{"id":813906,"date":"2026-05-02T06:59:36","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T04:59:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T06:59:36","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T04:59:36","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 022\/11-CU n\u00b0 434 – Payement"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Cr\u00e9ance<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : Sommation de payer \u2013 cr\u00e9ance \u2013 contestation \u2013 s\u00e9rieuse<\/p>\n

Les sommations de payer justifient l\u2019existence de la cr\u00e9ance ; Une contestation relative \u00e0 une cr\u00e9ance doit \u00eatre s\u00e9rieuse.<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 434 du 7 juillet 2017<\/p>\n

Dossier : 022\/11-CU<\/p>\n

SOMMATION DE PAYER \u2013 CR\u00c9ANCE \u2013 CONTESTATION \u2013 S\u00c9RIEUSE<\/p>\n

\u00ab Les sommations de payer justifient l\u2019existence de la cr\u00e9ance ; Une contestation relative \u00e0 une cr\u00e9ance doit \u00eatre s\u00e9rieuse \u00bb.<\/p>\n

R.J repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par R.G<\/p>\n

REPUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n

CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE ET SOCIALE<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale et Sociale, en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi sept juillet deux mille dix-sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l'arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi des \u00e9poux A.J demeurant au lot [Adresse 1], ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre Rakotondrasoa Mamy Rija, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, contre l'arr\u00eat n\u00b0872 du 02 ao\u00fbt 2010 rendu par la Chambre des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s de la Cour d'Appel d'Antananarivo dans la proc\u00e9dure qui les oppose \u00e0 R.J ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n

Sur les premier et deuxi\u00e8me moyens de cassation r\u00e9unis tir\u00e9s de l'article 26 de la Loi organique n\u00b02004.036 du 1er octobre 2004 sur la Cour Supr\u00eame, pris de la violation de l'article 223.1 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile pour fausse application ou fausse interpr\u00e9tation de la loi, absence, insuffisance, contradiction de motifs et g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement l'impossibilit\u00e9 pour la Cour de Cassation d'exercer son contr\u00f4le ;<\/p>\n

en ce que la Cour d'Appel a motiv\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision sur la bonne application de l'article 223.1 du Code de Proc\u00e9dure Civile qui dispose que " dans le cas o\u00f9 l'existence de la cr\u00e9ance n'est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s peut, \u00e0 titre provisionnel, accorder toute ou partie de la somme au cr\u00e9ancier " ; alors que dans ses discussions, la Cour a soulev\u00e9 que les \u00e9poux A.J ont reni\u00e9 leur dette en invoquant la responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle de X. et Y. et qu'ils auraient d\u00e9j\u00e0 fait des remboursements partiels de leur dette ; (premier moyen)<\/p>\n

en ce que la Cour d'Appel a accord\u00e9 et ordonn\u00e9 le paiement par provision de la moiti\u00e9 de la somme de 17.100.000 Ariary alors que dans ses discussions, elle a relev\u00e9 l'existence de deux exploits contenant deux montants diff\u00e9rents, celui du 15 novembre 2007 comporte la somme de 13.500.000 Ariary et celui du 7 avril 2008 17.100.000 ; (deuxi\u00e8me moyen)<\/p>\n

Vu lesdits textes;<\/p>\n

Attendu que l'origine de la cr\u00e9ance se trouve dans le " Fanekena " en date du 9 d\u00e9cembre 2008 sign\u00e9 par A.J en tant que d\u00e9biteur ;<\/p>\n

Que les sommations de payer justifient l'existence de la cr\u00e9ance ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que la cr\u00e9ance n'est pas s\u00e9rieusement contest\u00e9e ; qu'en statuant comme elle l'a fait, la Cour a bien appliqu\u00e9 la loi ;<\/p>\n

D'o\u00f9 il suit que le moyen n'est pas fond\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n

Condamne les demandeurs \u00e0 l'amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par la Cour de Cassation, Chambre civile Commerciale et Sociale les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Mesdames et Messieurs :<\/p>\n

– RASOARIMALALA Rinah Victorine, Pr\u00e9sident de Chambre, Pr\u00e9sident ;<\/p>\n

– RAZAFIMANANTSOA Fran\u00e7oise Pompe\u00ef, Conseiller – Rapporteur ;<\/p>\n

– RASOAMIHAJA Raderandraibe , Conseiller, RAJERISON Ars\u00e8ne, Conseiller, RASOLOFO Suzanne Odette, Conseiller, tous membres ;<\/p>\n

– NOELISON William, Avocat G\u00e9n\u00e9ral ;<\/p>\n

– RAJAONARISON Herimalala Patricia, Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Cr\u00e9ance Mots cl\u00e9s : Sommation de payer \u2013 cr\u00e9ance \u2013 contestation \u2013 s\u00e9rieuse Les sommations de payer justifient l\u2019existence de la cr\u00e9ance ; Une contestation relative \u00e0 une cr\u00e9ance doit \u00eatre s\u00e9rieuse. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 434 du 7 juillet 2017 Dossier : 022\/11-CU SOMMATION DE…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[49056],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,8600,48966,48968,56676],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-813906","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-et-sociale","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-juillet","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-payement","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 022\/11-CU n\u00b0 434 - Payement - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 022\/11-CU n\u00b0 434 - Payement\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Cr\u00e9ance Mots cl\u00e9s : Sommation de payer \u2013 cr\u00e9ance \u2013 contestation \u2013 s\u00e9rieuse Les sommations de payer justifient l\u2019existence de la cr\u00e9ance ; Une contestation relative \u00e0 une cr\u00e9ance doit \u00eatre s\u00e9rieuse. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 434 du 7 juillet 2017 Dossier : 022\/11-CU SOMMATION DE...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 022\\\/11-CU n\u00b0 434 - Payement - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T04:59:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 022\\\/11-CU n\u00b0 434 – Payement\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 022\/11-CU n\u00b0 434 - Payement - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 022\/11-CU n\u00b0 434 - Payement","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Cr\u00e9ance Mots cl\u00e9s : Sommation de payer \u2013 cr\u00e9ance \u2013 contestation \u2013 s\u00e9rieuse Les sommations de payer justifient l\u2019existence de la cr\u00e9ance ; Une contestation relative \u00e0 une cr\u00e9ance doit \u00eatre s\u00e9rieuse. Cassation : Ordinaire Nature : Civile Solution : Rejet ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 434 du 7 juillet 2017 Dossier : 022\/11-CU SOMMATION DE...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 022\/11-CU n\u00b0 434 - Payement - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T04:59:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-022-11-cu-n-434-payement\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 022\/11-CU n\u00b0 434 – Payement"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/813906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=813906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=813906"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=813906"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=813906"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=813906"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=813906"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=813906"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=813906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}