{"id":999705,"date":"2026-05-28T01:09:50","date_gmt":"2026-05-27T23:09:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/"},"modified":"2026-05-28T01:09:50","modified_gmt":"2026-05-27T23:09:50","slug":"arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira","status":"publish","type":"kji_decision","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/","title":{"rendered":"Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 – Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI c\/ Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Audience publique du 23 d\u00e9cembre 2021<\/p>\n

Requ\u00eate : N\u00b0 336\/2020\/PC du 04\/11\/2020<\/p>\n

Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI (Conseil : Ma\u00eetre Alain MASIRIKA NFUNEBASHIGA , Avocat \u00e0 la Cour)<\/p>\n

Contre<\/p>\n

Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA (Conseil : Willy KIRIZA MPALIRWA, Avocat \u00e0 la Cour)<\/p>\n

Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 du 23 d\u00e9cembre 2021<\/p>\n

La Cour Commune de Justice et d\u2019Arbitrage (CCJA) de l\u2019Organisation pour l\u2019Harmonisation en Afrique du Droit des Affaires (OHADA), Deuxi\u00e8me chambre, a rendu l\u2019Arr\u00eat suivant en son audience publique du 23 d\u00e9cembre 2021 o\u00f9 \u00e9taient pr\u00e9sents :<\/p>\n

Messieurs : Robert SAFARI ZIHALIRWA, Pr\u00e9sident Armand Claude DEMBA, Juge, rapporteur Mounetaga DIOUF, Juge<\/p>\n

et Ma\u00eetre Koessy Alfred BADO, Greffier ;<\/p>\n

Sur la requ\u00eate enregistr\u00e9e au greffe de la Cour de c\u00e9ans sous le num\u00e9ro 336\/2020\/PC du 04 novembre 2020 et introduite par Maitre Alain MASIRIKA NFUNEBASHIGA, Avocat \u00e0 la Cour, Etude situ\u00e9e au N\u00b0 135, Avenue P.E. LUMUMBA, quartier NDENDERE, Commune d\u2019Ibanda, ville de Bukavu, province du Sud-Kivu, en R\u00e9publique D\u00e9mocratique du Congo , agissant au nom et pour le compte de Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI, dans l\u2019affaire qui a oppos\u00e9 celle-ci \u00e0 Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA, ayant pour conseil Ma\u00eetre Willy KIRIZA MPALIRWA, Avocat \u00e0 la Cour, dont l\u2019\u00e9tude se situe \u00e0 la m\u00eame adresse que celle de la demanderesse, aux fins de liquidation des d\u00e9pens relatifs \u00e0 l\u2019instance ayant abouti \u00e0 l\u2019arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour de c\u00e9ans sous le num\u00e9ro 164\/2018 du 14 octobre 2018 ; ORGANISATION POUR L\u2019HARMONISATION EN AFRIQUE DU DROIT DES AFFAIRES (OHADA) ——– COUR COMMUNE DE JUSTICE ET D\u2019ARBITRAGE (CCJA) ——— Deuxi\u00e8me chambre ——-<\/p>\n

Sur le rapport de Monsieur Armand Claude DEMBA , Juge ;<\/p>\n

Vu le Trait\u00e9 relatif \u00e0 l\u2019harmonisation du droit des affaires en Afrique ;<\/p>\n

Vu le R\u00e8glement de proc\u00e9dure de la Cour Commune de Justice et d\u2019Arbitrage de l\u2019OHADA ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI expose \u00e0 l\u2019appui de sa requ\u00eate qu\u2019il ressort de l\u2019arr\u00eat susvis\u00e9 la condamnation de Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA aux d\u00e9pens, lesquels sont r\u00e9cup\u00e9rables au sens de l\u2019article 43 du R\u00e8glement de proc\u00e9dure de la CCJA ; qu\u2019en vertu de ce texte et de la D\u00e9cision n\u00b0001\/2000\/CCJA du 16 f\u00e9vrier 2000 du Pr\u00e9sident de la CCJA fixant la r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration, les frais de d\u00e9placement et de s\u00e9jour des Avocats, la requ\u00e9rante estime qu\u2019elle a droit aux sommes suivantes :<\/p>\n

