{"id":1218427,"date":"2026-06-29T23:57:56","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T21:57:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T00:06:56","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T22:06:56","slug":"cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/00492"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-sanction-de-la-meconnaissance-du-principe-du-contradictoire-par-le-premier-\">I. La sanction de la m\u00e9connaissance du principe du contradictoire par le premier juge<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-releve-doffice-irregulier-dune-fin-de-non-recevoir\">A. Le relev\u00e9 d&#8217;office irr\u00e9gulier d&#8217;une fin de non-recevoir<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lannulation-du-jugement-et-le-recours-a-levocation\">B. L&#8217;annulation du jugement et le recours \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9vocation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-laffirmation-de-la-recevabilite-de-la-seconde-action-en-paiement\">II. L&#8217;affirmation de la recevabilit\u00e9 de la seconde action en paiement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-distinction-des-demandes-malgre-lidentite-de-contrat-et-de-parties\">A. La distinction des demandes malgr\u00e9 l&#8217;identit\u00e9 de contrat et de parties<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-de-la-solution-sur-loffice-du-juge-dappel-apres-evocation\">B. La port\u00e9e de la solution sur l&#8217;office du juge d&#8217;appel apr\u00e8s \u00e9vocation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un arr\u00eat du 28 avril 2026, la Cour d&#8217;appel de Reims (Chambre de la famille et des contentieux de la protection, n\u00b0 25\/00492) \u00e9tait confront\u00e9e \u00e0 la d\u00e9licate articulation entre le principe du contradictoire et le relev\u00e9 d&#8217;office d&#8217;une fin de non-recevoir, ainsi qu&#8217;\u00e0 la port\u00e9e de l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e en mati\u00e8re de demandes successives.<\/p>\n<p>Le 23 juillet 2019, une banque consentait \u00e0 un emprunteur un cr\u00e9dit \u00e9tudiant de 15 000 euros. Apr\u00e8s plusieurs impay\u00e9s, la banque pronon\u00e7ait la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme et assignait l&#8217;emprunteur en paiement. Par un premier jugement du 9 septembre 2024, le juge des contentieux de la protection condamnait l&#8217;emprunteur \u00e0 verser 1 867,45 euros au titre du pr\u00eat \u00e9tudiant. La banque, invoquant une erreur mat\u00e9rielle sur le montant r\u00e9clam\u00e9, assignait \u00e0 nouveau l&#8217;emprunteur pour obtenir le paiement de 5 793,03 euros, correspondant au solde de la m\u00eame cr\u00e9ance. Par un jugement du 10 mars 2025, le m\u00eame juge d\u00e9clarait cette nouvelle action irrecevable en raison de l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e attach\u00e9e au premier jugement, et ce sans avoir pr\u00e9alablement invit\u00e9 les parties \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter leurs observations sur ce moyen relev\u00e9 d&#8217;office. La banque interjetait appel.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit centrale portait sur la validit\u00e9 du jugement ayant soulev\u00e9 d&#8217;office une fin de non-recevoir sans respecter le principe de la contradiction, et, apr\u00e8s annulation, sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d&#8217;une seconde action en paiement fond\u00e9e sur le m\u00eame contrat mais pour un montant diff\u00e9rent. La cour d&#8217;appel annule le jugement d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 pour violation du contradictoire, et, \u00e9voquant l&#8217;affaire, d\u00e9clare la nouvelle demande recevable, condamnant l&#8217;emprunteur au paiement de 5 540,43 euros.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;arr\u00eat comment\u00e9 pr\u00e9sente un double int\u00e9r\u00eat. Il rappelle d&#8217;abord la rigueur proc\u00e9durale impos\u00e9e au juge qui entend soulever d&#8217;office un moyen, sanctionn\u00e9e par l&#8217;annulation du jugement (I). Il pr\u00e9cise ensuite les conditions de l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e, en admettant la recevabilit\u00e9 d&#8217;une seconde demande lorsque l&#8217;objet de celle-ci n&#8217;est pas identique \u00e0 la premi\u00e8re (II).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-sanction-de-la-meconnaissance-du-principe-du-contradictoire-par-le-premier-\">I. La sanction de la m\u00e9connaissance du principe du contradictoire par le premier juge<\/h2>\n<p>La cour d&#8217;appel consacre la premi\u00e8re partie de sa motivation \u00e0 la nullit\u00e9 du jugement, fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 commise par le juge des contentieux de la protection. Le relev\u00e9 d&#8217;office d&#8217;une fin de non-recevoir sans d\u00e9bat contradictoire est censur\u00e9, la cour rappelant les exigences de l&#8217;article 16 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-releve-doffice-irregulier-dune-fin-de-non-recevoir\">A. Le relev\u00e9 d&#8217;office irr\u00e9gulier d&#8217;une fin de non-recevoir<\/h3>\n<p>Le premier juge avait soulev\u00e9 d&#8217;office la fin de non-recevoir tir\u00e9e de l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e pour d\u00e9clarer irrecevable l&#8217;action de la banque. Il ne pouvait, selon l&#8217;article 16 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, fonder