{"id":815040,"date":"2026-05-02T10:32:41","date_gmt":"2026-05-02T08:32:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/"},"modified":"2026-05-02T10:32:41","modified_gmt":"2026-05-02T08:32:41","slug":"cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 juin 2017, 214\/11-CO n\u00b0 402 &#8211; Pouvoir du uge"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure<\/p>\n<p>Mots cl\u00e9s : Bail commercial \u2013 accord sur le principe de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction \u2013 Expertises contradictoires \u2013 Pouvoir souverain d&#039;appr\u00e9ciation des juges du fond<\/p>\n<p>En pr\u00e9sence de deux rapports d\u2019expertise contradictoires sur le montant de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction \u00e0 allouer, les juges du fond ont le pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la cause.<\/p>\n<p>Cassation : Ordinaire<\/p>\n<p>Nature : Civile<\/p>\n<p>Solution : Rejet<\/p>\n<p>ARR\u00caT N\u00b0 402 du 02 juin 2017<\/p>\n<p>Dossier : 214\/11-CO<\/p>\n<p>BAIL COMMERCIAL \u2013 ACCORD SUR LE PRINCIPE DE L\u2019INDEMNIT\u00c9 D\u2019\u00c9VICTION \u2013 EXPERTISES CONTRADICTOIRES \u2013 POUVOIR SOUVERAIN D&#039;APPR\u00c9CIATION DES JUGES DU FOND<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab En pr\u00e9sence de deux rapports d\u2019expertise contradictoires sur le montant de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction \u00e0 allouer, les juges du fond ont le pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la cause \u00bb.<\/p>\n<p>Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 ABDEALY ABDOULHOUSSEN repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par son g\u00e9rant<\/p>\n<p>R\u00c9PUBLIQUE DE MADAGASCAR<\/p>\n<p>COUR DE CASSATION<\/p>\n<p>CHAMBRE CIVILE COMMERCIALE SOCIALE<\/p>\n<p>La Cour de Cassation, Chambre Civile Commerciale Sociale en son audience publique ordinaire du vendredi deux juin deux mille dix-sept, tenue au Palais de Justice \u00e0 Anosy, a rendu l&#039;arr\u00eat dont la teneur suit :<\/p>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi ;<\/p>\n<p>Statuant sur le pourvoi de la Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 ABDEALY ABDOULHOUSSEN, si\u00e8ge sis au [Adresse 1], repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par son g\u00e9rant, ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre Noro Helisoa RAHARIVOLOLONA, avocat, contre l\u2019arr\u00eat n\u00b0 1378 du 15 novembre 2010 de la Chambre Civile de la Cour d\u2019Appel d\u2019Antananarivo, rendu dans le litige l\u2019opposant aux \u00e9poux A.N ;<\/p>\n<p>Vu le m\u00e9moire en demande ;<\/p>\n<p>Sur le moyen unique de cassation tir\u00e9 des articles 25 et 26 de la loi organique 2004.036 du 1er octobre 2004 relative \u00e0 la Cour Supr\u00eame et les trois Cours la composant, pris de la violation de l\u2019article 08 alin\u00e9a 4 de l\u2019ordonnance 60.050 du 22 juin 1960 sur le bail commercial, pour fausse interpr\u00e9tation et fausse application de la loi, en ce que la Cour d\u2019Appel dans ses motifs de sa d\u00e9cision soutient que seule l\u2019application de l\u2019article 04 alin\u00e9a 2 de l\u2019ordonnance 60.050 pour d\u00e9terminer l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction alors que l\u2019alin\u00e9a 4 de l\u2019article 08 pr\u00e9voit que le bailleur qui exerce le droit de la reprise est tenu de verser au locataire ou \u00e0 son ayant droit une indemnit\u00e9 \u00e9gale au pr\u00e9judice subi et d\u00e9termin\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article sans toutefois qu\u2019elle puisse exc\u00e9der, pour les locaux objets de la reprise, le montant cumul\u00e9 des loyers des cinq derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es ; en ce que d\u2019autre part la Cour d\u2019Appel affirme que pour fixer \u00e9quitablement l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction elle poss\u00e8de les \u00e9l\u00e9ments suffisants pour la fixer \u00e0 10 millions ARIARY alors que l\u2019article 8 alin\u00e9a 4 pr\u00e9voit le montant cumul\u00e9 des cinq derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es soit la somme de 36 millions ariary ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu que l\u2019arr\u00eat attaqu\u00e9 \u00e9nonce \u00ab il est constant que les deux parties manifestent leur accord pour l\u2019allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction que le seul point discorde concerne le montant exact de cette indemnit\u00e9 ; que les deux rapports d\u2019expertise sur lesquels chacune des parties basent leur contestations et critiques r\u00e9ciproques sont vers\u00e9s au dossier, dont le premier fixe l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 \u00e0 6.117.040,04 AR. Et le second \u00e0 24.172.199 AR. ; que toutefois pour fixer \u00e9quitablement l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction, il convient de les combiner eu \u00e9gard \u00e0 l\u2019article 04 de l\u2019ordonnance 60.050 du 22 juin 1960&#8230; \u00bb ;<\/p>\n<p>Attendu qu\u2019en l\u2019\u00e9tat de ces \u00e9nonciations, les juges du fond n\u2019ont fait qu\u2019user de leur pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souverain des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la cause et ont bien appliqu\u00e9 la loi ; <\/p>\n<p>Attendu d\u00e8s lors que le moyen n\u2019est pas fond\u00e9 ; <\/p>\n<p>REJETTE le pourvoi ;<\/p>\n<p>Condamne la demanderesse \u00e0 l\u2019amende et aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<p>Ainsi jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 par Cour, Chambre les jour, mois et an que dessus.