{"id":812899,"date":"2026-05-02T03:46:45","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:46:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T03:46:45","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:46:45","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 989\/14-CO n\u00b0 569 – Demande nouvelle"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : ANNULATION ACTE DE NOTORIETE \u2013 DEMANDE NOUVELLE\u2013 DEFENSE A LA DEMANDE PRINCIPALE (NON) – VIOLATION DE L\u2019ARTICLE 411 CPC<\/p>\n

L\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 du 06 septembre 2013 n\u2019a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 demand\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re instance. En la recevant alors qu'elle est nouvelle et ne constitue point une d\u00e9fense \u00e0 la demande principale, la Cour d'Appel a m\u00e9connu le terme de la loi<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n

ARRET N\u00b0 569 du 22 ao\u00fbt 2017<\/p>\n

Dossier : 989\/14-CO<\/p>\n

ANNULATION ACTE DE NOTORIETE \u2013 DEMANDE NOUVELLE\u2013 DEFENSE A LA DEMANDE PRINCIPALE (NON) – VIOLATION DE L\u2019ARTICLE 411 CPC<\/p>\n

\u00ab L\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 du 06 septembre 2013 n\u2019a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 demand\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re instance. La Cour d\u2019appel l\u2019a re\u00e7ue alors qu\u2019elle est nouvelle et ne constitue point une d\u00e9fense \u00e0 la demande principale (demande de dommages int\u00e9r\u00eats), ni une compensation. En statuant ainsi, la Cour d\u2019appel a m\u00e9connu les termes de la loi et sa d\u00e9cision encourt la cassation \u00bb.<\/p>\n

R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n

CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE SOCIALE<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi vingt-deux ao\u00fbt deux mille dix-sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l'arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.J, demeurant \u00e0 [Adresse 1], Commune Rurale Arivonimamo II, \u00e9lisant domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de son conseil Ma\u00eetre Mamihaja RAHERIMIARANTSOA, avocat, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 845 du 09 juillet 2014 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo, rendu dans le litige l\u2019opposant \u00e0 R.J.J et R.M et R.S ;<\/p>\n

Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n

Sur le troisi\u00e8me moyen de cassation pris de la violation de l\u2019article 411 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile, tir\u00e9 des articles 25 et 26 de la loi organique 2004-036 du 1er octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant, pour violation de la loi en ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a re\u00e7u la demande d\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 n\u00b0 20 du 06 septembre 2013 formul\u00e9e par R.J.J et consorts alors que les dispositions de l\u2019article 411 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile sont claires \u00ab il ne peut \u00eatre form\u00e9 en cause d\u2019appel aucune demande nouvelle\u2026 \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il ressort des \u00e9l\u00e9ments constants de la proc\u00e9dure que la demande d\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 du 06 septembre 2013 n\u2019a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 demand\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re instance ;<\/p>\n

Attendu ainsi que cette demande est nouvelle et ne constitue point une d\u00e9fense \u00e0 la demande principale (demande de dommages int\u00e9r\u00eats) ni une compensation ; <\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en statuant ainsi, la Cour d\u2019Appel a m\u00e9connu les termes de la loi et sa d\u00e9cision encourt la cassation, et ce sans qu\u2019il soit besoin de statuer sur les deux autres moyens propos\u00e9s ;<\/p>\n

CASSE ET ANNULE l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 845 du 09 juillet 2014 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo ;<\/p>\n

Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction, autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende de cassation ;<\/p>\n

Condamne les d\u00e9fendeurs aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n

-RAKETAMANGA Odette, Pr\u00e9sident de Chambre, Pr\u00e9sident ;<\/p>\n

-RALANTOMAHEFA, Conseiller – Rapporteur ;<\/p>\n

– RAFENOMANANIONY Eliana Blandine, Conseiller, RAZAFINDRAMARO Haja Jacqueline, Conseiller, RAZAIARISOA Zafimanitra Vololonirina J., Conseiller, tous membres ;<\/p>\n

-MARIE Louise TINA, Avocat G\u00e9n\u00e9ral ;<\/p>\n

-TAFARA Elyss\u00e8re Rakotonindrainy ;<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : ANNULATION ACTE DE NOTORIETE \u2013 DEMANDE NOUVELLE\u2013 DEFENSE A LA DEMANDE PRINCIPALE (NON) – VIOLATION DE L\u2019ARTICLE 411 CPC L\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 du 06 septembre 2013 n\u2019a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 demand\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re instance. En la recevant alors qu’elle est nouvelle et ne constitue point une d\u00e9fense \u00e0…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[48962],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,16160,48966,48968,33539],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-812899","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-sociale","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-demande","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-nouvelle","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 989\/14-CO n\u00b0 569 - Demande nouvelle - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 989\/14-CO n\u00b0 569 - Demande nouvelle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : ANNULATION ACTE DE NOTORIETE \u2013 DEMANDE NOUVELLE\u2013 DEFENSE A LA DEMANDE PRINCIPALE (NON) - VIOLATION DE L\u2019ARTICLE 411 CPC L\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 du 06 septembre 2013 n\u2019a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 demand\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re instance. En la recevant alors qu'elle est nouvelle et ne constitue point une d\u00e9fense \u00e0...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 989\\\/14-CO n\u00b0 569 - Demande nouvelle - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T01:46:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 989\\\/14-CO n\u00b0 569 – Demande nouvelle\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 989\/14-CO n\u00b0 569 - Demande nouvelle - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 989\/14-CO n\u00b0 569 - Demande nouvelle","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : ANNULATION ACTE DE NOTORIETE \u2013 DEMANDE NOUVELLE\u2013 DEFENSE A LA DEMANDE PRINCIPALE (NON) - VIOLATION DE L\u2019ARTICLE 411 CPC L\u2019annulation de l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 du 06 septembre 2013 n\u2019a jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 demand\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re instance. En la recevant alors qu'elle est nouvelle et ne constitue point une d\u00e9fense \u00e0...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 989\/14-CO n\u00b0 569 - Demande nouvelle - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T01:46:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-989-14-co-n-569-demande-nouvelle\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 989\/14-CO n\u00b0 569 – Demande nouvelle"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/812899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=812899"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=812899"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=812899"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=812899"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=812899"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=812899"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=812899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}