{"id":1220162,"date":"2026-06-30T08:07:26","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:07:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T08:07:26","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:07:26","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-les-conditions-de-la-prorogation-de-la-periode-dobservation\">I. Les conditions de la prorogation de la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lexistence-dun-rapport-prealable-necessaire\">A. L\u2019existence d\u2019un rapport pr\u00e9alable n\u00e9cessaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-souveraine-du-tribunal-quant-a-la-necessite-de-la-prorogation\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine du tribunal quant \u00e0 la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de la prorogation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-modalites-procedurales-de-la-prorogation\">II. Les modalit\u00e9s proc\u00e9durales de la prorogation<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-forme-du-rapport-et-linformation-du-tribunal\">A. La forme du rapport et l\u2019information du tribunal<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-duree-de-la-prorogation-et-les-perspectives-de-la-procedure\">B. La dur\u00e9e de la prorogation et les perspectives de la proc\u00e9dure<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L01045), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation de la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation dans le cadre d\u2019une proc\u00e9dure de redressement judiciaire ouverte le 9 avril 2025 \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exploitant une boulangerie. La p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation initiale de six mois avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 renouvel\u00e9e pour une dur\u00e9e identique. Le minist\u00e8re public, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article L.621-3 du code de commerce, a sollicit\u00e9 une nouvelle prorogation. Le juge-commissaire a rendu un rapport oral estimant cette prolongation n\u00e9cessaire. Le tribunal, apr\u00e8s avoir entendu le minist\u00e8re public et le rapport oral des mandataires de justice, a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de proroger la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation de deux mois. La question juridique porte sur les conditions dans lesquelles le tribunal peut proroger la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation au-del\u00e0 des dur\u00e9es initiales. La solution retenue consacre un pouvoir souple du tribunal, appuy\u00e9 sur l\u2019avis du minist\u00e8re public et le rapport oral du juge-commissaire.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-les-conditions-de-la-prorogation-de-la-periode-dobservation\">I. Les conditions de la prorogation de la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lexistence-dun-rapport-prealable-necessaire\">A. L\u2019existence d\u2019un rapport pr\u00e9alable n\u00e9cessaire<\/h3>\n<p>La prorogation de la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation suppose que le tribunal se prononce au vu d\u2019un rapport. L\u2019article L.621-3 du code de commerce impose que la d\u00e9cision soit prise apr\u00e8s avis du minist\u00e8re public et sur rapport du juge-commissaire. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le jugement mentionne que le juge-commissaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 entendu en son rapport oral et que le tribunal statue <em>&#8221; sur le rapport oral des mandataires de justice &#8220;<\/em>. La forme orale du rapport ne fait pas obstacle \u00e0 sa validit\u00e9. La jurisprudence rappelle que <em>&#8221; Le tribunal se prononce au vu d\u2019un rapport, \u00e9tabli par l\u2019administrateur ou, lorsqu\u2019il n\u2019en a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9sign\u00e9, par le d\u00e9biteur &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67da5f07394dca364c71c796\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Toulouse, 18 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02312 ; Cour d\u2019appel de Bordeaux, 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/03600)<\/a><\/strong>. Cette exigence de rapport garantit que le tribunal dispose d\u2019informations objectives sur la situation du d\u00e9biteur. Dans la pr\u00e9sente esp\u00e8ce, le rapport oral du juge-commissaire, combin\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019avis du minist\u00e8re public, constitue une base suffisante pour fonder la prorogation. Le tribunal a ainsi respect\u00e9 les conditions l\u00e9gales.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-souveraine-du-tribunal-quant-a-la-necessite-de-la-prorogation\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souveraine du tribunal quant \u00e0 la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de la prorogation<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal dispose d\u2019un pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire pour appr\u00e9cier l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 de la prorogation. L\u2019article L.621-3 du code de commerce pr\u00e9voit que la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation peut \u00eatre prorog\u00e9e <em>&#8221; pour une dur\u00e9e d\u00e9termin\u00e9e &#8220;<\/em> sans fixer de crit\u00e8re imp\u00e9ratif autre que la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de la mesure. