{"id":1220146,"date":"2026-06-30T07:59:38","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T05:59:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T07:59:38","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T05:59:38","slug":"cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/02496"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-le-jeu-de-la-presomption-de-responsabilite-du-garagiste-et-son-renversement-pa\">I. Le jeu de la pr\u00e9somption de responsabilit\u00e9 du garagiste et son renversement par les expertises amiables<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-mecanisme-de-la-presomption-pesant-sur-le-garagiste-reparateur\">A. Le m\u00e9canisme de la pr\u00e9somption pesant sur le garagiste r\u00e9parateur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-contestation-serieuse-ecartee-par-les-rapports-dexpertise\">B. L&#8217;absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse \u00e9cart\u00e9e par les rapports d&#8217;expertise<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-loffice-du-juge-des-referes-entre-refus-de-provision-et-ordonnance-dexpertise\">II. L&#8217;office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s entre refus de provision et ordonnance d&#8217;expertise in futurum<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-rejet-de-la-provision-fonde-sur-lexistence-dune-contestation-serieuse\">A. Le rejet de la provision fond\u00e9 sur l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lordonnance-dexpertise-sur-le-fondement-de-larticle-145-du-code-de-procedure-c\">B. L&#8217;ordonnance d&#8217;expertise sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, mesure conservatoire utile<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 28 avril 2026, la chambre \u00e9conomique de la Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens a rendu un arr\u00eat statuant sur l&#8217;appel d&#8217;une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident du tribunal de commerce de Compi\u00e8gne. Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 cliente avait confi\u00e9 son v\u00e9hicule \u00e0 un garagiste pour une r\u00e9paration le 1er mars 2024. Durant la garde du professionnel, le moteur du v\u00e9hicule a subi une avarie grave. Deux expertises amiables, l&#8217;une diligent\u00e9e par l&#8217;assureur du garagiste le 6 septembre 2024, l&#8217;autre par l&#8217;assureur de la cliente le 14 octobre 2024, ont conclu que la panne \u00e9tait fortuite et sans lien avec l&#8217;intervention du garagiste. La cliente a assign\u00e9 ce dernier en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 pour obtenir la restitution du v\u00e9hicule en bon \u00e9tat de fonctionnement et une provision au titre du pr\u00e9judice de jouissance. Par ordonnance du 8 avril 2025, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la cliente de sa demande de provision pour pr\u00e9judice de jouissance dans sa motivation, mais a omis de statuer sur ce chef dans le dispositif. La cliente a interjet\u00e9 appel et form\u00e9 appel incident. Le garagiste a soulev\u00e9 l&#8217;irrecevabilit\u00e9 des conclusions d&#8217;appel incident. La cour devait d\u00e9terminer si l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, r\u00e9sultant de deux expertises amiables excluant la faute du garagiste, faisait obstacle \u00e0 l&#8217;octroi d&#8217;une provision et \u00e0 l&#8217;obligation de restituer le v\u00e9hicule en bon \u00e9tat, et si une mesure d&#8217;instruction pouvait \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e. La cour a rejet\u00e9 l&#8217;irrecevabilit\u00e9 des conclusions, infirm\u00e9 l&#8217;ordonnance d\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9e, d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la cliente de ses demandes de restitution et d&#8217;indemnisation, mais ordonn\u00e9 une expertise judiciaire sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-le-jeu-de-la-presomption-de-responsabilite-du-garagiste-et-son-renversement-pa\">I. Le jeu de la pr\u00e9somption de responsabilit\u00e9 du garagiste et son renversement par les expertises amiables<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-mecanisme-de-la-presomption-pesant-sur-le-garagiste-reparateur\">A. Le m\u00e9canisme de la pr\u00e9somption pesant sur le garagiste r\u00e9parateur<\/h3>\n<p>Le garagiste, en sa qualit\u00e9 de professionnel de la r\u00e9paration automobile, est tenu d&#8217;une obligation de r\u00e9sultat \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9gard de son client. Cette obligation consiste \u00e0 remettre le v\u00e9hicule en bon \u00e9tat de fonctionnement apr\u00e8s son intervention. La jurisprudence a d\u00e9duit de ce contrat d&#8217;entreprise une pr\u00e9somption de faute et une pr\u00e9somption de causalit\u00e9 d\u00e8s lors que des d\u00e9sordres surviennent ou persistent apr\u00e8s l&#8217;intervention du garagiste. Comme le rappelle la Cour d&#8217;appel de Versailles, <em>&#8220;en vertu de son contrat d&#8217;entreprise, le garagiste est tenu d&#8217;une obligation de r\u00e9sultat consistant \u00e0 remettre le v\u00e9hicule en bon \u00e9tat de fonctionnement, son obligation de r\u00e9sultat emportant \u00e0 la fois pr\u00e9somption de faute et pr\u00e9somption de causalit\u00e9 entre la faute et le dommage d\u00e8s lors que des d\u00e9sordres surviennent ou persistent apr\u00e8s son intervention&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67beaf7471eea201c9101228\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Versailles, 25 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/07312)<\/a><\/strong>. Dans l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la cliente invoquait cette pr\u00e9somption en soutenant que la casse du moteur, intervenue pendant que le v\u00e9hicule \u00e9tait sous la garde du garagiste, engageait n\u00e9cessairement la responsabilit\u00e9 de ce dernier. La cour d&#8217;appel a reconnu l&#8217;existence de cette pr\u00e9somption, mais a estim\u00e9 qu&#8217;elle pouvait \u00eatre renvers\u00e9e par le professionnel s&#8217;il rapportait la preuve de son absence de faute. Le garagiste a donc cherch\u00e9 \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer que la panne n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas imputable \u00e0 son intervention.