1) Honoraires de l\u2019avocat : 5.526.054,87 FCFA ; 2) Frais de greffe : 150 000 FCFA ; 3) Frais de photocopies, d\u2019exp\u00e9dition des m\u00e9moires en r\u00e9ponse, de l\u2019Arr\u00eat et de transfert : 1.458.425,54 FCFA ; Soit la somme totale de 7.134.480 FCFA ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que pour sa d\u00e9fense, Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA fait d\u2019abord observer que, s\u2019agissant du \u00ab gain r\u00e9alis\u00e9 par l\u2019avocat de la requ\u00e9rante \u00bb sur la base duquel sont calcul\u00e9s les honoraires, il n y a pas eu de ce gain, l\u2019immeuble objet du litige lui ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 attribu\u00e9 par une ordonnance n\u00b0175\/2015 du Pr\u00e9sident du Tribunal de commerce de Bukavu ; qu\u2019\u00e0 ce jour, Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA est r\u00e9install\u00e9e dans ledit immeuble ; qu\u2019ensuite, le re\u00e7u de 1738 dollars am\u00e9ricains au titre de frais de certification de pi\u00e8ces n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 confirm\u00e9 par le greffe comptable de la Cour d\u2019appel de Bukavu contact\u00e9 pour la circonstance ; qu\u2019en somme, conclut la d\u00e9fenderesse, \u00ab il sied de constater qu\u2019il ne reste que les frais d\u2019envoi et de greffe engag\u00e9s par Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI qui reste d\u00e9bitrice de la concluante car l\u2019immeuble attribu\u00e9 n\u2019a pas \u00e9pong\u00e9 la totalit\u00e9 de la cr\u00e9ance \u00bb ;<\/p>\n

Attendu que l\u2019article 43 du R\u00e8glement de proc\u00e9dure de la CCJA \u00e9nonce qu\u2019il est statu\u00e9 sur les d\u00e9pens dans l\u2019arr\u00eat qui met fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance ; que sont, \u00e0 cet effet, consid\u00e9r\u00e9s comme d\u00e9pens r\u00e9cup\u00e9rables :<\/p>\n

a) Les droits de greffe ; b) Les frais indispensables expos\u00e9s par les parties aux fins de la proc\u00e9dure, notamment les frais de d\u00e9placement et de s\u00e9jour et la r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration des avocats, selon le tarif fix\u00e9 par la Cour ; c)Les frais qu\u2019une partie a d\u00fb exposer aux fins d\u2019ex\u00e9cution forc\u00e9e suivant le tarif en vigueur dans l\u2019Etat ou l\u2019ex\u00e9cution forc\u00e9e a eu lieu ;<\/p>\n

Que la D\u00e9cision n\u00b0001\/2000\/CCJA du 16 f\u00e9vrier 2000 du Pr\u00e9sident de la CCJA, fixant la r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration, les frais de d\u00e9placement et de s\u00e9jour des Avocats, pr\u00e9voit quant \u00e0 elle, en son article 1 er, que la r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration due \u00e0 l\u2019avocat est fix\u00e9e \u00e0 2,5 % de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat du litige lorsqu\u2019il est sup\u00e9rieur \u00e0 1 000 000 FCFA conform\u00e9ment au tableau annex\u00e9 ;<\/p>\n

Attendu qu\u2019en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, il r\u00e9sulte des pi\u00e8ces du dossier que dans l\u2019arr\u00eat num\u00e9ro 164\/2018 rendu le 14 octobre 2018, la Cour de c\u00e9ans n\u2019a statu\u00e9 que sur \u00ab la recevabilit\u00e9 du moyen \u00bb et n\u2019a pas pu appr\u00e9cier la valeur du litige ; que Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI n\u2019ayant pas r\u00e9pliqu\u00e9 aux pr\u00e9tentions de Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA selon lesquelles elle s\u2019est l\u00e9galement r\u00e9install\u00e9e dans l\u2019immeuble en cause, il \u00e9chet de dire qu\u2019aucune r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration n\u2019est due \u00e0 ce titre ; que par contre, sont justifi\u00e9s les frais d\u2019exp\u00e9dition des documents \u00e0 la Cour et les frais de greffe, soit respectivement les sommes de 477.800 et 150.000 FCFA; qu\u2019il y a lieu de les mettre \u00e0 la charge de Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA qui ne les conteste nullement ;<\/p>\n

PAR CES MOTIFS<\/p>\n

Statuant publiquement, apr\u00e8s en avoir d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9,<\/p>\n

