{"id":1221670,"date":"2026-06-30T16:35:42","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:35:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T16:35:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:35:42","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02209"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-lextension-de-la-mesure-dinstruction-manifestation-des-pouvoirs-du-juge-des-re\">I. L\u2019extension de la mesure d\u2019instruction, manifestation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-un-motif-legitime-etabli-par-linteret-a-opposer-lexpertise\">A. Un motif l\u00e9gitime \u00e9tabli par l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 opposer l\u2019expertise<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-prejuge-sur-le-fond-condition-de-la-recevabilite\">B. L\u2019absence de pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur le fond, condition de la recevabilit\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-le-rejet-des-protestations-et-reserves-une-irrecevabilite-procedurale\">II. Le rejet des protestations et r\u00e9serves, une irrecevabilit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-distinction-operee-entre-assureurs-et-autres-defendeurs\">A. La distinction op\u00e9r\u00e9e entre assureurs et autres d\u00e9fendeurs<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-confirmation-de-labsence-de-pretention-au-sens-procedural\">B. La confirmation de l\u2019absence de pr\u00e9tention au sens proc\u00e9dural<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur une demande d\u2019extension d\u2019expertise judiciaire. Cette d\u00e9cision s\u2019inscrit dans le cadre d\u2019un litige relatif \u00e0 un contrat de construction de maison individuelle, opposant le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage \u00e0 un constructeur, et \u00e0 plusieurs sous-traitants.<\/p>\n<p>Un ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage a conclu un contrat de construction avec une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 constructrice. Une expertise judiciaire avait \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e le 12 octobre 2023 pour examiner des d\u00e9sordres affectant l\u2019immeuble. Dans son pr\u00e9-rapport du 4 septembre 2024, l\u2019expert a relev\u00e9 des d\u00e9sordres affectant les isolants du lot chauffage et le bois du lot terrasse. Le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage a alors saisi le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s pour \u00e9tendre les op\u00e9rations d\u2019expertise \u00e0 deux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s intervenantes, l\u2019une charg\u00e9e du chauffage, l\u2019autre de la menuiserie. La constructrice s\u2019est oppos\u00e9e en formulant des protestations et r\u00e9serves, tandis que les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s appel\u00e9es en cause n\u2019ont pas comparu.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit soumise au juge \u00e9tait de savoir si les conditions de l\u2019article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile \u00e9taient r\u00e9unies pour \u00e9tendre une mesure d\u2019instruction d\u00e9j\u00e0 ordonn\u00e9e \u00e0 de nouvelles parties, et si les protestations et r\u00e9serves \u00e9mises par un d\u00e9fendeur constituaient une pr\u00e9tention au sens de l\u2019article 4 du m\u00eame code. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a accueilli la demande d\u2019extension, rejet\u00e9 les protestations et r\u00e9serves comme n\u2019\u00e9tant pas des pr\u00e9tentions, et condamn\u00e9 la constructrice aux d\u00e9pens.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-lextension-de-la-mesure-dinstruction-manifestation-des-pouvoirs-du-juge-des-re\">I. L\u2019extension de la mesure d\u2019instruction, manifestation des pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-un-motif-legitime-etabli-par-linteret-a-opposer-lexpertise\">A. Un motif l\u00e9gitime \u00e9tabli par l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 opposer l\u2019expertise<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s rappelle que la mise en cause d\u2019un tiers est possible sur le fondement de l\u2019article 331 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, mais que l\u2019extension d\u2019une expertise d\u00e9j\u00e0 ordonn\u00e9e rel\u00e8ve de l\u2019article 145. Ce texte exige qu\u2019il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de rendre commune la mesure aux nouvelles parties. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019expert avait attribu\u00e9 les d\u00e9sordres constat\u00e9s \u00e0 des lots sp\u00e9cifiques. Le ma\u00eetre d\u2019ouvrage produisait des factures \u00e9tablissant l\u2019intervention des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s sur le chantier, ainsi que leurs observations sur les r\u00e9serves. Le juge en d\u00e9duit un int\u00e9r\u00eat manifeste \u00e0 pouvoir opposer les r\u00e9sultats de l\u2019expertise \u00e0 ces soci\u00e9t\u00e9s. Ainsi, <em>&#8220;le demandeur justifie d\u00e8s lors d\u2019un motif l\u00e9gitime pour obtenir la mesure d\u2019extension r\u00e9clam\u00e9e&#8221;<\/em>. Cette solution s\u2019inscrit dans une conception souple de l\u2019article 145, qui ne requiert pas que la responsabilit\u00e9 des parties appel\u00e9es soit d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9tablie. Elle est conforme \u00e0 la fonction probatoire du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, destin\u00e9e \u00e0 pr\u00e9parer un \u00e9ventuel proc\u00e8s au fond.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-prejuge-sur-le-fond-condition-de-la-recevabilite\">B. L\u2019absence de pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur le fond, condition de la recevabilit\u00e9<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge insiste sur le fait que l\u2019application de l\u2019article 145 <em>&#8220;n\u2019implique aucun pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur la responsabilit\u00e9 des parties appel\u00e9es \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure, ni sur les chances de succ\u00e8s du proc\u00e8s susceptible d\u2019\u00eatre ult\u00e9rieurement engag\u00e9&#8221;<\/em>. Cette pr\u00e9cision est essentielle : l\u2019extension n\u2019emporte aucune reconnaissance de droit. Les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s appel\u00e9es pourront contester leur responsabilit\u00e9 devant le juge du fond. La d\u00e9cision se borne \u00e0 organiser la contradiction dans le cadre de l\u2019expertise. Le juge \u00e9carte ainsi toute argumentation tendant \u00e0 faire obstacle \u00e0 l\u2019extension sous pr\u00e9texte que la garantie ou la responsabilit\u00e9 serait incertaine. Cette neutralit\u00e9 de l\u2019article 145 est constante en jurisprudence. En \u00e9tendant l\u2019expertise, le juge ne fait qu\u2019assurer l\u2019efficacit\u00e9 de la mesure d\u2019instruction, sans anticiper le sort du litige principal.