{"id":812522,"date":"2026-05-02T02:39:01","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T00:39:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T02:39:01","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T00:39:01","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 39\/08-CO n\u00b0 633 &#8211; Acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Succession<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : ACTE DE NOTORIETE- VALEUR PROBANTE<\/p>\n<p>L\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli sur simples d\u00e9clarations, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de contestation sur la qualit\u00e9 d\u2019h\u00e9ritier d\u2019une partie y mentionn\u00e9e, garde sa force probante.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n<p>Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 633 du 12 septembre 2017<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 39\/08-CO<\/p>\n<p>ACTE DE NOTORIETE \u2013 VALEUR PROBANTE<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab L\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli sur simples d\u00e9clarations, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de contestation sur la qualit\u00e9 d\u2019h\u00e9ritier d\u2019une partie y mentionn\u00e9e, garde sa force probante. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>assist\u00e9e de Ma\u00eetre R.M.I<\/p>\n<p>assist\u00e9 de Ma\u00eetre RASOLO MAMPIONONA Haja<\/p>\n<p>R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n<p>CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE SOCIALE<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi douze septembre deux mille dix sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.M.L demeurant au lot [Adresse 1], Fokontany Sahalava, Fianarantsoa I, mais \u00e9lisant domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de son conseil Ma\u00eetre RAVAOARIMINO Marie Th\u00e9r\u00e8se, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 284 rendu le 07 novembre 2007 par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Fianarantsoa dans l\u2019affaire l\u2019opposant \u00e0 R.L ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique de cassation \u00e0 trois branches, pris de la violation des articles 1er, 2, 65 de la loi n\u00b0 61-025 du 9 octobre 1961 relative aux actes d\u2019\u00e9tat civil, pour insuffisance de motifs, manque de base l\u00e9gale, fausse application et fausse interpr\u00e9tation de la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>En ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l\u2019action de la demanderesse irrecevable en l\u2019\u00e9tat en \u00e9non\u00e7ant que l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 est d\u00e9pourvu de toute force probante car il s\u2019agit d\u2019un acte unilat\u00e9ral alors que, d\u2019une part la loi n\u00b0 61-025 du 9 octobre 1961 dispose qu\u2019il s\u2019agit d\u2019un acte authentique qui peut suppl\u00e9er \u00e0 un acte de naissance ; <\/p>\n<p>Que la jurisprudence (l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 11 du 21 avril 1961 de la Cour Supr\u00eame page 272) affirme \u00ab qu\u2019un acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 publique re\u00e7u par une autorit\u00e9 publique comp\u00e9tente du Firaisampokontany suivant les formes prescrites par la loi est un acte authentique \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Qu\u2019enfin, le Fanamarinana du 03 novembre 2005 \u00e9tabli par les autres coh\u00e9ritiers atteste que la partie litigieuse constitue la part de R., grand-p\u00e8re de R.M.L et le preneur n\u2019a suspendu le paiement des loyers entre les mains de la demanderesse qu\u2019en 2004 ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu certes que l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli sur simple d\u00e9claration mais \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de contestation, cet acte \u00e9tablissant la qualit\u00e9 d\u2019h\u00e9ritier de R.M.L garde toute sa force probante que le moyen est fond\u00e9 et la cassation encourue ; <\/p>\n<p>CASSE ET ANNULE l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 284 du 07 novembre 2007 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Fianarantsoa ;<\/p>\n<p>Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende de cassation ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne le d\u00e9fendeur \u00e0 l\u2019amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS6806DD1E1931C\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS6806DD1E1931C\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Succession Mots cl\u00e9s : ACTE DE NOTORIETE- VALEUR PROBANTE L\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli sur simples d\u00e9clarations, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de contestation sur la qualit\u00e9 d\u2019h\u00e9ritier d\u2019une partie y mentionn\u00e9e, garde sa force probante. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Cassation Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 633 du 12 septembre 2017 Dossier : 39\/08-CO ACTE DE&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[48962],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,48966,48968,24026,15227],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-812522","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-sociale","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-notoriete","kji_keyword-septembre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 39\/08-CO n\u00b0 633 - Acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 39\/08-CO n\u00b0 633 - Acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Succession Mots cl\u00e9s : ACTE DE NOTORIETE- VALEUR PROBANTE L\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli sur simples d\u00e9clarations, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de contestation sur la qualit\u00e9 d\u2019h\u00e9ritier d\u2019une partie y mentionn\u00e9e, garde sa force probante. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Cassation Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 633 du 12 septembre 2017 Dossier : 39\/08-CO ACTE DE...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 39\\\/08-CO n\u00b0 633 - Acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T00:39:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 39\\\/08-CO n\u00b0 633 &#8211; Acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 39\/08-CO n\u00b0 633 - Acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 39\/08-CO n\u00b0 633 - Acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Succession Mots cl\u00e9s : ACTE DE NOTORIETE- VALEUR PROBANTE L\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli sur simples d\u00e9clarations, \u00e0 d\u00e9faut de contestation sur la qualit\u00e9 d\u2019h\u00e9ritier d\u2019une partie y mentionn\u00e9e, garde sa force probante. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Cassation Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 633 du 12 septembre 2017 Dossier : 39\/08-CO ACTE DE...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 39\/08-CO n\u00b0 633 - Acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T00:39:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-39-08-co-n-633-acte-de-notoriete\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 39\/08-CO n\u00b0 633 &#8211; Acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/812522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=812522"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=812522"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=812522"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=812522"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=812522"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=812522"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=812522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}