{"id":1221558,"date":"2026-06-30T16:25:43","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:25:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T16:25:43","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:25:43","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-lacceptation-du-desistement-comme-mode-dextinction-de-linstance\">I. L&#8217;ACCEPTATION DU DESISTEMENT COMME MODE D&#8217;EXTINCTION DE L&#8217;INSTANCE<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-constat-de-laccord-des-parties-sur-le-desistement\">A. Le constat de l&#8217;accord des parties sur le d\u00e9sistement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lextinction-de-linstance-par-leffet-du-desistement\">B. L&#8217;extinction de l&#8217;instance par l&#8217;effet du d\u00e9sistement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-repartition-conventionnelle-des-depens-comme-corollaire-du-desistement\">II. LA REPARTITION CONVENTIONNELLE DES DEPENS COMME COROLLAIRE DU DESISTEMENT<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lapplication-de-laccord-des-parties-sur-les-frais-et-depens\">A. L&#8217;application de l&#8217;accord des parties sur les frais et d\u00e9pens<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-pratique-de-la-solution-retenue-par-le-tribunal\">B. La port\u00e9e pratique de la solution retenue par le tribunal<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p><h2 id=\"i-lacceptation-du-desistement-comme-mode-dextinction-de-linstance\">I. L&#8217;ACCEPTATION DU DESISTEMENT COMME MODE D&#8217;EXTINCTION DE L&#8217;INSTANCE<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-constat-de-laccord-des-parties-sur-le-desistement\">A. Le constat de l&#8217;accord des parties sur le d\u00e9sistement<\/h3>\n<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, dans son jugement du 8 avril 2026, est saisi d&#8217;une demande de d\u00e9sistement formul\u00e9e par la demanderesse. La demanderesse d\u00e9clare se d\u00e9sister de son instance et de son action \u00e0 l&#8217;encontre de la d\u00e9fenderesse. La d\u00e9fenderesse, interrog\u00e9e sur ce point, ne s&#8217;oppose pas \u00e0 ce d\u00e9sistement. Le tribunal constate ainsi un accord expr\u00e8s entre les parties sur la volont\u00e9 de mettre fin au litige.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;article 395 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile dispose que le d\u00e9sistement n&#8217;est parfait que par l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la d\u00e9fenderesse a clairement indiqu\u00e9 qu&#8217;elle ne s&#8217;opposait pas au d\u00e9sistement, ce qui \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 une acceptation. Le tribunal peut donc l\u00e9galement donner acte \u00e0 la demanderesse de son d\u00e9sistement. La solution retenue est classique : le juge se borne \u00e0 constater l&#8217;accord des parties sans avoir \u00e0 statuer sur le fond du litige. Il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;un d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance et d&#8217;action, ce qui implique que non seulement la proc\u00e9dure est \u00e9teinte, mais que la demanderesse renonce \u00e9galement \u00e0 son droit d&#8217;agir sur le fondement de la demande initiale.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lextinction-de-linstance-par-leffet-du-desistement\">B. L&#8217;extinction de l&#8217;instance par l&#8217;effet du d\u00e9sistement<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal, apr\u00e8s avoir donn\u00e9 acte du d\u00e9sistement, constate l&#8217;extinction de l&#8217;instance et son dessaisissement. Cette cons\u00e9quence est express\u00e9ment pr\u00e9vue par l&#8217;article 384 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui \u00e9nonce que l&#8217;instance s&#8217;\u00e9teint notamment par l&#8217;effet du d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance. Le jugement rappelle d&#8217;ailleurs ce texte dans ses motifs. Le dessaisissement du juge est imm\u00e9diat et d\u00e9finitif : le tribunal ne peut plus conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire, sauf si un nouveau litige venait \u00e0 na\u00eetre entre les m\u00eames parties.<\/p>\n<p>La solution est donc conforme au droit positif. Le d\u00e9sistement accept\u00e9 emporte extinction de l&#8217;instance sans qu&#8217;il soit n\u00e9cessaire d&#8217;examiner le bien-fond\u00e9 des pr\u00e9tentions. Le tribunal exerce ici un r\u00f4le passif : il enregistre la volont\u00e9 concordante des parties et tire les cons\u00e9quences juridiques de cet accord. Cette solution est coh\u00e9rente avec la fonction du juge dans les mati\u00e8res o\u00f9 les parties disposent de leurs droits.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-repartition-conventionnelle-des-depens-comme-corollaire-du-desistement\">II. LA REPARTITION CONVENTIONNELLE DES DEPENS COMME COROLLAIRE DU DESISTEMENT<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lapplication-de-laccord-des-parties-sur-les-frais-et-depens\">A. L&#8217;application de l&#8217;accord des parties sur les frais et d\u00e9pens<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal laisse \u00e0 chacune des parties la charge de ses propres frais et d\u00e9pens. Cette d\u00e9cision est directement inspir\u00e9e de l&#8217;accord intervenu entre les parties lors de l&#8217;audience. Les conseils des deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s ont en effet conclu en ce sens, sans que le tribunal ait \u00e0 imposer une r\u00e9partition diff\u00e9rente. La solution est conforme \u00e0 la pratique des d\u00e9sistements amiables.<\/p>\n<p>Cette approche est confirm\u00e9e par la jurisprudence des cours d&#8217;appel. La Cour d&#8217;appel de Versailles a ainsi jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;Au regard de l&#8217;accord des parties, chacune conservera la charge des frais et d\u00e9pens qu&#8217;elle a engag\u00e9s.