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le jugement rel\u00e8ve que <em>&#8221; la prorogation de la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation appara\u00eet n\u00e9cessaire &#8220;<\/em> au vu du rapport oral du juge-commissaire. Le tribunal ne motive pas longuement cette n\u00e9cessit\u00e9, mais il se fonde sur l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du juge-commissaire. Cette motivation succincte est admise en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure collective, o\u00f9 le juge dispose d\u2019un large pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation des faits. La d\u00e9cision de proroger de deux mois illustre une appr\u00e9ciation concr\u00e8te : la dur\u00e9e est limit\u00e9e, ce qui sugg\u00e8re que les perspectives de redressement sont encore incertaines mais m\u00e9ritent un court d\u00e9lai suppl\u00e9mentaire. Le tribunal exerce donc son pouvoir souverain pour adapter la dur\u00e9e de la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation aux circonstances de l\u2019esp\u00e8ce.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-modalites-procedurales-de-la-prorogation\">II. Les modalit\u00e9s proc\u00e9durales de la prorogation<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-forme-du-rapport-et-linformation-du-tribunal\">A. La forme du rapport et l\u2019information du tribunal<\/h3>\n<p>La proc\u00e9dure de prorogation se caract\u00e9rise par une certaine souplesse. L\u2019article R.621-9 du code de commerce pr\u00e9voit la convocation des personnes cit\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019audience, mais ne pr\u00e9cise pas la forme du rapport. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le rapport oral du juge-commissaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9 suffisant. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence qui admet que le rapport puisse \u00eatre oral, d\u00e8s lors qu\u2019il permet au tribunal de s\u2019\u00e9clairer. Les d\u00e9cisions des cours d\u2019appel de Toulouse et de Bordeaux, d\u00e9j\u00e0 cit\u00e9es, insistent sur l\u2019existence d\u2019un rapport mais n\u2019exigent pas qu\u2019il soit \u00e9crit. La prorogation n\u2019\u00e9tant pas une d\u00e9cision d\u00e9finitive, une information orale peut suffire. Toutefois, cette souplesse doit \u00eatre concili\u00e9e avec le respect du contradictoire. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le d\u00e9biteur, bien que non comparant, \u00e9tait repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par l\u2019administrateur et le mandataire judiciaires, ce qui assure une certaine garantie proc\u00e9durale. Le tribunal a donc respect\u00e9 l\u2019\u00e9quilibre entre efficacit\u00e9 et droits de la d\u00e9fense.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-duree-de-la-prorogation-et-les-perspectives-de-la-procedure\">B. La dur\u00e9e de la prorogation et les perspectives de la proc\u00e9dure<\/h3>\n<p>La dur\u00e9e de la prorogation est fix\u00e9e souverainement par le tribunal dans la limite des textes. L\u2019article L.621-3 du code de commerce ne fixe pas de dur\u00e9e maximale pour la prorogation, mais la p\u00e9riode d\u2019observation totale ne doit pas exc\u00e9der dix-huit mois, sauf exceptions. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la prorogation de deux mois porte la p\u00e9riode totale \u00e0 quatorze mois, ce qui reste dans les limites l\u00e9gales. Le choix d\u2019une dur\u00e9e courte sugg\u00e8re que le tribunal entend maintenir une pression sur le d\u00e9biteur pour qu\u2019il finalise son plan de redressement. Cette d\u00e9cision s\u2019inscrit dans la logique de la proc\u00e9dure collective, qui vise \u00e0 sauver l\u2019entreprise tout en \u00e9vitant des p\u00e9riodes d\u2019observation trop longues. La prorogation accord\u00e9e permet de donner un d\u00e9lai suppl\u00e9mentaire pour pr\u00e9parer un plan, sans pour autant prolonger ind\u00e9finiment la situation. Le tribunal fait ainsi preuve de pragmatisme en adaptant la dur\u00e9e aux besoins concrets de l\u2019affaire.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67da5f07394dca364c71c796\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Toulouse, le 18 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/02312<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a455427c4e388cdacfc625\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Bordeaux, le 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/03600<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000044052569\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 621-3 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le jugement ouvre une p\u00e9riode d&#8217;observation d&#8217;une dur\u00e9e maximale de six mois qui peut \u00eatre renouvel\u00e9e une fois, pour une dur\u00e9e maximale de six mois, par d\u00e9cision sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9e \u00e0 la demande de l&#8217;administrateur, du d\u00e9biteur ou du minist\u00e8re public.<\/p>\n<p>Lorsqu&#8217;il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;une exploitation agricole, le tribunal peut proroger la dur\u00e9e de la p\u00e9riode d&#8217;observation en fonction de l&#8217;ann\u00e9e culturale en cours et des usages sp\u00e9cifiques aux productions de l&#8217;exploitation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000046073934\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article R. 621-9 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La p\u00e9riode d&#8217;observation ouverte par le jugement peut \u00eatre renouvel\u00e9e, en application de l&#8217;article L. 621-3, pour une dur\u00e9e maximale de six mois.<\/p>\n<p>Le pr\u00e9sident fixe l&#8217;affaire au r\u00f4le du tribunal au plus tard dix jours avant l&#8217;expiration de chaque p\u00e9riode d&#8217;observation. Le greffier convoque \u00e0 cette audience le d\u00e9biteur, les mandataires de justice, les contr\u00f4leurs et en avise le minist\u00e8re public.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal statue sur le renouvellement de la p\u00e9riode d&#8217;observation apr\u00e8s avis du minist\u00e8re public. Il recueille pr\u00e9alablement les observations du d\u00e9biteur, de l&#8217;administrateur, du mandataire judiciaire et des contr\u00f4leurs.