{"id":1223574,"date":"2026-07-01T00:02:16","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T22:02:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T00:02:16","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T22:02:16","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-loffice-du-juge-dans-la-liquidation-de-lastreinte-provisoire\">I. L&#8217;office du juge dans la liquidation de l&#8217;astreinte provisoire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-pouvoir-de-modulation-du-montant-de-lastreinte\">A. Le pouvoir de modulation du montant de l&#8217;astreinte<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-concrete-des-circonstances-de-linexecution\">B. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation concr\u00e8te des circonstances de l&#8217;inex\u00e9cution<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-le-renforcement-de-lefficacite-de-linjonction-par-lastreinte-definitive\">II. Le renforcement de l&#8217;efficacit\u00e9 de l&#8217;injonction par l&#8217;astreinte d\u00e9finitive<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-les-conditions-de-prononce-dune-astreinte-definitive\">A. Les conditions de prononc\u00e9 d&#8217;une astreinte d\u00e9finitive<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-de-la-decision-sur-lexecution-des-obligations\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision sur l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution des obligations<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026 par le juge de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution du tribunal judiciaire de Metz s&#8217;inscrit dans le contentieux de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions de justice. Il porte sur la liquidation d&#8217;une astreinte provisoire et le prononc\u00e9 d&#8217;une astreinte d\u00e9finitive \u00e0 l&#8217;encontre d&#8217;un bailleur social qui n&#8217;a pas ex\u00e9cut\u00e9 des travaux d&#8217;entretien dans un logement lou\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Des locataires ont obtenu le 2 f\u00e9vrier 2024 un jugement du juge des contentieux de la protection du tribunal judiciaire de Metz condamnant leur bailleur \u00e0 effectuer plusieurs travaux : r\u00e9paration de volets, reprise de fissures, r\u00e9fection de joints, remplacement d&#8217;une porte affaiss\u00e9e et mise aux normes de l&#8217;installation \u00e9lectrique. Cette d\u00e9cision \u00e9tait assortie d&#8217;une astreinte provisoire de 50 euros par jour de retard. Le bailleur n&#8217;ayant pas ex\u00e9cut\u00e9 les travaux, les locataires ont saisi le juge de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution aux fins de liquidation de l&#8217;astreinte provisoire et de fixation d&#8217;une astreinte d\u00e9finitive. Le bailleur, r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement cit\u00e9, n&#8217;a pas comparu.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit centrale est celle du pouvoir du juge de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution dans la liquidation d&#8217;une astreinte provisoire et dans le prononc\u00e9 d&#8217;une astreinte d\u00e9finitive lorsque le d\u00e9biteur n&#8217;a pas ex\u00e9cut\u00e9 son obligation. Le juge a liquid\u00e9 l&#8217;astreinte provisoire \u00e0 5 520 euros, soit 30 euros par jour au lieu des 50 euros initialement fix\u00e9s, et a prononc\u00e9 une nouvelle astreinte d\u00e9finitive de 50 euros par jour pendant six mois.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-loffice-du-juge-dans-la-liquidation-de-lastreinte-provisoire\">I. L&#8217;office du juge dans la liquidation de l&#8217;astreinte provisoire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-pouvoir-de-modulation-du-montant-de-lastreinte\">A. Le pouvoir de modulation du montant de l&#8217;astreinte<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution dispose d&#8217;un pouvoir souverain pour fixer le montant d\u00e9finitif de l&#8217;astreinte provisoire. L&#8217;article L.131-4 du code des proc\u00e9dures civiles d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution \u00e9nonce que <em>&#8220;le montant de l&#8217;astreinte provisoire est liquid\u00e9 en tenant compte du comportement de celui \u00e0 qui l&#8217;injonction a \u00e9t\u00e9 adress\u00e9e et des difficult\u00e9s qu&#8217;il a rencontr\u00e9es pour l&#8217;ex\u00e9cuter&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a324a33e9008412abd5712\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Metz, 4 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/01867)<\/a><\/strong>. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le juge a r\u00e9duit le montant journalier de 50 \u00e0 30 euros, soit 5 520 euros au lieu de 9 200 euros, sans pour autant exon\u00e9rer totalement le d\u00e9biteur. Il a relev\u00e9 que le bailleur ne rapportait pas la preuve d&#8217;avoir ex\u00e9cut\u00e9 son obligation et qu&#8217;aucune difficult\u00e9 particuli\u00e8re n&#8217;\u00e9tait d\u00e9montr\u00e9e. La r\u00e9duction op\u00e9r\u00e9e traduit une appr\u00e9ciation concr\u00e8te de la situation.