{"id":1218523,"date":"2026-06-30T00:10:04","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T22:10:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T00:10:04","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T22:10:04","slug":"cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/01327"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-delimitation-des-responsabilites-des-constructeurs-par-la-cour-dappel\">I. La d\u00e9limitation des responsabilit\u00e9s des constructeurs par la cour d\u2019appel<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lengagement-de-la-responsabilite-contractuelle-du-maitre-duvre-pour-manquement\">A. L\u2019engagement de la responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle du ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre pour manquement \u00e0 son obligation de conseil<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lexclusion-de-la-responsabilite-decennale-de-lentreprise-et-labsence-de-faute-\">B. L\u2019exclusion de la responsabilit\u00e9 d\u00e9cennale de l\u2019entreprise et l\u2019absence de faute contractuelle<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-contraintes-procedurales-et-levaluation-du-prejudice-reparable\">II. Les contraintes proc\u00e9durales et l\u2019\u00e9valuation du pr\u00e9judice r\u00e9parable<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-rigueur-du-principe-de-linterdiction-des-demandes-nouvelles-en-appel\">A. La rigueur du principe de l\u2019interdiction des demandes nouvelles en appel<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-determination-du-prejudice-reparable-entre-forfait-contractuel-et-necessite\">B. La d\u00e9termination du pr\u00e9judice r\u00e9parable entre forfait contractuel et n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 technique<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 28 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a statu\u00e9 sur un litige opposant un ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage, exploitant un centre sportif, \u00e0 un ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre et \u00e0 une entreprise charg\u00e9e du lot n\u00b010. Le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage avait confi\u00e9 la r\u00e9alisation d\u2019un \u00e9quipement sportif \u00e0 l\u2019entreprise, sous la direction du ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre. Apr\u00e8s la r\u00e9ception des travaux, des d\u00e9sordres sont apparus : les vestiaires n\u2019\u00e9taient pas chauff\u00e9s en p\u00e9riode hivernale, et une absence de calorifugeage sur les gaines de ventilation a \u00e9t\u00e9 constat\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Saisi par le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage, le tribunal judiciaire avait, par jugement du 7 juillet 2023, partiellement fait droit \u00e0 ses demandes, mais l\u2019avait d\u00e9bout\u00e9 de certaines pr\u00e9tentions. Le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage a interjet\u00e9 appel, et l\u2019entreprise a form\u00e9 un appel incident. Le ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre a soulev\u00e9 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 des demandes dirig\u00e9es contre lui en cause d\u2019appel, tandis que l\u2019entreprise a invoqu\u00e9 une fin de non-recevoir tir\u00e9e de l\u2019absence d\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 agir de l\u2019appelant.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit centrale portait sur la d\u00e9termination des responsabilit\u00e9s respectives des constructeurs au titre de l\u2019impropri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 destination de l\u2019ouvrage et sur la recevabilit\u00e9 des pr\u00e9tentions nouvelles formul\u00e9es en appel. La cour a estim\u00e9 que l\u2019impropri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 destination r\u00e9sultait d\u2019un manquement du ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre \u00e0 son devoir de conseil, et non d\u2019un d\u00e9faut d\u2019ex\u00e9cution imputable \u00e0 l\u2019entreprise. Elle a en outre d\u00e9clar\u00e9 irrecevables les demandes du ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage dirig\u00e9es contre le ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre au titre du calorifugeage, faute d\u2019avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es en premi\u00e8re instance.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-delimitation-des-responsabilites-des-constructeurs-par-la-cour-dappel\">I. La d\u00e9limitation des responsabilit\u00e9s des constructeurs par la cour d\u2019appel<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lengagement-de-la-responsabilite-contractuelle-du-maitre-duvre-pour-manquement\">A. L\u2019engagement de la responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle du ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre pour manquement \u00e0 son obligation de conseil<\/h3>\n<p>La cour d\u2019appel a retenu que l\u2019absence de chauffage dans les vestiaires caract\u00e9risait une impropri\u00e9t\u00e9 de l\u2019ouvrage \u00e0 sa destination au sens de l\u2019article 1792 du code civil. Elle a toutefois imput\u00e9 ce dommage non \u00e0 l\u2019entreprise, dont les travaux \u00e9taient conformes au contrat r\u00e9duit, mais au ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre. Celui-ci avait propos\u00e9 la suppression des batteries thermodynamiques sans en informer le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage des cons\u00e9quences thermiques, manquant ainsi \u00e0 son obligation de conseil. La cour a estim\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;c\u2019est par cons\u00e9quent \u00e0 juste titre que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 [D] [G] invoque un manquement de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Me2co \u00e0 l\u2019obligation de conseil dont celle-ci \u00e9tait redevable \u00e0 son \u00e9gard&#8221;<\/em>. Ce faisant, elle rappelle que le devoir de conseil du ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre ne se limite pas \u00e0 la simple ex\u00e9cution des prestations command\u00e9es, mais l\u2019oblige \u00e0 \u00e9clairer le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage sur les choix techniques d\u00e9terminants. La d\u00e9cision s\u2019inscrit dans une jurisprudence constante qui fait peser sur le ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre une obligation de renseignement renforc\u00e9e, notamment lorsque le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage est un profane.