D\u00e9clare la requ\u00eate de Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI partiellement justifi\u00e9e ;<\/p>\n

Liquide les d\u00e9pens ainsi qu\u2019il suit : – Frais de greffe : 150.000 FCFA ; – Autres frais : 477. 800 FCFA ; Soit la somme totale de 627.800 FCFA ;<\/p>\n

Dit que la dame Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA est condamn\u00e9e au paiement de cette somme ;<\/p>\n

D\u00e9boute Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI du surplus de ses demandes.<\/p>\n

Ainsi fait, jug\u00e9 et prononc\u00e9 les jour, mois et an que dessus et ont sign\u00e9 :<\/p>\n

Le Pr\u00e9sident<\/p>\n

Le Greffier<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Sources officielles :<\/strong> consulter la page source<\/a> · PDF officiel<\/a><\/p>\n

Biblioth\u00e8que num\u00e9rique OHADA. Republication conforme aux mentions l\u00e9gales.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Audience publique du 23 d\u00e9cembre 2021 Requ\u00eate : N\u00b0 336\/2020\/PC du 04\/11\/2020 Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI (Conseil : Ma\u00eetre Alain MASIRIKA NFUNEBASHIGA , Avocat \u00e0 la Cour) Contre Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA (Conseil : Willy KIRIZA MPALIRWA, Avocat \u00e0 la Cour) Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 du 23 d\u00e9cembre 2021 La Cour Commune de Justice et d\u2019Arbitrage (CCJA)…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":[],"kji_country":[93235],"kji_court":[93236],"kji_chamber":[108991],"kji_year":[36297],"kji_subject":[7646],"kji_keyword":[93246,8683,21028,109737,109736],"kji_language":[7733],"class_list":["post-999705","kji_decision","type-kji_decision","status-publish","hentry","kji_country-ohada","kji_court-cour-commune-de-justice-et-darbitrage-ccja","kji_chamber-deuxieme-chambre","kji_year-36297","kji_subject-divers","kji_keyword-affaire","kji_keyword-arret","kji_keyword-josephine","kji_keyword-mirindi","kji_keyword-nsimire","kji_language-francais"],"yoast_head":"\nArr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 - Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI c\/ Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 - Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI c\/ Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Audience publique du 23 d\u00e9cembre 2021 Requ\u00eate : N\u00b0 336\/2020\/PC du 04\/11\/2020 Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI (Conseil : Ma\u00eetre Alain MASIRIKA NFUNEBASHIGA , Avocat \u00e0 la Cour) Contre Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA (Conseil : Willy KIRIZA MPALIRWA, Avocat \u00e0 la Cour) Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 du 23 d\u00e9cembre 2021 La Cour Commune de Justice et d\u2019Arbitrage (CCJA)...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\\\/\",\"name\":\"Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\\\/2021 - Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI c\\\/ Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-27T23:09:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jurisprudences\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/jurisprudences\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\\\/2021 – Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI c\\\/ Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 - Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI c\/ Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 - Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI c\/ Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA","og_description":"Audience publique du 23 d\u00e9cembre 2021 Requ\u00eate : N\u00b0 336\/2020\/PC du 04\/11\/2020 Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI (Conseil : Ma\u00eetre Alain MASIRIKA NFUNEBASHIGA , Avocat \u00e0 la Cour) Contre Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA (Conseil : Willy KIRIZA MPALIRWA, Avocat \u00e0 la Cour) Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 du 23 d\u00e9cembre 2021 La Cour Commune de Justice et d\u2019Arbitrage (CCJA)...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/","name":"Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 - Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI c\/ Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-05-27T23:09:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/arret-n-218-2021-affaire-josephine-nsimire-mirindi-c-marie-claire-lugirira\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jurisprudences","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/jurisprudences\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Arr\u00eat N\u00b0 218\/2021 – Affaire : Jos\u00e9phine NSIMIRE MIRINDI c\/ Marie-Claire LUGIRIRA"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision\/999705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_decision"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kji_decision"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=999705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kji_country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_country?post=999705"},{"taxonomy":"kji_court","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_court?post=999705"},{"taxonomy":"kji_chamber","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_chamber?post=999705"},{"taxonomy":"kji_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_year?post=999705"},{"taxonomy":"kji_subject","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_subject?post=999705"},{"taxonomy":"kji_keyword","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_keyword?post=999705"},{"taxonomy":"kji_language","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kji_language?post=999705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}