{"id":1217112,"date":"2026-06-29T16:38:10","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T14:38:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/"},"modified":"2026-06-29T16:38:10","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T14:38:10","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-de-la-recevabilite-de-laction-du-prestataire\">I. L\u2019affirmation de la recevabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019action du prestataire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lecartement-des-fins-de-non-recevoir-procedurales\">A. L\u2019\u00e9cartement des fins de non-recevoir proc\u00e9durales<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-caracterisation-de-la-qualite-de-cocontractant-par-lapparence\">B. La caract\u00e9risation de la qualit\u00e9 de cocontractant par l\u2019apparence<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-confirmation-de-lobligation-de-paiement-a-la-charge-du-debiteur-apparent\">II. La confirmation de l\u2019obligation de paiement \u00e0 la charge du d\u00e9biteur apparent<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-labsence-de-novation-ou-de-substitution-de-debiteur-liberatoire\">A. L\u2019absence de novation ou de substitution de d\u00e9biteur lib\u00e9ratoire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-limitee-des-elements-extrinseques-au-contrat-initial\">B. La port\u00e9e limit\u00e9e des \u00e9l\u00e9ments extrins\u00e8ques au contrat initial<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 8 avril 2026, le tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a rendu un jugement dans un litige opposant deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s commerciales. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse, prestataire de services de communication digitale et de production audiovisuelle, r\u00e9clamait le paiement du solde de ses prestations \u00e0 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 qu\u2019elle estimait \u00eatre sa cocontractante. Cette derni\u00e8re refusait de payer, soutenant qu\u2019elle n\u2019\u00e9tait pas li\u00e9e contractuellement et qu\u2019un protocole transactionnel avec une autre soci\u00e9t\u00e9 du groupe l\u2019avait lib\u00e9r\u00e9e. La question de droit soumise au tribunal \u00e9tait de d\u00e9terminer si la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse pouvait \u00eatre tenue au paiement en qualit\u00e9 de cocontractante apparente, en d\u00e9pit de l\u2019existence d\u2019un accord avec une entit\u00e9 distincte et de modifications de facturation. Par son jugement, le tribunal a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la demande recevable et bien fond\u00e9e, condamnant la d\u00e9fenderesse \u00e0 verser la somme de 49 100 euros avec int\u00e9r\u00eats et frais.<\/p>\n<p>Il s\u2019agira d\u2019examiner d\u2019abord les conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019action retenues par le tribunal (I), puis la confirmation de l\u2019obligation de paiement sur le fondement de l\u2019apparence contractuelle (II).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-de-la-recevabilite-de-laction-du-prestataire\">I. L\u2019affirmation de la recevabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019action du prestataire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lecartement-des-fins-de-non-recevoir-procedurales\">A. L\u2019\u00e9cartement des fins de non-recevoir proc\u00e9durales<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a d\u00e9but\u00e9 son raisonnement par une fin de non-recevoir soulev\u00e9e par la d\u00e9fenderesse, qui invoquait son absence de qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 d\u00e9fendre et l\u2019autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e d\u2019une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 8 novembre 2024. Cette ordonnance avait condamn\u00e9 une autre soci\u00e9t\u00e9 du groupe au paiement provisionnel d\u2019une somme correspondant \u00e0 la cr\u00e9ance litigieuse. Le tribunal rappelle que, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 488 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, <em>&#8221; l&#8217;ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 n&#8217;a pas, au principal, l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e &#8220;<\/em>. Il \u00e9carte donc cette exception, car le r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 ne pr\u00e9juge pas du fond du droit. Sur le d\u00e9faut de qualit\u00e9, le tribunal observe que la demanderesse invoque des \u00e9l\u00e9ments pr\u00e9cis : acceptation du devis par un dirigeant de la d\u00e9fenderesse, paiement de plusieurs factures par cette derni\u00e8re, et implication directe dans l\u2019ex\u00e9cution. Ces faits, m\u00eame contest\u00e9s, rel\u00e8vent de l\u2019examen du bien-fond\u00e9 et non de la recevabilit\u00e9. La fin de non-recevoir est rejet\u00e9e, le tribunal jugeant que la contestation <em>&#8221; porte sur le bien-fond\u00e9 de la demande et non sur sa recevabilit\u00e9 &#8220;<\/em>. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la distinction classique entre les conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 et le fond du droit.