{"id":937055,"date":"2026-05-22T00:15:46","date_gmt":"2026-05-21T22:15:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/"},"modified":"2026-05-22T00:15:50","modified_gmt":"2026-05-21T22:15:50","slug":"cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 28 mai 2013"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 289\/13 Ch.c.C. du 28 mai 2013. (Not. : 9937\/13\/CD)<\/p>\n

La chambre du conseil de la Cour d'appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg a rendu le vingt-huit mai deux mille treize l'arr\u00eat qui suit:<\/p>\n

Vu les pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure instruite \u00e0 charge de:<\/p>\n

X.), n\u00e9e le (…) \u00e0 (…) (Portugal), demeurant \u00e0 L- (…),<\/p>\n

actuellement d\u00e9tenue au Centre P\u00e9nitentiaire \u00e0 Schrassig,<\/p>\n

Vu l'ordonnance n\u00b0 1187\/1 3 rendue le 14 mai 2013 par la chambre du conseil du tribunal d'arrondissement de Luxembourg, notifi\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019inculp\u00e9e le 16 mai 2013;<\/p>\n

Vu l\u2019appel relev\u00e9 de cette ordonnance le 15 mai 2013 par d\u00e9claration du mandataire de l\u2019inculp\u00e9e re\u00e7ue au greffe du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg;<\/p>\n

Vu les informations donn\u00e9es par t\u00e9l\u00e9copie le 24 mai 2013 \u00e0 l'inculp\u00e9e et \u00e0 son conseil pour la s\u00e9ance du mardi 28 mai 2013;<\/p>\n

Entendus en cette s\u00e9ance:<\/p>\n

Ma\u00eetre Nour E. HELLAL, avocat \u00e0 la Cour, demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, comparant pour l\u2019inculp\u00e9 e, en ses moyens d\u2019appel;<\/p>\n

Monsieur le premier avocat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Jeannot NIES, assumant les fonctions de minist\u00e8re public, en ses conclusions;<\/p>\n

L\u2019inculp\u00e9e X.) a eu la parole la derni\u00e8re;<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi;<\/p>\n

LA CHAMBRE DU CONSEIL DE LA COUR D'APPEL :<\/p>\n

Par d\u00e9claration du 15 mai 2013 au greffe du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg, l\u2019inculp\u00e9e a r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement fait relever appel d'une ordonnance de la chambre du conseil du m\u00eame tribunal du 14 mai 2013 qui a rejet\u00e9 sa demande de mise en libert\u00e9 provisoire. L'ordonnance entreprise est jointe au pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat.<\/p>\n

Le recours est fond\u00e9.<\/p>\n

En effet, les conditions exig\u00e9es par l'article 94 du code d'instruction criminelle pour motiver le maintien de la d\u00e9tention pr\u00e9ventive ne se trouvent plus remplies dans le chef de l\u2019inculp\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Pour garantir la repr\u00e9sentation de X.) aux actes de proc\u00e9dure futurs et pour \u00e9viter qu\u2019elle n\u2019abuse de sa libert\u00e9 pour commettre de nouvelles infractions, la Cour consid\u00e8re toutefois qu\u2019un placement sous contr\u00f4le judiciaire s\u2019impose en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce.<\/p>\n

L\u2019inculp\u00e9e est d\u00e8s lors \u00e0 soumettre aux obligations suivantes :<\/p>\n

1. ne pas entrer en contact avec les autres personnes inculp\u00e9es dans le pr\u00e9sent dossier,<\/p>\n

2. ne pas sortir des limites territoriales du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg.<\/p>\n

P A R C E S M O T I F S<\/p>\n

r e \u00e7 o i t l'appel;<\/p>\n

le d i t fond\u00e9;<\/p>\n

o r d o n n e que X.) sera mise provisoirement en libert\u00e9 \u00e0 charge pour elle de prendre l'engagement de se repr\u00e9senter \u00e0 tous les actes de la proc\u00e9dure et pour l'ex\u00e9cution du jugement aussit\u00f4t qu'elle en sera requis;<\/p>\n

p l a c e X.) sous contr\u00f4le judiciaire et soumet celle-ci aux obligations ci-avant \u00e9nonc\u00e9es;<\/p>\n

r \u00e9 s e r v e les frais de l'instance d'appel.<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait et jug\u00e9 par la chambre du conseil de la Cour d'appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg \u00e0 Luxembourg, Cit\u00e9 Judiciaire, Plateau du St. Esprit, o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents:<\/p>\n

Camille HOFFMANN, pr\u00e9sident de chambre, Mireille HARTMANN, conseiller, Monique FELTZ, conseiller,<\/p>\n

qui ont sign\u00e9 le pr\u00e9sent arr\u00eat avec le greffier Josiane STEMPER .<\/p>\n

N\u00b0 1187\/13 Not. 9937\/13\/CD<\/p>\n

S\u00e9ance de la chambre du conseil du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg du 14 mai 2013, o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents:<\/p>\n

Mich\u00e8le THIRY, vice- pr\u00e9sident, Fran\u00e7oise SCHANEN, premier juge et Anne CONTER, juge- d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9e, Jean-Paul KNEIP, greffier<\/p>\n

