{"id":1220433,"date":"2026-06-30T08:43:40","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:43:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T08:43:40","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:43:40","slug":"cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour d&#8217;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01513"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-rigueur-imposee-a-la-clause-attributive-de-competence-entre-commercants\">I. La rigueur impos\u00e9e \u00e0 la clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence entre commer\u00e7ants<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lexigence-dune-clause-tres-apparente-et-non-equivoque\">A. L\u2019exigence d\u2019une clause tr\u00e8s apparente et non \u00e9quivoque<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-leffet-des-discordances-contractuelles-sur-la-volonte-commune\">B. L\u2019effet des discordances contractuelles sur la volont\u00e9 commune<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-consequences-procedurales-de-labsence-de-clause-attributive-valide\">II. Les cons\u00e9quences proc\u00e9durales de l\u2019absence de clause attributive valide<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-retour-au-droit-commun-de-la-competence-territoriale\">A. Le retour au droit commun de la comp\u00e9tence territoriale<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-rejet-de-la-disjonction-de-linstance-une-mesure-dadministration-judiciaire\">B. Le rejet de la disjonction de l\u2019instance : une mesure d\u2019administration judiciaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un arr\u00eat du 29 avril 2026, la chambre commerciale de la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union a eu \u00e0 se prononcer sur la validit\u00e9 d\u2019une clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence en pr\u00e9sence de stipulations contractuelles discordantes. Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9, venderesse d\u2019une machine, a assign\u00e9 l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur en r\u00e9solution de la vente pour vices cach\u00e9s devant le tribunal mixte de commerce de Saint-Pierre de La R\u00e9union. Le vendeur a soulev\u00e9 une exception d\u2019incomp\u00e9tence territoriale en se pr\u00e9valant d\u2019une clause d\u00e9signant le tribunal de commerce de Versailles, ou subsidiairement celui de Vienne. Par jugement, le premier juge a rejet\u00e9 l\u2019exception et s\u2019est d\u00e9clar\u00e9 comp\u00e9tent. Le vendeur a relev\u00e9 appel. La cour devait d\u00e9terminer si la clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence, bien que stipul\u00e9e dans des conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales de vente sign\u00e9es, pouvait \u00eatre neutralis\u00e9e par l\u2019existence d\u2019une clause concurrente figurant dans d\u2019autres documents contractuels. La cour a confirm\u00e9 le jugement, \u00e9cartant la clause en raison de discordances insurmontables. Elle a \u00e9galement rejet\u00e9 la demande de disjonction de l\u2019instance. La solution invite \u00e0 analyser la rigueur exig\u00e9e pour les clauses attributives de comp\u00e9tence entre commer\u00e7ants (I) avant d\u2019en mesurer les cons\u00e9quences proc\u00e9durales sur la comp\u00e9tence et l\u2019administration de l\u2019instance (II).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-rigueur-imposee-a-la-clause-attributive-de-competence-entre-commercants\">I. La rigueur impos\u00e9e \u00e0 la clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence entre commer\u00e7ants<\/h2>\n<p>La cour rappelle que l\u2019article 48 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile exige, pour qu\u2019une clause d\u00e9rogeant aux r\u00e8gles territoriales soit valable, qu\u2019elle soit convenue entre commer\u00e7ants et <em>&#8221; sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9e de fa\u00e7on tr\u00e8s apparente &#8220;<\/em>. Elle ajoute que seule une clause <em>&#8221; claire, non \u00e9quivoque et d\u00e9pourvue de toute ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 &#8220;<\/em> peut faire \u00e9chec au droit commun. Cette exigence est renforc\u00e9e par l\u2019article 1119 du code civil, qui prive d\u2019effet les clauses incompatibles issues de conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales discordantes.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lexigence-dune-clause-tres-apparente-et-non-equivoque\">A. L\u2019exigence d\u2019une clause tr\u00e8s apparente et non \u00e9quivoque<\/h3>\n<p>La cour examine d\u2019abord le caract\u00e8re apparent de la clause invoqu\u00e9e par le vendeur. Les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales de vente, sign\u00e9es en 2016, comportent un paragraphe 8 intitul\u00e9 <em>&#8221; Juridiction &#8220;<\/em> r\u00e9dig\u00e9 en capitales, gras et soulign\u00e9. Bien que la clause figure parmi d\u2019autres stipulations, son rep\u00e9rage est ais\u00e9. La cour \u00e9carte ainsi l\u2019argument de l\u2019absence de caract\u00e8re tr\u00e8s apparent, jugeant que le paragraphe est <em>&#8221; facilement rep\u00e9rable et identifiable &#8220;<\/em>. Elle se conforme \u00e0 une lecture exigeante mais r\u00e9aliste de l\u2019article 48. Toutefois, cette apparente r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 ne suffit pas. Il faut encore que la clause soit d\u00e9pourvue d\u2019ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 dans son objet m\u00eame, ce qui conduit la cour \u00e0 s\u2019int\u00e9resser \u00e0 la coh\u00e9rence des documents contractuels.