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-caracterisation-de-la-qualite-de-cocontractant-par-lapparence\">B. La caract\u00e9risation de la qualit\u00e9 de cocontractant par l\u2019apparence<\/h3>\n<p>Sur le fond, le tribunal retient que la d\u00e9fenderesse a cr\u00e9\u00e9 une apparence l\u00e9gitime de cocontractante. Le devis du 2 mars 2023 a \u00e9t\u00e9 accept\u00e9 par son dirigeant, sans pr\u00e9cision d\u2019une intervention pour le compte exclusif d\u2019un tiers. Le tribunal souligne que <em>&#8221; lorsqu&#8217;un devis est accept\u00e9 par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 identifi\u00e9e sans pr\u00e9cision sur une intervention pour le compte exclusif d&#8217;un tiers, le prestataire est fond\u00e9 \u00e0 consid\u00e9rer cette soci\u00e9t\u00e9 comme son cocontractant &#8220;<\/em>. Cette apparence est renforc\u00e9e par le comportement ult\u00e9rieur : plusieurs factures libell\u00e9es au nom de la d\u00e9fenderesse ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9gl\u00e9es sans r\u00e9serve. Ces paiements constituent un <em>&#8221; indice s\u00e9rieux de la reconnaissance de l&#8217;obligation de paiement &#8220;<\/em>. Le tribunal \u00e9carte l\u2019argument d\u2019une erreur de facturation, estimant qu\u2019une erreur ne peut \u00eatre retenue que si le prestataire avait connaissance du d\u00e9biteur r\u00e9el et avait accept\u00e9 de traiter exclusivement avec lui. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la d\u00e9fenderesse a entretenu une apparence sur laquelle la demanderesse \u00e9tait fond\u00e9e \u00e0 s\u2019appuyer. Cette analyse s\u2019inscrit dans la th\u00e9orie de l\u2019apparence, qui permet de prot\u00e9ger la confiance l\u00e9gitime du cocontractant.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-confirmation-de-lobligation-de-paiement-a-la-charge-du-debiteur-apparent\">II. La confirmation de l\u2019obligation de paiement \u00e0 la charge du d\u00e9biteur apparent<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-labsence-de-novation-ou-de-substitution-de-debiteur-liberatoire\">A. L\u2019absence de novation ou de substitution de d\u00e9biteur lib\u00e9ratoire<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal examine les arguments tendant \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer que la d\u00e9fenderesse aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 lib\u00e9r\u00e9e de son obligation. D\u2019une part, les modifications ult\u00e9rieures de facturation au profit d\u2019autres soci\u00e9t\u00e9s du groupe ne caract\u00e9risent pas une substitution d\u00e9finitive de d\u00e9biteur. Le tribunal rappelle que <em>&#8221; la refacturation constitue une modalit\u00e9 d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution ou d&#8217;organisation comptable qui ne produit pas d&#8217;effet lib\u00e9ratoire en l&#8217;absence d&#8217;une volont\u00e9 non \u00e9quivoque du cr\u00e9ancier de renoncer \u00e0 ses droits contre le d\u00e9biteur initial &#8220;<\/em>. La demanderesse n\u2019a pas accept\u00e9 une telle renonciation. D\u2019autre part, la conclusion d\u2019un protocole transactionnel entre la demanderesse et deux autres soci\u00e9t\u00e9s du groupe, dont la d\u00e9fenderesse n\u2019\u00e9tait pas partie, ne saurait lib\u00e9rer cette derni\u00e8re. Le tribunal affirme que <em>&#8221; ce type d&#8217;accord ne produit effet qu&#8217;entre les parties qui l&#8217;ont sign\u00e9 et ne saurait lib\u00e9rer un tiers non signataire des obligations qu&#8217;il a contract\u00e9es ant\u00e9rieurement, sauf clause expresse en ce sens &#8220;<\/em>. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 l\u2019exigence d\u2019un consentement clair du cr\u00e9ancier \u00e0 la novation, comme le rappelle la jurisprudence r\u00e9cente : <em>&#8221; la preuve de ce consentement ne peut r\u00e9sulter de la seule acceptation du b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de la stipulation &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/695f68cfcdc6046d47987135\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cass. 3e civ., 8 janv. 2026, n\u00b024-11.645)<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-limitee-des-elements-extrinseques-au-contrat-initial\">B. La port\u00e9e limit\u00e9e des \u00e9l\u00e9ments extrins\u00e8ques au contrat initial<\/h3>\n<p>Enfin, le tribunal \u00e9carte les autres moyens de d\u00e9fense. La destination \u00e9conomique des prestations, qui profitait \u00e0 d\u2019autres soci\u00e9t\u00e9s du groupe, est inopposable au prestataire. Le tribunal juge que <em>&#8221; les relations internes entre soci\u00e9t\u00e9s li\u00e9es, la r\u00e9partition des charges ou l&#8217;identification de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitante d&#8217;un concept ne sont pas opposables au prestataire pour modifier l&#8217;identit\u00e9 du d\u00e9biteur contractuel &#8220;<\/em>. De m\u00eame, les contestations sur l\u2019ach\u00e8vement des prestations sont rejet\u00e9es, la d\u00e9fenderesse ayant pay\u00e9 sans r\u00e9serves ant\u00e9rieures. L\u2019existence d\u2019une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 condamnant une autre soci\u00e9t\u00e9 ne remet pas en cause l\u2019engagement initial. Le tribunal consid\u00e8re que la demanderesse, en agissant contre d\u2019autres soci\u00e9t\u00e9s du groupe, n\u2019a pas renonc\u00e9 implicitement \u00e0 ses droits contre la d\u00e9fenderesse. Cette approche est coh\u00e9rente avec la r\u00e8gle selon laquelle un tiers \u00e0 un contrat peut se voir opposer les conditions et limites de la responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle, mais ne peut lib\u00e9rer