{"id":1220178,"date":"2026-06-30T08:09:29","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:09:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T08:09:29","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:09:29","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-dun-controle-utilitaire-comme-fondement-de-la-decision\">I. L\u2019affirmation d\u2019un contr\u00f4le utilitaire comme fondement de la d\u00e9cision<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lutilite-comme-condition-procedurale-issue-de-larticle-r-1535\">A. L\u2019utilit\u00e9 comme condition proc\u00e9durale issue de l\u2019article R. 153\u20115<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-limites-dune-appreciation-exclusivement-utilitaire\">B. Les limites d\u2019une appr\u00e9ciation exclusivement utilitaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-une-conciliation-imparfaite-entre-droit-a-la-preuve-et-secret-des-affaires\">II. Une conciliation imparfaite entre droit \u00e0 la preuve et secret des affaires<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-labsence-de-recherche-de-lindispensabilite-de-la-piece\">A. L\u2019absence de recherche de l\u2019indispensabilit\u00e9 de la pi\u00e8ce<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-de-la-decision-sur-la-pratique-judiciaire\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision sur la pratique judiciaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 8 avril 2026, s\u2019est prononc\u00e9 sur le sort de centaines de pi\u00e8ces dont la communication \u00e9tait contest\u00e9e par les d\u00e9fendeurs au motif qu\u2019elles seraient couvertes par le secret des affaires ou par le secret des correspondances avocat-client. Cette d\u00e9cision intervient dans le cadre d\u2019une proc\u00e9dure d\u00e9j\u00e0 marqu\u00e9e par plusieurs ordonnances ant\u00e9rieures, rendues les 21 novembre 2025, 23 d\u00e9cembre 2025, 9 janvier 2026, 17 f\u00e9vrier 2026 et 3 mars 2026.<\/p>\n<p>Par une pr\u00e9c\u00e9dente ordonnance, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s avait ordonn\u00e9 la production sous s\u00e9questre de pi\u00e8ces d\u00e9tenues par les d\u00e9fendeurs. Ceux-ci ont invoqu\u00e9 la protection du secret des affaires et la confidentialit\u00e9 des \u00e9changes avec leur avocat pour s\u2019opposer \u00e0 leur communication. Le demandeur soutenait, \u00e0 l\u2019inverse, que ces pi\u00e8ces \u00e9taient n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 la d\u00e9monstration de faits de concurrence d\u00e9loyale. La question centrale \u00e9tait celle de la conciliation entre le droit \u00e0 la preuve et la protection du secret des affaires dans le cadre de la proc\u00e9dure sp\u00e9ciale pr\u00e9vue aux articles R. 153-2 et suivants du code de commerce.<\/p>\n<p>Pour chaque pi\u00e8ce num\u00e9rot\u00e9e de 800 \u00e0 999, le juge a indiqu\u00e9 dans un tableau joint \u00e0 l\u2019ordonnance sa d\u00e9cision, qui se r\u00e9sume le plus souvent par la mention <em>&#8221; non utile R153\u20115 &#8220;<\/em>. Pour certaines pi\u00e8ces, la lev\u00e9e du s\u00e9questre a \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e, tandis que pour d\u2019autres, le maintien du s\u00e9questre ou la destruction \u00e9tait pr\u00e9conis\u00e9. La solution retenue semble ainsi reposer sur l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation de l\u2019utilit\u00e9 de chaque pi\u00e8ce pour la solution du litige, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article R. 153-5 du code de commerce.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-dun-controle-utilitaire-comme-fondement-de-la-decision\">I. L\u2019affirmation d\u2019un contr\u00f4le utilitaire comme fondement de la d\u00e9cision<\/h2>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a fait de l\u2019utilit\u00e9 de la pi\u00e8ce le crit\u00e8re d\u00e9terminant pour statuer sur le sort des documents. Cette approche trouve son si\u00e8ge dans les dispositions du code de commerce.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lutilite-comme-condition-procedurale-issue-de-larticle-r-1535\">A. L\u2019utilit\u00e9 comme condition proc\u00e9durale issue de l\u2019article R. 153\u20115<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article R. 153-5 du code de commerce pr\u00e9voit que, lorsque la communication d\u2019une pi\u00e8ce est demand\u00e9e, le juge peut, si elle n\u2019est pas n\u00e9cessaire \u00e0 la solution du litige ou si la demande est abusive, ordonner qu\u2019elle soit \u00e9cart\u00e9e ou qu\u2019elle ne soit communiqu\u00e9e que partiellement. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a appliqu\u00e9 ce texte de mani\u00e8re litt\u00e9rale : pour chaque pi\u00e8ce, il a indiqu\u00e9 qu\u2019elle \u00e9tait <em>&#8221; non utile &#8220;<\/em>, ce qui justifiait le refus de la communiquer ou le maintien du s\u00e9questre. Il s\u2019agit d\u2019une application m\u00e9canique du crit\u00e8re de l\u2019utilit\u00e9, sans autre motivation.