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-leffet-des-discordances-contractuelles-sur-la-volonte-commune\">B. L\u2019effet des discordances contractuelles sur la volont\u00e9 commune<\/h3>\n<p>La cour constate que plusieurs documents li\u00e9s \u00e0 la vente litigieuse contiennent des clauses attributives de comp\u00e9tence contradictoires. Le devis du 1er mars 2021 d\u00e9signe le tribunal de commerce de Vienne, de m\u00eame que la facture proforma du 27 novembre 2019, sign\u00e9e par l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur. \u00c0 l\u2019inverse, la facture d\u00e9finitive du 20 janvier 2021 mentionne le tribunal de commerce de Versailles, mais n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 adress\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur. La cour \u00e9carte les documents relatifs \u00e0 des prestations distinctes et s\u2019attache exclusivement aux pi\u00e8ces de la vente. Elle retient que la facture proforma, mat\u00e9rialisant l\u2019accord sur la chose et le prix, comporte une clause visant Vienne, tandis que les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales sign\u00e9es ant\u00e9rieurement visent Versailles. Il en r\u00e9sulte une <em>&#8221; discordance [\u2026] parfaitement \u00e9tablie &#8220;<\/em>, source d\u2019ambigu\u00eft\u00e9. Appliquant l\u2019article 1119 du code civil, elle en d\u00e9duit que les clauses incompatibles sont sans effet et que le litige rel\u00e8ve des r\u00e8gles de droit commun. Cette solution s\u2019inscrit dans la droite ligne de la jurisprudence qui exige une ad\u00e9quation parfaite des stipulations : <em>&#8221; une clause attribuant comp\u00e9tence \u00e0 une juridiction \u00e9trang\u00e8re, valablement stipul\u00e9e, l\u2019emporte sur la comp\u00e9tence sp\u00e9ciale [\u2026] m\u00eame en cas d\u2019indivisibilit\u00e9 du litige ou d\u2019interd\u00e9pendance des contrats &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68e5facda28a47f8aa0163a5\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cass. 1re civ., 8 oct. 2025, n\u00b023-16.756)<\/a><\/strong>. Mais encore faut-il que la clause soit unique et non contredite. Or, la cour retient que la coexistence de deux clauses distinctes rend impossible toute d\u00e9termination claire de la volont\u00e9 des parties. Elle rejoint en cela l\u2019analyse de la cour d\u2019appel de Douai, pour laquelle <em>&#8221; la seule absence de contestation de la clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence [\u2026] ne peut valoir acceptation &#8220;<\/em> lorsqu\u2019il existe une contradiction contractuelle (CA Douai, 24 avr. 2025, n\u00b024\/02986).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-consequences-procedurales-de-labsence-de-clause-attributive-valide\">II. Les cons\u00e9quences proc\u00e9durales de l\u2019absence de clause attributive valide<\/h2>\n<p>Une fois \u00e9cart\u00e9es les clauses attributives, la cour se tourne vers les r\u00e8gles de comp\u00e9tence territoriale de droit commun. Elle confirme la comp\u00e9tence de la juridiction r\u00e9unionnaise d\u00e9j\u00e0 retenue par le premier juge, et rejette la demande de disjonction de l\u2019instance, consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme une mesure d\u2019administration judiciaire insusceptible d\u2019appel.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-retour-au-droit-commun-de-la-competence-territoriale\">A. Le retour au droit commun de la comp\u00e9tence territoriale<\/h3>\n<p>La cour ne pr\u00e9cise pas le fondement pr\u00e9cis de la comp\u00e9tence du tribunal mixte de commerce de Saint-Pierre de La R\u00e9union, mais elle le confirme implicitement. En l\u2019absence de clause valable, les crit\u00e8res g\u00e9n\u00e9raux de comp\u00e9tence territoriale reprennent leur empire : soit le domicile du d\u00e9fendeur (article 42 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile), soit le lieu de livraison effective de la chose ou le lieu du fait dommageable (article 46). En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019acqu\u00e9reur est situ\u00e9 \u00e0 La R\u00e9union et la machine y a \u00e9t\u00e9 livr\u00e9e. La comp\u00e9tence du tribunal r\u00e9unionnais est donc naturelle. La cour rejette l\u2019appel en confirmant que <em>&#8221; le tribunal mixte de commerce de Saint-Pierre de La R\u00e9union [est] comp\u00e9tent &#8220;<\/em>. Elle \u00e9carte ainsi toute discussion subsidiaire sur une comp\u00e9tence alternative au profit du tribunal de Saint-Denis de La R\u00e9union. Cette solution est logique : d\u00e8s lors que les clauses sont neutralis\u00e9es, le juge du lieu d\u2019ex\u00e9cution du contrat ou du domicile du d\u00e9fendeur retrouve sa pl\u00e9nitude de comp\u00e9tence. La cour fait ainsi preuve de rigueur en ne s\u2019\u00e9cartant pas des principes g\u00e9n\u00e9raux.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-rejet-de-la-disjonction-de-linstance-une-mesure-dadministration-judiciaire\">B. Le rejet de la disjonction de l\u2019instance : une mesure d\u2019administration judiciaire<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019appelante sollicitait la disjonction de l\u2019instance principale en r\u00e9solution de la vente et des appels en garantie form\u00e9s par le vendeur. La cour rappelle que les mesures de jonction et disjonction sont des <em>&#8221; mesures d\u2019administration judiciaires &#8220;<\/em> pr\u00e9vues aux articles 367 et 368 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, et qu\u2019elles sont insusceptibles de recours en application de l\u2019article 537. Elle constate que, m\u00eame s\u2019il lui est loisible d\u2019ordonner la disjonction, il n\u2019est pas <em>&#8221; dans l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat d\u2019une bonne administration de la justice &#8220;<\/em> de le faire, malgr\u00e9 l\u2019alourdissement de la proc\u00e9dure. La cour privil\u00e9gie l\u2019unit\u00e9 du litige et la c\u00e9l\u00e9rit\u00e9. Ce faisant, elle exerce son pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire de mani\u00e8re souveraine, sans encourir de critique juridique. Le rejet de la disjonction conforte la comp\u00e9tence de la juridiction r\u00e9unionnaise pour conna\u00eetre de l\u2019ensemble du contentieux. L\u2019arr\u00eat illustre ainsi que la neutralisation d\u2019une clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence, m\u00eame r\u00e9guli\u00e8re en apparence, peut r\u00e9sulter de simples discordances contractuelles, et que les juges du fond disposent d\u2019une large marge d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation pour organiser l\u2019instance.