{"id":1220120,"date":"2026-06-30T07:56:20","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T05:56:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T07:56:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T05:56:20","slug":"cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/05638"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-une-opposition-soumise-a-un-strict-formalisme-probatoire\">I. Une opposition soumise \u00e0 un strict formalisme probatoire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-charge-de-la-preuve-du-respect-du-delai-legal-dopposition\">A. La charge de la preuve du respect du d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal d&#8217;opposition<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-rigoureuse-des-elements-de-preuve-par-la-cour\">B. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation rigoureuse des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve par la cour<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-lexigence-probatoire-en-matiere-de-recouvrement-dallocations\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019exigence probatoire en mati\u00e8re de recouvrement d\u2019allocations<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-confirmation-dun-formalisme-protecteur-pour-lorganisme-creancier\">A. La confirmation d\u2019un formalisme protecteur pour l\u2019organisme cr\u00e9ancier<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-interrogations-sur-lequilibre-entre-protection-du-creancier-et-droits-du-d\">B. Les interrogations sur l\u2019\u00e9quilibre entre protection du cr\u00e9ancier et droits du d\u00e9biteur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>L&#8217;arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, chambre 1-1, le 28 avril 2026, porte sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d&#8217;une opposition \u00e0 une contrainte d\u00e9livr\u00e9e pour le recouvrement d&#8217;un trop-per\u00e7u d&#8217;allocations. L&#8217;appelante a form\u00e9 opposition \u00e0 l&#8217;encontre d&#8217;une contrainte qui lui avait \u00e9t\u00e9 signifi\u00e9e le 31 janvier 2023 par proc\u00e8s-verbal de commissaire de justice d\u00e9pos\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00e9tude. Elle soutenait avoir adress\u00e9 sa lettre d&#8217;opposition par recommand\u00e9 le 3 f\u00e9vrier 2023 et produisait un ticket de d\u00e9p\u00f4t dat\u00e9 du 14 f\u00e9vrier 2023. L&#8217;organisme de recouvrement concluait \u00e0 l&#8217;irrecevabilit\u00e9 de l&#8217;opposition, faute de preuve certaine de l&#8217;envoi dans le d\u00e9lai de quinze jours suivant la signification. Par ordonnance, le juge de la mise en \u00e9tat avait d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l&#8217;opposition irrecevable. L&#8217;appelante a interjet\u00e9 appel de cette d\u00e9cision. La question de droit soumise \u00e0 la cour \u00e9tait de d\u00e9terminer si l&#8217;opposant \u00e0 une contrainte peut rapporter la preuve du d\u00e9p\u00f4t de sa lettre recommand\u00e9e dans le d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal par la seule production d&#8217;un ticket de d\u00e9p\u00f4t non confirm\u00e9 par un accus\u00e9 de r\u00e9ception ou un suivi postal. La Cour d&#8217;appel a confirm\u00e9 l&#8217;ordonnance d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9e, jugeant que le simple ticket produit par l&#8217;appelante, non accompagn\u00e9 d&#8217;une confirmation de d\u00e9p\u00f4t \u00e9lectronique ou d&#8217;un avis de r\u00e9ception, ne constitue pas une preuve suffisante du d\u00e9p\u00f4t effectif de la lettre dans le d\u00e9lai de quinze jours. Elle en a d\u00e9duit que l&#8217;opposition \u00e9tait irrecevable comme form\u00e9e hors d\u00e9lais, et a rejet\u00e9 l&#8217;ensemble des pr\u00e9tentions de l&#8217;appelante.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-une-opposition-soumise-a-un-strict-formalisme-probatoire\">I. Une opposition soumise \u00e0 un strict formalisme probatoire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-charge-de-la-preuve-du-respect-du-delai-legal-dopposition\">A. La charge de la preuve du respect du d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal d&#8217;opposition<\/h3>\n<p>La Cour d&#8217;appel rappelle que, selon l&#8217;article R. 5426-22 du code du travail, l&#8217;opposition \u00e0 contrainte doit \u00eatre form\u00e9e dans les quinze jours suivant sa notification et qu\u2019<em>&#8220;il appartient \u00e0 l&#8217;opposant de rapporter la preuve du d\u00e9p\u00f4t de la lettre dans le d\u00e9lai de 15 jours&#8221;<\/em>. Cette r\u00e8gle, conforme au droit commun de la proc\u00e9dure civile, place sur le d\u00e9biteur la charge de prouver qu&#8217;il a respect\u00e9 le d\u00e9lai imp\u00e9ratif. L&#8217;appelante soutenait que la lettre avait \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9dig\u00e9e le 3 f\u00e9vrier 2023 et que le ticket de la poste du 14 f\u00e9vrier 2023 constituait un faisceau d&#8217;indices suffisant. La cour \u00e9carte cette argumentation en relevant que <em>&#8220;le simple ticket vers\u00e9 aux d\u00e9bats par l&#8217;appelante n&#8217;indique pas que la lettre a effectivement \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9e&#8221;<\/em>. Elle souligne que si l&#8217;utilisateur peut \u00e9diter un autocollant avec les mentions de la lettre recommand\u00e9e \u00e0 partir d&#8217;un ordinateur personnel ou d&#8217;une borne, <em>&#8220;encore faut-il pour obtenir la d\u00e9livrance d&#8217;un scellement \u00e9lectronique qui fait foi, que la lettre soit effectivement d\u00e9pos\u00e9e dans les bureaux de la poste&#8221;<\/em>. L&#8217;absence de confirmation ult\u00e9rieure ou d&#8217;accus\u00e9 de r\u00e9ception emp\u00eache donc d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avec certitude que le d\u00e9p\u00f4t a eu lieu avant l&#8217;expiration du d\u00e9lai. La cour insiste sur le fait que l&#8217;appelante <em>&#8220;ne produit pas un avis de r\u00e9ception de sa lettre ou tout \u00e9l\u00e9ment permettant d&#8217;en attester&#8221;<\/em>. Ainsi, la charge probatoire p\u00e8se lourdement sur l&#8217;opposant, qui doit fournir une preuve tangible et v\u00e9rifiable du d\u00e9p\u00f4t.