&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/698c1c99cdc6046d47d6bef1\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Versailles, le 10 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/05310)<\/a><\/strong>. De m\u00eame, la Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence a retenu que <em>&#8220;Selon accord des parties, chacune gardera \u00e0 sa charge ses propres d\u00e9pens et les frais qu&#8217;elle a expos\u00e9s.&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/680b1f944d571f883366921c\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, le 24 avril 2025, n\u00b021\/08895)<\/a><\/strong>. Le tribunal reprend ici explicitement cette logique contractuelle.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-pratique-de-la-solution-retenue-par-le-tribunal\">B. La port\u00e9e pratique de la solution retenue par le tribunal<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision du tribunal pr\u00e9sente une port\u00e9e pratique importante. En laissant chaque partie supporter ses propres d\u00e9pens, le tribunal encourage les d\u00e9sistements amiables en \u00e9vitant une condamnation aux d\u00e9pens qui pourrait dissuader une partie de se d\u00e9sister. Cette solution est \u00e9galement conforme \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 : puisque les deux parties ont accept\u00e9 le d\u00e9sistement, il est logique qu&#8217;elles assument chacune les frais qu&#8217;elles ont expos\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<p>Le jugement pr\u00e9cise en outre le montant des frais de greffe liquid\u00e9s \u00e0 55,67 \u20ac TTC. Cette liquidation est distincte des frais d&#8217;avocat et autres d\u00e9pens. Le tribunal laisse cette somme \u00e0 la charge de la partie qui l&#8217;a expos\u00e9e, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l&#8217;accord g\u00e9n\u00e9ral. Cette solution est pragmatique et \u00e9vite tout contentieux ult\u00e9rieur sur le sort des d\u00e9pens. Elle t\u00e9moigne de la volont\u00e9 du tribunal de faciliter une sortie n\u00e9goci\u00e9e du litige, sans affrontement judiciaire inutile.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/698c1c99cdc6046d47d6bef1\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Versailles, le 10 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/05310<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/680b1f944d571f883366921c\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 24 avril 2025, n\u00b021\/08895<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410620\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 395 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Le d\u00e9sistement n&#8217;est parfait que par l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur.<\/p>\n<p>    Toutefois, l&#8217;acceptation n&#8217;est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n&#8217;a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051928783\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 384 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>En dehors des cas o\u00f9 cet effet r\u00e9sulte du jugement, l&#8217;instance s&#8217;\u00e9teint accessoirement \u00e0 l&#8217;action par l&#8217;effet de la transaction, de l&#8217;acquiescement, du d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;action ou, dans les actions non transmissibles, par le d\u00e9c\u00e8s d&#8217;une partie.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;extinction de l&#8217;instance est constat\u00e9e par une d\u00e9cision de dessaisissement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I. L&#8217;ACCEPTATION DU DESISTEMENT COMME MODE D&#8217;EXTINCTION DE L&#8217;INSTANCE A. Le constat de l&#8217;accord des parties sur le d\u00e9sistement Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4871,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"6a0e2271cdc6046d475c4227","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6a0e2271cdc6046d475c4227","_kj_judilibre_id":"6a0e2271cdc6046d475c4227","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris","_kj_chambre":"chambre 1-7","_kj_rg":"2025076014","_kj_date":"2026-04-08","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1221558","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I. L&#039;ACCEPTATION DU DESISTEMENT COMME MODE D&#039;EXTINCTION DE L&#039;INSTANCE A. Le constat de l&#039;accord des parties sur le d\u00e9sistement Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I. L&#039;ACCEPTATION DU DESISTEMENT COMME MODE D&#039;EXTINCTION DE L&#039;INSTANCE A. Le constat de l&#039;accord des parties sur le d\u00e9sistement Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T14:25:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4048\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3036\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:25:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1013,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T14:25:43+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:25:43+00:00\",\"description\":\"I. L'ACCEPTATION DU DESISTEMENT COMME MODE D'EXTINCTION DE L'INSTANCE A. Le constat de l'accord des parties sur le d\u00e9sistement Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4048,\"height\":3036},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"I. L'ACCEPTATION DU DESISTEMENT COMME MODE D'EXTINCTION DE L'INSTANCE A. Le constat de l'accord des parties sur le d\u00e9sistement Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014","og_description":"I. L'ACCEPTATION DU DESISTEMENT COMME MODE D'EXTINCTION DE L'INSTANCE A. Le constat de l'accord des parties sur le d\u00e9sistement Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T14:25:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4048,"height":3036,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:25:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/"},"wordCount":1013,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T14:25:43+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:25:43+00:00","description":"I. L'ACCEPTATION DU DESISTEMENT COMME MODE D'EXTINCTION DE L'INSTANCE A. Le constat de l'accord des parties sur le d\u00e9sistement Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp","width":4048,"height":3036},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-8-avril-2026-n2025076014\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 