{"id":1223572,"date":"2026-07-01T00:01:56","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T22:01:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T00:01:56","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T22:01:56","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-le-refus-de-jonction-expression-du-pouvoir-discretionnaire-du-juge-en-matiere-\">I. Le refus de jonction, expression du pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire du juge en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-les-conditions-et-la-nature-de-la-jonction-dinstances\">A. Les conditions et la nature de la jonction d\u2019instances<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lapplication-au-cas-despece-le-rejet-justifie-par-lautonomie-des-instances\">B. L\u2019application au cas d\u2019esp\u00e8ce : le rejet justifi\u00e9 par l\u2019autonomie des instances<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-sanction-de-la-faute-de-la-caisse-dans-le-recouvrement-de-lindu\">II. La sanction de la faute de la caisse dans le recouvrement de l\u2019indu<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-faute-caracterisee-par-la-meconnaissance-des-voies-de-recours\">A. La faute caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e par la m\u00e9connaissance des voies de recours<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-reparation-du-prejudice-subi-par-le-professionnel-de-sante\">B. La r\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice subi par le professionnel de sant\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b0 25\/00009) qui soul\u00e8ve plusieurs questions int\u00e9ressant le contentieux de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale. Un professionnel de sant\u00e9 avait contest\u00e9 un indu de facturation notifi\u00e9 par la caisse g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale. Celle-ci, malgr\u00e9 la saisine de la commission de recours amiable, avait proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 des retenues sur flux de paiement. Le professionnel a saisi le tribunal pour obtenir l\u2019annulation de l\u2019indu et des dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats. Parall\u00e8lement, la caisse sollicitait la jonction de sept instances portant sur des indus distincts mais opposant les m\u00eames parties. Le tribunal a rejet\u00e9 cette demande, annul\u00e9 l\u2019indu et condamn\u00e9 la caisse \u00e0 verser 300 euros de dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats, outre les d\u00e9pens et une somme au titre de l\u2019article 700 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. La question de droit principale r\u00e9side dans l\u2019office du juge face \u00e0 une demande de jonction, d\u2019une part, et dans les conditions de mise en \u0153uvre de la responsabilit\u00e9 de la caisse pour recouvrement indu, d\u2019autre part. La solution retenue manifeste un \u00e9quilibre entre la ma\u00eetrise proc\u00e9durale du tribunal et la protection du professionnel contre des pratiques de recouvrement h\u00e2tives. Elle m\u00e9rite une analyse en deux temps : le refus de jonction traduit l\u2019exercice d\u2019un pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire (I), tandis que la condamnation aux dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats consacre la faute de la caisse et la r\u00e9paration d\u2019un pr\u00e9judice certain (II).<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-le-refus-de-jonction-expression-du-pouvoir-discretionnaire-du-juge-en-matiere-\">I. Le refus de jonction, expression du pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire du juge en mati\u00e8re de proc\u00e9dure<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-les-conditions-et-la-nature-de-la-jonction-dinstances\">A. Les conditions et la nature de la jonction d\u2019instances<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal rappelle d\u2019abord le fondement textuel de la jonction. <em>&#8220;Aux termes des dispositions de l\u2019article 367 alin\u00e9a 1 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, le juge peut, \u00e0 la demande des parties ou d\u2019office, ordonner la jonction de plusieurs instances pendantes devant lui s\u2019il existe entre les litiges un lien tel qu\u2019il soit de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat d\u2019une bonne justice de les faire instruire ou juger ensemble.&#8221;<\/em> Cette disposition conf\u00e8re au juge une simple facult\u00e9, non une obligation. La jurisprudence pr\u00e9cise que la jonction est une mesure d\u2019administration judiciaire souverainement appr\u00e9ci\u00e9e par les juges du fond. Ainsi, la Cour d\u2019appel de Metz a pu \u00e9noncer que <em>&#8220;les juges du fond appr\u00e9cient souverainement l&#8217;opportunit\u00e9 de la jonction ou de la disjonction d&#8217;instances&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c93d797263abde591dd33a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Metz, 5 mars 2025, n\u00b022\/00764)<\/a><\/strong>. De m\u00eame, la Cour d&#8217;appel de Pau a rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;la d\u00e9cision de jonction est une mesure d&#8217;administration judiciaire&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b8181c33cb53c26b806650\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Pau, 20 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/02426)<\/a><\/strong>. Le juge dispose donc d\u2019un large pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation, soumis \u00e0 la seule exigence d\u2019un lien entre les litiges et de l\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eat d\u2019une bonne justice. