{"id":812900,"date":"2026-05-02T03:46:48","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:46:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T03:46:48","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T01:46:48","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 719\/14-CO n\u00b0 568 – Biens commun"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : R\u00e9gime mantrimonial<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : BIENS PERSONNELS \u2013 ACQUISITION AVANT LE MARIAGE \u2013 EXCES DE POUVOIR<\/p>\n

Il ressort des pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure que les actes d\u2019acquisition par la demanderesse au pourvoi sont de loin ant\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 son acte de mariage datant du 23 f\u00e9vrier 1994. En ignorant la chronologie des faits, l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 justifie les griefs du moyen et encourt la cassation<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 568 du 22 aout 2017<\/p>\n

Dossier : 719\/14-CO<\/p>\n

BIENS PERSONNELS \u2013 ACQUISITION AVANT LE MARIAGE \u2013 EXCES DE POUVOIR<\/p>\n

\u00ab Il ressort des pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure que les actes d\u2019acquisition par la demanderesse au pourvoi sont de loin ant\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 son acte de mariage datant du 23 f\u00e9vrier 1994. En ignorant la chronologie des faits, l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 justifie les griefs du moyen et encourt la cassation \u00bb.<\/p>\n

R.E, assist\u00e9e de Ma\u00eetre Nirina RAJAONARIVELO<\/p>\n

R.S, assist\u00e9s de Ma\u00eetre RABENIRINA Lalaina<\/p>\n

REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n

CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE SOCIALE<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du mardi vingt-deux ao\u00fbt deux mille dix-sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l'arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.E, demeurant au lot [Adresse 1] Antananarivo, ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre Nirina RAJAONARIVELO, avocat, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 1299 du 05 novembre 2013 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo, rendu dans le litige l\u2019opposant \u00e0 R.J.J et R.S ;<\/p>\n

Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n

Sur le moyen unique de cassation tir\u00e9 de l\u2019article 26 de la loi organique 2004-036 du 1er octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant, pour fausse application de la loi, exc\u00e8s de pouvoir en ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a confirm\u00e9 le jugement n\u00b0 057 du 27 septembre 2011 ayant d\u00e9bout\u00e9 R.E de sa demande aux motifs que celle-ci n\u2019a pas pu rapporter la preuve justifiant que les parcelles 258 et 259 font partie de ses biens personnels alors que R.E a produit l\u2019acte de vente en date du 30 septembre 1989, l\u2019acte de mariage n\u00b0 02 du 23 f\u00e9vrier 1994 et l\u2019\u00e9tat parcellaire des parcelles n\u00b0 258 et 259 en date du 20 janvier 2010 ; <\/p>\n

Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s au moyen ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il ressorte des pi\u00e8ces constantes de la proc\u00e9dure que les actes d\u2019acquisition par R.E sont de loin ant\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 son acte de mariage datant du 23 f\u00e9vrier 1994 ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en ignorant la chronologie des faits l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 justifie les griefs du moyen et encourt la cassation, le caract\u00e8re propre \u00e0 la demanderesse au pourvoi des parcelles litigieuses \u00e9tant ainsi ind\u00e9niable ;<\/p>\n

CASSE ET ANNULE en toutes ses dispositions l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 1299 du 05 novembre 2013 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo ;<\/p>\n

Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction, autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende de cassation ;<\/p>\n

Condamne les d\u00e9fendeurs aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : R\u00e9gime mantrimonial Mots cl\u00e9s : BIENS PERSONNELS \u2013 ACQUISITION AVANT LE MARIAGE \u2013 EXCES DE POUVOIR Il ressort des pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure que les actes d\u2019acquisition par la demanderesse au pourvoi sont de loin ant\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 son acte de mariage datant du 23 f\u00e9vrier 1994. En ignorant la chronologie des faits, l\u2019arr\u00eat…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[48962],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[50731,8424,49055,48966,48968],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-812900","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-sociale","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-biens","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-commun","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 719\/14-CO n\u00b0 568 - Biens commun - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 719\/14-CO n\u00b0 568 - Biens commun\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : R\u00e9gime mantrimonial Mots cl\u00e9s : BIENS PERSONNELS \u2013 ACQUISITION AVANT LE MARIAGE \u2013 EXCES DE POUVOIR Il ressort des pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure que les actes d\u2019acquisition par la demanderesse au pourvoi sont de loin ant\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 son acte de mariage datant du 23 f\u00e9vrier 1994. En ignorant la chronologie des faits, l\u2019arr\u00eat...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 719\\\/14-CO n\u00b0 568 - Biens commun - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T01:46:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 719\\\/14-CO n\u00b0 568 – Biens commun\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 719\/14-CO n\u00b0 568 - Biens commun - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 719\/14-CO n\u00b0 568 - Biens commun","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : R\u00e9gime mantrimonial Mots cl\u00e9s : BIENS PERSONNELS \u2013 ACQUISITION AVANT LE MARIAGE \u2013 EXCES DE POUVOIR Il ressort des pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure que les actes d\u2019acquisition par la demanderesse au pourvoi sont de loin ant\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 son acte de mariage datant du 23 f\u00e9vrier 1994. En ignorant la chronologie des faits, l\u2019arr\u00eat...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 719\/14-CO n\u00b0 568 - Biens commun - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T01:46:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-22-aout-2017-719-14-co-n-568-biens-commun\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 22 ao\u00fbt 2017, 719\/14-CO n\u00b0 568 – Biens commun"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/812900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=812900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=812900"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=812900"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=812900"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=812900"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=812900"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=812900"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=812900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}