{"id":1218835,"date":"2026-06-30T00:55:24","date_gmt":"2026-06-29T22:55:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T00:55:24","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T22:55:24","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/06190"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-le-perfectionnement-du-desistement-dinstance-par-labsence-dopposition-du-defen\">I. Le perfectionnement du d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance par l\u2019absence d\u2019opposition du d\u00e9fendeur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lapplication-des-articles-394-et-395-du-code-de-procedure-civile\">A. L\u2019application des articles 394 et 395 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-defense-au-fond-comme-condition-implicite-dacceptation\">B. L\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense au fond comme condition implicite d\u2019acceptation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-consequences-accessoires-du-desistement-et-la-repartition-des-frais\">II. Les cons\u00e9quences accessoires du d\u00e9sistement et la r\u00e9partition des frais<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-charge-des-depens-fondee-sur-la-cause-du-desistement\">A. La charge des d\u00e9pens fond\u00e9e sur la cause du d\u00e9sistement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-rejet-de-la-demande-fondee-sur-larticle-700-du-code-de-procedure-civile\">B. Le rejet de la demande fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/06190), a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance intervenu dans un litige locatif. Le demandeur, bailleur, avait assign\u00e9 la d\u00e9fenderesse, locataire, en r\u00e9siliation de bail et paiement d\u2019un arri\u00e9r\u00e9. Il s\u2019est d\u00e9sist\u00e9 de ses demandes apr\u00e8s avoir constat\u00e9 que la dette locative avait \u00e9t\u00e9 sold\u00e9e le 1er mai 2025, soit ant\u00e9rieurement \u00e0 la d\u00e9livrance de l\u2019assignation. La d\u00e9fenderesse, absente \u00e0 l\u2019audience, n\u2019a formul\u00e9 aucune observation. Le juge des contentieux de la protection a constat\u00e9 le d\u00e9sistement comme parfait, a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 le demandeur de sa demande au titre de l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile et l\u2019a condamn\u00e9 aux entiers d\u00e9pens. La question juridique centrale \u00e9tait celle des conditions dans lesquelles un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance peut \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme parfait lorsque le d\u00e9fendeur, bien qu\u2019absent, n\u2019a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond. La solution retenue est que l\u2019absence d\u2019observation et l\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense au fond rendent le d\u00e9sistement parfait sans acceptation expresse, mais que les cons\u00e9quences financi\u00e8res doivent \u00eatre appr\u00e9ci\u00e9es au regard de l\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-le-perfectionnement-du-desistement-dinstance-par-labsence-dopposition-du-defen\">I. Le perfectionnement du d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance par l\u2019absence d\u2019opposition du d\u00e9fendeur<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lapplication-des-articles-394-et-395-du-code-de-procedure-civile\">A. L\u2019application des articles 394 et 395 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a fond\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision sur les articles 394 et 395 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. L\u2019article 394 dispose que le demandeur peut, en toute mati\u00e8re, se d\u00e9sister de sa demande pour mettre fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance. L\u2019article 395 pr\u00e9cise que ce d\u00e9sistement n\u2019est parfait que par l\u2019acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le demandeur a manifest\u00e9 son intention de se d\u00e9sister. La d\u00e9fenderesse, bien qu\u2019absente, n\u2019avait pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ni fin de non-recevoir. Le tribunal a donc logiquement estim\u00e9 que le d\u00e9sistement \u00e9tait parfait. Cette solution s\u2019inscrit dans le droit commun de la proc\u00e9dure civile : le d\u00e9sistement unilat\u00e9ral est admis tant que le d\u00e9fendeur n\u2019a pas oppos\u00e9 de d\u00e9fense. La Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, dans un arr\u00eat du 30 avril 2025, a rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; le d\u00e9sistement n&#8217;est parfait que par l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur. Toutefois cette acceptation n&#8217;est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n&#8217;a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste &#8220;<\/em> (n\u00b021\/06828). Le jugement comment\u00e9 applique strictement cette r\u00e8gle, confirmant que l\u2019absence de comparution du d\u00e9fendeur \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 une absence de d\u00e9fense, ce qui dispense d\u2019une acceptation expresse.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-defense-au-fond-comme-condition-implicite-dacceptation\">B. L\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense au fond comme condition implicite d\u2019acceptation<\/h3>\n<p>Le raisonnement du juge repose sur une interpr\u00e9tation souple de l\u2019exigence d\u2019acceptation. En effet, la d\u00e9fenderesse n\u2019a pas comparu, mais cela n\u2019a pas fait obstacle au perfectionnement du d\u00e9sistement. Le tribunal a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que l\u2019absence d\u2019observation valait absence d\u2019opposition. Cette approche est pragmatique : elle \u00e9vite de bloquer la proc\u00e9dure par une formalit\u00e9 impossible \u00e0 remplir lorsque le d\u00e9fendeur est d\u00e9faillant. Elle est \u00e9galement conforme \u00e0 la finalit\u00e9 du d\u00e9sistement, qui est de mettre fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance sans d\u00e9bat au fond. Toutefois, on peut s\u2019interroger sur le sort d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement intervenu apr\u00e8s que le d\u00e9fendeur a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 des moyens de d\u00e9fense. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, il n\u2019y avait eu aucune d\u00e9fense, ce qui rendait la situation simple. Le juge n\u2019a pas eu \u00e0 trancher la question de l\u2019acceptation tacite. La valeur de cette d\u00e9cision est donc limit\u00e9e \u00e0 son contexte factuel, mais elle illustre la r\u00e8gle classique de l\u2019article 395.