sa d\u00e9cision sur ce moyen sans avoir pr\u00e9alablement invit\u00e9 les parties \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter leurs observations. La cour d&#8217;appel constate express\u00e9ment que <em>&#8220;le premier juge a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la demande de la banque irrecevable tir\u00e9e de l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e sans avoir mis ce moyen dans les d\u00e9bats&#8221;<\/em>. Cette omission est constitutive d&#8217;une violation du principe de la contradiction, principe fondamental de la proc\u00e9dure civile. La jurisprudence de la Cour d&#8217;appel de Grenoble confirme cette exigence, \u00e9non\u00e7ant qu&#8217;un juge qui <em>&#8220;soulev\u00e9 d&#8217;office la fin de non recevoir tir\u00e9 du d\u00e9faut de qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 agir sans inviter la Sci S\u00e9r\u00e9nit\u00e9 \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter ses observations sur ce point. Il a ainsi viol\u00e9 le principe du contradictoire&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a6f694ce90ac879b580502\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Grenoble, le 6 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/02047)<\/a><\/strong>. Le d\u00e9faut de respect de cette formalit\u00e9 substantielle entra\u00eene l&#8217;irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du jugement.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lannulation-du-jugement-et-le-recours-a-levocation\">B. L&#8217;annulation du jugement et le recours \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9vocation<\/h3>\n<p>En raison de cette irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9, la cour d&#8217;appel prononce l&#8217;annulation du jugement d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9. Elle applique l&#8217;article 562 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile qui, en cas d&#8217;annulation, lui permet d&#8217;\u00e9voquer l&#8217;affaire, c&#8217;est-\u00e0-dire de statuer sur le fond du litige. Cette facult\u00e9 d&#8217;\u00e9vocation n&#8217;est pas une obligation, mais la cour l&#8217;exerce en l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce. L&#8217;annulation pour vice de forme rend caduc le jugement de premi\u00e8re instance, et la cour se trouve investie de la pl\u00e9nitude de juridiction pour trancher la contestation. Elle peut ainsi se prononcer directement sur la recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande de la banque, sans renvoyer l&#8217;affaire devant une juridiction de premi\u00e8re instance. Cette solution, conforme \u00e0 la lettre de l&#8217;article 562, permet d&#8217;\u00e9viter un allongement inutile de la proc\u00e9dure et de statuer d\u00e9finitivement sur le litige.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-laffirmation-de-la-recevabilite-de-la-seconde-action-en-paiement\">II. L&#8217;affirmation de la recevabilit\u00e9 de la seconde action en paiement<\/h2>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s avoir annul\u00e9 le jugement et \u00e9voqu\u00e9 l&#8217;affaire, la cour d&#8217;appel examine la recevabilit\u00e9 de la demande de la banque au regard de l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e attach\u00e9e au premier jugement du 9 septembre 2024. Elle \u00e9carte cette fin de non-recevoir en op\u00e9rant une distinction fine entre les deux demandes.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-distinction-des-demandes-malgre-lidentite-de-contrat-et-de-parties\">A. La distinction des demandes malgr\u00e9 l&#8217;identit\u00e9 de contrat et de parties<\/h3>\n<p>La banque avait obtenu, par le premier jugement du 9 septembre 2024, la condamnation de l&#8217;emprunteur au paiement de 1 867,45 euros au titre du pr\u00eat \u00e9tudiant. Elle sollicitait, dans sa seconde assignation, le paiement de 5 793,03 euros pour le m\u00eame contrat. L&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e, d\u00e9finie \u00e0 l&#8217;article 1355 du code civil, exige la triple identit\u00e9 de parties, de cause et d&#8217;objet. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, les parties et la cause (le contrat de pr\u00eat) sont identiques. Cependant, la cour rel\u00e8ve que <em>&#8220;la demande de condamnation au paiement de la somme de 5 793,03 euros correspond \u00e0 une autre demande que celle d\u00e9j\u00e0 tranch\u00e9e&#8221;<\/em>. La banque justifiait avoir commis une <em>&#8220;erreur mat\u00e9rielle&#8221;<\/em> dans sa premi\u00e8re assignation, ne r\u00e9clamant qu&#8217;une partie de sa cr\u00e9ance. Ainsi, l&#8217;objet de la seconde demande est diff\u00e9rent : il ne s&#8217;agit pas de remettre en cause la premi\u00e8re condamnation, mais d&#8217;obtenir le paiement du solde de la cr\u00e9ance, qui n&#8217;avait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 inclus dans la premi\u00e8re instance. Les deux demandes ne portent donc pas sur la m\u00eame chose au sens de l&#8217;article 1355 du code civil.