<\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision renouvelant la p\u00e9riode d&#8217;observation est communiqu\u00e9e aux personnes mentionn\u00e9es \u00e0 l&#8217;article R. 621-7 et aux contr\u00f4leurs. Elle est mentionn\u00e9e aux registres pr\u00e9vus aux quatre premiers alin\u00e9as de l&#8217;article R. 621-8.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L01045), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation de la p\u00e9riode&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9648,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f12018cdc6046d47e3fb01","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f12018cdc6046d47e3fb01","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f12018cdc6046d47e3fb01","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre","_kj_chambre":"8\u00e8me chambre","_kj_rg":"2026L01045","_kj_date":"2026-04-08","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L01045), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation de la p\u00e9riode...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L01045), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation de la p\u00e9riode...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T06:07:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:07:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1363,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T06:07:26+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:07:26+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L01045), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation de la p\u00e9riode...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4000,\"height\":3000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L01045), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation de la p\u00e9riode...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045","og_description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L01045), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation de la p\u00e9riode...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T06:07:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4000,"height":3000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:07:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/"},"wordCount":1363,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T06:07:26+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:07:26+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement du 8 avril 2026 (n\u00b02026L01045), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation de la p\u00e9riode...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp","width":4000,"height":3000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026l01045\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01045"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-KddQtnCcZ68-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57q2","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1207183,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-7-avril-2026-n2026l00726\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220162,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00726","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement rendu le 7 avril 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation du d\u00e9lai de cl\u00f4ture de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1207174,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-7-avril-2026-n2026l00727\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220162,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00727","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un jugement du 7 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (7\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026L00727) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une requ\u00eate du liquidateur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1220172,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026f00192\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220162,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00192","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 8 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (3e chambre) a rendu une ordonnance de r\u00e9ouverture des d\u00e9bats dans un litige opposant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228744,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00750\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220162,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00750","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, dans sa neuvi\u00e8me chambre, a rendu le 9 avril 2026 un jugement statuant sur une demande de prorogation...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1207214,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-7-avril-2026-n2018r00679\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220162,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02018R00679","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a rendu une ordonnance le 7 avril 2026 (n\u00b02018R00679) dans le cadre d\u2019une mesure d\u2019instruction. Un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228701,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l01125\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220162,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01125","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, dans un jugement rendu le 9 avril 2026 par sa 9\u00e8me chambre, a \u00e9t\u00e9 confront\u00e9 \u00e0 la question du passage...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220162"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220162\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9648"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}