{"id":1220312,"date":"2026-06-30T08:21:26","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:21:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T08:21:26","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:21:26","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01278"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-lexigence-dun-lien-de-causalite-renforce-en-matiere-de-rechute\">I. L\u2019exigence d\u2019un lien de causalit\u00e9 renforc\u00e9 en mati\u00e8re de rechute<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-rappel-des-conditions-legales-de-la-notion-de-rechute\">A. Le rappel des conditions l\u00e9gales de la notion de rechute<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-presomption-dimputabilite-et-le-renversement-de-la-charge-de-la-pr\">B. L\u2019absence de pr\u00e9somption d\u2019imputabilit\u00e9 et le renversement de la charge de la preuve<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-mesure-dexpertise-comme-outil-de-clarification-du-litige-medical\">II. La mesure d\u2019expertise comme outil de clarification du litige m\u00e9dical<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-caracterisation-dun-litige-dordre-medical-justifiant-une-instruction\">A. La caract\u00e9risation d\u2019un litige d\u2019ordre m\u00e9dical justifiant une instruction<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-de-lexpertise-ordonnee-un-encadrement-strict-de-la-mission\">B. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019expertise ordonn\u00e9e : un encadrement strict de la mission<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, par un jugement avant dire droit du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b024\/01278), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une contestation relative \u00e0 la prise en charge d\u2019une rechute survenue pr\u00e8s de quinze ans apr\u00e8s un accident du travail initial. Le demandeur, victime d\u2019un lumbago en juin 2008, avait produit un certificat m\u00e9dical de rechute du 6 f\u00e9vrier 2023 mentionnant une lombosciatique S1 gauche. La caisse primaire d\u2019assurance maladie n\u2019ayant pas statu\u00e9 sur cette contestation, le litige fut port\u00e9 devant la juridiction.<\/p>\n<p>En premi\u00e8re instance, le tribunal devait d\u00e9terminer si les l\u00e9sions constat\u00e9es en f\u00e9vrier 2023 pouvaient \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9es de rechute de l\u2019accident du travail de 2008, sachant que la pr\u00e9somption d\u2019imputabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019article L.411-1 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale ne jouait plus en faveur de la victime. Le demandeur soutenait l\u2019existence d\u2019un lien entre les deux \u00e9v\u00e9nements, tandis que l\u2019organisme social contestait cette relation. La question de droit centrale \u00e9tait celle de la charge et de l\u2019\u00e9tendue de la preuve du lien de causalit\u00e9 direct et exclusif entre les l\u00e9sions nouvelles et l\u2019accident initial, en l\u2019absence de pr\u00e9somption l\u00e9gale.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal a estim\u00e9 que le litige pr\u00e9sentait un caract\u00e8re m\u00e9dical et a ordonn\u00e9 une expertise sur pi\u00e8ces afin de dire si les l\u00e9sions de f\u00e9vrier 2023 sont en lien de causalit\u00e9 certain, direct et unique avec l\u2019accident du travail de juin 2008. Il a rappel\u00e9 que la victime ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie pas de la pr\u00e9somption d\u2019imputabilit\u00e9 pour une rechute et qu\u2019il lui appartient de rapporter cette preuve. La solution retenue consiste \u00e0 surseoir \u00e0 statuer et \u00e0 diligenter une mesure d\u2019instruction, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article L.142-11 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-lexigence-dun-lien-de-causalite-renforce-en-matiere-de-rechute\">I. L\u2019exigence d\u2019un lien de causalit\u00e9 renforc\u00e9 en mati\u00e8re de rechute<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-rappel-des-conditions-legales-de-la-notion-de-rechute\">A. Le rappel des conditions l\u00e9gales de la notion de rechute<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal fonde son raisonnement sur les articles L.443-1 et L.443-2 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale. L\u2019article L.443-1 dispose que toute modification dans l\u2019\u00e9tat de la victime, constat\u00e9e apr\u00e8s la gu\u00e9rison apparente ou la consolidation, peut donner lieu \u00e0 une nouvelle fixation des r\u00e9parations. L\u2019article L.443-2 pr\u00e9cise que si l\u2019aggravation n\u00e9cessite un traitement m\u00e9dical, la caisse statue sur la prise en charge de la rechute. Le juge en d\u00e9duit que seules peuvent \u00eatre retenues, \u00e0 titre de rechute, l\u2019aggravation ou les nouvelles l\u00e9sions en lien de causalit\u00e9 direct et exclusif avec l\u2019accident du travail, et non les simples manifestations des s\u00e9quelles. Cette interpr\u00e9tation est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante de la Cour de cassation, qui exige un lien certain, direct et unique entre les troubles nouveaux et le traumatisme initial (Soc. 14 novembre 