{"id":1217111,"date":"2026-06-29T16:38:03","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T14:38:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/"},"modified":"2026-06-29T16:38:03","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T14:38:03","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-constatation-de-lextinction-de-linstance-par-le-juge\">I. La constatation de l\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance par le juge<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-desistement-daction-comme-cause-legale-dextinction\">A. Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019action comme cause l\u00e9gale d\u2019extinction<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-caractere-automatique-du-dessaisissement\">B. Le caract\u00e8re automatique du dessaisissement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-consequences-financieres-et-la-portee-de-la-decision\">II. Les cons\u00e9quences financi\u00e8res et la port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-charge-des-depens-mise-a-la-partie-demanderesse\">A. La charge des d\u00e9pens mise \u00e0 la partie demanderesse<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-marge-dappreciation-du-tribunal\">B. L\u2019absence de marge d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du tribunal<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, par une d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00477), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par un syndicat de copropri\u00e9taires agissant par l\u2019interm\u00e9diaire de son syndic. Ce demandeur a engag\u00e9 une action dont il s\u2019est ult\u00e9rieurement d\u00e9sist\u00e9. Lors de l\u2019audience, le tribunal a \u00e9t\u00e9 invit\u00e9 \u00e0 tirer les cons\u00e9quences de ce d\u00e9sistement. La proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9v\u00e8le que le demandeur a manifest\u00e9 sa volont\u00e9 de se d\u00e9sister de son action, sans que le d\u00e9fendeur ne s\u2019y oppose. La question de droit qui se posait \u00e9tait celle des effets juridiques d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019action sur l\u2019instance en cours et du r\u00f4le du juge dans la constatation de cette extinction. Le tribunal, faisant application de l\u2019article 384 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, a constat\u00e9 l\u2019extinction de l\u2019action et de l\u2019instance, s\u2019est dessaisi de l\u2019affaire et a laiss\u00e9 les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge du demandeur, sauf convention contraire. Cette solution, simple en apparence, m\u00e9rite d\u2019\u00eatre analys\u00e9e dans son m\u00e9canisme et sa port\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-constatation-de-lextinction-de-linstance-par-le-juge\">I. La constatation de l\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance par le juge<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-desistement-daction-comme-cause-legale-dextinction\">A. Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019action comme cause l\u00e9gale d\u2019extinction<\/h3>\n<p>Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019action constitue un mode d\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance pr\u00e9vu par l\u2019article 384 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Cette disposition \u00e9nonce que l\u2019instance s\u2019\u00e9teint accessoirement \u00e0 l\u2019action par l\u2019effet du d\u00e9sistement d\u2019action, et que cette extinction est constat\u00e9e par une d\u00e9cision de dessaisissement. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e fait explicitement r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 ce texte pour fonder sa solution. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le demandeur a exprim\u00e9 sans \u00e9quivoque sa volont\u00e9 de renoncer \u00e0 son action, ce qui a entra\u00een\u00e9 l\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance. La jurisprudence confirme ce m\u00e9canisme : <em>&#8221; Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 384 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, l\u2019instance s\u2019\u00e9teint accessoirement \u00e0 l\u2019action par l\u2019effet du d\u00e9sistement d\u2019action ; l\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance est constat\u00e9e par une d\u00e9cision de dessaisissement &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d51c824e9af1785cdad06b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon, 27 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/00064)<\/a><\/strong>. Le tribunal n\u2019a donc fait que donner acte de cette extinction, sans avoir \u00e0 appr\u00e9cier le bien-fond\u00e9 de la demande. Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019action, parce qu\u2019il \u00e9teint l\u2019action elle-m\u00eame, emporte n\u00e9cessairement l\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance qui la porte. Cette solution respecte la logique processuelle selon laquelle l\u2019instance est l\u2019accessoire de l\u2019action.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-caractere-automatique-du-dessaisissement\">B. Le caract\u00e8re automatique du dessaisissement<\/h3>\n<p>Le dessaisissement du juge d\u00e9coule directement de la constatation de l\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance. Il s\u2019agit d\u2019un acte purement d\u00e9claratif, non constitutif. Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, dans sa d\u00e9cision, <em>&#8221; se dessaisit de la pr\u00e9sente affaire &#8220;<\/em> apr\u00e8s avoir constat\u00e9 l\u2019extinction. Ce dessaisissement est la cons\u00e9quence m\u00e9canique de la disparition de l\u2019instance. Le juge ne dispose d\u2019aucun pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation sur l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 du d\u00e9sistement. D\u00e8s lors que la volont\u00e9 de se d\u00e9sister est certaine et que le d\u00e9sistement est accept\u00e9 ou que le d\u00e9fendeur n\u2019a pas conclu au fond, le juge doit se borner \u00e0 le constater. La formulation retenue par la juridiction marseillaise, <em>&#8221; constate l\u2019extinction de l\u2019action &#8220;<\/em>, souligne ce r\u00f4le passif. L\u2019arr\u00eat dijonnais pr\u00e9cit\u00e9 rappelle que l\u2019extinction est constat\u00e9e, non ordonn\u00e9e. Ainsi, le juge agit comme un greffier de la volont\u00e9 des parties, garant