{"id":813288,"date":"2026-05-02T04:59:13","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T02:59:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T04:59:13","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T02:59:13","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 ao\u00fbt 2017, 244\/09-CO n\u00b0 532 &#8211; Executuon du contrat"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Contrat<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : CONVENTION ENTRE LES PARTIES \u2013 EXECUTION<\/p>\n<p>Il ne saurait \u00eatre fait grief \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019Appel de s\u2019\u00eatre r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00e0 la convention entre les parties et de les avoir renvoy\u00e9es \u00e0 son ex\u00e9cution<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>ARRET N\u00b0 532 du 04 aout 2017<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 244\/09-CO<\/p>\n<p>CONVENTION ENTRE LES PARTIES \u2013 EXECUTION<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab Il ne saurait \u00eatre fait grief \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019Appel de s\u2019\u00eatre r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00e0 la convention entre les parties et de les avoir renvoy\u00e9es \u00e0 son ex\u00e9cution \u00bb.<\/p>\n<p>REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n<p>CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE ET SOCIALE<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi quatre ao\u00fbt deux mille dix-sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de R.M, demeurant \u00e0 [Adresse 1], \u00e9lisant domicile en l\u2019\u00e9tude de son conseil Ma\u00eetre Jacqueline RAZANAMAVO, avocat, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0439 du 10 d\u00e9cembre 2008 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Fianarantsoa, rendu dans le litige l\u2019opposant \u00e0 R.J.P ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu les m\u00e9moires en demande et en d\u00e9fense ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le premier moyen de cassation tir\u00e9 de l\u2019article 25 de la loi organique 2004.036 du 1er octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les Cours la composant, pris de la violation de l\u2019article 2 de la loi 2006.031 du 24 novembre 2006 portant r\u00e9gime juridique de la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 fonci\u00e8re priv\u00e9e non titr\u00e9e et de l\u2019article 2228 du Code Civil en ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel, en rejetant les demandes de R.M, n\u2019a pas pris en consid\u00e9ration la mise en valeur effective, paisible, publique et permanente entreprise par l\u2019ascendant de celui-ci et lui-m\u00eame pendant plusieurs ann\u00e9es sur le terrain, que cette occupation a \u00e9t\u00e9 suivie d\u2019un trouble de jouissance de la part de R.J.P alors que il est prouv\u00e9 de l\u2019enqu\u00eate en Chambre du Conseil que le d\u00e9fendeur au pourvoi n\u2019a pas contest\u00e9 la possession entreprise par R.M avant 2001, ce qui est reconnu par les t\u00e9moins ; qu\u2019il s\u2019agit d\u2019une pr\u00e9somption de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que des \u00e9l\u00e9ments constants de la proc\u00e9dure que le terrain litigieux, en une partie, se situe aux abords du lac servant de r\u00e9servoir d\u2019eau de la localit\u00e9 int\u00e9ress\u00e9e ; et que pour la pr\u00e9servation de l\u2019environnement, les autorit\u00e9s locales s\u2019opposent \u00e0 l\u2019occupation des lieux ; et c\u2019est l\u2019objet du \u00ab FIFANARAHANA \u00bb en date du 14 octobre 2001 faite entre les parties et les autorit\u00e9s locales ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu ainsi que R.M est malvenu d\u2019invoquer un droit d\u2019occupation sur les lieux et il ne peut ni en jouir ni invoquer une pr\u00e9somption de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le moyen est d\u00e8s lors mal fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le deuxi\u00e8me moyen de cassation tir\u00e9 de l\u2019article 25 de la loi organique 2004.036 du 1er octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les Cours la composant, pris de la violation de l\u2019article 167 alin\u00e9a 1 de la loi sur la Th\u00e9orie G\u00e9n\u00e9rale des Obligations en ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a bas\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision au \u00ab FANDAMINANA \u00bb et \u00ab FIFANEKENA \u00bb en date du 14 octobre 2001 alors qu\u2019il s\u2019agit d\u2019un contrat \u00e0 dur\u00e9e ind\u00e9termin\u00e9e pouvant \u00eatre r\u00e9sili\u00e9 par l&#039;une des parties selon le principe g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de droit \u00ab nul n\u2019est li\u00e9 \u00e0 vie par un contrat \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019en ses motivations, l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 \u00e9nonce que \u00ab les parties ont toutes les deux outre pass\u00e9 les dispositions contenues dans la convention en y faisant des cultures et y plantant des gr\u00e9velias \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p> Il \u00e9chet de les replacer dans l\u2019\u00e9tat o\u00f9 \u00e9taient leur exploitation avant octobre 2001 afin de pr\u00e9server le r\u00e9servoir d\u2019eau lohafahidrano ; et ainsi a renvoy\u00e9 les parties \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du \u00ab FANDAMINANA \u00bb et \u00ab FIFANEKENA \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que ces actes \u00e9tant un proc\u00e8s-verbal constatant l\u2019accord des parties suite \u00e0 une m\u00e9diation des autorit\u00e9s locales, il ne saurait \u00eatre fait grief \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019Appel de s\u2019y \u00eatre r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 et d\u2019avoir renvoy\u00e9 les parties \u00e0 son ex\u00e9cution ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que le moyen n\u2019est pas fond\u00e9 et doit \u00eatre rejet\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n<p>REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne le demandeur \u00e0 l\u2019amende et aux d\u00e9pens. <\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS6806DD1E15227\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS6806DD1E15227\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Contrat Mots cl\u00e9s : CONVENTION ENTRE LES PARTIES \u2013 EXECUTION Il ne saurait \u00eatre fait grief \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019Appel de s\u2019\u00eatre r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00e0 la convention entre les parties et de les avoir renvoy\u00e9es \u00e0 son ex\u00e9cution Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet ARRET N\u00b0 532 du 04 aout 2017&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[49056],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,22253,56296,48966,48968],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-813288","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-et-sociale","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-contrat","kji_keyword-executuon","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 ao\u00fbt 2017, 244\/09-CO n\u00b0 532 - Executuon du contrat - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 ao\u00fbt 2017, 244\/09-CO n\u00b0 532 - Executuon du contrat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Contrat Mots cl\u00e9s : CONVENTION ENTRE LES PARTIES \u2013 EXECUTION Il ne saurait \u00eatre fait grief \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019Appel de s\u2019\u00eatre r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00e0 la convention entre les parties et de les avoir renvoy\u00e9es \u00e0 son ex\u00e9cution Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet ARRET N\u00b0 532 du 04 aout 2017...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 ao\u00fbt 2017, 244\\\/09-CO n\u00b0 532 - Executuon du contrat - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T02:59:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 ao\u00fbt 2017, 244\\\/09-CO n\u00b0 532 &#8211; Executuon du contrat\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 ao\u00fbt 2017, 244\/09-CO n\u00b0 532 - Executuon du contrat - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 ao\u00fbt 2017, 244\/09-CO n\u00b0 532 - Executuon du contrat","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Contrat Mots cl\u00e9s : CONVENTION ENTRE LES PARTIES \u2013 EXECUTION Il ne saurait \u00eatre fait grief \u00e0 la Cour d\u2019Appel de s\u2019\u00eatre r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00e0 la convention entre les parties et de les avoir renvoy\u00e9es \u00e0 son ex\u00e9cution Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet ARRET N\u00b0 532 du 04 aout 2017...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 ao\u00fbt 2017, 244\/09-CO n\u00b0 532 - Executuon du contrat - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T02:59:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-4-aout-2017-244-09-co-n-532-executuon-du-contrat\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 4 ao\u00fbt 2017, 244\/09-CO n\u00b0 532 &#8211; Executuon du contrat"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/813288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=813288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=813288"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=813288"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=813288"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=813288"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=813288"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=813288"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=813288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}