2002, n\u00b001-20.657 ; Soc. 19 d\u00e9cembre 2002, n\u00b000-22.482). Le tribunal se montre ainsi rigoureux dans la d\u00e9finition de la rechute, \u00e9cartant toute \u00e9volution naturelle des s\u00e9quelles qui ne constituerait pas une aggravation objectiv\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-presomption-dimputabilite-et-le-renversement-de-la-charge-de-la-pr\">B. L\u2019absence de pr\u00e9somption d\u2019imputabilit\u00e9 et le renversement de la charge de la preuve<\/h3>\n<p>Le jugement souligne avec nettet\u00e9 que la victime d\u2019une rechute ne b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie pas de la pr\u00e9somption d\u2019imputabilit\u00e9 de l\u2019article L.411-1 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale. Cette pr\u00e9somption, qui s\u2019applique pendant toute la dur\u00e9e d\u2019incapacit\u00e9 pr\u00e9c\u00e9dant la gu\u00e9rison ou la consolidation, cesse apr\u00e8s cette date. Le tribunal cite la jurisprudence de la Cour de cassation (Soc. 12 juillet 1990, n\u00b088-17.743) pour affirmer qu\u2019il appartient \u00e0 l\u2019assur\u00e9 de prouver l\u2019existence d\u2019une relation certaine, directe et unique entre les manifestations douloureuses et le traumatisme initial. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le certificat m\u00e9dical de rechute a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli pr\u00e8s de quinze ans apr\u00e8s l\u2019accident, ce qui exclut le b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de la pr\u00e9somption. Cette position est coh\u00e9rente avec la protection de l\u2019\u00e9quilibre financier des r\u00e9gimes d\u2019assurance maladie, car elle \u00e9vite une imputation automatique de toute pathologie ult\u00e9rieure \u00e0 un accident ancien. La charge probatoire p\u00e8se d\u00e9sormais enti\u00e8rement sur la victime, ce qui constitue une difficult\u00e9 certaine pour celle-ci, surtout lorsque le lien m\u00e9dical n\u2019est pas \u00e9vident.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-mesure-dexpertise-comme-outil-de-clarification-du-litige-medical\">II. La mesure d\u2019expertise comme outil de clarification du litige m\u00e9dical<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-caracterisation-dun-litige-dordre-medical-justifiant-une-instruction\">A. La caract\u00e9risation d\u2019un litige d\u2019ordre m\u00e9dical justifiant une instruction<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal constate que la caisse n\u2019a pas statu\u00e9 sur la contestation de l\u2019assur\u00e9 et que les \u00e9l\u00e9ments produits ne permettent pas de trancher la question du lien de causalit\u00e9. Il rel\u00e8ve que le demandeur justifie d\u2019un certificat m\u00e9dical de son m\u00e9decin traitant prescrivant des s\u00e9ances de kin\u00e9sith\u00e9rapie en raison de l\u2019accident de 2008 et de la rechute de 2023, mais que cela ne suffit pas \u00e0 \u00e9tablir la preuve exig\u00e9e. En cons\u00e9quence, il estime qu\u2019il existe un litige d\u2019ordre m\u00e9dical et ordonne une expertise sur pi\u00e8ces, sans examen clinique, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article L.142-11 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale. Ce choix proc\u00e9dural est pertinent car il permet de recueillir l\u2019avis d\u2019un expert neutre avant de statuer au fond. Comme le rappelle la Cour d\u2019appel de Paris dans un arr\u00eat du 28 mars 2025 (n\u00b019\/12472), <em>&#8221; l\u2019avis technique de l\u2019expert ou du comit\u00e9 [\u2026] s\u2019impose \u00e0 l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 comme \u00e0 la caisse &#8220;<\/em> et, au vu de cet avis, le juge peut ordonner une nouvelle expertise. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e illustre ainsi l\u2019usage classique de la mesure d\u2019instruction en mati\u00e8re de contentieux technique de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-de-lexpertise-ordonnee-un-encadrement-strict-de-la-mission\">B. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019expertise ordonn\u00e9e : un encadrement strict de la mission<\/h3>\n<p>La mission confi\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019expert est pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment d\u00e9limit\u00e9e : il devra dire si les l\u00e9sions mentionn\u00e9es sur le certificat m\u00e9dical de rechute du 6 f\u00e9vrier 2023 sont en lien de causalit\u00e9 certain, direct et unique avec l\u2019accident du travail du 26 juin 2008. Le tribunal prend soin de pr\u00e9ciser que l\u2019expertise se fera sur pi\u00e8ces, sans examen clinique, ce qui limite les frais et les d\u00e9lais. Il renvoie \u00e9galement aux articles 273 et 275 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile pour la communication des pi\u00e8ces. Cette expertise s\u2019inscrit dans le cadre d\u2019un jugement avant dire droit, ce qui signifie que le tribunal ne se prononce pas encore sur le fond. La port\u00e9e de cette d\u00e9cision est double : d\u2019une part, elle rappelle que la preuve du lien de causalit\u00e9 en mati\u00e8re de rechute est exigeante et ne peut reposer sur de simples pr\u00e9somptions ; d\u2019autre part, elle offre \u00e0 la victime une chance de d\u00e9montrer ce