de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-consequences-financieres-et-la-portee-de-la-decision\">II. Les cons\u00e9quences financi\u00e8res et la port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-charge-des-depens-mise-a-la-partie-demanderesse\">A. La charge des d\u00e9pens mise \u00e0 la partie demanderesse<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e applique \u00e9galement l\u2019article 696 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile en laissant les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge du syndicat des copropri\u00e9taires, demandeur qui s\u2019est d\u00e9sist\u00e9. Cette r\u00e8gle est de principe : la partie qui succombe supporte les d\u00e9pens. En cas de d\u00e9sistement d\u2019action, le demandeur est consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme succombant dans son instance, puisqu\u2019il y renonce. Toutefois, l\u2019article 696 pr\u00e9voit que les parties peuvent convenir d\u2019une r\u00e9partition diff\u00e9rente. Le tribunal a pris soin d\u2019ajouter la r\u00e9serve <em>&#8221; sauf convention contraire &#8220;<\/em>, ce qui montre que la solution n\u2019est pas absolue. En l\u2019absence d\u2019accord, le demandeur assume les frais de l\u2019instance, incluant ceux liquid\u00e9s par le greffe \u00e0 hauteur de 70,55 euros. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la logique indemnitaire des d\u00e9pens : c\u2019est celui qui provoque l\u2019instance et y met fin unilat\u00e9ralement qui en supporte le co\u00fbt.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-marge-dappreciation-du-tribunal\">B. L\u2019absence de marge d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du tribunal<\/h3>\n<p>La port\u00e9e de cette d\u00e9cision r\u00e9side dans le rappel du r\u00f4le limit\u00e9 du juge en mati\u00e8re de d\u00e9sistement. Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille n\u2019a pas examin\u00e9 le fond du litige, ni v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 si le d\u00e9sistement \u00e9tait libre et non \u00e9quivoque \u2013 le simple constat de la volont\u00e9 exprim\u00e9e lui a suffi. La jurisprudence d\u2019appui, toujours dans la m\u00eame formulation <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d51c824e9af1785cdad069\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon, 27 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/00082)<\/a><\/strong>, insiste sur le fait que l\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance est <em>&#8221; accessoire &#8220;<\/em> \u00e0 l\u2019action. Le juge ne peut ni refuser le d\u00e9sistement, ni en modifier les effets. Cette absence de marge garantit la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique : une fois le d\u00e9sistement act\u00e9, l\u2019action ne peut plus \u00eatre reprise, sauf dans les cas limit\u00e9s de l\u2019article 386 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. La d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 s\u2019inscrit donc dans une application stricte des textes, sans innovation ni d\u00e9rogation. Elle illustre la simplicit\u00e9 et la pr\u00e9visibilit\u00e9 du droit processuel en mati\u00e8re de d\u00e9sistement.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d51c824e9af1785cdad06b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Dijon, le 27 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/00064<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d51c824e9af1785cdad069\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Dijon, le 27 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/00082<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051928783\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 384 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>En dehors des cas o\u00f9 cet effet r\u00e9sulte du jugement, l&#8217;instance s&#8217;\u00e9teint accessoirement \u00e0 l&#8217;action par l&#8217;effet de la transaction, de l&#8217;acquiescement, du d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;action ou, dans les actions non transmissibles, par le d\u00e9c\u00e8s d&#8217;une partie.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;extinction de l&#8217;instance est constat\u00e9e par une d\u00e9cision de dessaisissement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042941174\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 696 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La partie perdante est condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 moins que le juge, par d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e, n&#8217;en mette la totalit\u00e9 ou une fraction \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une autre partie.<\/p>\n<p>Les conditions dans lesquelles il peut \u00eatre mis \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une partie qui b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle tout ou partie des d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance sont fix\u00e9es par les dispositions de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 et du d\u00e9cret n\u00b0 2020-1717 du 28 d\u00e9cembre 2020.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410611\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 386 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;instance est p\u00e9rim\u00e9e lorsque aucune des parties n&#8217;accomplit de diligences pendant deux ans.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, par une d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00477), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par un syndicat de copropri\u00e9taires&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9676,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69d8b552cdc6046d47bec321","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69d8b552cdc6046d47bec321","_kj_judilibre_id":"69d8b552cdc6046d47bec321","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille","_kj_chambre":"Chambre 10","_kj_rg":"2025F00477","_kj_date":"2026-04-08","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1217111","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, par une d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00477), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par un syndicat de copropri\u00e9taires...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, par une d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00477), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par un syndicat de copropri\u00e9taires...