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-de-la-solution-sur-loffice-du-juge-dappel-apres-evocation\">B. La port\u00e9e de la solution sur l&#8217;office du juge d&#8217;appel apr\u00e8s \u00e9vocation<\/h3>\n<p>En d\u00e9clarant la demande recevable, la cour d&#8217;appel valide implicitement la possibilit\u00e9 pour un cr\u00e9ancier de fractionner sa demande en paiement, \u00e0 condition que chaque demande soit fond\u00e9e sur un objet distinct et non d\u00e9j\u00e0 jug\u00e9. Cette solution, conforme \u00e0 la r\u00e8gle selon laquelle <em>&#8220;il n&#8217;est pas tenu de pr\u00e9senter dans la m\u00eame instance toutes les demandes fond\u00e9es sur les m\u00eames faits&#8221;<\/em>, \u00e9carte le risque de litispendance ou d&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e. La Cour de cassation a d&#8217;ailleurs pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que, lorsqu&#8217;un juge envisage de relever d&#8217;office un moyen, <em>&#8220;le juge n&#8217;est pas tenu d&#8217;ordonner la r\u00e9ouverture des d\u00e9bats&#8221;<\/em> s&#8217;il a invit\u00e9 les parties \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter leurs observations par note en d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9 <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68de29625eaf3d95fe752d85\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cass. Deuxi\u00e8me chambre civile, le 2 octobre 2025, n\u00b023-10.667)<\/a><\/strong>. La cour d&#8217;appel, en statuant sur le fond, exerce pleinement son office juridictionnel apr\u00e8s \u00e9vocation. Elle condamne l&#8217;emprunteur au paiement de 5 540,43 euros, montant correspondant au solde de la cr\u00e9ance d\u00e9duction faite de la somme d\u00e9j\u00e0 obtenue par le premier jugement.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a6f694ce90ac879b580502\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Grenoble, le 6 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/02047<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68de29625eaf3d95fe752d85\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Deuxi\u00e8me chambre civile, le 2 octobre 2025, n\u00b023-10.667<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410109\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 16 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le juge doit, en toutes circonstances, faire observer et observer lui-m\u00eame le principe de la contradiction.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Il ne peut retenir, dans sa d\u00e9cision, les moyens, les explications et les documents invoqu\u00e9s ou produits par les parties que si celles-ci ont \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 m\u00eame d&#8217;en d\u00e9battre contradictoirement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Il ne peut fonder sa d\u00e9cision sur les moyens de droit qu&#8217;il a relev\u00e9s d&#8217;office sans avoir au pr\u00e9alable invit\u00e9 les parties \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter leurs observations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000048869044\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 562 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;appel d\u00e9f\u00e8re \u00e0 la cour la connaissance des chefs du dispositif de jugement qu&#8217;il critique express\u00e9ment et de ceux qui en d\u00e9pendent.<\/p>\n<p>Toutefois, la d\u00e9volution op\u00e8re pour le tout lorsque l&#8217;appel tend \u00e0 l&#8217;annulation du jugement.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032042331\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1355 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">L&#8217;autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e n&#8217;a lieu qu&#8217;\u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9gard de ce qui a fait l&#8217;objet du jugement. Il faut que la chose demand\u00e9e soit la m\u00eame ; que la demande soit fond\u00e9e sur la m\u00eame cause ; que la demande soit entre les m\u00eames parties, et form\u00e9e par elles et contre elles en la m\u00eame qualit\u00e9.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"closing\" id=\"envoyer-pieces\" style=\"margin:48px 0 36px;padding:48px 36px;text-align:center;border-radius:24px;background:radial-gradient(circle at 50% 0%,rgba(0,0,204,0.08) 0%,transparent 60%),rgba(255,255,255,0.72);border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.08);\">\n<div class=\"closing-heading\" role=\"heading\" aria-level=\"2\" style=\"font-size:clamp(30px,4vw,44px);line-height:1.18;font-weight:700;margin:0 0 18px;letter-spacing:-0.022em;color:#1B1B1B;font-family:Lato,sans-serif;\">Envoyez vos pi\u00e8ces. Recevez une <span class=\"nowrap\" style=\"white-space:nowrap;\"><span class=\"tag\" style=\"display:inline-block;background:#0000CC;color:#fff;padding:2px 14px 5px;border-radius:10px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-0.005em;box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,204,.10);\">strat\u00e9gie<\/span>.<\/span><\/div>\n<p>Transmettez les pi\u00e8ces de votre dossier au cabinet. Ma\u00eetre Hassan KOHEN vous r\u00e9pond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une premi\u00e8re analyse strat\u00e9gique.