<\/p>\n<p>O\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n<p>Messieurs et Mesdames<\/p>\n<p>La minute du pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat a \u00e9t\u00e9 sign\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident, le Rapporteur et le Greffier.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/details\/DCS6806DD1E10C2C\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/jurisprudence.justice.gov.mg\/decision\/print\/DCS6806DD1E10C2C\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Portail officiel du Ministere de la Justice de Madagascar.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Bail commercial \u2013 accord sur le principe de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction \u2013 Expertises contradictoires \u2013 Pouvoir souverain d&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation des juges du fond En pr\u00e9sence de deux rapports d\u2019expertise contradictoires sur le montant de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction \u00e0 allouer, les juges du fond ont le pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[48960],"kji_court":[48961],"kji_chamber":[48962],"kji_year":[52833],"kji_subject":[7625],"kji_keyword":[8424,48966,48968,49306],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-815040","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-madagascar","kji_court-cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar","kji_chamber-chambre-civile-commerciale-sociale","kji_year-52833","kji_subject-commercial","kji_keyword-cassation","kji_keyword-madagascar","kji_keyword-matieres","kji_keyword-pouvoir","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 juin 2017, 214\/11-CO n\u00b0 402 - Pouvoir du uge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 juin 2017, 214\/11-CO n\u00b0 402 - Pouvoir du uge\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Bail commercial \u2013 accord sur le principe de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction \u2013 Expertises contradictoires \u2013 Pouvoir souverain d&#039;appr\u00e9ciation des juges du fond En pr\u00e9sence de deux rapports d\u2019expertise contradictoires sur le montant de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction \u00e0 allouer, les juges du fond ont le pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 juin 2017, 214\\\/11-CO n\u00b0 402 - Pouvoir du uge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-02T08:32:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 juin 2017, 214\\\/11-CO n\u00b0 402 &#8211; Pouvoir du uge\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 juin 2017, 214\/11-CO n\u00b0 402 - Pouvoir du uge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 juin 2017, 214\/11-CO n\u00b0 402 - Pouvoir du uge","og_description":"Mati\u00e8res : Proc\u00e9dure Mots cl\u00e9s : Bail commercial \u2013 accord sur le principe de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction \u2013 Expertises contradictoires \u2013 Pouvoir souverain d'appr\u00e9ciation des juges du fond En pr\u00e9sence de deux rapports d\u2019expertise contradictoires sur le montant de l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00e9viction \u00e0 allouer, les juges du fond ont le pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/","name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 juin 2017, 214\/11-CO n\u00b0 402 - Pouvoir du uge - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-02T08:32:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-de-cassation-de-madagascar-2-juin-2017-214-11-co-n-402-pouvoir-du-uge\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour de cassation de Madagascar, 2 juin 2017, 214\/11-CO n\u00b0 402 &#8211; Pouvoir du uge"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/815040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=815040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=815040"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=815040"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=815040"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=815040"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=815040"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=815040"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=815040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}