{"id":1221727,"date":"2026-06-30T16:48:19","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:48:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T16:48:19","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T14:48:19","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02115"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-du-motif-legitime-comme-condition-centrale-de-la-mesure-in-futuru\">I. L&#8217;affirmation du motif l\u00e9gitime comme condition centrale de la mesure in futurum<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-une-condition-assouplie-par-labsence-de-prejuge-sur-le-fond\">A. Une condition assouplie par l&#8217;absence de pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur le fond<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-une-exigence-maintenue-de-credibilite-et-dabsence-de-caractere-manifestement-v\">B. Une exigence maintenue de cr\u00e9dibilit\u00e9 et d&#8217;absence de caract\u00e8re manifestement vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-procedurale-de-lordonnance-et-ses-consequences-sur-les-parties\">II. La port\u00e9e proc\u00e9durale de l&#8217;ordonnance et ses cons\u00e9quences sur les parties<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-distinction-operee-entre-les-reserves-des-assureurs-et-les-protestations-de\">A. La distinction op\u00e9r\u00e9e entre les r\u00e9serves des assureurs et les protestations des autres d\u00e9fendeurs<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-charge-des-depens-et-labsence-de-condamnation-au-titre-de-larticle-700\">B. La charge des d\u00e9pens et l&#8217;absence de condamnation au titre de l&#8217;article 700<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#8217;une demande d&#8217;expertise m\u00e9dicale fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Un accident sportif \u00e9tait survenu le 25 novembre 2023 lors d&#8217;un match de football, causant au demandeur une fracture d\u00e9plac\u00e9e de l&#8217;hum\u00e9rus gauche ayant n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 une intervention chirurgicale. Le demandeur a assign\u00e9 en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le joueur impliqu\u00e9, le club sportif, leurs assureurs respectifs ainsi que l&#8217;organisme social, sollicitant une mesure d&#8217;instruction avant tout proc\u00e8s.<\/p>\n<p>La proc\u00e9dure a oppos\u00e9 le demandeur, qui estimait justifier d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments rendant cr\u00e9dibles ses suppositions, aux d\u00e9fendeurs, lesquels ont formul\u00e9 des protestations et r\u00e9serves, notamment quant \u00e0 leur garantie par les assureurs. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s a d\u00fb d\u00e9terminer si les conditions de l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile \u00e9taient r\u00e9unies pour ordonner une expertise. La question de droit centrale portait sur l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation du motif l\u00e9gitime exig\u00e9 pour une mesure d&#8217;instruction in futurum, particuli\u00e8rement lorsqu&#8217;un accident corporel est \u00e9tabli.<\/p>\n<p>Le juge a fait droit \u00e0 la demande en ordonnant une expertise judiciaire contradictoire, tout en donnant acte aux assureurs de leurs r\u00e9serves de garantie et en mettant les d\u00e9pens \u00e0 la charge du demandeur. Cette solution s&#8217;inscrit dans une application classique de l&#8217;article 145, mais appelle une r\u00e9flexion sur la mani\u00e8re dont le motif l\u00e9gitime est caract\u00e9ris\u00e9 et sur les cons\u00e9quences proc\u00e9durales d&#8217;une telle mesure.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-du-motif-legitime-comme-condition-centrale-de-la-mesure-in-futuru\">I. L&#8217;affirmation du motif l\u00e9gitime comme condition centrale de la mesure in futurum<\/h2>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e rappelle que le motif l\u00e9gitime constitue le socle de toute demande fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s en pr\u00e9cise le contenu et les contours, en conciliant souplesse probatoire et exigence de cr\u00e9dibilit\u00e9 du litige potentiel.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-une-condition-assouplie-par-labsence-de-prejuge-sur-le-fond\">A. Une condition assouplie par l&#8217;absence de pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur le fond<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s \u00e9carte d&#8217;embl\u00e9e toute exigence de d\u00e9monstration pr\u00e9alable du bien-fond\u00e9 de l&#8217;action future. Il \u00e9nonce que l&#8217;application de l&#8217;article 145 <em>&#8220;n&#8217;implique aucun pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur la responsabilit\u00e9 des parties appel\u00e9es \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure, ni sur les chances de succ\u00e8s du proc\u00e8s susceptible d&#8217;\u00eatre ult\u00e9rieurement engag\u00e9&#8221;<\/em>. Cette formulation exclut que le demandeur doive prouver sa cr\u00e9ance avant m\u00eame d&#8217;avoir pu \u00e9tablir les faits.<\/p>\n<p>Cette approche est coh\u00e9rente avec la finalit\u00e9 m\u00eame de la mesure in futurum, qui vise pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment \u00e0 <em>&#8220;conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve des faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige&#8221;<\/em>. Le juge rappelle utilement que le demandeur <em>&#8220;n&#8217;a pas \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer l&#8217;existence des faits qu&#8217;il invoque, puisque cette mesure in futurum est justement destin\u00e9e \u00e0 les \u00e9tablir&#8221;<\/em>. La distinction est nette entre la simple vraisemblance des faits, qui justifie l&#8217;expertise, et la charge de la preuve qui p\u00e8sera sur le fond.