un d\u00e9biteur sans son accord <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6942530e61c46255e1714e80\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cass. com., 17 d\u00e9c. 2025, n\u00b024-20.154)<\/a><\/strong>. En cons\u00e9quence, le tribunal condamne la d\u00e9fenderesse au paiement du solde impay\u00e9, assorti des int\u00e9r\u00eats au taux l\u00e9gal et d\u2019une indemnit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/695f68cfcdc6046d47987135\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Troisi\u00e8me chambre civile, le 8 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-11.645<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6942530e61c46255e1714e80\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Chambre commerciale financi\u00e8re et \u00e9conomique, le 17 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b024-20.154<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410758\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 488 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   L&#8217;ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 n&#8217;a pas, au principal, l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>    Elle ne peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9e ou rapport\u00e9e en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 qu&#8217;en cas de circonstances nouvelles.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 8 avril 2026, le tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a rendu un jugement dans un litige opposant deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s commerciales. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4915,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69d78b7bcdc6046d47a28e46","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69d78b7bcdc6046d47a28e46","_kj_judilibre_id":"69d78b7bcdc6046d47a28e46","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Chamb\u00e9ry","_kj_chambre":"Rendu de d\u00e9cisions","_kj_rg":"2025F00196","_kj_date":"2026-04-08","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1217112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 8 avril 2026, le tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a rendu un jugement dans un litige opposant deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s commerciales. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse,...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 8 avril 2026, le tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a rendu un jugement dans un litige opposant deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s commerciales. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse,...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T14:38:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3872\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2592\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T14:38:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1305,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T14:38:10+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T14:38:10+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 8 avril 2026, le tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a rendu un jugement dans un litige opposant deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s commerciales. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse,...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3872,\"height\":2592},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 8 avril 2026, le tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a rendu un jugement dans un litige opposant deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s commerciales. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse,...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196","og_description":"Le 8 avril 2026, le tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a rendu un jugement dans un litige opposant deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s commerciales. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse,...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T14:38:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3872,"height":2592,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196","datePublished":"2026-06-29T14:38:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/"},"wordCount":1305,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-29T14:38:10+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T14:38:10+00:00","description":"Le 8 avril 2026, le tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a rendu un jugement dans un litige opposant deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s commerciales. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse,...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp","width":3872,"height":2592},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00196\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00196"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andrian-rubinskiy-2g3yyKNaMxw-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-56CQ","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1217036,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025r00051\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217112,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025R00051","author":"Kohen","date":"29 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par une ordonnance du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025R00051), le pr\u00e9sident du tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation du d\u00e9lai...