage. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Cassation ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 661 du 26…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,49335,48966,48968,15227],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-812079","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-indivision","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-septembre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 26 septembre 2017, 360\/08-CO n\u00b0 661 - Indivision - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 26 septembre 2017, 360\/08-CO n\u00b0 661 - Indivision\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : INDIVISION- VENTE DE QUOTE PART : OUI- EFFETS En mati\u00e8re de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 indivise, la vente d\u2019une quote-part est valable, \u00e0 charge pour les autres copropri\u00e9taires d\u2019en demander, en cas de contestation, l\u2019annulation apr\u00e8s le partage. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Cassation ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 661 du 26...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 26 septembre 2017, 360\\\/08-CO n\u00b0 661 - Indivision - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-01T23:11:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 26 septembre 2017, 360\\\/08-CO n\u00b0 661 – Indivision\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 26 septembre 2017, 360\/08-CO n\u00b0 661 - Indivision - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 26 septembre 2017, 360\/08-CO n\u00b0 661 - Indivision","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : INDIVISION- VENTE DE QUOTE PART : OUI- EFFETS En mati\u00e8re de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 indivise, la vente d\u2019une quote-part est valable, \u00e0 charge pour les autres copropri\u00e9taires d\u2019en demander, en cas de contestation, l\u2019annulation apr\u00e8s le partage. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Cassation ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 661 du 26...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 26 septembre 2017, 360\/08-CO n\u00b0 661 - Indivision - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-01T23:11:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-26-septembre-2017-360-08-co-n-661-indivision\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 26 septembre 2017, 360\/08-CO n\u00b0 661 – Indivision"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/812079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=812079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=812079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=812079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=812079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=812079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=812079"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=812079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}