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal devait d\u00e9terminer si les sept dossiers pr\u00e9sentaient un tel lien.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lapplication-au-cas-despece-le-rejet-justifie-par-lautonomie-des-instances\">B. L\u2019application au cas d\u2019esp\u00e8ce : le rejet justifi\u00e9 par l\u2019autonomie des instances<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal constate que les dossiers <em>&#8220;opposent les m\u00eames parties et concernent tous des indus de facturation&#8221;<\/em>. Il semblerait \u00e0 premi\u00e8re vue que la condition du lien soit remplie. Pourtant, le juge \u00e9carte la jonction en relevant que <em>&#8220;chacun de ces dossiers correspond \u00e0 une notification d\u2019indu sp\u00e9cifique avec des conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 et des voies de recours propres&#8221;<\/em>. Il en d\u00e9duit que <em>&#8220;la jonction n\u2019est donc pas de bonne justice&#8221;<\/em>. Cette motivation r\u00e9v\u00e8le que le tribunal ne se contente pas d\u2019une identit\u00e9 de parties ou d\u2019objet g\u00e9n\u00e9ral. Il exige que le lien soit d\u2019une intensit\u00e9 suffisante pour justifier une instruction ou un jugement communs. En l\u2019occurrence, l\u2019autonomie proc\u00e9durale de chaque litige \u2013 li\u00e9e \u00e0 des notifications distinctes \u2013 commande un traitement s\u00e9par\u00e9. Le rejet de la demande de jonction illustre donc l\u2019exercice concret du pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire du juge, qui refuse de subordonner la gestion d\u2019instances multiples \u00e0 un simple crit\u00e8re d\u2019\u00e9conomie proc\u00e9durale. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la nature de la jonction, mesure qui ne doit pas nuire \u00e0 la clart\u00e9 des d\u00e9bats ni aux droits de chaque partie. Le tribunal a ainsi fait pr\u00e9valoir la sp\u00e9cificit\u00e9 de chaque recours sur la commodit\u00e9 all\u00e9gu\u00e9e par la caisse.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-sanction-de-la-faute-de-la-caisse-dans-le-recouvrement-de-lindu\">II. La sanction de la faute de la caisse dans le recouvrement de l\u2019indu<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-faute-caracterisee-par-la-meconnaissance-des-voies-de-recours\">A. La faute caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e par la m\u00e9connaissance des voies de recours<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal constate que la caisse a proc\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 des retenues sur flux de paiement alors m\u00eame que l\u2019indu \u00e9tait contest\u00e9 devant la commission de recours amiable. Il affirme que <em>&#8220;le fait pour la caisse de proc\u00e9der \u00e0 des retenues sur flux de paiement alors que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 avait contest\u00e9 l\u2019indu devant la commission de recours amiable est constitutif d\u2019une faute&#8221;<\/em>. Cette qualification s\u2019appuie sur l\u2019article L133-4 alin\u00e9a 11 du code de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale, qui permet la r\u00e9cup\u00e9ration par retenue seulement si le professionnel n\u2019a ni pay\u00e9 ni produit d\u2019observations et ne conteste pas le caract\u00e8re indu. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la contestation pr\u00e9alable faisait obstacle \u00e0 ce mode de recouvrement. Le tribunal applique donc les principes de la responsabilit\u00e9 civile d\u00e9lictuelle des articles 1240 et 1241 du code civil, rappelant qu\u2019<em>&#8220;il incombe d\u00e8s lors \u00e0 celui qui invoque un pr\u00e9judice de rapporter la preuve de l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un pr\u00e9judice, d&#8217;une faute commise par la personne \u00e0 laquelle il l&#8217;impute, du lien de causalit\u00e9 entre cette faute et ce pr\u00e9judice&#8221;<\/em>. La faute est ainsi \u00e9tablie : la caisse a viol\u00e9 les r\u00e8gles de recouvrement en ignorant la contestation, ce qui constitue une n\u00e9gligence ou une imprudence. Cette solution est s\u00e9v\u00e8re mais logique : elle dissuade les organismes de recourir \u00e0 des mesures de r\u00e9torsion avant l\u2019\u00e9puisement des voies de recours.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-reparation-du-prejudice-subi-par-le-professionnel-de-sante\">B. La r\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice subi par le professionnel de sant\u00e9<\/h3>\n<p>Sur le pr\u00e9judice, le tribunal dispose d\u2019un rapport d\u2019expert-comptable qui \u00e9value l\u2019impact financier global des indus sur trente-six mois. Il reconna\u00eet que ce rapport <em>&#8220;\u00e9tablit de mani\u00e8re certaine l\u2019existence d\u2019un pr\u00e9judice de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 mais ne permet pas de comprendre exactement le chiffrage retenu dossier par dossier&#8221;<\/em>. Il \u00e9carte donc ce document comme unique r\u00e9f\u00e9rence et proc\u00e8de \u00e0 une appr\u00e9ciation in concreto. La retenue litigieuse portait sur 1 446,25 euros, retenue le 17 d\u00e9cembre 2024 et rembours\u00e9e