{"id":937001,"date":"2026-05-22T00:13:11","date_gmt":"2026-05-21T22:13:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/"},"modified":"2026-05-22T00:13:16","modified_gmt":"2026-05-21T22:13:16","slug":"cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 30 mai 2013, n\u00b0 0530-36941"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"kji-decision\">\n<div class=\"kji-full-text\">\n<p>Assistance judiciaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9e \u00e0 A.) par le d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 du B\u00e2tonnier en date du 29 septembre 2011<\/p>\n<p>Exempt \u2013 appel en mati\u00e8re de droit du travail<\/p>\n<p>Audience publique du trente mai deux mille treize<\/p>\n<p>Num\u00e9ros 36941 et 37626 du r\u00f4le. Composition: Romain LUDOVICY, pr\u00e9sident de chambre; Astrid MAAS, premier conseiller; Roger LINDEN, premier conseiller; Alain BERNARD, greffier.<\/p>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p>Entre:<\/p>\n<p>la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e SOC1.) s.\u00e0r.l,, \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 L-(\u2026), repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son g\u00e9rant actuellement en fonctions,<\/p>\n<p>appelante aux termes d\u2019un exploit de l\u2019huissier de justice Geoffrey GALL\u00c9 de Luxembourg du 7 janvier 2011,<\/p>\n<p>comparant par Ma\u00eetre Ars\u00e8ne KRONSHAGEN, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg,<\/p>\n<p>et: A.), demeurant \u00e0 L- (\u2026), intim\u00e9 aux fins du pr\u00e9dit exploit GALL\u00c9, comparant par Ma\u00eetre R\u00e9guia AMIALI, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg,<\/p>\n<p>II<\/p>\n<p>Entre:<\/p>\n<p>A.), demeurant \u00e0 L- (\u2026),<\/p>\n<p>appelant aux termes d\u2019un exploit de l\u2019huissier de justice Yves TAPELLA d\u2019Esch-sur-Alzette du 15 juin 2011,<\/p>\n<p>comparant par Ma\u00eetre R\u00e9guia AMIALI , avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg,<\/p>\n<p>et:<\/p>\n<p>1) la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e SOC1.) s.\u00e0r.l,, \u00e9tablie et ayant son si\u00e8ge social \u00e0 L-(\u2026), repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son g\u00e9rant actuellement en fonctions,<\/p>\n<p>intim\u00e9e aux fins du pr\u00e9dit exploit TAPELLA,<\/p>\n<p>comparant par Ma\u00eetre Ars\u00e8ne KRONSHAGEN , avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg.<\/p>\n<p>2) l\u2019ETAT DU GRAND-DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par le Ministre d\u2019Etat, dont les bureaux sont \u00e9tablis \u00e0 L- 1352 Luxembourg, 4, rue de la Congr\u00e9gation, et pour autant que de besoin par le Ministre du Travail et de l\u2019Emploi, dont les bureaux sont \u00e9tablis \u00e0 Luxembourg, 26, rue Zithe, ayant dans ses attributions le Fonds pour l\u2019emploi,<\/p>\n<p>intim\u00e9 aux fins du pr\u00e9dit exploit TAPELLA,<\/p>\n<p>comparant par Ma\u00eetre Georges PIERRET, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>LA COUR D\u2019APPEL:<\/p>\n<p>Revu l\u2019arr\u00eat de la Cour du 4 octobre 2012 qui a ordonn\u00e9 la r\u00e9ouverture des d\u00e9bats aux fins de permettre aux parties de parfaire l\u2019instruction relativement \u00e0 la demande de A.) en d\u00e9livrance de la fiche de salaire non p\u00e9riodique rectifi\u00e9e portant sur le solde de cong\u00e9 de janvier 2009 qui, selon le salari\u00e9, devrait indiquer un taux d\u2019imposition de 0%, de m\u00eame qu\u2019un taux horaire de 15,3684 \u20ac au lieu du taux y indiqu\u00e9 de 9,4898 \u20ac.<\/p>\n<p>Par conclusions du 16 janvier 2013, A.) a renonc\u00e9 \u00e0 sa demande tendant \u00e0 voir figurer sur la fiche de salaire non p\u00e9riodique un taux d\u2019imposition de 0%, mais maintenu le reste de sa demande.<\/p>\n<p>Suite \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tablissement par l\u2019employeur d\u2019une deuxi\u00e8me fiche de salaire rectifi\u00e9e reprenant le taux horaire r\u00e9clam\u00e9, A.) a \u00e9galement renonc\u00e9 au volet de sa demande tendant \u00e0 voir figurer sur ladite fiche un taux horaire de 15,3684 \u20ac.<\/p>\n<p>Il convient de lui en donner acte.<\/p>\n<p>A.) r\u00e9clame une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 2.500 \u20ac pour chacune des deux instances.<\/p>\n<p>Sa demande en allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure pour la premi\u00e8re instance n\u2019est pas fond\u00e9e par adoption de la motivation du jugement du 5 mai 2011 dans lequel le tribunal du travail a constat\u00e9 que le salari\u00e9 b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiait de l\u2019assistance judiciaire pour la premi\u00e8re instance.<\/p>\n<p>La demande du salari\u00e9 en allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure pour l\u2019instance d\u2019appel n\u2019est pas fond\u00e9e non plus, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 qu\u2019il s\u2019est vu accorder le 29 septembre 2011 l\u2019assistance judiciaire par le d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 du B\u00e2tonnier de sorte qu\u2019il n\u2019aura \u00e0 supporter ni frais ni d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance d\u2019appel.<\/p>\n<p>La m\u00eame demande de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 en allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure pour l\u2019instance d\u2019appel est \u00e9galement \u00e0 rejeter, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 qu\u2019il n\u2019est pas in\u00e9quitable qu\u2019elle doive supporter une partie des frais non compris dans les d\u00e9pens qu\u2019elle a d\u00fb engager pour faire valoir ses droits en instance d\u2019appel.