lien par une expertise objective. La solution retenue est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence de la Cour d\u2019appel de N\u00eemes du 30 janvier 2025 (n\u00b024\/00082), qui rappelle que <em>&#8221; la pr\u00e9somption d\u2019imputabilit\u00e9 au travail s\u2019applique non seulement au fait accidentel, mais \u00e9galement \u00e0 l\u2019ensemble des \u00e9volutions constat\u00e9es et des prestations d\u00e9livr\u00e9es jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la compl\u00e8te gu\u00e9rison ou la consolidation &#8220;<\/em>, ce qui implique a contrario qu\u2019apr\u00e8s consolidation, la charge probatoire est invers\u00e9e. En ordonnant une expertise, le tribunal laisse au rapport m\u00e9dical le soin de trancher, en toute impartialit\u00e9, la question du lien causal.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e78ddfa0756e3a702f8e03\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 28 mars 2025, n\u00b019\/12472<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/679c6c08e498d62cfdde104b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de N\u00eemes, le 30 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/00082<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000035651060\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 2314-23 du Code du travail<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Pour les salari\u00e9s mis \u00e0 disposition qui remplissent les conditions mentionn\u00e9es au 2\u00b0 de l&#8217;article L. 1111-2, la condition de pr\u00e9sence dans l&#8217;entreprise utilisatrice est de douze mois continus pour y \u00eatre \u00e9lecteur. Les salari\u00e9s mis \u00e0 disposition ne sont pas \u00e9ligibles dans l&#8217;entreprise utilisatrice. <\/p>\n<p>Les salari\u00e9s mis \u00e0 disposition qui remplissent les conditions mentionn\u00e9es au premier alin\u00e9a choisissent s&#8217;ils exercent leur droit de vote dans l&#8217;entreprise qui les emploie ou l&#8217;entreprise utilisatrice.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006743107\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 443-2 du Code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Si l&#8217;aggravation de la l\u00e9sion entra\u00eene pour la victime la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d&#8217;un traitement m\u00e9dical, qu&#8217;il y ait ou non nouvelle incapacit\u00e9 temporaire, la caisse primaire d&#8217;assurance maladie statue sur la prise en charge de la rechute. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410410\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 273 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   L&#8217;expert doit informer le juge de l&#8217;avancement de ses op\u00e9rations et des diligences par lui accomplies.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410413\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 275 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les parties doivent remettre sans d\u00e9lai \u00e0 l&#8217;expert tous les documents que celui-ci estime n\u00e9cessaires \u00e0 l&#8217;accomplissement de sa mission.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>En cas de carence des parties, l&#8217;expert en informe le juge qui peut ordonner la production des documents, s&#8217;il y a lieu sous astreinte, ou bien, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, l&#8217;autoriser \u00e0 passer outre ou \u00e0 d\u00e9poser son rapport en l&#8217;\u00e9tat. La juridiction de jugement peut tirer toute cons\u00e9quence de droit du d\u00e9faut de communication des documents \u00e0 l&#8217;expert.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000047452603\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 411-1 du Code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Est consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme accident du travail, quelle qu&#8217;en soit la cause, l&#8217;accident survenu par le fait ou \u00e0 l&#8217;occasion du travail \u00e0 toute personne mentionn\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 311-2.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000041399104\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 142-11 du Code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les frais r\u00e9sultant des consultations et expertises ordonn\u00e9es par les juridictions comp\u00e9tentes dans le cadre des contentieux mentionn\u00e9s aux 1\u00b0et 4\u00b0, 5\u00b0, 6\u00b0, 8\u00b0 et 9\u00b0 de l&#8217;article L. 142-1 sont pris en charge par l&#8217;organisme mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 221-1.<\/p>\n<p>Un d\u00e9cret fixe les conditions dans lesquelles les frais expos\u00e9s \u00e0 ce titre peuvent \u00eatre avanc\u00e9s par l&#8217;Etat ainsi que les conditions dans lesquelles ils sont, dans ce cas, rembours\u00e9s \u00e0 ce dernier par l&#8217;organisme mentionn\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 221-1.<\/p>\n<p>Un arr\u00eat\u00e9 d\u00e9termine les conditions dans lesquelles les d\u00e9penses acquitt\u00e9es par la Caisse nationale de l&#8217;assurance maladie en application du pr\u00e9sent article sont r\u00e9parties entre les organismes du r\u00e9gime g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale, du r\u00e9gime de la mutualit\u00e9 sociale agricole, des r\u00e9gimes sp\u00e9ciaux mentionn\u00e9s au livre VII et les organismes institu\u00e9s par le livre VI.