{"id":813909,"date":"2026-05-02T06:59:44","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T04:59:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T06:59:44","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T04:59:44","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 177\/10-CO n\u00b0 414 – Terrain domanial – Comp\u00e9tence"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n

Mots cl\u00e9s : Demandes simultan\u00e9es d\u2019attribution de terrain domanial \u2013 D\u00e9cision d\u2019expulsion \u2013 Incomp\u00e9tence du Tribunal judiciaire<\/p>\n

Le terrain en question \u00e9tant domanial, l\u2019attribution du titre rel\u00e8ve de la comp\u00e9tence exclusive de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative. Ainsi, en ordonnant l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019une des parties et attribuant \u00e0 l\u2019autre le terrain litigieux, la Cour d\u2019appel a exc\u00e9d\u00e9 sa comp\u00e9tence et empi\u00e8te sur la comp\u00e9tence de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative seule habilit\u00e9e par la loi \u00e0 s\u2019y prononcer. Les moyens \u00e9tant fond\u00e9s, la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e encourt la cassation.<\/p>\n

Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n

Nature : Civile<\/p>\n

Solution : Cassation<\/p>\n

ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 414 du 07 juillet 2017<\/p>\n

Dossier : 177\/10-CO<\/p>\n

DEMANDES SIMULTAN\u00c9ES D\u2019ATTRIBUTION DE TERRAIN DOMANIAL \u2013 D\u00c9CISION D\u2019EXPULSION \u2013 INCOMP\u00c9TENCE DU TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE<\/p>\n

\u00ab Le terrain en question \u00e9tant domanial, l\u2019attribution du titre rel\u00e8ve de la comp\u00e9tence exclusive de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative. Ainsi, en ordonnant l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019une des parties et attribuant \u00e0 l\u2019autre le terrain litigieux, la Cour d\u2019appel a exc\u00e9d\u00e9 sa comp\u00e9tence et empi\u00e8te sur la comp\u00e9tence de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative seule habilit\u00e9e par la loi \u00e0 s\u2019y prononcer. Les moyens \u00e9tant fond\u00e9s, la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e encourt la cassation \u00bb.<\/p>\n

Monsieur A.R.C repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par dame R.L.B<\/p>\n

R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n

COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n

CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE SOCIALE<\/p>\n

La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi sept juillet deux mille dix-sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l'arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n

Statuant sur le pourvoi de A.R.C repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par R.L.B, domicili\u00e9e au lot [Adresse 1], contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 CATO 447\/CIV du 27 octobre 2009 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Toamasina, rendu dans le litige l\u2019opposant \u00e0 A.R ;<\/p>\n

Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n

Sur les premier et deuxi\u00e8me moyens de cassation r\u00e9unis tir\u00e9 des articles 25 et 26 de la loi organique 2004.036 du 1er octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant, pris de la violation de l\u2019article 11 alin\u00e9a 1er de la loi 60-004 du 15 f\u00e9vrier 1960 relative au domaine priv\u00e9 national pour violation de la loi, contradiction de motifs et g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement impossibilit\u00e9 pour la Cour de Cassation d\u2019exercer son contr\u00f4le, exc\u00e8s de pouvoir et incomp\u00e9tence en ce que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 a infirm\u00e9 le jugement entrepris et ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019expulsion du demandeur au pourvoi au motif que le terrain litigieux est un terrain domanial et appartient suivant acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 produit au dossier \u00e0 R.K alors qu\u2019un terrain domanial appartient \u00e0 l\u2019Etat et ne peut appartenir \u00e0 un particulier qu\u2019\u00e0 la suite d\u2019une proc\u00e9dure d\u2019immatriculation ; (premier moyen)<\/p>\n

En ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel a ordonn\u00e9 l\u2019expulsion du demandeur au pourvoi au motif que le terrain litigieux a \u00e9t\u00e9 mis en valeur par feu R.K, p\u00e8re adoptif de l\u2019appelant, alors que le seul habilit\u00e9 \u00e0 demander l\u2019expulsion des occupants du terrain est le propri\u00e9taire inscrit qui jusqu\u2019\u00e0 maintenant demeure l\u2019Etat Malagasy ; que d\u00e8s lors que le terrain litigieux a fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une demande d\u2019attribution suivant l\u2019article 18 et suivants de la loi 60.004 du 15 f\u00e9vrier 1960, il appartient \u00e0 l\u2019Administration comp\u00e9tente de d\u00e9cider du sort de la demande ainsi que des oppositions y aff\u00e9rentes ; qu\u2019en ordonnant l\u2019expulsion, malgr\u00e9 la proc\u00e9dure d\u2019acquisition faite par le demandeur, encore pendante devant l\u2019administration comp\u00e9tente, la Cour d\u2019Appel exc\u00e8de ses pouvoirs et empi\u00e8te sur un domaine qui n\u2019est pas le sien ; (deuxi\u00e8me moyen) <\/p>\n