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-le-rejet-des-protestations-et-reserves-une-irrecevabilite-procedurale\">II. Le rejet des protestations et r\u00e9serves, une irrecevabilit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-distinction-operee-entre-assureurs-et-autres-defendeurs\">A. La distinction op\u00e9r\u00e9e entre assureurs et autres d\u00e9fendeurs<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s distingue clairement les cat\u00e9gories de d\u00e9fendeurs. Il admet que l\u2019assureur puisse <em>&#8220;vouloir \u00e9mettre des r\u00e9serves sur sa garantie lorsqu\u2019il prend la direction du proc\u00e8s en application de l\u2019article L.113-7 du code des assurances&#8221;<\/em>. Dans ce cas, il est possible de lui <em>&#8220;donner acte&#8221;<\/em> de ses r\u00e9serves, ce qui constitue une simple prise d\u2019acte, sans port\u00e9e juridique contraignante. En revanche, pour les autres d\u00e9fendeurs, le juge estime qu\u2019il <em>&#8220;nul besoin de donner acte des \u2018protestations et r\u00e9serves\u2019&#8221;<\/em>. Il motive cette position en rappelant qu\u2019il <em>&#8220;ne s\u2019agit en ce cas-l\u00e0 pas d\u2019une pr\u00e9tention au sens de l\u2019article 4 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile&#8221;<\/em>. La demande de donner acte n\u2019emporte aucun droit et ne peut donc \u00eatre accueillie comme une pr\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-confirmation-de-labsence-de-pretention-au-sens-procedural\">B. La confirmation de l\u2019absence de pr\u00e9tention au sens proc\u00e9dural<\/h3>\n<p>Cette solution s\u2019appuie sur une conception stricte de la notion de pr\u00e9tention. Une pr\u00e9tention, au sens de l\u2019article 4 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, est une demande tendant \u00e0 obtenir un avantage juridique. Or, les protestations et r\u00e9serves, lorsqu\u2019elles \u00e9manent d\u2019une partie qui n\u2019est pas assureur, ne constituent qu\u2019une simple d\u00e9claration d\u2019intention, sans effet sur le cours de l\u2019instance. La Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes a jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;n\u2019est pas reconventionnelle, la demande form\u00e9e par un cod\u00e9fendeur contre un autre qui n\u2019a \u00e9lev\u00e9 aucune pr\u00e9tention \u00e0 son encontre&#8221;<\/em> et que <em>&#8220;ces demandes sont irrecevables&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a31fb5f1a54976865ca704\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes, 4 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/04263)<\/a><\/strong>. Par analogie, les protestations et r\u00e9serves ne peuvent \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9es de pr\u00e9tentions. De m\u00eame, la Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes a rappel\u00e9 que l\u2019article 564 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile prohibe les pr\u00e9tentions nouvelles en appel, sauf exceptions <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68130054c18ac1a26471cdcd\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes, 30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/04836)<\/a><\/strong>. Cela confirme que les seules demandes ayant une port\u00e9e juridique sont celles qui modifient l\u2019objet du litige. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les protestations et r\u00e9serves n\u2019ayant aucun effet sur la mesure d\u2019expertise, leur rejet est justifi\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a31fb5f1a54976865ca704\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rennes, le 4 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/04263<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68130054c18ac1a26471cdcd\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rennes, le 30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/04836<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410488\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 331 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Un tiers peut \u00eatre mis en cause aux fins de condamnation par toute partie qui est en droit d&#8217;agir contre lui \u00e0 titre principal.<\/p>\n<p>    Il peut \u00e9galement \u00eatre mis en cause par la partie qui y a int\u00e9r\u00eat afin de lui rendre commun le jugement.<\/p>\n<p>    Le tiers doit \u00eatre appel\u00e9 en temps utile pour faire valoir sa d\u00e9fense.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410097\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 4 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   L&#8217;objet du litige est d\u00e9termin\u00e9 par les pr\u00e9tentions respectives des parties.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Ces pr\u00e9tentions sont fix\u00e9es par l&#8217;acte introductif d&#8217;instance et par les conclusions en d\u00e9fense. Toutefois l&#8217;objet du litige peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9 par des demandes incidentes lorsque celles-ci se rattachent aux pr\u00e9tentions originaires par un lien suffisant.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000021450413\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 564 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>A peine d&#8217;irrecevabilit\u00e9 relev\u00e9e d&#8217;office, les parties ne peuvent soumettre \u00e0 la cour de nouvelles pr\u00e9tentions si ce n&#8217;est pour opposer compensation, faire \u00e9carter les pr\u00e9tentions adverses ou faire juger les questions n\u00e9es de l&#8217;intervention d&#8217;un tiers, ou de la survenance ou de la r\u00e9v\u00e9lation d&#8217;un fait.