<\/p>\n<p>PAR CES MOTIFS<\/p>\n<p>la Cour d\u2019appel, huiti\u00e8me chambre, si\u00e9geant en mati\u00e8re de droit du travail, statuant contradictoirement, le magistrat de la mise en \u00e9tat entendu en son rapport,<\/p>\n<p>statuant en continuation de l\u2019arr\u00eat de la Cour du 4 octobre 2012,<\/p>\n<p>donne acte \u00e0 A.) qu\u2019il renonce \u00e0 sa demande en d\u00e9livrance de la fiche de salaire non p\u00e9riodique rectifi\u00e9e portant sur le solde de cong\u00e9 de janvier 2009,<\/p>\n<p>confirme le jugement du tribunal du travail d\u2019Esch- sur-Alzette du 5 mai 2011 en ce qu\u2019il a rejet\u00e9 la demande de A.) en allocation d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 de proc\u00e9dure de 2.500 \u20ac,<\/p>\n<p>rejette les demandes des parties bas\u00e9es sur l\u2019article 240 du NCPC,<\/p>\n<p>d\u00e9clare l\u2019arr\u00eat commun \u00e0 l\u2019ETAT DU GRAND &#8211; DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG, pris en sa qualit\u00e9 de gestionnaire du Fonds pour l\u2019emploi,<\/p>\n<p>condamne A.) et la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e SOC1.) \u00e0 supporter \u00e0 parts \u00e9gales les frais et d\u00e9pens de l\u2019instance d\u2019appel et en ordonne la distraction au profit de Ma\u00eetres R\u00e9guia Amiali et Georges Pierret, avocats constitu\u00e9s, sur leurs affirmations de droit.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr class=\"kji-sep\" \/>\n<p class=\"kji-source-links\"><strong>Sources officielles :<\/strong> <a class=\"kji-source-link\" href=\"https:\/\/data.public.lu\/fr\/datasets\/cour-superieure-de-justice-chambre-8\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">consulter la page source<\/a> &middot; <a class=\"kji-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/download.data.public.lu\/resources\/cour-superieure-de-justice-chambre-8\/20240827-201617\/20130530-36941-assis-jud-2a-accessible.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"kji-license-note\"><em>Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Assistance judiciaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9e \u00e0 A.) par le d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 du B\u00e2tonnier en date du 29 septembre 2011 Exempt \u2013 appel en mati\u00e8re de droit du travail Audience publique du trente mai deux mille treize Num\u00e9ros 36941 et 37626 du r\u00f4le. Composition: Romain LUDOVICY, pr\u00e9sident\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[12305],"kji_chamber":[21144],"kji_year":[90591],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8459,8458,7950,9055,12307],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-937001","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-superieure-de-justice","kji_chamber-chambre-8","kji_year-90591","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-accordee","kji_keyword-assistance","kji_keyword-judiciaire","kji_keyword-justice","kji_keyword-superieure","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 30 mai 2013, n\u00b0 0530-36941 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 30 mai 2013, n\u00b0 0530-36941\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Assistance judiciaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9e \u00e0 A.) par le d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 du B\u00e2tonnier en date du 29 septembre 2011 Exempt \u2013 appel en mati\u00e8re de droit du travail Audience publique du trente mai deux mille treize Num\u00e9ros 36941 et 37626 du r\u00f4le. Composition: Romain LUDOVICY, pr\u00e9sident\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-21T22:13:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 30 mai 2013, n\u00b0 0530-36941 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-21T22:13:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-21T22:13:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 30 mai 2013, n\u00b0 0530-36941\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 30 mai 2013, n\u00b0 0530-36941 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 30 mai 2013, n\u00b0 0530-36941","og_description":"Assistance judiciaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9e \u00e0 A.) par le d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9 du B\u00e2tonnier en date du 29 septembre 2011 Exempt \u2013 appel en mati\u00e8re de droit du travail Audience publique du trente mai deux mille treize Num\u00e9ros 36941 et 37626 du r\u00f4le. Composition: Romain LUDOVICY, pr\u00e9sident\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-21T22:13:16+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/","name":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 30 mai 2013, n\u00b0 0530-36941 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-21T22:13:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-21T22:13:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-30-mai-2013-n-0530-36941\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 30 mai 2013, n\u00b0 0530-36941"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/937001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=937001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=937001"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=937001"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=937001"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=937001"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=937001"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=937001"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=937001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}