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-consequences-accessoires-du-desistement-et-la-repartition-des-frais\">II. Les cons\u00e9quences accessoires du d\u00e9sistement et la r\u00e9partition des frais<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-charge-des-depens-fondee-sur-la-cause-du-desistement\">A. La charge des d\u00e9pens fond\u00e9e sur la cause du d\u00e9sistement<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a condamn\u00e9 le demandeur aux entiers d\u00e9pens. Il a motiv\u00e9 cette d\u00e9cision en relevant que la dette locative avait \u00e9t\u00e9 sold\u00e9e avant la d\u00e9livrance de l\u2019assignation. D\u00e8s lors, le demandeur \u00e9tait \u00e0 l\u2019origine d\u2019une proc\u00e9dure devenue sans objet. L\u2019article 696 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile dispose que la partie perdante est condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens. En mati\u00e8re de d\u00e9sistement, c\u2019est g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement le demandeur qui les supporte, sauf convention contraire. Ici, le juge a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que le demandeur \u00e9tait la partie perdante au sens de l\u2019article 696, car il a introduit une action alors que sa cr\u00e9ance \u00e9tait d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9teinte. Cette solution est \u00e9quitable : elle \u00e9vite de faire peser les frais sur un d\u00e9fendeur qui n\u2019a rien \u00e0 se reprocher. La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, dans un arr\u00eat du 21 f\u00e9vrier 2025, a jug\u00e9 que la partie qui succombe peut \u00eatre condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens, mais a ajout\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ne commande pas de les condamner en application des dispositions de l&#8217;article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile en cause d&#8217;appel &#8220;<\/em> (n\u00b024\/08791). Le jugement comment\u00e9 va plus loin en liant directement la charge des d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la faute proc\u00e9durale du demandeur.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-rejet-de-la-demande-fondee-sur-larticle-700-du-code-de-procedure-civile\">B. Le rejet de la demande fond\u00e9e sur l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/h3>\n<p>Le demandeur a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bout\u00e9 de sa demande d\u2019indemnit\u00e9 sur le fondement de l\u2019article 700. Le juge a pris en compte l\u2019\u00e9quit\u00e9 et la situation \u00e9conomique des parties. Le fait que la dette f\u00fbt d\u00e9j\u00e0 sold\u00e9e avant l\u2019assignation a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9terminant : le demandeur ne pouvait pr\u00e9tendre \u00e0 une indemnit\u00e9 alors qu\u2019il avait lui-m\u00eame provoqu\u00e9 inutilement le proc\u00e8s. La d\u00e9fenderesse, absente, n\u2019a pas formul\u00e9 de demande reconventionnelle. Le rejet est donc logique. Cette partie de la d\u00e9cision rappelle que l\u2019article 700 est une facult\u00e9 et non une obligation pour le juge. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine du premier juge ne peut \u00eatre censur\u00e9e que pour erreur manifeste. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le motif tir\u00e9 de l\u2019ant\u00e9riorit\u00e9 du paiement justifie pleinement le rejet. La port\u00e9e de ce point est essentiellement factuelle : chaque esp\u00e8ce sera appr\u00e9ci\u00e9e en fonction des circonstances du d\u00e9sistement.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6813085a046d639136715cae\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2025, n\u00b021\/06828<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b96846262cbecf7684963c\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 21 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/08791<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410619\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 394 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le demandeur peut, en toute mati\u00e8re, se d\u00e9sister de sa demande en vue de mettre fin \u00e0 l&#8217;instance.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410620\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 395 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Le d\u00e9sistement n&#8217;est parfait que par l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur.<\/p>\n<p>    Toutefois, l&#8217;acceptation n&#8217;est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n&#8217;a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042941174\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 696 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La partie perdante est condamn\u00e9e aux d\u00e9pens, \u00e0 moins que le juge, par d\u00e9cision motiv\u00e9e, n&#8217;en mette la totalit\u00e9 ou une fraction \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une autre partie.<\/p>\n<p>Les conditions dans lesquelles il peut \u00eatre mis \u00e0 la charge d&#8217;une partie qui b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle tout ou partie des d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance sont fix\u00e9es par les dispositions de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 et du d\u00e9cret n\u00b0 2020-1717 du 28 d\u00e9cembre 2020.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/06190), a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance intervenu dans un litige&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9613,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cc11edcdc6046d47a6e760","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cc11edcdc6046d47a6e760","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cc11edcdc6046d47a6e760","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Lille","_kj_chambre":"TPRX","_kj_rg":"25\/06190","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1218835","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/06190 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/06190), a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance intervenu dans un litige...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/06190\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/06190), a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance intervenu dans un litige...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-29T22:55:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6240\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/06190\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T22:55:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1586,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/06190\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-29T22:55:24+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/06190 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-29T22:55:24+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\\\/06190), a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance intervenu dans un litige...