<\/p>\n<p>Cette approche pr\u00e9sente l\u2019avantage de la clart\u00e9 : elle \u00e9vite une analyse approfondie de chaque pi\u00e8ce et permet un traitement rapide d\u2019un grand nombre de documents. Le juge s\u2019est livr\u00e9 \u00e0 une appr\u00e9ciation sommaire de la pertinence des pi\u00e8ces au regard du litige, ce qui est conforme \u00e0 l\u2019office du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, tenu de statuer en urgence.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-limites-dune-appreciation-exclusivement-utilitaire\">B. Les limites d\u2019une appr\u00e9ciation exclusivement utilitaire<\/h3>\n<p>Cependant, r\u00e9duire la protection du secret des affaires \u00e0 un simple contr\u00f4le d\u2019utilit\u00e9 peut conduire \u00e0 des solutions insuffisamment motiv\u00e9es. Le juge n\u2019explique pas pourquoi chaque pi\u00e8ce est jug\u00e9e inutile. Il ne pr\u00e9cise pas davantage en quoi la protection du secret serait, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, justifi\u00e9e par un int\u00e9r\u00eat l\u00e9gitime. Or, la Cour de cassation rappelle que le juge doit rechercher si la pi\u00e8ce est indispensable \u00e0 l\u2019exercice du droit \u00e0 la preuve et si l\u2019atteinte au secret est proportionn\u00e9e. Dans un arr\u00eat du 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025, elle a censur\u00e9 une cour d\u2019appel pour n\u2019avoir pas effectu\u00e9 une telle recherche, exigeant que soit v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 <em>&#8221; si la pi\u00e8ce produite n\u2019\u00e9tait pas indispensable pour prouver les faits all\u00e9gu\u00e9s de concurrence d\u00e9loyale et si l\u2019atteinte port\u00e9e [\u2026] n\u2019\u00e9tait pas strictement proportionn\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019objectif poursuivi &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a3097deaef5a22b443b3ab\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cass. com., 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023-10.953)<\/a><\/strong>. La d\u00e9cision du Tribunal de Nanterre, en ne s\u2019en tenant qu\u2019\u00e0 l\u2019utilit\u00e9, semble m\u00e9conna\u00eetre cette exigence de proportionnalit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-une-conciliation-imparfaite-entre-droit-a-la-preuve-et-secret-des-affaires\">II. Une conciliation imparfaite entre droit \u00e0 la preuve et secret des affaires<\/h2>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision illustre les difficult\u00e9s pratiques d\u2019une mise en \u0153uvre \u00e9quilibr\u00e9e des m\u00e9canismes de protection du secret. Elle interroge tant sur la m\u00e9thode suivie que sur ses cons\u00e9quences.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-labsence-de-recherche-de-lindispensabilite-de-la-piece\">A. L\u2019absence de recherche de l\u2019indispensabilit\u00e9 de la pi\u00e8ce<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article L. 153-1 du code de commerce dispose que le droit \u00e0 la preuve peut justifier la production d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ments couverts par le secret des affaires, \u00e0 condition que la production soit indispensable et proportionn\u00e9e. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s n\u2019a pas op\u00e9r\u00e9 cette recherche pour les pi\u00e8ces qu\u2019il a d\u00e9clar\u00e9es <em>&#8221; non utiles &#8220;<\/em>. Il s\u2019est content\u00e9 d\u2019un constat d\u2019inutilit\u00e9 sans examiner si, malgr\u00e9 cette inutilit\u00e9 apparente, la pi\u00e8ce pourrait \u00eatre indispensable \u00e0 la d\u00e9monstration des faits. En outre, pour les pi\u00e8ces dont le s\u00e9questre a \u00e9t\u00e9 lev\u00e9, on ignore si une mesure de communication partielle ou de r\u00e9sum\u00e9 aurait pu concilier les int\u00e9r\u00eats. La Cour d\u2019appel de Versailles, le 6 mars 2025, a rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; lorsque seuls certains \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la pi\u00e8ce sont de nature \u00e0 porter atteinte \u00e0 un secret des affaires sans \u00eatre n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 la solution du litige, le juge ordonne la communication ou la production de la pi\u00e8ce dans une version non confidentielle ou sous forme d\u2019un r\u00e9sum\u00e9 &#8220;<\/em> (CA Versailles, 6 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/00333). Cette alternative, pourtant pr\u00e9vue par les textes, n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 mise en \u0153uvre.