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-rigoureuse-des-elements-de-preuve-par-la-cour\">B. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation rigoureuse des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve par la cour<\/h3>\n<p>La cour examine les pi\u00e8ces produites par l&#8217;appelante, notamment le ticket du 14 f\u00e9vrier 2023 et les tampons du greffe du tribunal judiciaire de Marseille appos\u00e9s sur le courrier les 22 f\u00e9vrier et 15 mars 2023. Elle constate que ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments, m\u00eame combin\u00e9s, ne permettent pas d&#8217;\u00e9tablir que le d\u00e9p\u00f4t de la lettre recommand\u00e9e a \u00e9t\u00e9 effectu\u00e9 dans le d\u00e9lai l\u00e9gal. Le raisonnement est clair : le ticket seul ne vaut pas preuve du d\u00e9p\u00f4t ; les tampons du greffe sont post\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 l&#8217;expiration du d\u00e9lai et ne sauraient suppl\u00e9er une absence de preuve de l&#8217;envoi initial. La cour ajoute qu&#8217;<em>&#8220;il en demeure toujours une absence de certitude de son d\u00e9p\u00f4t et donc de son envoi \u00e0 cette date&#8221;<\/em>. Cette appr\u00e9ciation stricte des \u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve illustre la rigueur avec laquelle les juges du fond contr\u00f4lent le respect des formalit\u00e9s. Aucune circonstance particuli\u00e8re, telle que la mention de la date de r\u00e9daction de la lettre, n&#8217;est retenue pour att\u00e9nuer cette exigence. La cour privil\u00e9gie une preuve objective et irr\u00e9futable du d\u00e9p\u00f4t, refusant toute pr\u00e9somption ou faisceau d&#8217;indices insuffisamment \u00e9tay\u00e9. Cette position s&#8217;inscrit dans une logique de s\u00e9curisation des proc\u00e9dures de recouvrement.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-lexigence-probatoire-en-matiere-de-recouvrement-dallocations\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019exigence probatoire en mati\u00e8re de recouvrement d\u2019allocations<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-confirmation-dun-formalisme-protecteur-pour-lorganisme-creancier\">A. La confirmation d\u2019un formalisme protecteur pour l\u2019organisme cr\u00e9ancier<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;arr\u00eat de la Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence s&#8217;inscrit dans une tendance jurisprudentielle exigeante quant \u00e0 la preuve du respect des d\u00e9lais d&#8217;opposition. En imposant \u00e0 l&#8217;opposant de produire un accus\u00e9 de r\u00e9ception ou une confirmation de d\u00e9p\u00f4t \u00e9manant des services postaux, la cour garantit \u00e0 l&#8217;organisme de recouvrement une s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique certaine. Cette solution rejoint, sur un point connexe, les exigences relatives \u00e0 la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des actes pr\u00e9paratoires au recouvrement. La Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris a ainsi jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;la contrainte doit \u00eatre sign\u00e9e par son auteur, c&#8217;est-\u00e0-dire par le directeur de l&#8217;organisme de recouvrement&#8221;<\/em> et que le d\u00e9l\u00e9gataire doit justifier d&#8217;une d\u00e9l\u00e9gation ant\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la signature <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e78ddfa0756e3a702f8e05\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris, 28 mars 2025, n\u00b019\/11008)<\/a><\/strong>. De m\u00eame, la Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon a rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;la mise en demeure doit \u00eatre sign\u00e9e par le directeur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral ou son d\u00e9l\u00e9gataire&#8221;<\/em> et que le juge ne peut valider une telle pi\u00e8ce <em>&#8220;sans rechercher, lorsque cela lui est demand\u00e9, si le signataire avait r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement pouvoir ou d\u00e9l\u00e9gation&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/677e1644dbb9bd42de09fc4c\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Lyon, 7 janvier 2025, n\u00b023\/03947)<\/a><\/strong>. Si ces d\u00e9cisions concernent la signature des actes, elles t\u00e9moignent d&#8217;une exigence de rigueur dans la preuve des formalit\u00e9s, analogue \u00e0 celle retenue en l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce pour l&#8217;opposition. L&#8217;arr\u00eat comment\u00e9 consacre donc un formalisme protecteur pour l&#8217;organisme cr\u00e9ancier, qui peut ainsi opposer une fin de non-recevoir \u00e0 l&#8217;opposant n\u00e9gligent dans la conservation des preuves de son envoi.