{"id":812674,"date":"2026-05-02T03:00:51","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T03:00:51","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:00:51","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 582\/06-CO n\u00b0 573 – Cararct\u00e8re"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Succession<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : SUCCESSION \u2013 PARTAGE \u2013ACTION EN PARTAGE DE SUCCESSION IMPRESCRIPTIBLE (OUI)\u2013 FAUSSE APPLICATION<\/p>\n

Le droit \u00e0 la succession est imprescriptible. En d\u00e9clarant les actions des h\u00e9ritiers des demandeur au pourvoi prescrites, la Cour d\u2019appel n\u2019a pas su distinguer dans les demandes qui lui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 soumises les diverses actions intent\u00e9es, et a fait une fausse interpr\u00e9tation et fausse application de la loi.<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n

ARRET N\u00b0 573 du 01 septembre 2017<\/p>\n

Dossier : 582\/06-CO<\/p>\n

SUCCESSION \u2013 PARTAGE \u2013 ACTION EN PARTAGE DE SUCCESSION IMPRESCRIPTIBLE (OUI) \u2013 FAUSSE APPLICATION<\/p>\n

\u00ab Le droit \u00e0 la succession est imprescriptible. En d\u00e9clarant les actions des h\u00e9ritiers des demandeur au pourvoi prescrites, la Cour d\u2019appel n\u2019a pas su distinguer dans les demandes qui lui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 soumises les diverses actions intent\u00e9es, et a fait une fausse interpr\u00e9tation et fausse application de la loi \u00bb.<\/p>\n

R.D et consorts<\/p>\n

REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n

CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE ET SOCIALE<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale et Sociale, en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi premier septembre deux mille dix-sept, tenue au palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l'arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.R et R.N, demeurant respectivement lot [Adresse 1] Soanierana Antananarivo et lot [Adresse 2] Ambohitrakely Betongolo Antananarivo, ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre Ralaiarimanana, avocat, contre l'arr\u00eat n\u00b0 1104 du 18 octobre 2004 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d'Appel d'Antananarivo, rendu dans le litige les opposant \u00e0 R.D et R.V ;<\/p>\n

Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n

Sur l'unique moyen de cassation tir\u00e9 de l'article 26 de la loi 2004-036 du 01 octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame, pour violation de la loi, en ce que l'arr\u00eat a prononc\u00e9 l'extinction de l'action, alors que la prescription trentenaire ne s'applique pas en mati\u00e8re de succession et a \u00e9t\u00e9 soulev\u00e9 pour la premi\u00e8re fois en appel ;<\/p>\n

Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que les actions en partage de succession sont imprescriptibles ; que les h\u00e9ritiers R.B ont saisi le Tribunal de Premi\u00e8re Instance d'Antananarivo de plusieurs chefs de demandes dont l'annulation de l'acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 n\u00b0 39 du 30 mars 1954, action en p\u00e9tition d'h\u00e9r\u00e9dit\u00e9, annuler la mutation faite sur les livres fonciers, action en annulation d'inscription, le partage des biens entre les h\u00e9ritiers de feu R.B, action de partage de succession ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que bien que la prescription sur les inscriptions sur le livre foncier soit acquise conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l'article 122 de l'ordonnance 60-146, tel que l'a \u00e9voqu\u00e9 l'arr\u00eat, en partage de succession, par contre, ne l'est pas, le droit \u00e0 la succession \u00e9tant imprescriptible ; qu'en d\u00e9clarant les actions des h\u00e9ritiers R.B prescrites, la Cour d'Appel n'a pas su distinguer, dans les demandes qui lui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 soumises, les diverses actions intent\u00e9es et a fait une fausse interpr\u00e9tation et fausse application de la loi ;<\/p>\n

Que le moyen est fond\u00e9 et la cassation encourue ;<\/p>\n

Condamne les d\u00e9fendeurs aux d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n

CASSE ET ANNULE l'arr\u00eat n\u00b01104 du 18 octobre 2004 de la Cour d'Appel d'Antananarivo ;<\/p>\n

Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne la restitution de l'amende de cassation ;<\/p>\n

Condamne les d\u00e9fendeurs aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile Commerciale et Sociale les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

– RAJAONA Andriamanankandrianina, Pr\u00e9sident de Chambre, Pr\u00e9sident ;<\/p>\n

– RAZAFINDRAMARO Haja Jacqueline, Conseiller – Rapporteur ;<\/p>\n

– RASIVIARISON F\u00e9licien, Conseiller, RASOLONANAHARY Vololoniaina, Conseiller, RAZAIARISOA Zafimanitra Vololonirina J., Conseiller, tous membres ;<\/p>\n

– RAHARIVELO Jean Baptiste, Avocat G\u00e9n\u00e9ral ;<\/p>\n

– ANDRIANALISOA Ramanamisata Eloi, Greffier.<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur, et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Succession Mots cl\u00e9s : SUCCESSION \u2013 PARTAGE \u2013ACTION EN PARTAGE DE SUCCESSION IMPRESCRIPTIBLE (OUI)\u2013 FAUSSE APPLICATION Le droit \u00e0 la succession est imprescriptible. En d\u00e9clarant les actions des h\u00e9ritiers des demandeur au pourvoi prescrites, la Cour d\u2019appel n\u2019a pas su distinguer dans les demandes qui lui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 soumises les diverses actions intent\u00e9es,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[49056],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[55794,8424,48966,48968,15227],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-812674","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-et-sociale","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cararctere","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-septembre","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 582\/06-CO n\u00b0 573 - Cararct\u00e8re - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 582\/06-CO n\u00b0 573 - Cararct\u00e8re\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Succession Mots cl\u00e9s : SUCCESSION \u2013 PARTAGE \u2013ACTION EN PARTAGE DE SUCCESSION IMPRESCRIPTIBLE (OUI)\u2013 FAUSSE APPLICATION Le droit \u00e0 la succession est imprescriptible. En d\u00e9clarant les actions des h\u00e9ritiers des demandeur au pourvoi prescrites, la Cour d\u2019appel n\u2019a pas su distinguer dans les demandes qui lui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 soumises les diverses actions intent\u00e9es,...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 582\\\/06-CO n\u00b0 573 - Cararct\u00e8re - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T01:00:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 582\\\/06-CO n\u00b0 573 – Cararct\u00e8re\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 582\/06-CO n\u00b0 573 - Cararct\u00e8re - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 582\/06-CO n\u00b0 573 - Cararct\u00e8re","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Succession Mots cl\u00e9s : SUCCESSION \u2013 PARTAGE \u2013ACTION EN PARTAGE DE SUCCESSION IMPRESCRIPTIBLE (OUI)\u2013 FAUSSE APPLICATION Le droit \u00e0 la succession est imprescriptible. En d\u00e9clarant les actions des h\u00e9ritiers des demandeur au pourvoi prescrites, la Cour d\u2019appel n\u2019a pas su distinguer dans les demandes qui lui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 soumises les diverses actions intent\u00e9es,...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 582\/06-CO n\u00b0 573 - Cararct\u00e8re - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T01:00:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-1-septembre-2017-582-06-co-n-573-cararctere-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 1 septembre 2017, 582\/06-CO n\u00b0 573 – Cararct\u00e8re"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/812674","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812674"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=812674"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=812674"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=812674"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=812674"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=812674"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=812674"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=812674"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}