Vu la requ\u00eate de mise en libert\u00e9 provisoire annex\u00e9e, d\u00e9pos\u00e9e par Ma\u00eetre S\u00e9bastien LANOUE, avocat demeurant \u00e0 Luxembourg, au nom et pour compte de<\/p>\n

X.), n\u00e9e le (…) \u00e0 (…) (Portugal), demeurant \u00e0 L- (…), actuellement en d\u00e9tention pr\u00e9ventive.<\/p>\n

Vu le rapport du juge d\u2019instruction, lequel a \u00e9t\u00e9 mis \u00e0 la disposition de l\u2019inculp\u00e9e,<\/p>\n

Entendus en la s\u00e9ance de la chambre du conseil du 14 mai 2013, Ma\u00eetre S\u00e9bastien LANOUE et l\u2019inculp\u00e9e en leurs moyens et le repr\u00e9sentant du Minist\u00e8re Public, Laurent SECK, en ses conclusions.<\/p>\n

La chambre du conseil, apr\u00e8s avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la loi, a rendu l\u2019<\/p>\n

qui suit, et ce au vu du dossier lui soumis:<\/p>\n

Il existe des indices graves de culpabilit\u00e9 \u00e0 charge de l\u2019inculp\u00e9e r\u00e9sultant de l\u2019ensemble des \u00e9l\u00e9ments du dossier d\u2019instruction et notamment de ses aveux partiels, des d\u00e9clarations des co-inculp\u00e9s, des constatations et des observations des autorit\u00e9s polici\u00e8res, du r\u00e9sultat des saisies.<\/p>\n

Les faits lui reproch\u00e9s emportent une peine d\u2019emprisonnement correctionnel d\u2019un maximum sup\u00e9rieur \u00e0 deux ans.<\/p>\n

Le danger de fuite existe en fait au vu de la gravit\u00e9 des faits reproch\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019inculp\u00e9e.<\/p>\n

Il existe un danger d\u2019obscurcissement des preuves \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 que l\u2019instruction n\u2019est pas termin\u00e9e et qu\u2019il reste des interrogatoires et v\u00e9rifications \u00e0 faire.<\/p>\n

Il y a lieu de craindre, au vu de la situation personnelle de l\u2019inculp\u00e9e et de la multiplicit\u00e9 des faits similaires lui reproch\u00e9s, que celle- ci n\u2019abuse de sa libert\u00e9 pour commettre de nouvelles infractions.<\/p>\n

Il n\u2019y a partant pas lieu de faire droit ni \u00e0 la requ\u00eate ni \u00e0 la demande subsidiaire. P a r c e s m o t i f s : la chambre du conseil du tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg,<\/p>\n

r e j e t t e la demande de mise en libert\u00e9 provisoire,<\/p>\n

r \u00e9 s e r v e les frais.<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait et prononc\u00e9 au tribunal d\u2019arrondissement de et \u00e0 Luxembourg, date qu\u2019en t\u00eate.<\/p>\n

O R D O N N A N C E<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Licence CC BY-ND 4.0 (Administration judiciaire, data.public.lu). Republication autorisee avec attribution, sans modification editoriale du texte integral.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 289\/13 Ch.c.C. du 28 mai 2013. (Not. : 9937\/13\/CD) La chambre du conseil de la Cour d’appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg a rendu le vingt-huit mai deux mille treize l’arr\u00eat qui suit: Vu les pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure instruite \u00e0 charge de:\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[8418],"kji_court":[12305],"kji_chamber":[23318],"kji_year":[90591],"kji_subject":[7724],"kji_keyword":[8683,9055,12307],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-937055","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-luxembourg","kji_court-cour-superieure-de-justice","kji_chamber-chambre-du-conseil","kji_year-90591","kji_subject-civil","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-justice","kji_keyword-superieure","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nCour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 28 mai 2013 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 28 mai 2013\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 289\/13 Ch.c.C. du 28 mai 2013. (Not. : 9937\/13\/CD) La chambre du conseil de la Cour d'appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg a rendu le vingt-huit mai deux mille treize l'arr\u00eat qui suit: Vu les pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure instruite \u00e0 charge de:\u2026\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-21T22:15:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 28 mai 2013 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-21T22:15:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-21T22:15:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 28 mai 2013\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 28 mai 2013 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 28 mai 2013","og_description":"Arr\u00eat n\u00b0 289\/13 Ch.c.C. du 28 mai 2013. (Not. : 9937\/13\/CD) La chambre du conseil de la Cour d'appel du Grand- Duch\u00e9 de Luxembourg a rendu le vingt-huit mai deux mille treize l'arr\u00eat qui suit: Vu les pi\u00e8ces de la proc\u00e9dure instruite \u00e0 charge de:\u2026","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_modified_time":"2026-05-21T22:15:50+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/","name":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 28 mai 2013 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-21T22:15:46+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-21T22:15:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/cour-superieure-de-justice-28-mai-2013\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice, 28 mai 2013"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/937055","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=937055"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=937055"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=937055"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=937055"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=937055"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=937055"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=937055"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=937055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}