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lexclusion-de-la-responsabilite-decennale-de-lentreprise-et-labsence-de-faute-\">B. L\u2019exclusion de la responsabilit\u00e9 d\u00e9cennale de l\u2019entreprise et l\u2019absence de faute contractuelle<\/h3>\n<p>\u00c0 l\u2019inverse, la cour a \u00e9cart\u00e9 toute responsabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019entreprise sur le fondement de l\u2019article 1792 du code civil. Elle a relev\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;le dommage ne trouve pas son si\u00e8ge dans les travaux r\u00e9alis\u00e9s par cette derni\u00e8re, mais r\u00e9sulte d\u2019une absence de mise en \u0153uvre d\u2019un \u00e9l\u00e9ment d\u2019\u00e9quipement, pourtant n\u00e9cessaire, d\u00e9cid\u00e9 par le ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre&#8221;<\/em>. L\u2019entreprise n\u2019ayant pas \u00e9t\u00e9 charg\u00e9e de fournir les batteries, l\u2019impropri\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 destination ne peut lui \u00eatre imput\u00e9e. La cour ajoute qu\u2019aucun manquement \u00e0 son devoir de conseil ne peut lui \u00eatre reproch\u00e9, d\u00e8s lors que l\u2019initiative de la suppression \u00e9manait du ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre, conseill\u00e9 par un sous-traitant sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9. En revanche, la cour a retenu la responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle de l\u2019entreprise pour le d\u00e9faut de calorifugeage, non apparent \u00e0 la r\u00e9ception, et l\u2019a condamn\u00e9e \u00e0 payer une somme au titre des prestations omises. Cette solution distingue nettement les deux obligations : la responsabilit\u00e9 d\u00e9cennale est limit\u00e9e aux vices affectant l\u2019ouvrage lui-m\u00eame, tandis que la responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle de droit commun s\u2019applique aux non-conformit\u00e9s d\u2019ex\u00e9cution.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-contraintes-procedurales-et-levaluation-du-prejudice-reparable\">II. Les contraintes proc\u00e9durales et l\u2019\u00e9valuation du pr\u00e9judice r\u00e9parable<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-rigueur-du-principe-de-linterdiction-des-demandes-nouvelles-en-appel\">A. La rigueur du principe de l\u2019interdiction des demandes nouvelles en appel<\/h3>\n<p>Le ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre a soulev\u00e9 l\u2019irrecevabilit\u00e9 des demandes du ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage relatives au d\u00e9faut de calorifugeage et \u00e0 la surconsommation \u00e9lectrique, au motif qu\u2019elles n\u2019avaient pas \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es en premi\u00e8re instance contre lui. La cour a fait droit \u00e0 cette exception en appliquant l\u2019article 564 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Elle a jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;l\u2019extension \u00e0 une partie, en cause d\u2019appel, d\u2019une demande qui n\u2019\u00e9tait pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e en premi\u00e8re instance qu\u2019\u00e0 l\u2019encontre d\u2019une autre partie, ne correspond pas aux pr\u00e9visions de l\u2019article 566 pr\u00e9cit\u00e9&#8221;<\/em>. Elle a ainsi d\u00e9clar\u00e9 le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage irrecevable en ses demandes contre le ma\u00eetre d\u2019\u0153uvre. Cette solution rejoint la position de la Cour d\u2019appel de Metz, selon laquelle <em>&#8220;le droit d\u2019intimer en appel tous ceux qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 parties en premi\u00e8re instance n\u2019autorise pas une partie \u00e0 former contre ceux-ci une demande non soumise au premier juge&#8221;<\/em> (CA Metz, 16 janvier 2025, n\u00b023\/00805). La cour de Dijon consacre ainsi une conception stricte de la prohibition des pr\u00e9tentions nouvelles, qui s\u2019oppose \u00e0 un simple changement de partie d\u00e9fenderesse en cause d\u2019appel.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-determination-du-prejudice-reparable-entre-forfait-contractuel-et-necessite\">B. La d\u00e9termination du pr\u00e9judice r\u00e9parable entre forfait contractuel et n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 technique<\/h3>\n<p>Sur le quantum de la r\u00e9paration, la cour a op\u00e9r\u00e9 une distinction rigoureuse. Pour le d\u00e9faut de chauffage, elle a limit\u00e9 l\u2019indemnisation \u00e0 la mise en place d\u2019une seule batterie \u00e9lectrique, d\u2019un co\u00fbt de 3 000 euros, au lieu des quatre batteries thermodynamiques r\u00e9clam\u00e9es par le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage. Elle a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que seule l\u2019absence d\u2019une batterie \u00e9tait \u00e0 l\u2019origine des d\u00e9sordres, et que la batterie \u00e9lectrique pr\u00e9conis\u00e9e par l\u2019expert \u00e9tait suffisante. Pour le calorifugeage, la cour a \u00e9cart\u00e9 l\u2019argument de l\u2019entreprise fond\u00e9 sur l\u2019article 1793 du code civil, relatif au forfait, en estimant que ce texte <em>&#8220;ne s\u2019applique nullement \u00e0 l\u2019hypoth\u00e8se d\u2019un d\u00e9faut de r\u00e9alisation par le constructeur de prestations pr\u00e9vues au contrat et factur\u00e9es au ma\u00eetre de l\u2019ouvrage&#8221;<\/em>. Elle a fix\u00e9 l\u2019indemnisation sur la base de l\u2019\u00e9valuation non contradictoire initiale de 10 750 euros, index\u00e9e, plut\u00f4t que sur les devis post\u00e9rieurs plus \u00e9lev\u00e9s. Cette approche pragmatique vise \u00e0 \u00e9viter une surindemnisation tout en tenant compte du rench\u00e9rissement des travaux.