{"id":812525,"date":"2026-05-02T02:39:10","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T00:39:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T02:39:10","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T00:39:10","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 202\/14-CO n\u00b0 625 &#8211; Etablissement de la filiation paternelle"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Filiation<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : ETABLISSEMENT DE LA FILIATION &#8211; TEST ADN &#8211; CONSENTEMENT DE LA MERE &#8211; DROIT DE LA DEFENSE- PRINCIPE DU CONTRADICTOIRE-EXCES DE POUVOIR<\/p>\n<p>En refusant une nouvelle demande de test ADN formul\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 p\u00e8re de l\u2019enfant et exigeant le consentement de la m\u00e8re alors qu\u2019un tel consentement n\u2019est pas requis par la loi, la Cour d\u2019Appel, refusant cette demande et en ajoutant \u00e0 la loi des dispositions nouvelles, outrepasse ses pouvoirs et fait fi du droit de la d\u00e9fense et du principe du contradictoire.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 625 du 12 septembre 2017<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 202\/14-CO<\/p>\n<p>ETABLISSEMENT DE LA FILIATION \u2013 TEST ADN \u2013 CONSENTEMENT DE LA MERE \u2013 DROIT DE LA DEFENSE \u2013 PRINCIPE DU CONTRADICTOIRE \u2013 EXCES DE POUVOIR<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab En refusant une nouvelle demande de test ADN formul\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 p\u00e8re de l\u2019enfant et exigeant le consentement de la m\u00e8re alors qu\u2019un tel consentement n\u2019est pas requis par la loi, la Cour d\u2019Appel, refusant cette demande et en ajoutant \u00e0 la loi des dispositions nouvelles, outrepasse ses pouvoirs et fait fi du droit de la d\u00e9fense et du principe du contradictoire. \u00bb<\/p>\n<p>R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Cour de Cassation<\/p>\n<p>Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi douze septembre deux mille dix sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de L.J, demeurant \u00e0 la [Adresse 1] Ambondrona Nosy-Be, \u00e9lisant domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de son conseil Ma\u00eetre FONTY Louis, avocat, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 30 D du 02 octobre 2013 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antsiranana, rendu dans le litige l\u2019opposant \u00e0 A.A.H ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique de cassation tir\u00e9 des articles 25 et 26 de la loi organique 2004-036 du 1er octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant, pris de la violation de l\u2019article 09 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile en ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a pass\u00e9 outre \u00e0 la demande de L.J d\u2019organiser un nouveau test ADN alors que l\u2019article 09 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile permet \u00e0 chaque partie de prouver conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi, les faits n\u00e9cessaires au succ\u00e8s de sa pr\u00e9tention, ce qui constitue la violation du droit de la d\u00e9fense, principe fondamental du droit ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le moyen reproche \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 d\u2019avoir pass\u00e9 outre \u00e0 la demande d\u2019un nouveau test ADN de l\u2019enfant reconnu par le demandeur au pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 exige de la m\u00e8re que celle-ci soit consentante \u00e0 cette demande de nouveau test ADN et cependant aucun texte de loi n\u2019exige un tel consentement, la Cour d\u2019Appel devant donc trancher d\u2019une mani\u00e8re objective le litige dont elle est saisie ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019en refusant cette demande et en ajoutant \u00e0 la loi des dispositions nouvelles, la Cour d\u2019Appel a outrepass\u00e9 ses pouvoirs et fait foi du droit de la d\u00e9fense ; et le principe du contradictoire ;<\/p>\n<p>CASSE ET ANNULE l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 30 D du 02 octobre 2002 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antsiranana, en toutes ses dispositions ;<\/p>\n<p>Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction, autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n<p>Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende de cassation ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne la d\u00e9fenderesse aux d\u00e9pens. <\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n<p>-RAKETAMANGA Odette, Pr\u00e9sident de Chambre, Pr\u00e9sident ;<\/p>\n<p>-RANDRIAMANANTENA Mauricette, Conseiller &#8211; Rapporteur ;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; RALANTOMAHEFA, Conseiller, ANDRIAMBELOSON Hortensia Hantasoa, Conseiller, RASOLONANAHARY Vololoniaina, Conseiller, tous membres ;<\/p>\n<p>-ANDRIANARISOA Lalaonirina Odile, Avocat G\u00e9n\u00e9ral ;<\/p>\n<p>-RAJAONARISON Herimalala Patricia ;<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS6806DD1E18D15\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS6806DD1E18D15\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Filiation Mots cl\u00e9s : ETABLISSEMENT DE LA FILIATION &#8211; TEST ADN &#8211; CONSENTEMENT DE LA MERE &#8211; DROIT DE LA DEFENSE- PRINCIPE DU CONTRADICTOIRE-EXCES DE POUVOIR En refusant une nouvelle demande de test ADN formul\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 p\u00e8re de l\u2019enfant et exigeant le consentement de la m\u00e8re alors qu\u2019un tel consentement n\u2019est&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8424,55667,55666,48966,15227],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-812525","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-etablissement","kji_keyword-filiation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-septembre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 202\/14-CO n\u00b0 625 - Etablissement de la filiation paternelle - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 202\/14-CO n\u00b0 625 - Etablissement de la filiation paternelle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Filiation Mots cl\u00e9s : ETABLISSEMENT DE LA FILIATION - TEST ADN - CONSENTEMENT DE LA MERE - DROIT DE LA DEFENSE- PRINCIPE DU CONTRADICTOIRE-EXCES DE POUVOIR En refusant une nouvelle demande de test ADN formul\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 p\u00e8re de l\u2019enfant et exigeant le consentement de la m\u00e8re alors qu\u2019un tel consentement n\u2019est...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 202\\\/14-CO n\u00b0 625 - Etablissement de la filiation paternelle - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T00:39:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 202\\\/14-CO n\u00b0 625 &#8211; Etablissement de la filiation paternelle\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 202\/14-CO n\u00b0 625 - Etablissement de la filiation paternelle - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 202\/14-CO n\u00b0 625 - Etablissement de la filiation paternelle","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Filiation Mots cl\u00e9s : ETABLISSEMENT DE LA FILIATION - TEST ADN - CONSENTEMENT DE LA MERE - DROIT DE LA DEFENSE- PRINCIPE DU CONTRADICTOIRE-EXCES DE POUVOIR En refusant une nouvelle demande de test ADN formul\u00e9e par le pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 p\u00e8re de l\u2019enfant et exigeant le consentement de la m\u00e8re alors qu\u2019un tel consentement n\u2019est...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 202\/14-CO n\u00b0 625 - Etablissement de la filiation paternelle - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T00:39:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-12-septembre-2017-202-14-co-n-625-etablissement-de-la-filiation-paternelle\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 12 septembre 2017, 202\/14-CO n\u00b0 625 &#8211; Etablissement de la filiation paternelle"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/812525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=812525"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=812525"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=812525"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=812525"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=812525"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=812525"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=812525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}