<\/p>\n<p>En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le juge s&#8217;appuie sur des pi\u00e8ces m\u00e9dicales concordantes \u2013 comptes rendus d&#8217;urgence, certificats m\u00e9dicaux, rapport d&#8217;expertise amiable \u2013 pour estimer que les dommages corporels all\u00e9gu\u00e9s sont <em>&#8220;vraisemblables&#8221;<\/em>. Il ne lui appartient pas de trancher la responsabilit\u00e9, mais seulement de v\u00e9rifier que le litige potentiel n&#8217;est pas manifestement d\u00e9pourvu de s\u00e9rieux. Cette souplesse \u00e9vite que la proc\u00e9dure de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 ne devienne un filtre excessif qui priverait le demandeur de tout acc\u00e8s \u00e0 la preuve.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-une-exigence-maintenue-de-credibilite-et-dabsence-de-caractere-manifestement-v\">B. Une exigence maintenue de cr\u00e9dibilit\u00e9 et d&#8217;absence de caract\u00e8re manifestement vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec<\/h3>\n<p>Malgr\u00e9 cette souplesse, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s encadre strictement le motif l\u00e9gitime par deux conditions cumulatives. Il exige d&#8217;abord que les faits invoqu\u00e9s soient <em>&#8220;cr\u00e9dibles et plausibles, ne relevant pas de la simple hypoth\u00e8se&#8221;<\/em>. Ensuite, il impose que le litige potentiel <em>&#8220;n&#8217;est pas manifestement vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec&#8221;<\/em>. Cette double exigence op\u00e8re un filtrage n\u00e9cessaire pour \u00e9carter les demandes purement exploratoires ou abusives.<\/p>\n<p>Cette position s&#8217;inscrit dans le droit fil de la jurisprudence r\u00e9cente. La Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence a ainsi jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;pour que le motif de l&#8217;action soit l\u00e9gitime, il faut et il suffit que la mesure soit pertinente et qu&#8217;elle ait pour but d&#8217;\u00e9tablir une preuve dont la production est susceptible d&#8217;influer sur la solution d&#8217;un litige futur ayant un objet et un fondement pr\u00e9cis et non manifestement vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ef71658d5c08d4a262e600\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Aix-en-Provence, 3 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/07573)<\/a><\/strong>. De m\u00eame, la Cour d&#8217;appel de Dijon a rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;les pr\u00e9tentions du demandeur \u00e0 l&#8217;expertise ne doivent pas \u00eatre manifestement vou\u00e9es \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9chec&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c2a65feca614ae404072f1\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Dijon, 27 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/00867)<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le juge applique ces crit\u00e8res avec rigueur. Il rel\u00e8ve que les pi\u00e8ces m\u00e9dicales produites rendent vraisembables les blessures et leur lien avec l&#8217;accident. Il \u00e9carte ainsi tout risque de requ\u00eate infond\u00e9e. La d\u00e9cision d\u00e9montre que le motif l\u00e9gitime n&#8217;est pas une simple formalit\u00e9, mais bien un contr\u00f4le de proportionnalit\u00e9 entre le droit \u00e0 la preuve du demandeur et la protection des d\u00e9fendeurs contre des investigations abusives.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-procedurale-de-lordonnance-et-ses-consequences-sur-les-parties\">II. La port\u00e9e proc\u00e9durale de l&#8217;ordonnance et ses cons\u00e9quences sur les parties<\/h2>\n<p>Au-del\u00e0 de l&#8217;affirmation du motif l\u00e9gitime, la d\u00e9cision du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s fixe le cadre proc\u00e9dural de l&#8217;expertise et en tire les cons\u00e9quences quant \u00e0 la charge des d\u00e9pens et au sort des protestations et r\u00e9serves.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-distinction-operee-entre-les-reserves-des-assureurs-et-les-protestations-de\">A. La distinction op\u00e9r\u00e9e entre les r\u00e9serves des assureurs et les protestations des autres d\u00e9fendeurs<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s accorde une attention particuli\u00e8re aux r\u00e9serves formul\u00e9es par les assureurs. Il <em>&#8220;donne acte&#8221;<\/em> aux soci\u00e9t\u00e9s d&#8217;assurance de leurs r\u00e9serves de garantie, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l&#8217;article L.113-7 du code des assurances qui permet \u00e0 l&#8217;assureur de conserver sa libert\u00e9 d&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation lorsqu&#8217;il prend la direction du proc\u00e8s. Cette mention est classique et ne pr\u00e9juge en rien de l&#8217;issue du litige au fond.<\/p>\n<p>En revanche, le juge \u00e9carte les <em>&#8220;protestations et r\u00e9serves&#8221;<\/em> des autres d\u00e9fendeurs, au motif qu&#8217;il ne s&#8217;agit pas d&#8217;une <em>&#8220;pr\u00e9tention au sens de l&#8217;article 4 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile&#8221;<\/em>. Il rappelle que l&#8217;article 145 n&#8217;implique aucun pr\u00e9jug\u00e9 sur la responsabilit\u00e9, rendant inutile de donner acte de r\u00e9serves qui ne correspondent \u00e0 aucun droit processuel sp\u00e9cifique. Cette distinction est opportune : elle \u00e9vite que la proc\u00e9dure de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 ne soit alourdie par des d\u00e9clarations sans port\u00e9e juridique.