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-contestation-serieuse-ecartee-par-les-rapports-dexpertise\">B. L&#8217;absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse \u00e9cart\u00e9e par les rapports d&#8217;expertise<\/h3>\n<p>La pr\u00e9somption de responsabilit\u00e9 n&#8217;est pas irr\u00e9fragable. Le garagiste peut la combattre en apportant la preuve que le dommage provient d&#8217;une cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re \u00e0 sa faute. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, deux expertises amiables ont \u00e9t\u00e9 produites. La premi\u00e8re, r\u00e9alis\u00e9e \u00e0 la demande de l&#8217;assureur du garagiste, concluait qu&#8217;<em>&#8220;il n&#8217;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli de lien de causalit\u00e9 direct ou indirect entre l&#8217;intervention et les dommages&#8221;<\/em>. La seconde, r\u00e9alis\u00e9e \u00e0 la demande de l&#8217;assureur de la cliente, indiquait que <em>&#8220;la responsabilit\u00e9 du garagiste est \u00e9trang\u00e8re \u00e0 cette affaire&#8221;<\/em> et qualifiait la panne de <em>&#8220;fortuite&#8221;<\/em>. Ces deux rapports s&#8217;accordent \u00e0 exclure toute faute du r\u00e9parateur. La cour en a d\u00e9duit qu&#8217;ils <em>&#8220;renversent la pr\u00e9somption de responsabilit\u00e9 pesant sur le garagiste&#8221;<\/em>. Ce raisonnement est conforme \u00e0 la position adopt\u00e9e par la Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, selon laquelle <em>&#8220;l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une faute et celle d&#8217;un lien causal entre la faute et ces d\u00e9sordres sont pr\u00e9sum\u00e9es. Ni l&#8217;incertitude sur l&#8217;origine d&#8217;une panne ni la difficult\u00e9 \u00e0 d\u00e9celer cette origine ne suffisent \u00e0 \u00e9carter les pr\u00e9somptions pesant sur le garagiste&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c69ab1fb88929976ac16e6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Bordeaux, 3 mars 2025, n\u00b023\/00916)<\/a><\/strong>. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, ce n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas une simple incertitude mais des conclusions expertales concordantes. La cour a donc jug\u00e9 que la contestation soulev\u00e9e par le garagiste \u00e9tait s\u00e9rieuse au sens de l&#8217;article 873 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de commerce.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-loffice-du-juge-des-referes-entre-refus-de-provision-et-ordonnance-dexpertise\">II. L&#8217;office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s entre refus de provision et ordonnance d&#8217;expertise in futurum<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-rejet-de-la-provision-fonde-sur-lexistence-dune-contestation-serieuse\">A. Le rejet de la provision fond\u00e9 sur l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;article 873 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de commerce autorise le pr\u00e9sident du tribunal de commerce, en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, \u00e0 accorder une provision ou \u00e0 ordonner l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution d&#8217;une obligation de faire lorsque l&#8217;obligation n&#8217;est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable. En mati\u00e8re de responsabilit\u00e9 du garagiste, l&#8217;obligation de restitution du v\u00e9hicule en bon \u00e9tat de fonctionnement constitue une obligation de faire. Toutefois, cette obligation n&#8217;est pas contestable si la faute du r\u00e9parateur est \u00e9tablie ou pr\u00e9sum\u00e9e sans \u00eatre renvers\u00e9e. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, les expertises amiables ayant \u00e9cart\u00e9 toute faute, la cour a estim\u00e9 que l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse faisait obstacle \u00e0 l&#8217;octroi d&#8217;une provision et \u00e0 l&#8217;injonction de restituer le v\u00e9hicule r\u00e9par\u00e9. Elle a ainsi infirm\u00e9 l&#8217;ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 qui, bien que d\u00e9boutant la cliente, n&#8217;avait pas formellement statu\u00e9 sur le pr\u00e9judice de jouissance. La cour a soulign\u00e9 que le co\u00fbt de la r\u00e9paration du moteur, estim\u00e9 \u00e0 environ 20 000 euros, ajout\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;incertitude sur la cause de la panne, rendait la cr\u00e9ance de la cliente s\u00e9rieusement contestable. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne peut donc pas, dans ces conditions, allouer une provision.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lordonnance-dexpertise-sur-le-fondement-de-larticle-145-du-code-de-procedure-c\">B. L&#8217;ordonnance d&#8217;expertise sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, mesure conservatoire utile<\/h3>\n<p>Parall\u00e8lement au rejet des demandes provisionnelles, la cour a fait droit \u00e0 la demande subsidiaire d&#8217;expertise judiciaire form\u00e9e par la cliente. Elle a relev\u00e9 l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat l\u00e9gitime de cette derni\u00e8re \u00e0 <em>&#8220;conserver ou \u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s au fond la preuve des faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige&#8221;<\/em>, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. En effet, malgr\u00e9 les deux expertises amiables, celles-ci n&#8217;\u00e9taient pas contradictoires entre les parties et n&#8217;avaient pas \u00e9t\u00e9 soumises au d\u00e9bat judiciaire. La mission confi\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;expert est particuli\u00e8rement large : d\u00e9terminer l&#8217;historique du v\u00e9hicule, d\u00e9crire les travaux r\u00e9alis\u00e9s par le garagiste, rechercher l&#8217;origine des d\u00e9sordres, et donner son avis sur les responsabilit\u00e9s encourues. Cette mesure d&#8217;instruction pr\u00e9sente un double int\u00e9r\u00eat. D&#8217;une part, elle permet d&#8217;\u00e9clairer le juge du fond sur la cause exacte de la panne, en d\u00e9passant les conclusions divergentes possibles des expertises priv\u00e9es. D&#8217;autre part, elle constitue une voie interm\u00e9diaire entre un rejet pur et simple des demandes et une condamnation h\u00e2tive du garagiste. La cour a ainsi concili\u00e9 le principe de l&#8217;absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 avec la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de faire la lumi\u00e8re sur un litige technique complexe. L&#8217;expertise est ordonn\u00e9e aux frais avanc\u00e9s de la cliente, ce qui est classique pour une mesure sollicit\u00e9e par une partie. Cette solution montre que le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, m\u00eame s&#8217;il ne peut trancher le fond, peut parfaitement organiser l&#8217;administration de la preuve en vue d&#8217;un proc\u00e8s ult\u00e9rieur.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c69ab1fb88929976ac16e6\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Bordeaux, le 3 mars 2025, n\u00b023\/00916<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67beaf7471eea201c9101228\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Versailles, le 25 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/07312<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 28 avril 2026, la chambre \u00e9conomique de la Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens a rendu un arr\u00eat statuant sur l&#8217;appel d&#8217;une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident du&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4903,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f1a351cdc6046d47ee9b7b","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f1a351cdc6046d47ee9b7b","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f1a351cdc6046d47ee9b7b","_kj_jur":"Cour d'appel","_kj_lieu":"Amiens","_kj_chambre":"CHAMBRE \u00c9CONOMIQUE","_kj_rg":"25\/02496","_kj_date":"2026-04-28","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6455,6454],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-dappel","category-decisions-juridiques"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/02496 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 28 avril 2026, la chambre \u00e9conomique de la Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Amiens a rendu un arr\u00eat statuant sur l&#039;appel d&#039;une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident du...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/02496\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 28 avril 2026, la chambre \u00e9conomique de la Cour d&#039;appel d&#039;Amiens a rendu un arr\u00eat statuant sur l&#039;appel d&#039;une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident du...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T05:59:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4813\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3209\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02496\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T05:59:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1688,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cour d'appel\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02496\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T05:59:38+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel d'Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02496 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T05:59:38+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 28 avril 2026, la chambre \u00e9conomique de la Cour d'appel d'Amiens a rendu un arr\u00eat statuant sur l'appel d'une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident du...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4813,\"height\":3209},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour d&rsquo;appel d&rsquo;Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02496\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour d'appel d'Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/02496 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 28 avril 2026, la chambre \u00e9conomique de la Cour d'appel d'Amiens a rendu un arr\u00eat statuant sur l'appel d'une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident du...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour d'appel d'Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/02496","og_description":"Le 28 avril 2026, la chambre \u00e9conomique de la Cour d'appel d'Amiens a rendu un arr\u00eat statuant sur l'appel d'une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident du...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T05:59:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4813,"height":3209,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/02496","datePublished":"2026-06-30T05:59:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/"},"wordCount":1688,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Cour d'appel","D\u00e9cisions juridiques"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/02496","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cour d'appel"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T05:59:38+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/","name":"Cour d'appel d'Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/02496 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T05:59:38+00:00","description":"Le 28 avril 2026, la chambre \u00e9conomique de la Cour d'appel d'Amiens a rendu un arr\u00eat statuant sur l'appel d'une ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sident du...