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/viktor-hesse-qPwYg5s1Fs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/viktor-hesse-qPwYg5s1Fs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/viktor-hesse-qPwYg5s1Fs-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/viktor-hesse-qPwYg5s1Fs-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/viktor-hesse-qPwYg5s1Fs-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/viktor-hesse-qPwYg5s1Fs-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201576,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-3-avril-2026-n2026r00028\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217112,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02026R00028","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. L\u2019AFFIRMATION D\u2019UN POUVOIR DISCR\u00c9TIONNAIRE DU JUGE DES R\u00c9F\u00c9R\u00c9S EN MATI\u00c8RE DE JONCTION D\u2019INSTANCES A. Le constat d\u2019un lien objectif entre les litiges Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1217113,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-chambery-le-8-avril-2026-n2025f00382\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217112,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00382","author":"Kohen","date":"29 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 8 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Chamb\u00e9ry a rendu un jugement (n\u00b02025F00382) statuant sur le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance d\u2019une banque, demanderesse,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-VcLOsHAk_SA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-VcLOsHAk_SA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-VcLOsHAk_SA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-VcLOsHAk_SA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-VcLOsHAk_SA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-VcLOsHAk_SA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1227515,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-lille-metropole-le-9-avril-2026-n2025030344\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217112,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Lille M\u00e9tropole, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02025030344","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 rendue le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Lille M\u00e9tropole a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 (la demanderesse) \u00e0 l\u2019encontre...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-FZXDalHMmRM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-FZXDalHMmRM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-FZXDalHMmRM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-FZXDalHMmRM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-FZXDalHMmRM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-FZXDalHMmRM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1204978,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-rouen-le-7-avril-2026-n2026003374\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217112,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Rouen, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02026003374","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. L'APPRECIATION JUDICIAIRE DE L'ETAT DE CESSATION DES PAIEMENTS A. La caract\u00e9risation de l'imp\u00e9cuniosit\u00e9 au regard de l'actif disponible Le tribunal de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-hURFShgggjI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-hURFShgggjI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-hURFShgggjI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-hURFShgggjI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-hURFShgggjI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-hURFShgggjI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1204945,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-rouen-le-7-avril-2026-n2026002535\/","url_meta":{"origin":1217112,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Rouen, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02026002535","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 7 avril 2026, le tribunal de commerce de Rouen, statuant en chambre du conseil, a rendu un jugement sur une demande de prorogation du d\u00e9lai de d\u00e9p\u00f4t de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Xp2cnkaRwlw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Xp2cnkaRwlw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Xp2cnkaRwlw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Xp2cnkaRwlw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Xp2cnkaRwlw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-Xp2cnkaRwlw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1217112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1217112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1217112\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4915"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1217112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1217112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1217112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}