<\/p>\n<div class=\"cta-row\" style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:12px;justify-content:center;margin:24px 0;\"><a class=\"cta cta-primary\" href=\"tel:+33689113445\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:#0000CC;color:#ffffff;border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;box-shadow:0 10px 30px rgba(0,0,204,0.18);\">Appeler maintenant \u2192<\/a><a class=\"cta cta-secondary\" href=\"mailto:contact@kohenavocats.com?subject=Demande%20d%27analyse\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:rgba(255,255,255,0.95);color:#1B1B1B;border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.12);border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;\">\u00c9crire au cabinet<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"promises\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);gap:14px;max-width:880px;margin:30px auto 12px;font-size:14px;color:#4A4A4A;font-weight:700;\">\n<div class=\"promise\">Premi\u00e8re analyse offerte<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">R\u00e9ponse personnelle sous 24 h<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">100 % confidentiel<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">Jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 1 Go de pi\u00e8ces<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un arr\u00eat du 28 avril 2026, la Cour d&#8217;appel de Reims (Chambre de la famille et des contentieux de la protection, n\u00b0 25\/00492) \u00e9tait confront\u00e9e \u00e0 la&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9620,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f195e3cdc6046d47ed7e15","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f195e3cdc6046d47ed7e15","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f195e3cdc6046d47ed7e15","_kj_jur":"Cour d'appel","_kj_lieu":"Reims","_kj_chambre":"Chambre-2 JCP","_kj_rg":"25\/00492","_kj_date":"2026-04-28","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6455,6454],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1218427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-dappel","category-decisions-juridiques"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour d&#039;appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/00492 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un arr\u00eat du 28 avril 2026, la Cour d&#039;appel de Reims (Chambre de la famille et des contentieux de la protection, n\u00b0 25\/00492) \u00e9tait confront\u00e9e \u00e0 la...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour d&#039;appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/00492\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un arr\u00eat du 28 avril 2026, la Cour d&#039;appel de Reims (Chambre de la famille et des contentieux de la protection, n\u00b0 25\/00492) \u00e9tait confront\u00e9e \u00e0 la...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T21:57:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T22:06:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2994\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3919\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00492\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T21:57:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T22:06:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1685,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cour d'appel\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00492\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00492 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T21:57:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T22:06:56+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un arr\u00eat du 28 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel de Reims (Chambre de la famille et des contentieux de la protection, n\u00b0 25\\\/00492) \u00e9tait confront\u00e9e \u00e0 la...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":2994,\"height\":3919},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00492\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour d'appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/00492 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un arr\u00eat du 28 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel de Reims (Chambre de la famille et des contentieux de la protection, n\u00b0 25\/00492) \u00e9tait confront\u00e9e \u00e0 la...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour d'appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/00492","og_description":"Par un arr\u00eat du 28 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel de Reims (Chambre de la famille et des contentieux de la protection, n\u00b0 25\/00492) \u00e9tait confront\u00e9e \u00e0 la...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T21:57:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-29T22:06:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2994,"height":3919,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/00492","datePublished":"2026-06-29T21:57:56+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-29T22:06:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/"},"wordCount":1685,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Cour d'appel","D\u00e9cisions juridiques"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/00492","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cour d'appel"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/","name":"Cour d'appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/00492 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T21:57:56+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-29T22:06:56+00:00","description":"Par un arr\u00eat du 28 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel de Reims (Chambre de la famille et des contentieux de la protection, n\u00b0 25\/00492) \u00e9tait confront\u00e9e \u00e0 la...