{"id":879048,"date":"2026-05-11T06:47:35","date_gmt":"2026-05-11T04:47:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/"},"modified":"2026-05-11T06:47:35","modified_gmt":"2026-05-11T04:47:35","slug":"bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/","title":{"rendered":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2016-09-27, 5 StR 417\/16"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Tenor<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 16. M\u00e4rz 2016 wird mit der Ma\u00dfgabe (\u00a7 349 Abs. 4 StPO) nach \u00a7 349 Abs. 2 StPO als unbegr\u00fcndet verworfen, dass die Anordnung der Ma\u00dfregel (\u00a7 64 StGB) entf\u00e4llt; die Anordnung der Unterbringung des Angeklagten in der Entziehungsanstalt im Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 23. Februar 2015 \u2013 (528 KLs) 251 Js 683\/15 (36\/14) \u2013 wird aufrechterhalten.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

Der Beschwerdef\u00fchrer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

Das Landgericht hat bei der Entscheidung \u00fcber die Anordnung der Unterbringung des Angeklagten in einer Entziehungsanstalt (\u00a7 64 StGB) nicht bedacht, dass s\u00e4mtliche abgeurteilte Taten zeitlich vor dem Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 23. Februar 2015 begangen wurden. Wegen des Vorrangs von \u00a7 55 Abs. 2 StGB vor \u00a7 67f StGB war deshalb die in dieser Verurteilung angeordnete Ma\u00dfregel aufrechtzuerhalten; die neuerlich angeordnete Ma\u00dfregel hat zu entfallen (vgl. BGH, Urteile vom 10. Dezember 1981 \u2013 4 StR 622\/81, BGHSt 30, 305, und vom 11. September 1997 \u2013 4 StR 287\/97, NStZ 1998, 97). Die Entscheidung des Landgerichts, keinen Vorwegvollzug eines Teils der verh\u00e4ngten Gesamtfreiheitsstrafe (\u00a7 67 Abs. 2 StGB) anzuordnen, ist angesichts der vollstreckungsrechtlichen Besonderheiten nicht zu beanstanden.<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n
\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

D\u00f6lp\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0K\u00f6nig\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Berger<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Bellay\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Feilcke<\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n

\n
<\/dt>\n
\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Rechtsprechung im Internet (BMJV\/BfJ) : les decisions sont mises a disposition gratuitement en HTML, PDF et XML pour libre utilisation et re-utilisation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tenor Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 16. M\u00e4rz 2016 wird mit der Ma\u00dfgabe (\u00a7 349 Abs. 4 StPO) nach \u00a7 349 Abs. 2 StPO als unbegr\u00fcndet verworfen, dass die Anordnung der Ma\u00dfregel (\u00a7 64 StGB) entf\u00e4llt; die Anordnung der Unterbringung des Angeklagten in der Entziehungsanstalt im Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 23. Februar 2015…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[7802],"kji_court":[7803],"kji_chamber":[8711],"kji_year":[61603],"kji_subject":[7632],"kji_keyword":[7808,7806,8712,7809],"kji_language":[7805],"class_list":["post-879048","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-allemagne","kji_court-bundesgerichtshof","kji_chamber-5-strafsenat","kji_year-61603","kji_subject-penal","kji_keyword-beschluss","kji_keyword-bundesgerichtshof","kji_keyword-strafsenat","kji_keyword-tenor","kji_language-allemand"],"yoast_head":"\nBundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2016-09-27, 5 StR 417\/16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2016-09-27, 5 StR 417\/16\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tenor Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 16. M\u00e4rz 2016 wird mit der Ma\u00dfgabe (\u00a7 349 Abs. 4 StPO) nach \u00a7 349 Abs. 2 StPO als unbegr\u00fcndet verworfen, dass die Anordnung der Ma\u00dfregel (\u00a7 64 StGB) entf\u00e4llt; die Anordnung der Unterbringung des Angeklagten in der Entziehungsanstalt im Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 23. Februar 2015...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\\\/\",\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2016-09-27, 5 StR 417\\\/16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-11T04:47:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2016-09-27, 5 StR 417\\\/16\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2016-09-27, 5 StR 417\/16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2016-09-27, 5 StR 417\/16","og_description":"Tenor Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 16. M\u00e4rz 2016 wird mit der Ma\u00dfgabe (\u00a7 349 Abs. 4 StPO) nach \u00a7 349 Abs. 2 StPO als unbegr\u00fcndet verworfen, dass die Anordnung der Ma\u00dfregel (\u00a7 64 StGB) entf\u00e4llt; die Anordnung der Unterbringung des Angeklagten in der Entziehungsanstalt im Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 23. Februar 2015...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/","name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2016-09-27, 5 StR 417\/16 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-11T04:47:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/bundesgerichtshof-5-strafsenat-beschluss-2016-09-27-5-str-417-16\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Bundesgerichtshof, 5. Strafsenat, Beschluss, 2016-09-27, 5 StR 417\/16"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/879048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=879048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=879048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=879048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=879048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=879048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=879048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=879048"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=879048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}