le 18 juin 2025. Le tribunal alloue <em>&#8220;une somme de 300 euros \u00e0 titre de dommages et int\u00e9r\u00eats&#8221;<\/em> pour <em>&#8220;compenser le pr\u00e9judice financier li\u00e9 \u00e0 ces retenues illicites&#8221;<\/em>. Ce quantum peut para\u00eetre modeste, mais il refl\u00e8te la volont\u00e9 de ne pas se fonder sur une \u00e9valuation globale impr\u00e9cise. Le juge exerce son pouvoir souverain pour \u00e9valuer le pr\u00e9judice directement caus\u00e9 par la faute de la caisse. Il retient un pr\u00e9judice financier certain \u2013 la privation temporaire de la somme \u2013, sans suivre la demande de 1 200 euros fond\u00e9e sur un rapport trop g\u00e9n\u00e9ral. Cette solution est pragmatique : elle indemnise le professionnel sans ouvrir la voie \u00e0 des demandes disproportionn\u00e9es. Elle est \u00e9galement conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante exigeant un lien direct entre la faute et le dommage. En condamnant la caisse aux d\u00e9pens et \u00e0 une indemnit\u00e9 de 150 euros au titre de l\u2019article 700, le tribunal ach\u00e8ve de r\u00e9tablir l\u2019\u00e9quilibre entre les parties.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c93d797263abde591dd33a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Metz, le 5 mars 2025, n\u00b022\/00764<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67b8181c33cb53c26b806650\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Pau, le 20 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/02426<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000037802119\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article R. 153-1 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Lorsqu&#8217;il est saisi sur requ\u00eate sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile ou au cours d&#8217;une mesure d&#8217;instruction ordonn\u00e9e sur ce fondement, le juge peut ordonner d&#8217;office le placement sous s\u00e9questre provisoire des pi\u00e8ces demand\u00e9es afin d&#8217;assurer la protection du secret des affaires.<\/p>\n<p> Si le juge n&#8217;est pas saisi d&#8217;une demande de modification ou de r\u00e9tractation de son ordonnance en application de l&#8217;article 497 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile dans un d\u00e9lai d&#8217;un mois \u00e0 compter de la signification de la d\u00e9cision, la mesure de s\u00e9questre provisoire mentionn\u00e9e \u00e0 l&#8217;alin\u00e9a pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent est lev\u00e9e et les pi\u00e8ces sont transmises au requ\u00e9rant.<\/p>\n<p> Le juge saisi en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 d&#8217;une demande de modification ou de r\u00e9tractation de l&#8217;ordonnance est comp\u00e9tent pour statuer sur la lev\u00e9e totale ou partielle de la mesure de s\u00e9questre dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues par les articles R. 153-3 \u00e0 R. 153-10.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032041571\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1240 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">Tout fait quelconque de l&#8217;homme, qui cause \u00e0 autrui un dommage, oblige celui par la faute duquel il est arriv\u00e9 \u00e0 le r\u00e9parer. <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032041565\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1241 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">Chacun est responsable du dommage qu&#8217;il a caus\u00e9 non seulement par son fait, mais encore par sa n\u00e9gligence ou par son imprudence.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b0 25\/00009) qui soul\u00e8ve plusieurs&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9474,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69dd770ccdc6046d4723dbfb","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69dd770ccdc6046d4723dbfb","_kj_judilibre_id":"69dd770ccdc6046d4723dbfb","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre","_kj_chambre":"CTX PROTECTION SOCIALE","_kj_rg":"25\/00009","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1223572","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b0 25\/00009) qui soul\u00e8ve plusieurs...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b0 25\/00009) qui soul\u00e8ve plusieurs...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T22:01:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"5000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3750\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00009\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T22:01:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1867,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00009\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T22:01:56+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T22:01:56+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b0 25\\\/00009) qui soul\u00e8ve plusieurs...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":5000,\"height\":3750},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b0 25\/00009) qui soul\u00e8ve plusieurs...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00009","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b0 25\/00009) qui soul\u00e8ve plusieurs...