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp","width":2994,"height":3919},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-reims-le-28-avril-2026-n25-00492\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Reims, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/00492"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/chris-barbalis-r4ytn1RdQas-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-56Y3","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":459778,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-marseille-24-11-2025-n-24ma02469\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218427,"position":0},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de MARSEILLE \u2013 24\/11\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24MA02469","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Marseille a rendu, le 24 novembre 2025, un arr\u00eat pr\u00e9cisant les conditions de r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 d'une proc\u00e9dure fiscale et...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/les-anderson-OuR30IIMHBI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/les-anderson-OuR30IIMHBI-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/les-anderson-OuR30IIMHBI-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/les-anderson-OuR30IIMHBI-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/les-anderson-OuR30IIMHBI-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/les-anderson-OuR30IIMHBI-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457029,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-douai-21-01-2026-n-25da00930\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218427,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de DOUAI \u2013 21\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25DA00930","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 21 janvier 2026, la cour administrative d'appel de Douai pr\u00e9cise les conditions d'octroi des frais irr\u00e9p\u00e9tibles pour un b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":461296,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-17-10-2025-n-24nt01851\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218427,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 17\/10\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24NT01851","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Nantes a rendu le 17 octobre 2025 un arr\u00eat concernant le refus de visa oppos\u00e9 \u00e0 un enfant mineur. Un ressortissant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457495,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-paris-09-01-2026-n-25pa03146\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218427,"position":3},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de PARIS \u2013 09\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25PA03146","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Paris a rendu, le 9 janvier 2026, un arr\u00eat pr\u00e9cisant les conditions de r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des jugements et de substitution de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-eWpBNXRHfTI-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-eWpBNXRHfTI-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-eWpBNXRHfTI-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-eWpBNXRHfTI-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-eWpBNXRHfTI-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/giammarco-boscaro-eWpBNXRHfTI-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457070,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-23-01-2026-n-25nt00851\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218427,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 23\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NT00851","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Nantes, par un arr\u00eat du 23 janvier 2026, rejette l'appel form\u00e9 contre un jugement ayant confirm\u00e9 le refus de r\u00e9tablir...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/and-machines-6IbHR1pTE0Q-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/and-machines-6IbHR1pTE0Q-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/and-machines-6IbHR1pTE0Q-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/and-machines-6IbHR1pTE0Q-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/and-machines-6IbHR1pTE0Q-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/and-machines-6IbHR1pTE0Q-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457466,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-paris-08-01-2026-n-25pa03124\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218427,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de PARIS \u2013 08\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25PA03124","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Paris a rendu le 8 janvier 2026 un arr\u00eat concernant la mise en \u0153uvre du d\u00e9sistement d'office des requ\u00e9rants. Des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1218427"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218427\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1218498,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218427\/revisions\/1218498"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9620"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1218427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1218427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1218427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}