<\/p>\n<p>Cette d\u00e9cision s&#8217;inscrit dans le cadre l\u00e9gal qui impose au juge de prendre en compte le comportement du d\u00e9biteur. Le juge a constat\u00e9 que le bailleur s&#8217;\u00e9tait d\u00e9sint\u00e9ress\u00e9 du litige en ne comparaissant pas. Il n&#8217;a cependant pas retenu de mauvaise foi caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e, ce qui explique qu&#8217;il n&#8217;ait pas maintenu le taux initial. La modulation op\u00e9r\u00e9e concilie la n\u00e9cessaire sanction de l&#8217;inex\u00e9cution avec le principe de proportionnalit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-concrete-des-circonstances-de-linexecution\">B. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation concr\u00e8te des circonstances de l&#8217;inex\u00e9cution<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge doit rechercher si l&#8217;inex\u00e9cution provient d&#8217;une cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re au d\u00e9biteur. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le constat d&#8217;huissier du 5 mai 2025 d\u00e9montrait que les travaux n&#8217;avaient pas \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9alis\u00e9s : fissures persistantes, porte toujours d\u00e9fectueuse, volets non r\u00e9par\u00e9s. Le juge a \u00e9cart\u00e9 toute cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re, le bailleur ne faisant \u00e9tat d&#8217;aucun obstacle. Il a toutefois r\u00e9duit le montant de l&#8217;astreinte en invoquant un <em>&#8220;rapport raisonnable de proportionnalit\u00e9 entre le montant auquel il liquide l&#8217;astreinte et l&#8217;enjeu du litige&#8221;<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Cette exigence de proportionnalit\u00e9 n&#8217;est pas express\u00e9ment pr\u00e9vue par l&#8217;article L.131-4 mais r\u00e9sulte de la jurisprudence. Le juge a estim\u00e9 que l&#8217;enjeu du litige, \u00e0 savoir des travaux d&#8217;entretien d&#8217;un logement lou\u00e9, justifiait une mod\u00e9ration par rapport au montant th\u00e9orique. La d\u00e9cision montre que le juge de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution dispose d&#8217;une marge d&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation importante pour adapter la sanction \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de la situation.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-le-renforcement-de-lefficacite-de-linjonction-par-lastreinte-definitive\">II. Le renforcement de l&#8217;efficacit\u00e9 de l&#8217;injonction par l&#8217;astreinte d\u00e9finitive<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-les-conditions-de-prononce-dune-astreinte-definitive\">A. Les conditions de prononc\u00e9 d&#8217;une astreinte d\u00e9finitive<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;article L.131-2 du code des proc\u00e9dures civiles d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution dispose qu&#8217;<em>&#8220;une astreinte d\u00e9finitive ne peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e qu&#8217;apr\u00e8s le prononc\u00e9 d&#8217;une astreinte provisoire et pour une dur\u00e9e que le juge d\u00e9termine&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6788a3d405b7378c3f0c534a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel d&#8217;Amiens, 15 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/00867)<\/a><\/strong>. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la premi\u00e8re condition \u00e9tait remplie puisque l&#8217;astreinte provisoire avait \u00e9t\u00e9 prononc\u00e9e par le jugement du 2 f\u00e9vrier 2024. Le juge a estim\u00e9 que les circonstances rendaient n\u00e9cessaire le prononc\u00e9 d&#8217;une astreinte d\u00e9finitive, compte tenu de l&#8217;absence d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution et du d\u00e9sint\u00e9r\u00eat manifeste du bailleur.<\/p>\n<p>Le juge a fix\u00e9 l&#8217;astreinte d\u00e9finitive \u00e0 50 euros par jour pendant six mois, soit le m\u00eame montant que l&#8217;astreinte provisoire initiale. Il a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 qu&#8217;elle courrait \u00e0 compter de la signification du pr\u00e9sent jugement. Le choix d&#8217;une dur\u00e9e limit\u00e9e \u00e0 six mois t\u00e9moigne d&#8217;une volont\u00e9 de laisser une ultime chance au d\u00e9biteur tout en maintenant une pression suffisante. Le non-respect de cette nouvelle injonction pourrait ouvrir droit \u00e0 une nouvelle liquidation.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-de-la-decision-sur-lexecution-des-obligations\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision sur l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution des obligations<\/h3>\n<p>Le jugement rappelle que l&#8217;appel n&#8217;est pas suspensif, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l&#8217;article R.121-21 du code des proc\u00e9dures civiles d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution. Cette disposition assure l&#8217;efficacit\u00e9 imm\u00e9diate de la d\u00e9cision. Le bailleur ne peut donc \u00e9chapper \u00e0 l&#8217;astreinte d\u00e9finitive en interjetant appel. La d\u00e9cision consacre \u00e9galement le cumul des astreintes : l&#8217;astreinte provisoire liquid\u00e9e pour la p\u00e9riode pass\u00e9e et l&#8217;astreinte d\u00e9finitive pour l&#8217;avenir.