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-de-la-decision-sur-la-pratique-judiciaire\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision sur la pratique judiciaire<\/h3>\n<p>En se bornant \u00e0 un crit\u00e8re d\u2019utilit\u00e9 non explicit\u00e9, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s expose sa d\u00e9cision \u00e0 un risque de censure. La Cour de cassation exige en effet une motivation concr\u00e8te, fond\u00e9e sur une appr\u00e9ciation circonstanci\u00e9e de l\u2019indispensabilit\u00e9 et de la proportionnalit\u00e9. La d\u00e9cision du 8 avril 2026 marque une certaine forme de pragmatisme, propre \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, mais qui pourrait \u00eatre jug\u00e9e insuffisante au regard des exigences l\u00e9gales. Elle laisse \u00e9galement dans l\u2019incertitude le sort des pi\u00e8ces dont le s\u00e9questre a \u00e9t\u00e9 lev\u00e9 : aucune restriction n\u2019est pr\u00e9vue, ce qui pourrait permettre une divulgation non contr\u00f4l\u00e9e d\u2019informations potentiellement confidentielles. \u00c0 l\u2019inverse, le maintien syst\u00e9matique du s\u00e9questre pour les pi\u00e8ces <em>&#8221; non utiles &#8220;<\/em> peut priver la partie demanderesse d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e9ments de preuve importants, au m\u00e9pris du droit \u00e0 un proc\u00e8s \u00e9quitable. Cette d\u00e9cision illustre la difficult\u00e9 de concilier c\u00e9l\u00e9rit\u00e9 et garanties proc\u00e9durales dans le contentieux du secret des affaires.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a3097deaef5a22b443b3ab\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Chambre commerciale financi\u00e8re et \u00e9conomique, le 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023-10.953<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ca8bc05b43e49564643ba4\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Versailles, le 6 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/00333<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000037802129\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article R. 153-5 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge refuse la communication ou la production de la pi\u00e8ce lorsque celle-ci n&#8217;est pas n\u00e9cessaire \u00e0 la solution du litige.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000038311180\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 153-1 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Lorsque, \u00e0 l&#8217;occasion d&#8217;une instance civile ou commerciale ayant pour objet une mesure d&#8217;instruction sollicit\u00e9e avant tout proc\u00e8s au fond ou \u00e0 l&#8217;occasion d&#8217;une instance au fond, il est fait \u00e9tat ou est demand\u00e9e la communication ou la production d&#8217;une pi\u00e8ce dont il est all\u00e9gu\u00e9 par une partie ou un tiers ou dont il a \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9 qu&#8217;elle est de nature \u00e0 porter atteinte \u00e0 un secret des affaires, le juge peut, d&#8217;office ou \u00e0 la demande d&#8217;une partie ou d&#8217;un tiers, si la protection de ce secret ne peut \u00eatre assur\u00e9e autrement et sans pr\u00e9judice de l&#8217;exercice des droits de la d\u00e9fense :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 Prendre connaissance seul de cette pi\u00e8ce et, s&#8217;il l&#8217;estime n\u00e9cessaire, ordonner une expertise et solliciter l&#8217;avis, pour chacune des parties, d&#8217;une personne habilit\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;assister ou la repr\u00e9senter, afin de d\u00e9cider s&#8217;il y a lieu d&#8217;appliquer des mesures de protection pr\u00e9vues au pr\u00e9sent article ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 D\u00e9cider de limiter la communication ou la production de cette pi\u00e8ce \u00e0 certains de ses \u00e9l\u00e9ments, en ordonner la communication ou la production sous une forme de r\u00e9sum\u00e9 ou en restreindre l&#8217;acc\u00e8s, pour chacune des parties, au plus \u00e0 une personne physique et une personne habilit\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;assister ou la repr\u00e9senter ;<\/p>\n<p>3\u00b0 D\u00e9cider que les d\u00e9bats auront lieu et que la d\u00e9cision sera prononc\u00e9e en chambre du conseil ;<\/p>\n<p>4\u00b0 Adapter la motivation de sa d\u00e9cision et les modalit\u00e9s de publicit\u00e9 de celle-ci aux n\u00e9cessit\u00e9s de la protection du secret des affaires.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 8 avril 2026, s\u2019est prononc\u00e9 sur le sort de centaines de pi\u00e8ces&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9567,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69e9a664cdc6046d473716c8","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69e9a664cdc6046d473716c8","_kj_judilibre_id":"69e9a664cdc6046d473716c8","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"2024R00696","_kj_date":"2026-04-08","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220178","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 8 avril 2026, s\u2019est prononc\u00e9 sur le sort de centaines de pi\u00e8ces...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 8 avril 2026, s\u2019est prononc\u00e9 sur le sort de centaines de pi\u00e8ces...