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","width":4813,"height":3209},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-28-avril-2026-n25-02496\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour d&rsquo;appel d&rsquo;Amiens, le 28 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/02496"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/philippe-oursel-pWhx6q22d_I-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57pM","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1111417,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-damiens-le-31-mars-2026-n25-00894\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220146,"position":0},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, le 31 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00894","author":"Kohen","date":"15 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 31 mars 2026, la Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Amiens, dans sa deuxi\u00e8me chambre protection sociale, a statu\u00e9 sur le litige opposant un employeur \u00e0 une caisse primaire...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Code des assurances&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Code des assurances","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/code-des-assurances\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-UzSgkFUhmVc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-UzSgkFUhmVc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-UzSgkFUhmVc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-UzSgkFUhmVc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-UzSgkFUhmVc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-UzSgkFUhmVc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":508407,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-libourne-le-14-novembre-2025-n24-00319\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220146,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Libourne, le 14 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/00319","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Libourne, statuant le 14 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 un litige contractuel entre un motocycliste et son garagiste. Apr\u00e8s des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/volodymyr-kondriianenko-n2EXdta0MeM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/volodymyr-kondriianenko-n2EXdta0MeM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/volodymyr-kondriianenko-n2EXdta0MeM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/volodymyr-kondriianenko-n2EXdta0MeM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/volodymyr-kondriianenko-n2EXdta0MeM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/volodymyr-kondriianenko-n2EXdta0MeM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":794006,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-11-decembre-2025-n25-02054\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220146,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 11 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b025\/02054","author":"Kohen","date":"1 May 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal de proximit\u00e9 de Tourcoing, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 11 d\u00e9cembre 2025, s'est prononc\u00e9 sur la responsabilit\u00e9 contractuelle d'un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":736586,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-rouen-le-29-janvier-2026-n24-03812\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220146,"position":3},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Rouen, le 29 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/03812","author":"Kohen","date":"28 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour d'appel de Rouen, dans son arr\u00eat du 29 janvier 2026, statue sur la responsabilit\u00e9 d'un garagiste et la garantie de son assureur. Un propri\u00e9taire...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/j-venerosy-EitiaUwmD-8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/j-venerosy-EitiaUwmD-8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/j-venerosy-EitiaUwmD-8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/j-venerosy-EitiaUwmD-8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/j-venerosy-EitiaUwmD-8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/j-venerosy-EitiaUwmD-8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":762575,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-13-janvier-2026-n25-07119\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220146,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 13 janvier 2026, n\u00b025\/07119","author":"Kohen","date":"29 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Lille, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire du 13 janvier 2026, statue sur la responsabilit\u00e9 d\u2019un garagiste pour une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":503810,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-la-reunion-le-20-novembre-2025-n25-00553\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220146,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de La R\u00e9union, le 20 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00553","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, par un jugement du 20 novembre 2025, a statu\u00e9 sur un litige entre une cliente et un garage. La premi\u00e8re soutenait que le garage...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-UacA8X7HWwg-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220146"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220146\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}