<\/p>\n<p>En liquidant l&#8217;astreinte provisoire \u00e0 un montant inf\u00e9rieur au maximum possible, le juge a fait preuve de pragmatisme. Il a \u00e9vit\u00e9 une condamnation excessive qui aurait pu \u00eatre contest\u00e9e pour disproportion. En revanche, le prononc\u00e9 d&#8217;une astreinte d\u00e9finitive au taux int\u00e9gral de 50 euros par jour montre une fermet\u00e9 accrue pour l&#8217;avenir. Cette solution \u00e9quilibr\u00e9e permet de sanctionner le pass\u00e9 tout en incitant \u00e0 une ex\u00e9cution rapide. La port\u00e9e de ce jugement est de rappeler que l&#8217;astreinte, m\u00eame mod\u00e9r\u00e9e dans sa liquidation, reste un instrument efficace pour contraindre un d\u00e9biteur r\u00e9calcitrant \u00e0 ex\u00e9cuter ses obligations.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a324a33e9008412abd5712\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Metz, le 4 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/01867<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6788a3d405b7378c3f0c534a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Amiens, le 15 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/00867<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000025025724\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 131-4 du Code des proc\u00e9dures civiles d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le montant de l&#8217;astreinte provisoire est liquid\u00e9 en tenant compte du comportement de celui \u00e0 qui l&#8217;injonction a \u00e9t\u00e9 adress\u00e9e et des difficult\u00e9s qu&#8217;il a rencontr\u00e9es pour l&#8217;ex\u00e9cuter.<br \/> Le taux de l&#8217;astreinte d\u00e9finitive ne peut jamais \u00eatre modifi\u00e9 lors de sa liquidation.<br \/> L&#8217;astreinte provisoire ou d\u00e9finitive est supprim\u00e9e en tout ou partie s&#8217;il est \u00e9tabli que l&#8217;inex\u00e9cution ou le retard dans l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution de l&#8217;injonction du juge provient, en tout ou partie, d&#8217;une cause \u00e9trang\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000025025719\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 131-2 du Code des proc\u00e9dures civiles d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;astreinte est ind\u00e9pendante des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats.<br \/> L&#8217;astreinte est provisoire ou d\u00e9finitive. L&#8217;astreinte est consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme provisoire, \u00e0 moins que le juge n&#8217;ait pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 son caract\u00e8re d\u00e9finitif.<br \/> Une astreinte d\u00e9finitive ne peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e qu&#8217;apr\u00e8s le prononc\u00e9 d&#8217;une astreinte provisoire et pour une dur\u00e9e que le juge d\u00e9termine. Si l&#8217;une de ces conditions n&#8217;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9e, l&#8217;astreinte est liquid\u00e9e comme une astreinte provisoire.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000025938340\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article R. 121-21 du Code des proc\u00e9dures civiles d&#8217;ex\u00e9cution<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le d\u00e9lai d&#8217;appel et l&#8217;appel lui-m\u00eame n&#8217;ont pas d&#8217;effet suspensif.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026 par le juge de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution du tribunal judiciaire de Metz s&#8217;inscrit dans le contentieux de l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions de&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9498,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69deb182cdc6046d473f5a86","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69deb182cdc6046d473f5a86","_kj_judilibre_id":"69deb182cdc6046d473f5a86","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Metz","_kj_chambre":"CH4 JEX FOND","_kj_rg":"25\/00206","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1223574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026 par le juge de l&#039;ex\u00e9cution du tribunal judiciaire de Metz s&#039;inscrit dans le contentieux de l&#039;ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions de...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026 par le juge de l&#039;ex\u00e9cution du tribunal judiciaire de Metz s&#039;inscrit dans le contentieux de l&#039;ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions de...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-30T22:02:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3564\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"6336\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00206\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T22:02:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1466,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00206\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-30T22:02:16+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00206 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-30T22:02:16+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026 par le juge de l'ex\u00e9cution du tribunal judiciaire de Metz s'inscrit dans le contentieux de l'ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions de...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3564,\"height\":6336},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/00206\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026 par le juge de l'ex\u00e9cution du tribunal judiciaire de Metz s'inscrit dans le contentieux de l'ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions de...