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T14:38:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4968\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3332\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T14:38:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1281,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T14:38:03+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T14:38:03+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, par une d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00477), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par un syndicat de copropri\u00e9taires...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4968,\"height\":3332},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, par une d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00477), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par un syndicat de copropri\u00e9taires...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477","og_description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, par une d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00477), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par un syndicat de copropri\u00e9taires...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T14:38:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4968,"height":3332,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477","datePublished":"2026-06-29T14:38:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/"},"wordCount":1281,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-29T14:38:03+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T14:38:03+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, par une d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F00477), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par un syndicat de copropri\u00e9taires...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp","width":4968,"height":3332},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00477\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00477"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kristijan-arsov-A2a12i_diJs-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-56CP","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1203375,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-3-avril-2026-n2022f00550\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217111,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02022F00550","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, chambre 16, a rendu le 3 avril 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b02022F00550) relative aux effets d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-zeH-ljawHtg-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1211450,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-7-avril-2026-n2025f00818\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217111,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00818","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, dans un jugement du 7 avril 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande conjointe d\u2019homologation d\u2019un protocole...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/polina-kuzovkova-sar-Y4BxZDA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/polina-kuzovkova-sar-Y4BxZDA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/polina-kuzovkova-sar-Y4BxZDA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/polina-kuzovkova-sar-Y4BxZDA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/polina-kuzovkova-sar-Y4BxZDA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/polina-kuzovkova-sar-Y4BxZDA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493073,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-10-novembre-2025-n2024f01386\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217111,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 10 novembre 2025, n\u00b02024F01386","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des Activit\u00e9s \u00c9conomiques de Marseille, statuant le 10 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 une action en responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle relative \u00e0 des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-D22VPXUIm0o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1211418,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-7-avril-2026-n2025f00398\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217111,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00398","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille, dans une d\u00e9cision du 7 avril 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance et d\u2019action...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-34SzSSXv2Qk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-34SzSSXv2Qk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-34SzSSXv2Qk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-34SzSSXv2Qk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-34SzSSXv2Qk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-34SzSSXv2Qk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1211444,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-7-avril-2026-n2025f00817\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217111,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00817","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 7 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Marseille (chambre 07) a rendu un jugement dans une instance engag\u00e9e par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495464,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-marseille-le-2-decembre-2025-n2025r00340\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217111,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Marseille, le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b02025R00340","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, dans une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, se prononce sur une demande d\u2019expertise. Un h\u00f4tel a confi\u00e9 le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1217111","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1217111"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1217111\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9676"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1217111"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1217111"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1217111"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}