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, par un jugement avant dire droit du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b024\/01278), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une contestation relative \u00e0 la prise en&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9511,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69d6d1e8cdc6046d47929698","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69d6d1e8cdc6046d47929698","_kj_judilibre_id":"69d6d1e8cdc6046d47929698","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Grenoble","_kj_chambre":"3.1 chb sociale du TASS","_kj_rg":"24\/01278","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01278 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, par un jugement avant dire droit du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b024\/01278), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une contestation relative \u00e0 la prise en...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01278\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, par un jugement avant dire droit du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b024\/01278), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une contestation relative \u00e0 la prise en...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T06:21:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6657\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4636\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01278\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:21:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1868,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01278\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T06:21:26+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01278 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:21:26+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, par un jugement avant dire droit du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b024\\\/01278), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une contestation relative \u00e0 la prise en...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6657,\"height\":4636},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\\\/01278\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01278 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, par un jugement avant dire droit du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b024\/01278), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une contestation relative \u00e0 la prise en...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01278","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, par un jugement avant dire droit du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b024\/01278), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une contestation relative \u00e0 la prise en...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T06:21:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6657,"height":4636,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01278","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:21:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/"},"wordCount":1868,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01278","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T06:21:26+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01278 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:21:26+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, par un jugement avant dire droit du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b024\/01278), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une contestation relative \u00e0 la prise en...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","width":6657,"height":4636},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-grenoble-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01278\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Grenoble, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01278"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2F-9_XQYhP8-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57ss","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":462390,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/ce-conseil-detat-07-02-2025-n-501149\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220312,"position":0},"title":"CE \u2013 Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat \u2013 07\/02\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 501149","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"L'ordonnance comment\u00e9e, rendue par le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Conseil d'\u00c9tat le 7 f\u00e9vrier 2025, traite de la liquidation d'une astreinte administrative. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/dario-bronnimann-QRj9c38HgHg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/dario-bronnimann-QRj9c38HgHg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/dario-bronnimann-QRj9c38HgHg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/dario-bronnimann-QRj9c38HgHg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/dario-bronnimann-QRj9c38HgHg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/dario-bronnimann-QRj9c38HgHg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":463403,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-lyon-26-03-2025-n-23ly00623\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220312,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de LYON \u2013 26\/03\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 23LY00623","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Lyon a rendu, le 26 mars 2025, une d\u00e9cision remarqu\u00e9e relative au contentieux de l\u2019autorisation environnementale d\u2019un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/aleix-ventayol-yPoM-wmzKMM-unsplash-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/aleix-ventayol-yPoM-wmzKMM-unsplash-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/aleix-ventayol-yPoM-wmzKMM-unsplash-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/aleix-ventayol-yPoM-wmzKMM-unsplash-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/aleix-ventayol-yPoM-wmzKMM-unsplash-2.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/aleix-ventayol-yPoM-wmzKMM-unsplash-2.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":461767,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/ce-conseil-detat-13-10-2025-n-508710\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220312,"position":2},"title":"CE \u2013 Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat \u2013 13\/10\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 508710","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil d'\u00c9tat, par une ordonnance rendue le 13 octobre 2025, se prononce sur la r\u00e9partition des comp\u00e9tences juridictionnelles concernant les fichiers...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kedar-gadge-qNbe1RLo06M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kedar-gadge-qNbe1RLo06M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kedar-gadge-qNbe1RLo06M-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kedar-gadge-qNbe1RLo06M-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kedar-gadge-qNbe1RLo06M-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kedar-gadge-qNbe1RLo06M-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":462672,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-21-08-2025-n-25tl00612\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220312,"position":3},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 21\/08\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL00612","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par une ordonnance rendue le 21 ao\u00fbt 2025, la Cour administrative d'appel de Toulouse pr\u00e9cise les conditions d'application du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9-expertise m\u00e9dicale....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/diane-picchiottino-x5-AOGEbv3c-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":458115,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/ce-conseil-detat-22-12-2025-n-504572\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220312,"position":4},"title":"CE \u2013 Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat \u2013 22\/12\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 504572","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat a rendu, le 22 d\u00e9cembre 2025, une d\u00e9cision relative au droit de substitution d'un contribuable pour exercer une action appartenant \u00e0 sa...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jonathan-velasquez-eUSpDPSFdKU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jonathan-velasquez-eUSpDPSFdKU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jonathan-velasquez-eUSpDPSFdKU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jonathan-velasquez-eUSpDPSFdKU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jonathan-velasquez-eUSpDPSFdKU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jonathan-velasquez-eUSpDPSFdKU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":463665,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/ce-conseil-detat-30-01-2025-n-497272\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220312,"position":5},"title":"CE \u2013 Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat \u2013 30\/01\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 497272","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Conseil d'\u00c9tat, par un arr\u00eat rendu le 30 janvier 2025, apporte une pr\u00e9cision majeure sur le partage de comp\u00e9tences entre les deux ordres de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-XdxxYxeOFUo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-XdxxYxeOFUo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-XdxxYxeOFUo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-XdxxYxeOFUo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-XdxxYxeOFUo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-XdxxYxeOFUo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220312"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220312\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9511"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}