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/678f383406f4e91c5f36c4be\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Metz, le 16 janvier 2025, n\u00b023\/00805<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6864c20631953a33f9365ed7\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Besan\u00e7on, le 7 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/00067<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006443502\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1792 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Tout constructeur d&#8217;un ouvrage est responsable de plein droit, envers le ma\u00eetre ou l&#8217;acqu\u00e9reur de l&#8217;ouvrage, des dommages, m\u00eame r\u00e9sultant d&#8217;un vice du sol, qui compromettent la solidit\u00e9 de l&#8217;ouvrage ou qui, l&#8217;affectant dans l&#8217;un de ses \u00e9l\u00e9ments constitutifs ou l&#8217;un de ses \u00e9l\u00e9ments d&#8217;\u00e9quipement, le rendent impropre \u00e0 sa destination.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Une telle responsabilit\u00e9 n&#8217;a point lieu si le constructeur prouve que les dommages proviennent d&#8217;une cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000021450413\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 564 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>A peine d&#8217;irrecevabilit\u00e9 relev\u00e9e d&#8217;office, les parties ne peuvent soumettre \u00e0 la cour de nouvelles pr\u00e9tentions si ce n&#8217;est pour opposer compensation, faire \u00e9carter les pr\u00e9tentions adverses ou faire juger les questions n\u00e9es de l&#8217;intervention d&#8217;un tiers, ou de la survenance ou de la r\u00e9v\u00e9lation d&#8217;un fait.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006443573\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1793 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Lorsqu&#8217;un architecte ou un entrepreneur s&#8217;est charg\u00e9 de la construction \u00e0 forfait d&#8217;un b\u00e2timent, d&#8217;apr\u00e8s un plan arr\u00eat\u00e9 et convenu avec le propri\u00e9taire du sol, il ne peut demander aucune augmentation de prix, ni sous le pr\u00e9texte de l&#8217;augmentation de la main-d&#8217;oeuvre ou des mat\u00e9riaux, ni sous celui de changements ou d&#8217;augmentations faits sur ce plan, si ces changements ou augmentations n&#8217;ont pas \u00e9t\u00e9 autoris\u00e9s par \u00e9crit, et le prix convenu avec le propri\u00e9taire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 28 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a statu\u00e9 sur un litige opposant un ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9680,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f19faccdc6046d47ee5282","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f19faccdc6046d47ee5282","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f19faccdc6046d47ee5282","_kj_jur":"Cour d'appel","_kj_lieu":"Dijon","_kj_chambre":"1re chambre civile","_kj_rg":"23\/01327","_kj_date":"2026-04-28","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6455,6454],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1218523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-dappel","category-decisions-juridiques"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour d&#039;appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/01327 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 28 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a statu\u00e9 sur un litige opposant un ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage,...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour d&#039;appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/01327\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 28 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a statu\u00e9 sur un litige opposant un ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage,...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T22:10:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4079\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"6119\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\\\/01327\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T22:10:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1572,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cour d'appel\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\\\/01327\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T22:10:04+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\\\/01327 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T22:10:04+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 28 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a statu\u00e9 sur un litige opposant un ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage,...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4079,\"height\":6119},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\\\/01327\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour d'appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/01327 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 28 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a statu\u00e9 sur un litige opposant un ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage,...