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-interrogations-sur-lequilibre-entre-protection-du-creancier-et-droits-du-d\">B. Les interrogations sur l\u2019\u00e9quilibre entre protection du cr\u00e9ancier et droits du d\u00e9biteur<\/h3>\n<p>La rigueur probatoire impos\u00e9e par la cour peut toutefois soulever des questions quant \u00e0 l&#8217;effectivit\u00e9 du droit d&#8217;opposition. Le d\u00e9lai de quinze jours est court, et le d\u00e9biteur peut l\u00e9gitimement ne pas conserver un accus\u00e9 de r\u00e9ception ou ignorer les modalit\u00e9s de preuve exig\u00e9es. En exigeant une preuve certaine, la cour \u00e9carte toute possibilit\u00e9 pour l&#8217;opposant de d\u00e9montrer son respect du d\u00e9lai par d&#8217;autres moyens, comme la date de r\u00e9daction de la lettre ou les tampons ult\u00e9rieurs du greffe. Cette solution, si elle assure la pr\u00e9visibilit\u00e9 pour le cr\u00e9ancier, risque de priver le d\u00e9biteur de son recours pour des raisons purement probatoires, m\u00eame s&#8217;il a agi de bonne foi. Le juge ne semble pas avoir recherch\u00e9 si l&#8217;organisme de recouvrement justifiait lui-m\u00eame de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la mise en demeure et de la contrainte, alors m\u00eame que l&#8217;appelante contestait la signature de la mise en demeure. En d\u00e9clarant l&#8217;opposition irrecevable sans examiner ces moyens de fond, la cour renforce la position du cr\u00e9ancier et r\u00e9duit la port\u00e9e du contr\u00f4le judiciaire. Une telle approche pourrait \u00eatre critiqu\u00e9e au regard du droit \u00e0 un recours effectif garanti par l&#8217;article 6 de la Convention europ\u00e9enne des droits de l&#8217;homme, si le formalisme probatoire devient un obstacle disproportionn\u00e9. L&#8217;arr\u00eat s&#8217;inscrit dans une conception stricte de la preuve, mais interroge sur l&#8217;\u00e9quilibre entre la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique du recouvrement et la protection du d\u00e9biteur.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e78ddfa0756e3a702f8e05\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 28 mars 2025, n\u00b019\/11008<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/677e1644dbb9bd42de09fc4c\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Lyon, le 7 janvier 2025, n\u00b023\/03947<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000026386111\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article R. 5426-22 du Code du travail<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">Le d\u00e9biteur peut former opposition par inscription au secr\u00e9tariat du tribunal comp\u00e9tent dans le ressort duquel il est domicili\u00e9 ou par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d&#8217;avis de r\u00e9ception adress\u00e9e au secr\u00e9tariat dudit tribunal dans les quinze jours \u00e0 compter de la notification. <\/p>\n<p> L&#8217;opposition est motiv\u00e9e. Une copie de la contrainte contest\u00e9e y est jointe. <\/p>\n<p> Cette opposition suspend la mise en \u0153uvre de la contrainte. <\/p>\n<p> La d\u00e9cision du tribunal, statuant sur opposition, est ex\u00e9cutoire de droit \u00e0 titre provisoire. <\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>L&#8217;arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, chambre 1-1, le 28 avril 2026, porte sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d&#8217;une opposition \u00e0 une contrainte d\u00e9livr\u00e9e&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":3920,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f1a3c3cdc6046d47eea515","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f1a3c3cdc6046d47eea515","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f1a3c3cdc6046d47eea515","_kj_jur":"Cour d'appel","_kj_lieu":"Aix-en-Provence","_kj_chambre":"Chambre 1-1","_kj_rg":"25\/05638","_kj_date":"2026-04-28","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6455,6454],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-dappel","category-decisions-juridiques"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/05638 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"L&#039;arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Aix-en-Provence, chambre 1-1, le 28 avril 2026, porte sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d&#039;une opposition \u00e0 une contrainte d\u00e9livr\u00e9e...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/05638\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"L&#039;arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Aix-en-Provence, chambre 1-1, le 28 avril 2026, porte sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d&#039;une opposition \u00e0 une contrainte d\u00e9livr\u00e9e...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T05:56:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4182\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2778\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05638\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T05:56:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1624,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cour d'appel\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05638\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T05:56:20+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05638 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T05:56:20+00:00\",\"description\":\"L'arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, chambre 1-1, le 28 avril 2026, porte sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d'une opposition \u00e0 une contrainte d\u00e9livr\u00e9e...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4182,\"height\":2778},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour d&rsquo;appel d&rsquo;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05638\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/05638 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"L'arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, chambre 1-1, le 28 avril 2026, porte sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d'une opposition \u00e0 une contrainte d\u00e9livr\u00e9e...