<\/p>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision fixe \u00e9galement le contradictoire de l&#8217;expertise. Le juge ordonne la mesure au contradictoire du demandeur, du joueur impliqu\u00e9, du club sportif, de leurs assureurs respectifs et de l&#8217;organisme social. Il exclut en revanche le courtier en assurance, simple interm\u00e9diaire sans lien avec le litige. Cette solution garantit que toutes les personnes susceptibles d&#8217;\u00eatre concern\u00e9es par le rapport d&#8217;expertise puissent participer aux op\u00e9rations et faire valoir leurs observations.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-charge-des-depens-et-labsence-de-condamnation-au-titre-de-larticle-700\">B. La charge des d\u00e9pens et l&#8217;absence de condamnation au titre de l&#8217;article 700<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s condamne le demandeur aux d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance. Il motive cette d\u00e9cision par le fait que <em>&#8220;le fondement de l&#8217;action s&#8217;analyse comme une recherche probatoire au b\u00e9n\u00e9fice de la partie qui en prend l&#8217;initiative, justifiant qu&#8217;il en assume la charge dans un premier temps&#8221;<\/em>. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la logique de l&#8217;article 145 : c&#8217;est le demandeur qui sollicite une mesure d&#8217;instruction pour son propre int\u00e9r\u00eat probatoire, il est donc \u00e9quitable qu&#8217;il en supporte provisoirement le co\u00fbt.<\/p>\n<p>Le juge pr\u00e9cise que cette charge est <em>&#8220;dans un premier temps&#8221;<\/em>, laissant entendre que la r\u00e9partition d\u00e9finitive des frais d&#8217;expertise pourra \u00eatre modifi\u00e9e par le juge du fond. Cette prudence est salutaire : elle \u00e9vite de figer une situation qui pourrait \u00e9voluer en fonction de l&#8217;issue du litige. Le demandeur doit consigner une provision de 1 500 euros, mais cette avance ne pr\u00e9juge pas de la charge finale, qui <em>&#8220;peut incomber \u00e0 l&#8217;une ou l&#8217;autre des parties&#8221;<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Enfin, le juge d\u00e9boute le demandeur de sa demande fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Il justifie cette d\u00e9cision par l&#8217;absence de condamnation aux d\u00e9pens et le fait que les d\u00e9fendeurs ne sont pas <em>&#8220;perdants \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sente instance&#8221;<\/em>. Cette position est coh\u00e9rente avec la nature non contentieuse de la proc\u00e9dure sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 145 : la mesure ordonn\u00e9e ne tranche aucun droit, elle se borne \u00e0 organiser la preuve. Il serait donc in\u00e9quitable de faire supporter aux d\u00e9fendeurs les frais irr\u00e9p\u00e9tibles d&#8217;une proc\u00e9dure qu&#8217;ils n&#8217;ont pas provoqu\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67ef71658d5c08d4a262e600\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 3 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/07573<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c2a65feca614ae404072f1\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Dijon, le 27 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/00867<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410097\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 4 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   L&#8217;objet du litige est d\u00e9termin\u00e9 par les pr\u00e9tentions respectives des parties.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Ces pr\u00e9tentions sont fix\u00e9es par l&#8217;acte introductif d&#8217;instance et par les conclusions en d\u00e9fense. Toutefois l&#8217;objet du litige peut \u00eatre modifi\u00e9 par des demandes incidentes lorsque celles-ci se rattachent aux pr\u00e9tentions originaires par un lien suffisant.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#8217;une demande d&#8217;expertise m\u00e9dicale fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;article 145 du code de&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9732,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cefd87cdc6046d47eb1471","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cefd87cdc6046d47eb1471","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cefd87cdc6046d47eb1471","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Toulouse","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s","_kj_rg":"25\/02115","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1221727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02115 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#039;une demande d&#039;expertise m\u00e9dicale fond\u00e9e sur l&#039;article 145 du code de...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02115\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#039;une demande d&#039;expertise m\u00e9dicale fond\u00e9e sur l&#039;article 145 du code de...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T14:48:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02115\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:48:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2107,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02115\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T14:48:19+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02115 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T14:48:19+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande d'expertise m\u00e9dicale fond\u00e9e sur l'article 145 du code de...