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour d'appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/01327","og_description":"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 28 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a statu\u00e9 sur un litige opposant un ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage,...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T22:10:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4079,"height":6119,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/01327","datePublished":"2026-06-29T22:10:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/"},"wordCount":1572,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Cour d'appel","D\u00e9cisions juridiques"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/01327","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cour d'appel"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-29T22:10:04+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/","name":"Cour d'appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/01327 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T22:10:04+00:00","description":"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 28 avril 2026, la premi\u00e8re chambre civile de la Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a statu\u00e9 sur un litige opposant un ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage,...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp","width":4079,"height":6119},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-dijon-le-28-avril-2026-n23-01327\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Dijon, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/01327"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/george-dagerotip-8CdA2foBDnk-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-56ZB","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":441041,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-20-866\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218523,"position":0},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-20.866","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Il r\u00e9sulte de l'article 1147 du code civil, dans sa r\u00e9daction ant\u00e9rieure \u00e0 celle issue de l'ordonnance n\u00b02010-131 du 10 f\u00e9vrier 2016, que l'organisateur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-plv4_0R9-dc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-plv4_0R9-dc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-plv4_0R9-dc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-plv4_0R9-dc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-plv4_0R9-dc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-plv4_0R9-dc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1205304,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-23-avril-2026-n24-01196\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218523,"position":1},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 23 avril 2026, n\u00b024\/01196","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour d'appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union, dans un arr\u00eat du 23 avril 2026 (n\u00b024\/01196), \u00e9tait saisie d'un litige opposant une salari\u00e9e \u00e0 une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jean-baptiste-d-1cEU-jXHCuM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1220121,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n21-13156\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218523,"position":2},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b021\/13156","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 28 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (Chambre 1-1, n\u00b021\/13156) s'est prononc\u00e9e sur l'\u00e9tendue de la responsabilit\u00e9 d'un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201556,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-pau-le-3-avril-2026-n2024004424\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218523,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Pau, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02024004424","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un jugement du 1er octobre 2024, le tribunal de commerce de Pau a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire d'une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exer\u00e7ant une activit\u00e9 de pose, mise...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456885,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01037\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218523,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01037","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441309,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-11-095\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218523,"position":5},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-11.095","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour de cassation op\u00e8re un contr\u00f4le de la qualification juridique des faits. Elle censure partiellement un arr\u00eat d'appel pour d\u00e9faut de base l\u00e9gale. La...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/wesley-tingey-kjXbfNTPMHY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1218523"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218523\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9680"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1218523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1218523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1218523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}