{"id":846301,"date":"2026-05-06T07:25:35","date_gmt":"2026-05-06T05:25:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/"},"modified":"2026-05-06T07:25:35","modified_gmt":"2026-05-06T05:25:35","slug":"bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/","title":{"rendered":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-04-14, 5 StR 595\/25"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<h3>Tenor<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>\n                  <span>Es wird festgestellt, dass die Reise des Verteidigers des Angeklagten M.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0, Rechtsanwalt B.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 aus B.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0, zur Hauptverhandlung vor dem 5. Strafsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs am 5.\u00a0Mai 2026 in Leipzig einschlie\u00dflich einer Anreise am Vortag erforderlich ist.<\/span>\n               <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<h3>Gr\u00fcnde<\/h3>\n<div>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt>\n               <a name=\"rd_1\">1<\/a>\n            <\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Der Antragsteller hat als beigeordneter Verteidiger beantragt, die Erforderlichkeit seiner Reise zur Hauptverhandlung vor dem Senat in vorliegender Sache einschlie\u00dflich einer Anreise am Vortag festzustellen. Bei einer Anreise erst am Hauptverhandlungstag k\u00f6nne er selbst bei Reisebeginn um 6 Uhr eine rechtzeitige Ankunft nicht gew\u00e4hrleisten. Hierzu hat er auf konkrete, f\u00fcr die rund 500\u00a0km lange Strecke derzeit bestehende Problemlagen sowohl bei der Bahn- als auch bei der Flug- und Stra\u00dfenverbindung hingewiesen.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt>\n               <a name=\"rd_2\">2<\/a>\n            <\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Diesem Antrag war gem\u00e4\u00df \u00a7 46 Abs. 2 RVG zu entsprechen. \u00dcber die Angemessenheit von Auslagen (Fahrt- und \u00dcbernachtungskosten) ist bei der Festsetzung der Verg\u00fctung zu entscheiden.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>Cirener\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Gericke\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mosbacher<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<dl class=\"RspDL\">\n<dt><\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Resch\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Werner<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/?quelle=jlink&#038;docid=jb-KORE706992026&#038;psml=bsjrsprod.psml&#038;max=true\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de\/jportal\/portal\/page\/bsjrsprod.psml\/screen\/JWPDFScreen\/filename\/BGH_5_StR_595-25_KORE706992026.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Rechtsprechung im Internet (BMJV\/BfJ) : les decisions sont mises a disposition gratuitement en HTML, PDF et XML pour libre utilisation et re-utilisation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tenor Es wird festgestellt, dass die Reise des Verteidigers des Angeklagten M. , Rechtsanwalt B. aus B. , zur Hauptverhandlung vor dem 5. Strafsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs am 5. Mai 2026 in Leipzig einschlie\u00dflich einer Anreise am Vortag erforderlich ist. Gr\u00fcnde 1 Der Antragsteller hat als beigeordneter Verteidiger beantragt, die Erforderlichkeit seiner Reise zur Hauptverhandlung vor dem Senat in vorliegender Sache&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7802],"kji_court":[7803],"kji_chamber":[8711],"kji_year":[7610],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7808,7806,8712,7809],"kji_language":[7805],"class_list":["post-846301","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-allemagne","kji_court-bundesgerichtshof","kji_chamber-5-strafsenat","kji_year-7610","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-beschluss","kji_keyword-bundesgerichtshof","kji_keyword-strafsenat","kji_keyword-tenor","kji_language-allemand"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-04-14, 5 StR 595\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-04-14, 5 StR 595\/25\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tenor Es wird festgestellt, dass die Reise des Verteidigers des Angeklagten M. , Rechtsanwalt B. aus B. , zur Hauptverhandlung vor dem 5. Strafsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs am 5. Mai 2026 in Leipzig einschlie\u00dflich einer Anreise am Vortag erforderlich ist. Gr\u00fcnde 1 Der Antragsteller hat als beigeordneter Verteidiger beantragt, die Erforderlichkeit seiner Reise zur Hauptverhandlung vor dem Senat in vorliegender Sache...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\\\/\",\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-04-14, 5 StR 595\\\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-06T05:25:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-04-14, 5 StR 595\\\/25\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-04-14, 5 StR 595\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-04-14, 5 StR 595\/25","og_description":"Tenor Es wird festgestellt, dass die Reise des Verteidigers des Angeklagten M. , Rechtsanwalt B. aus B. , zur Hauptverhandlung vor dem 5. Strafsenat des Bundesgerichtshofs am 5. Mai 2026 in Leipzig einschlie\u00dflich einer Anreise am Vortag erforderlich ist. Gr\u00fcnde 1 Der Antragsteller hat als beigeordneter Verteidiger beantragt, die Erforderlichkeit seiner Reise zur Hauptverhandlung vor dem Senat in vorliegender Sache...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/","name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-04-14, 5 StR 595\/25 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-06T05:25:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2026-04-14-5-str-595-25\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2026-04-14, 5 StR 595\/25"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/846301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=846301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=846301"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=846301"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=846301"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=846301"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=846301"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=846301"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=846301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}