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206","og_description":"Le jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026 par le juge de l'ex\u00e9cution du tribunal judiciaire de Metz s'inscrit dans le contentieux de l'ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions de...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-06-30T22:02:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3564,"height":6336,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206","datePublished":"2026-06-30T22:02:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/"},"wordCount":1466,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-06-30T22:02:16+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-30T22:02:16+00:00","description":"Le jugement rendu le 27 mars 2026 par le juge de l'ex\u00e9cution du tribunal judiciaire de Metz s'inscrit dans le contentieux de l'ex\u00e9cution des d\u00e9cisions de...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp","width":3564,"height":6336},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/steve-johnson-Zc8yTDRagWY-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-58j4","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":498891,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-novembre-2025-n24-01942\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223574,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/01942","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal administratif de Strasbourg, statuant le 27 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 un recours contre le refus de reconnaissance d'une maladie...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493529,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-7-novembre-2025-n24-00966\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223574,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 7 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/00966","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Metz, p\u00f4le social, statuant le 11 juin 2026, se prononce sur un recours contentieux relatif \u00e0 un trop-per\u00e7u d\u2019allocation aux...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/allison-saeng-HoeAHyJKj6o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494878,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-octobre-2025-n21-01121\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223574,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 octobre 2025, n\u00b021\/01121","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, p\u00f4le social de Metz, statuant le 21 mai 2026, se prononce sur une demande en reconnaissance de faute inexcusable de l'employeur....","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/robin-ooode-A5hD0BMzsbo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494899,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-24-octobre-2025-n22-00597\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223574,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 24 octobre 2025, n\u00b022\/00597","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, p\u00f4le social, a statu\u00e9 le 12 mai 2026 sur un litige relatif \u00e0 un accident du travail. L\u2019affaire concernait la recevabilit\u00e9 d\u2019un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/laura-adai-QMJsqsUvCmA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":498796,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-27-novembre-2025-n23-01413\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223574,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b023\/01413","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, p\u00f4le social, a rendu un jugement le 27 novembre 2025. Un employeur contestait l'imputabilit\u00e9 professionnelle de soins et arr\u00eats de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-WACE8feA8SQ-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":497121,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-metz-le-28-novembre-2025-n25-01955\/","url_meta":{"origin":1223574,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Metz, le 28 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/01955","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire, statuant le 28 novembre 2025, a examin\u00e9 une action en paiement de charges de copropri\u00e9t\u00e9 impay\u00e9es. Le syndicat des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-tJSToBa5cwc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-tJSToBa5cwc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-tJSToBa5cwc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-tJSToBa5cwc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-tJSToBa5cwc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/camille-brodard-tJSToBa5cwc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1223574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1223574"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1223574\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9498"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1223574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1223574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1223574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}