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68e5facda28a47f8aa0163a5\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Premi\u00e8re chambre civile, le 8 octobre 2025, n\u00b023-16.756<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68106204623750c90e2d7718\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Douai, le 24 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/02986<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410585\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 367 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le juge peut, \u00e0 la demande des parties ou d&#8217;office, ordonner la jonction de plusieurs instances pendantes devant lui s&#8217;il existe entre les litiges un lien tel qu&#8217;il soit de l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat d&#8217;une bonne justice de les faire instruire ou juger ensemble.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Il peut \u00e9galement ordonner la disjonction d&#8217;une instance en plusieurs.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410586\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 368 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les d\u00e9cisions de jonction ou disjonction d&#8217;instances sont des mesures d&#8217;administration judiciaire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410147\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 48 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Toute clause qui, directement ou indirectement, d\u00e9roge aux r\u00e8gles de comp\u00e9tence territoriale est r\u00e9put\u00e9e non \u00e9crite \u00e0 moins qu&#8217;elle n&#8217;ait \u00e9t\u00e9 convenue entre des personnes ayant toutes contract\u00e9 en qualit\u00e9 de commer\u00e7ant et qu&#8217;elle n&#8217;ait \u00e9t\u00e9 sp\u00e9cifi\u00e9e de fa\u00e7on tr\u00e8s apparente dans l&#8217;engagement de la partie \u00e0 qui elle est oppos\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032040866\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1119 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales invoqu\u00e9es par une partie n&#8217;ont effet \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9gard de l&#8217;autre que si elles ont \u00e9t\u00e9 port\u00e9es \u00e0 la connaissance de celle-ci et si elle les a accept\u00e9es. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> En cas de discordance entre des conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales invoqu\u00e9es par l&#8217;une et l&#8217;autre des parties, les clauses incompatibles sont sans effet. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> En cas de discordance entre des conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales et des conditions particuli\u00e8res, les secondes l&#8217;emportent sur les premi\u00e8res. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410140\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 42 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente est, sauf disposition contraire, celle du lieu o\u00f9 demeure le d\u00e9fendeur.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   S&#8217;il y a plusieurs d\u00e9fendeurs, le demandeur saisit, \u00e0 son choix, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 demeure l&#8217;un d&#8217;eux.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Si le d\u00e9fendeur n&#8217;a ni domicile ni r\u00e9sidence connus, le demandeur peut saisir la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 il demeure ou celle de son choix s&#8217;il demeure \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9tranger.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un arr\u00eat du 29 avril 2026, la chambre commerciale de la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union a eu \u00e0 se prononcer sur la validit\u00e9 d\u2019une clause&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9685,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f2e39dcdc6046d470c29fa","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f2e39dcdc6046d470c29fa","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f2e39dcdc6046d470c29fa","_kj_jur":"Cour d'appel","_kj_lieu":"Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union","_kj_chambre":"Chambre commerciale","_kj_rg":"25\/01513","_kj_date":"2026-04-29","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6455,6454],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220433","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-dappel","category-decisions-juridiques"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour d&#039;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01513 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un arr\u00eat du 29 avril 2026, la chambre commerciale de la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union a eu \u00e0 se prononcer sur la validit\u00e9 d\u2019une clause...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour d&#039;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01513\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un arr\u00eat du 29 avril 2026, la chambre commerciale de la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union a eu \u00e0 se prononcer sur la validit\u00e9 d\u2019une clause...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T06:43:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6016\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4016\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/01513\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:43:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1748,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cour d'appel\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/01513\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T06:43:40+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/01513 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T06:43:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un arr\u00eat du 29 avril 2026, la chambre commerciale de la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union a eu \u00e0 se prononcer sur la validit\u00e9 d\u2019une clause...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6016,\"height\":4016},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour d&rsquo;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/01513\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour d'appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01513 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un arr\u00eat du 29 avril 2026, la chambre commerciale de la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union a eu \u00e0 se prononcer sur la validit\u00e9 d\u2019une clause...