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3500,\"height\":3000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/02115\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02115 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande d'expertise m\u00e9dicale fond\u00e9e sur l'article 145 du code de...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02115","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande d'expertise m\u00e9dicale fond\u00e9e sur l'article 145 du code de...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T14:48:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3500,"height":3000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02115","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:48:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/"},"wordCount":2107,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02115","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T14:48:19+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02115 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T14:48:19+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 mars 2026, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande d'expertise m\u00e9dicale fond\u00e9e sur l'article 145 du code de...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp","width":3500,"height":3000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-02115\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/02115"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-qCodK5vqaNs-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-57Ph","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":456885,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01037\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221727,"position":0},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01037","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel form\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision. Le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/nathan-cima-L89SN03SJK8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456888,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-toulouse-27-01-2026-n-25tl01039\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221727,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de TOULOUSE \u2013 27\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25TL01039","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La pr\u00e9sente ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, rendue par une cour administrative d\u2019appel, statue sur un appel dirig\u00e9 contre le rejet d\u2019une demande de provision....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1220375,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-reims-le-27-mars-2026-n26-00023\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221727,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Reims, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/00023","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Reims, dans sa formation du p\u00f4le social, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision de d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance. Cette affaire opposait...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/joshua-coleman-FYev7eaTcRE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1221739,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-toulouse-le-27-mars-2026-n25-01533\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221727,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/01533","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Toulouse, par un jugement avant dire droit rendu le 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/01533), a ordonn\u00e9 la r\u00e9vocation de l\u2019ordonnance de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1207386,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-bordeaux-le-27-mars-2026-n25-01502\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221727,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Bordeaux, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/01502","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de l'homologation d'un accord transactionnel en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 A. Les conditions de validit\u00e9 de la transaction soumise \u00e0 l'homologation La...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":497991,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-toulouse-le-27-novembre-2025-n2025006962\/","url_meta":{"origin":1221727,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Toulouse, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025006962","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, dans un jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, statue sur une demande en r\u00e9solution d\u2019un contrat de pr\u00eat. L\u2019emprunteur et sa caution...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1221727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1221727\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9732"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1221727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1221727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1221727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}