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6240,\"height\":4160},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/06190\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/06190 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/06190), a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance intervenu dans un litige...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/06190","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/06190), a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance intervenu dans un litige...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-29T22:55:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6240,"height":4160,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/06190","datePublished":"2026-06-29T22:55:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/"},"wordCount":1586,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/06190","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-29T22:55:24+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/06190 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-29T22:55:24+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/06190), a eu \u00e0 conna\u00eetre d\u2019un d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance intervenu dans un litige...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp","width":6240,"height":4160},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-06190\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/06190"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/andrej-lisakov-KkjNOCBD6HQ-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-574D","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1218826,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00395\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218835,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00395","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, statuant en qualit\u00e9 de juge de l'ex\u00e9cution le 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/00395), \u00e9tait saisi d'une demande de d\u00e9lais pour quitter...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493130,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-7-novembre-2025-n23-01634\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218835,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 7 novembre 2025, n\u00b023\/01634","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lille, statuant \u00e0 juge unique le 7 novembre 2025, se prononce sur un recours en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accident du travail. L\u2019employeur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/louis-paulin-SYJrwRyI51E-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491008,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-18-novembre-2025-n25-01267\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218835,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 18 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01267","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lille, statuant en mati\u00e8re sociale, a rendu un jugement le 18 novembre 2025. L\u2019affaire concernait une opposition form\u00e9e contre...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/leonhard-niederwimmer-GOqi8yEDEsE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/leonhard-niederwimmer-GOqi8yEDEsE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/leonhard-niederwimmer-GOqi8yEDEsE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/leonhard-niederwimmer-GOqi8yEDEsE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/leonhard-niederwimmer-GOqi8yEDEsE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/leonhard-niederwimmer-GOqi8yEDEsE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496066,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-2-decembre-2025-n25-12652\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218835,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b025\/12652","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lille, statuant en juge de la mise en \u00e9tat, constate la p\u00e9remption de l'instance le 20 novembre 2024. L'affaire opposait une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ionut-dobre-nnlVXi1lp3k-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ionut-dobre-nnlVXi1lp3k-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ionut-dobre-nnlVXi1lp3k-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ionut-dobre-nnlVXi1lp3k-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ionut-dobre-nnlVXi1lp3k-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/ionut-dobre-nnlVXi1lp3k-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495994,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-2-decembre-2025-n25-01521\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218835,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01521","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lille, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, a examin\u00e9 une demande en paiement de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9. Le syndicat,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-RwwD1cmvyC0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-RwwD1cmvyC0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-RwwD1cmvyC0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-RwwD1cmvyC0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-RwwD1cmvyC0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-RwwD1cmvyC0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1223526,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-lille-metropole-le-8-avril-2026-n2025015334\/","url_meta":{"origin":1218835,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Lille M\u00e9tropole, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025015334","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par exploit du 17 juin 2025, deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s ont assign\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me soci\u00e9t\u00e9 en paiement devant le Tribunal de commerce de Lille M\u00e9tropole. L\u2019affaire a...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/feyza-yildirim-dFgyns8DMIE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/feyza-yildirim-dFgyns8DMIE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/feyza-yildirim-dFgyns8DMIE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/feyza-yildirim-dFgyns8DMIE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/feyza-yildirim-dFgyns8DMIE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/feyza-yildirim-dFgyns8DMIE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218835","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1218835"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218835\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9613"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1218835"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1218835"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1218835"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}