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T22:01:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":5000,"height":3750,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00009","datePublished":"2026-06-30T22:01:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/"},"wordCount":1867,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00009","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T22:01:56+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00009 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T22:01:56+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision (n\u00b0 25\/00009) qui soul\u00e8ve plusieurs...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp","width":5000,"height":3750},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00009\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-IfcBri1Vu6s-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-58j2","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1223592,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00126\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223572,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00126","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa formation d\u00e9di\u00e9e au contentieux de la protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision appelant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xuan-nguyen-OGk-S3p9HRw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xuan-nguyen-OGk-S3p9HRw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xuan-nguyen-OGk-S3p9HRw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xuan-nguyen-OGk-S3p9HRw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xuan-nguyen-OGk-S3p9HRw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/xuan-nguyen-OGk-S3p9HRw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1223591,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00059\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223572,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00059","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un jugement contradictoire rendu le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, chambre de la protection sociale, a statu\u00e9 sur un litige...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-2IQXr2ZqAdY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1223578,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n24-01489\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223572,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b024\/01489","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa d\u00e9cision du 27 mars 2026, \u00e9tait saisi d\u2019un litige opposant un professionnel de sant\u00e9 \u00e0 un organisme de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sebastian-pichler-bAQH53VquTc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sebastian-pichler-bAQH53VquTc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sebastian-pichler-bAQH53VquTc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sebastian-pichler-bAQH53VquTc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sebastian-pichler-bAQH53VquTc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/sebastian-pichler-bAQH53VquTc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":497167,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-28-novembre-2025-n25-00286\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223572,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, le 28 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00286","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, statuant en la forme des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s le 28 novembre 2025, se prononce sur une demande de provision formul\u00e9e par un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-fcfjIHK9fbY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496673,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-1-decembre-2025-n25-01450\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223572,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, le 1 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01450","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le juge de l\u2019ex\u00e9cution du tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, statuant le 2 f\u00e9vrier 2026, se prononce sur une contestation de saisies-attribution. La...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mateus-campos-felipe-rgnkCd4rF1A-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1223581,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-pointe-a-pitre-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00181\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223572,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00c0-Pitre, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00181","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Pointe-\u00e0-Pitre, dans sa chambre CTX protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision (RG n\u00b025\/00181) appelant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/clay-banks-5JQAKBU0vG8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1223572","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1223572"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1223572\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9474"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1223572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1223572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1223572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}