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/05638","og_description":"L'arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, chambre 1-1, le 28 avril 2026, porte sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d'une opposition \u00e0 une contrainte d\u00e9livr\u00e9e...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T05:56:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4182,"height":2778,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/05638","datePublished":"2026-06-30T05:56:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/"},"wordCount":1624,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Cour d'appel","D\u00e9cisions juridiques"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/05638","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cour d'appel"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T05:56:20+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/","name":"Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/05638 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T05:56:20+00:00","description":"L'arr\u00eat rendu par la Cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence, chambre 1-1, le 28 avril 2026, porte sur la recevabilit\u00e9 d'une opposition \u00e0 une contrainte d\u00e9livr\u00e9e...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp","width":4182,"height":2778},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-daix-en-provence-le-28-avril-2026-n25-05638\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour d&rsquo;appel d&rsquo;Aix-en-Provence, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/05638"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/valentino-mazzariello-Ndm1hhIcwHc-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57pm","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1201500,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-3-avril-2026-n2025091434\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220120,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02025091434","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un jugement du 3 avril 2026 (Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, chambre 1-14, RG 2025091434), le tribunal a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une opposition \u00e0 une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1207167,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-7-avril-2026-n2026f00141\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220120,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00141","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 7 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant en formation coll\u00e9giale, a rendu un jugement sur une opposition \u00e0 une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/felix-fuchs-P4NdKIesk_A-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201511,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-3-avril-2026-n2025061315\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220120,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02025061315","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 3 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en formation coll\u00e9giale, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019homologation d\u2019un accord...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1211421,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-daix-en-provence-le-7-avril-2026-n2025006329\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220120,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&#8217;aix-en-Provence, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025006329","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, par un jugement contradictoire rendu le 7 avril 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1220325,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-reims-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00028\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220120,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Reims, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00028","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Reims, p\u00f4le social, a statu\u00e9 sur un d\u00e9sistement d'instance dans un litige opposant un assur\u00e9 social \u00e0 la caisse...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U0gb3evEU8I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U0gb3evEU8I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U0gb3evEU8I-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U0gb3evEU8I-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U0gb3evEU8I-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-U0gb3evEU8I-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1218801,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-saint-brieuc-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02003\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220120,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Saint-Brieuc, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02003","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Saint-Brieuc, dans un jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/02003), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance d\u2019injonction de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-yJLFsme5WMU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-yJLFsme5WMU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-yJLFsme5WMU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-yJLFsme5WMU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-yJLFsme5WMU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ave-calvar-yJLFsme5WMU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220120\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3920"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}