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur une demande d\u2019extension d\u2019expertise&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4843,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cefdf3cdc6046d47eb1c1c","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cefdf3cdc6046d47eb1c1c","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cefdf3cdc6046d47eb1c1c","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Toulouse","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s","_kj_rg":"25\/02209","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1221670","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02209 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur une demande d\u2019extension d\u2019expertise...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02209\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur une demande d\u2019extension d\u2019expertise...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T14:35:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5184\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02209\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:35:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1526,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02209\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T14:35:42+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02209 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:35:42+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur une demande d\u2019extension d\u2019expertise...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5184,\"height\":3888},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02209\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02209 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur une demande d\u2019extension d\u2019expertise...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02209","og_description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur une demande d\u2019extension d\u2019expertise...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T14:35:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5184,"height":3888,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02209","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:35:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/"},"wordCount":1526,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02209","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T14:35:42+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02209 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:35:42+00:00","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse a rendu une ordonnance statuant sur une demande d\u2019extension d\u2019expertise...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp","width":5184,"height":3888},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02209\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02209"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexey-larionov-S8cOCANSb8g-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57Om","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":456885,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01037\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221670,"position":0},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01037","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1220375,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-reims-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00023\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221670,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Reims, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00023","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Reims, dans sa formation du p\u00f4le social, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision de d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance. Cette affaire opposait...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456888,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01039\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221670,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01039","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel dirig\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457216,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-20-01-2026-n-24tl02095\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221670,"position":3},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 20\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 24TL02095","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Toulouse, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 20 janvier 2026, examine la validit\u00e9 d'une mesure d'\u00e9loignement frappant un citoyen...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daniele-d-andreti-ud9u7beav2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1223594,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulon-le-27-mars-2026-n25-03012\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221670,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulon, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/03012","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulon, dans son ordonnance du 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/03012), \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019une proc\u00e9dure opposant un bailleur \u00e0 sa locataire. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457061,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/ce-conseil-detat-22-01-2026-n-511666\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221670,"position":5},"title":"CE \u2013 Conseil d&#8217;\u00c9tat \u2013 22\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 511666","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s du Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat a rendu, le 22 janvier 2026, une ordonnance relative au droit fondamental \u00e0 l\u2019h\u00e9bergement d\u2019urgence. Les requ\u00e9rants,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rosilaine-alves-674oH-T1wNo-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221670","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1221670"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221670\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1221670"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1221670"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1221670"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}