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T06:09:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4600\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3450\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:09:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1624,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T06:09:29+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:09:29+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 8 avril 2026, s\u2019est prononc\u00e9 sur le sort de centaines de pi\u00e8ces...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4600,\"height\":3450},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 8 avril 2026, s\u2019est prononc\u00e9 sur le sort de centaines de pi\u00e8ces...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696","og_description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 8 avril 2026, s\u2019est prononc\u00e9 sur le sort de centaines de pi\u00e8ces...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T06:09:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4600,"height":3450,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:09:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/"},"wordCount":1624,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T06:09:29+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:09:29+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 8 avril 2026, s\u2019est prononc\u00e9 sur le sort de centaines de pi\u00e8ces...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp","width":4600,"height":3450},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2024r00696\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02024R00696"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IQwGidv9mK0-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57qi","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1207183,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-7-avril-2026-n2026l00726\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220178,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00726","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par un jugement rendu le 7 avril 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande de prorogation du d\u00e9lai de cl\u00f4ture de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1207174,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-7-avril-2026-n2026l00727\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220178,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00727","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un jugement du 7 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (7\u00e8me chambre, n\u00b02026L00727) a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une requ\u00eate du liquidateur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-wRCxUP603nE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1220172,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-8-avril-2026-n2026f00192\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220178,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02026F00192","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 8 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre (3e chambre) a rendu une ordonnance de r\u00e9ouverture des d\u00e9bats dans un litige opposant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/venus-major-dRu-1z24xCw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228744,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00750\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220178,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00750","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, dans sa neuvi\u00e8me chambre, a rendu le 9 avril 2026 un jugement statuant sur une demande de prorogation...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pierre-antona-ir9dYEOvx5s-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1207214,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-7-avril-2026-n2018r00679\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220178,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02018R00679","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a rendu une ordonnance le 7 avril 2026 (n\u00b02018R00679) dans le cadre d\u2019une mesure d\u2019instruction. Un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-hj1WiuQsWzY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1228701,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l01125\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220178,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L01125","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, dans un jugement rendu le 9 avril 2026 par sa 9\u00e8me chambre, a \u00e9t\u00e9 confront\u00e9 \u00e0 la question du passage...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-CRktpOMkRIs-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220178","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220178"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220178\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}