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour d'appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01513","og_description":"Par un arr\u00eat du 29 avril 2026, la chambre commerciale de la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union a eu \u00e0 se prononcer sur la validit\u00e9 d\u2019une clause...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T06:43:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6016,"height":4016,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour d&#8217;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01513","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:43:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/"},"wordCount":1748,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Cour d'appel","D\u00e9cisions juridiques"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour d&#8217;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01513","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cour d'appel"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T06:43:40+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/","name":"Cour d'appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01513 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T06:43:40+00:00","description":"Par un arr\u00eat du 29 avril 2026, la chambre commerciale de la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union a eu \u00e0 se prononcer sur la validit\u00e9 d\u2019une clause...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp","width":6016,"height":4016},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-la-reunion-le-29-avril-2026-n25-01513\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour d&rsquo;appel de La R\u00e9union, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01513"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/kateryna-hliznitsova-TQpOu3Bivsc-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57up","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":461296,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nantes-17-10-2025-n-24nt01851\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220433,"position":0},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANTES \u2013 17\/10\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24NT01851","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Nantes a rendu le 17 octobre 2025 un arr\u00eat concernant le refus de visa oppos\u00e9 \u00e0 un enfant mineur. Un ressortissant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-2UZMc83XJ8I-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":458467,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-lyon-18-12-2025-n-24ly03506\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220433,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de LYON \u2013 18\/12\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24LY03506","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un arr\u00eat rendu le 18 d\u00e9cembre 2025, la cour administrative d'appel de Lyon pr\u00e9cise les conditions de publicit\u00e9 des s\u00e9ances municipales durant l'\u00e9tat...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-QO3j7qdSKv8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":459905,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-marseille-18-11-2025-n-24ma01668\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220433,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de MARSEILLE \u2013 18\/11\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24MA01668","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0La Cour administrative d'appel de Marseille, le 18 novembre 2025, a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 les modalit\u00e9s d'urbanisation en zone de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-VKn4-6O9LWk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":459273,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-versailles-04-12-2025-n-24ve01311\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220433,"position":3},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de VERSAILLES \u2013 04\/12\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24VE01311","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Versailles s'est prononc\u00e9e le 20 novembre 2025 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 d'une d\u00e9lib\u00e9ration municipale autorisant la vente d'un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457169,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nancy-15-01-2026-n-25nc02530\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220433,"position":4},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANCY \u2013 15\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25NC02530","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par une ordonnance enregistr\u00e9e sous le num\u00e9ro 25NC02530, la cour administrative d\u2019appel de Nancy statue sur le versement d\u2019une provision \u00e0 une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457083,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-22-01-2026-n-23tl02820\/","url_meta":{"origin":1220433,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 22\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 23TL02820","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d'appel de Toulouse, par un arr\u00eat rendu le 22 janvier 2026, s'est prononc\u00e9e sur la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 d'une obligation de quitter le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-23s86SIERuk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-23s86SIERuk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-23s86SIERuk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-23s86SIERuk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-23s86SIERuk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-23s86SIERuk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220433","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220433"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220433\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9685"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220433"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220433"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220433"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}