8 avril 2026, n\u00b02025076014"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-wood-IDVIKdf8JYw-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57My","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1211434,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-cusset-le-7-avril-2026-n2025001675\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221558,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cusset, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025001675","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le d\u00e9sistement d'instance et d'action constitue un mode d'extinction du proc\u00e8s par la volont\u00e9 du demandeur. Le tribunal de commerce de Cusset, dans un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/frank-van-hulst-DNYn_v6WVJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493635,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-clermont-ferrand-le-6-novembre-2025-n2022000399\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221558,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Clermont-Ferrand, le 6 novembre 2025, n\u00b02022000399","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Clermont-Ferrand, le six novembre deux mille vingt-cinq, statue sur un d\u00e9sistement d'instance et d'action. L'affaire concernait...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/miriam-espacio-nUiCEOe6vvA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/miriam-espacio-nUiCEOe6vvA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/miriam-espacio-nUiCEOe6vvA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/miriam-espacio-nUiCEOe6vvA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/miriam-espacio-nUiCEOe6vvA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/miriam-espacio-nUiCEOe6vvA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1091407,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dauch-le-20-mars-2026-n2025003808\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221558,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&#8217;auch, le 20 mars 2026, n\u00b02025003808","author":"Kohen","date":"13 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par une d\u00e9cision du 20 mars 2026, le Tribunal de commerce d'Auch, statuant en contentieux g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une instance introduite par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-imdnMdUDomE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-imdnMdUDomE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-imdnMdUDomE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-imdnMdUDomE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-imdnMdUDomE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-imdnMdUDomE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496940,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-mont-de-marsan-le-28-novembre-2025-n2025002677\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221558,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Mont-de-Marsan, le 28 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025002677","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Mont-de-Marsan, le 28 novembre 2025, statue sur une demande d\u2019ouverture de liquidation judiciaire. Le demandeur se d\u00e9siste...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jakob-braun-S7d5wbPWb_A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jakob-braun-S7d5wbPWb_A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jakob-braun-S7d5wbPWb_A-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jakob-braun-S7d5wbPWb_A-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jakob-braun-S7d5wbPWb_A-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jakob-braun-S7d5wbPWb_A-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1209462,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-creteil-le-7-avril-2026-n2025f01180\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221558,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cr\u00e9teil, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01180","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Cr\u00e9teil, par un jugement du 7 avril 2026, a constat\u00e9 l\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance et son dessaisissement en raison du d\u00e9sistement...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TGyzkRiEysA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TGyzkRiEysA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TGyzkRiEysA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TGyzkRiEysA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TGyzkRiEysA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-TGyzkRiEysA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494541,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-28-octobre-2025-n2025056244\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221558,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 28 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025056244","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, le 28 octobre 2025, statue sur une instance relative \u00e0 un d\u00e9faut de paiement d\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eats. Les demandeurs...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/marius-badstuber-wFHqJCuGB1g-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/marius-badstuber-wFHqJCuGB1g-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/marius-badstuber-wFHqJCuGB1g-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/marius-badstuber-wFHqJCuGB1g-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/marius-badstuber-wFHqJCuGB1g-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/marius-badstuber-wFHqJCuGB1g-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221558","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1221558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221558\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1221558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1221558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1221558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}