Vu les textes de loi vis\u00e9s aux moyens ; <\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019il ressort des \u00e9l\u00e9ments constants acquis \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure que les deux parties au proc\u00e8s ont chacune d\u00e9pos\u00e9 une proc\u00e9dure de demande d\u2019acquisition du terrain litigieux aupr\u00e8s des Services des Domaines ; lesquelles sont encore en cours, aucun titre de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 n\u2019\u00e9tant d\u00e9livr\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019ainsi, aucune des parties ne peut revendiquer des droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 tant que l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative seule habilit\u00e9e \u00e0 s\u2019y prononcer n\u2019ait statu\u00e9 sur les demandes d\u2019acquisition ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en retenant que \u00ab le terrain litigieux est un terrain domanial et appartenant suivant l\u2019acte de notori\u00e9t\u00e9 vers\u00e9 au dossier \u00e0 R.K \u00bb l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 encourt les griefs des moyens en m\u00e9langeant les proc\u00e9dures du p\u00e9titoire et possessoire ;<\/p>\n

Attendu par ailleurs que le terrain litigieux \u00e9tant domanial, l\u2019attribution du titre rel\u00e8ve de la comp\u00e9tence exclusive de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative et les autorit\u00e9s judiciaires se doivent de se d\u00e9clarer incomp\u00e9tentes pour statuer sur le litige ;<\/p>\n

Attendu ainsi qu\u2019en ordonnant l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019une des parties et attribuant \u00e0 l\u2019autre partie le terrain litigieux, la Cour d\u2019Appel a exc\u00e9d\u00e9 sa comp\u00e9tence et empi\u00e8te sur la comp\u00e9tence de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative seule habilit\u00e9e par la loi \u00e0 s\u2019y prononcer ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019ainsi les moyens r\u00e9unis sont fond\u00e9s et la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e encourt la cassation, sans qu\u2019il soit besoin de statuer sur le troisi\u00e8me moyen propos\u00e9 ; <\/p>\n

CASSE ET ANNULE l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 CATO 447\/CIV\/09 du 27 octobre 2009 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel de Toamasina ;<\/p>\n

Renvoie la cause et les parties devant la m\u00eame juridiction, autrement compos\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Ordonne la restitution de l\u2019amende consign\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Condamne le d\u00e9fendeur aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n

Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n

O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n

La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Demandes simultan\u00e9es d\u2019attribution de terrain domanial \u2013 D\u00e9cision d\u2019expulsion \u2013 Incomp\u00e9tence du Tribunal judiciaire Le terrain en question \u00e9tant domanial, l\u2019attribution du titre rel\u00e8ve de la comp\u00e9tence exclusive de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative. Ainsi, en ordonnant l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019une des parties et attribuant \u00e0 l\u2019autre le terrain litigieux, la Cour d\u2019appel…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[48962],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,50720,8600,48966,37033],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-813909","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-sociale","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-domanial","kji_keyword-juillet","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-terrain","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 177\/10-CO n\u00b0 414 - Terrain domanial - Comp\u00e9tence - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 177\/10-CO n\u00b0 414 - Terrain domanial - Comp\u00e9tence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Demandes simultan\u00e9es d\u2019attribution de terrain domanial \u2013 D\u00e9cision d\u2019expulsion \u2013 Incomp\u00e9tence du Tribunal judiciaire Le terrain en question \u00e9tant domanial, l\u2019attribution du titre rel\u00e8ve de la comp\u00e9tence exclusive de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative. Ainsi, en ordonnant l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019une des parties et attribuant \u00e0 l\u2019autre le terrain litigieux, la Cour d\u2019appel...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 177\\\/10-CO n\u00b0 414 - Terrain domanial - Comp\u00e9tence - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T04:59:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 177\\\/10-CO n\u00b0 414 – Terrain domanial – Comp\u00e9tence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 177\/10-CO n\u00b0 414 - Terrain domanial - Comp\u00e9tence - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 177\/10-CO n\u00b0 414 - Terrain domanial - Comp\u00e9tence","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Demandes simultan\u00e9es d\u2019attribution de terrain domanial \u2013 D\u00e9cision d\u2019expulsion \u2013 Incomp\u00e9tence du Tribunal judiciaire Le terrain en question \u00e9tant domanial, l\u2019attribution du titre rel\u00e8ve de la comp\u00e9tence exclusive de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative. Ainsi, en ordonnant l\u2019expulsion de l\u2019une des parties et attribuant \u00e0 l\u2019autre le terrain litigieux, la Cour d\u2019appel...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 177\/10-CO n\u00b0 414 - Terrain domanial - Comp\u00e9tence - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T04:59:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-7-juillet-2017-177-10-co-n-414-terrain-domanial-competence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 7 juillet 2017, 177\/10-CO n\u00b0 414 – Terrain domanial – Comp\u00e9tence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/813909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=813909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=813909"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=813909"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=813909"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=813909"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=813909"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=813909"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=813909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}