{"id":812663,"date":"2026-05-02T03:00:33","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T03:00:33","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:00:33","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 481\/12-CO n\u00b0 584 – Occupation pr\u00e9caire"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Foncier<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : Occupant pr\u00e9caire – dur\u00e9e \u2013 contrat sans modification \u2013 Possessoire (non)<\/p>\n

L\u2019occupant pr\u00e9caire en vertu d\u2019un contrat reste en cette qualit\u00e9 tant que le contrat ne subit pas de modification, peu importe la dur\u00e9e de cette qualit\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 584 du 01 septembre 2017<\/p>\n

Dossier : 481\/12-CO<\/p>\n

OCCUPANT PR\u00c9CAIRE \u2013 DUR\u00c9E \u2013 CONTRAT SANS MODIFICATION \u2013 POSSESSOIRE (NON)<\/p>\n

\u00ab L\u2019occupant pr\u00e9caire en vertu d\u2019un contrat reste en cette qualit\u00e9 tant que le contrat ne subit pas de modification, peu importe la dur\u00e9e de cette qualit\u00e9. \u00bb<\/p>\n

R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n

CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE SOCIALE<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile Commerciale et Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi premier septembre deux mille dix sept, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l'arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi;<\/p>\n

Statuant en suite du pourvoi de R. et C., demeurant [Adresse 1] Ambalakirajy, Mandritsara, contre d'arr\u00eat n\u00b0 404 du 26 octobre 2011 rendu par la Chambre Civile de la Cour d'Appel de Mahajanga, dans le litige l'opposant \u00e0 N. ;<\/p>\n

Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande;<\/p>\n

Sur le premier moyen de cassation tir\u00e9 de l'article 26 de la loi 2004-036 du 01 octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame pour violation de la loi, en ce que l'arr\u00eat leur a fait d\u00e9fense de troubler la jouissance des consorts N., alors que ceux-ci sont des occupants pr\u00e9caires et ne m\u00e9rite pas la protection de la loi ;<\/p>\n

Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que l'occupant pr\u00e9caire, en vertu d'un contrat, reste en cette qualit\u00e9 tant que le contrat n'ait subi une modification ; qu'il importe peu de la dur\u00e9e de cette qualit\u00e9 ; que l'arr\u00eat constatant l'existence du contrat dat\u00e9 de 1930, dans lequel il a \u00e9t\u00e9 clairement stipul\u00e9 la qualit\u00e9 de fermier des consorts N., n'a pas su tirer les cons\u00e9quences de droit de ce contrat ; qu'en effet, \u00e9tant ainsi \u00e0 l'origine, des occupants \u00e0 titre pr\u00e9caire, les consorts N. le reste ; qu'ils ne peuvent b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier de la protection de la loi en mati\u00e8re de possession ;<\/p>\n

Que le moyen est fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Sur le second moyen de cassation tir\u00e9 de l'article 26 de la loi 2004-036 du 01 octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame pour violation de la loi, d\u00e9naturation des faits, en ce que l'arr\u00eat a dit le contrat dat\u00e9 de 1930 inop\u00e9rant par suite de la prescription trentenaire, alors que la prescription ne trouve pas application en l'esp\u00e8ce et que le d\u00e9lai court \u00e0 partir du 22 ao\u00fbt 1998, date de r\u00e9clamation pour l'abandon du terrain par les consorts N. ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que la prescription trentenaire s'entend des actions en vue de l'ex\u00e9cution d'une obligation que la prescription trentenaire n'est pas un constat de caducit\u00e9 de tout contrat apr\u00e8s trente ans ; que l'action principale de R. et C. \u00e9tait la r\u00e9clamation du terrain en mettant fin au bail \u00e0 fermage qui \u00e9tait illimit\u00e9 ; que le contrat dat\u00e9 de 1930 a \u00e9t\u00e9 produit pour faire la preuve de la qualit\u00e9 d'occupant pr\u00e9caire des consorts N. et non une action en vue de l'ex\u00e9cution d'une obligation due depuis cette date ;<\/p>\n

Que le moyen est fond\u00e9 et la cassation encourue ;<\/p>\n

CASSE ET ANNULE l'arr\u00eat n\u00b0 404 du 26 octobre 2011 de la Cour d'Appel de Mahajanga;<\/p>\n

Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction mais autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne la restitution de l'amende de cassation ;<\/p>\n

Condamne le d\u00e9fendeur aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile Commerciale et Sociale les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents:<\/p>\n

Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur, et le Greffier.\/.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : Occupant pr\u00e9caire – dur\u00e9e \u2013 contrat sans modification \u2013 Possessoire (non) L\u2019occupant pr\u00e9caire en vertu d\u2019un contrat reste en cette qualit\u00e9 tant que le contrat ne subit pas de modification, peu importe la dur\u00e9e de cette qualit\u00e9. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Cassation Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 584…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[48962],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,48966,21118,55782,15227],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-812663","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-sociale","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-occupation","kji_keyword-precaire","kji_keyword-septembre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 481\/12-CO n\u00b0 584 - Occupation pr\u00e9caire - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 481\/12-CO n\u00b0 584 - Occupation pr\u00e9caire\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : Occupant pr\u00e9caire - dur\u00e9e \u2013 contrat sans modification \u2013 Possessoire (non) L\u2019occupant pr\u00e9caire en vertu d\u2019un contrat reste en cette qualit\u00e9 tant que le contrat ne subit pas de modification, peu importe la dur\u00e9e de cette qualit\u00e9. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Cassation Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 584...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 481\\\/12-CO n\u00b0 584 - Occupation pr\u00e9caire - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T01:00:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 481\\\/12-CO n\u00b0 584 – Occupation pr\u00e9caire\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 481\/12-CO n\u00b0 584 - Occupation pr\u00e9caire - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 481\/12-CO n\u00b0 584 - Occupation pr\u00e9caire","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Foncier Mots cl\u00e9s : Occupant pr\u00e9caire - dur\u00e9e \u2013 contrat sans modification \u2013 Possessoire (non) L\u2019occupant pr\u00e9caire en vertu d\u2019un contrat reste en cette qualit\u00e9 tant que le contrat ne subit pas de modification, peu importe la dur\u00e9e de cette qualit\u00e9. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Cassation Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 584...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 481\/12-CO n\u00b0 584 - Occupation pr\u00e9caire - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T01:00:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-481-12-co-n-584-occupation-precaire-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 481\/12-CO n\u00b0 584 – Occupation pr\u00e9caire"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/812663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=812663"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=812663"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=812663"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=812663"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=812663"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=812663"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=812663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}