{"id":1227525,"date":"2026-07-01T16:01:44","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:01:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T16:01:44","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:01:44","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-le-role-du-juge-judiciaire-dans-le-controle-de-la-regularite-du-placement-en-r\">I. Le r\u00f4le du juge judiciaire dans le contr\u00f4le de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en r\u00e9tention<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lincompetence-du-juge-judiciaire-pour-connaitre-de-la-legalite-de-lobligation-\">A. L\u2019incomp\u00e9tence du juge judiciaire pour conna\u00eetre de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 de l\u2019obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-des-garanties-de-representation-et-du-risque-de-soustraction-a-l\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation des garanties de repr\u00e9sentation et du risque de soustraction \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-conditions-et-la-mise-en-uvre-de-la-prolongation-de-la-retention-administ\">II. Les conditions et la mise en \u0153uvre de la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-verification-des-conditions-de-recevabilite-et-de-regularite-de-la-procedur\">A. La v\u00e9rification des conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 et de r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-dassignation-a-residence-et-la-prolongation-ordonnee\">B. L\u2019absence d\u2019assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence et la prolongation ordonn\u00e9e<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par une d\u00e9cision rendue le 29 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en r\u00e9tention administrative d\u2019un \u00e9tranger et sur la demande de prolongation de cette mesure. Le 23 d\u00e9cembre 2025, une obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais avec d\u00e9lai de trente jours avait \u00e9t\u00e9 prise \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9. Le 25 mars 2026, l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative ordonna son placement en r\u00e9tention. Le 26 mars 2026, l\u2019administration saisit le juge aux fins de prolongation pour vingt-six jours. Le 28 mars 2026, l\u2019\u00e9tranger contesta la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la d\u00e9cision de placement. Les deux proc\u00e9dures furent jointes.<\/p>\n<p>Le demandeur faisait valoir que le d\u00e9lai de d\u00e9part volontaire \u00e9tant encore en cours, le placement en r\u00e9tention \u00e9tait impossible. Il soutenait \u00e9galement que la notification de l\u2019obligation de quitter le territoire, envoy\u00e9e \u00e0 son domicile alors qu\u2019il \u00e9tait incarc\u00e9r\u00e9, \u00e9tait irr\u00e9guli\u00e8re et devait entra\u00eener l\u2019annulation du placement. Il invoquait enfin une erreur manifeste d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation quant \u00e0 ses garanties de repr\u00e9sentation. L&#8217;administration, de son c\u00f4t\u00e9, sollicitait la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention en estimant la proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et le risque de soustraction caract\u00e9ris\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit qui se posait au juge \u00e9tait double. D\u2019une part, dans quelle mesure le juge judiciaire, incomp\u00e9tent pour conna\u00eetre de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions administratives relatives au s\u00e9jour, peut-il contr\u00f4ler la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en r\u00e9tention ? D\u2019autre part, \u00e0 quelles conditions la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention peut-elle \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e, notamment en l\u2019absence de remise d\u2019un passeport ?<\/p>\n<p>Le juge a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la requ\u00eate de l\u2019\u00e9tranger recevable mais a jug\u00e9 la d\u00e9cision de placement r\u00e9guli\u00e8re. Il a \u00e9galement d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la requ\u00eate en prolongation recevable et la proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, et a ordonn\u00e9 la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention pour vingt-six jours. Il a \u00e9cart\u00e9 les moyens tir\u00e9s de la contestation de l\u2019OQTF et du d\u00e9faut de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-le-role-du-juge-judiciaire-dans-le-controle-de-la-regularite-du-placement-en-r\">I. Le r\u00f4le du juge judiciaire dans le contr\u00f4le de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en r\u00e9tention<\/h2>\n<p>Le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention exerce un contr\u00f4le limit\u00e9 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement. Il ne lui appartient pas de se prononcer sur la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 de l\u2019obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais. En revanche, il doit v\u00e9rifier le caract\u00e8re ex\u00e9cutoire de cette d\u00e9cision et appr\u00e9cier les conditions de fond du placement.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lincompetence-du-juge-judiciaire-pour-connaitre-de-la-legalite-de-lobligation-\">A. L\u2019incomp\u00e9tence du juge judiciaire pour conna\u00eetre de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 de l\u2019obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e rappelle que le juge judiciaire n\u2019a pas comp\u00e9tence pour conna\u00eetre de la contestation de la notification de l\u2019obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais. L\u2019\u00e9tranger soutenait que l\u2019envoi de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 \u00e0 son domicile pendant son incarc\u00e9ration rendait la notification irr\u00e9guli\u00e8re. Le juge \u00e9carte ce moyen en affirmant que <em>&#8221; la circonstance tenant \u00e0 l\u2019envoi par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d\u2019avis de r\u00e9ception de l\u2019obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais au domicile d\u00e9clar\u00e9 de Monsieur, [L] alors que celui-ci se trouvait incarc\u00e9r\u00e9 ne peut remettre en cause la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en r\u00e9tention administrative &#8220;<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Cette position est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante qui, en application de la loi des 16-24 ao\u00fbt 1790 et du d\u00e9cret du 16 fructidor an III, r\u00e9serve au juge administratif le contentieux de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions relatives au s\u00e9jour et \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9loignement. Comme l\u2019a rappel\u00e9 la Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, <em>&#8221; le juge administratif est seul comp\u00e9tent pour conna\u00eetre de la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 des d\u00e9cisions relatives au s\u00e9jour et \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9loignement d\u2019un \u00e9tranger &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67aee49874f5133eff49cf50\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/00227)<\/a><\/strong>. Il incombe n\u00e9anmoins au juge judiciaire de s\u2019assurer du caract\u00e8re ex\u00e9cutoire de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9, en ce qu\u2019il a \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019OQTF avait \u00e9t\u00e9 notifi\u00e9e et son d\u00e9lai de d\u00e9part volontaire n\u2019\u00e9tait pas expir\u00e9, mais le juge n\u2019a pas \u00e0 appr\u00e9cier les conditions de cette notification pour le placement. Il se borne \u00e0 constater que la d\u00e9cision d\u2019\u00e9loignement existe et qu\u2019elle est ex\u00e9cutoire.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-des-garanties-de-representation-et-du-risque-de-soustraction-a-l\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation des garanties de repr\u00e9sentation et du risque de soustraction \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution<\/h3>\n<p>Pour ordonner le placement en r\u00e9tention, l\u2019autorit\u00e9 administrative doit \u00e9tablir un risque de soustraction \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision d\u2019\u00e9loignement. Ce risque s\u2019appr\u00e9cie notamment au regard des crit\u00e8res de l\u2019article L. 612-3 du CESEDA. Le juge doit se placer \u00e0 la date de la d\u00e9cision de placement. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019\u00e9tranger, auditionn\u00e9 en d\u00e9tention, avait indiqu\u00e9 \u00eatre domicili\u00e9 chez un cousin sans pouvoir en donner l\u2019adresse exacte. Il reconnaissait ne pas avoir de titre de s\u00e9jour et d\u00e9clarait ne pas entendre se conformer \u00e0 la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement.<\/p>\n<p>Le juge en d\u00e9duit que ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments <em>&#8221; caract\u00e9risent suffisamment le d\u00e9faut de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation suffisantes et le risque subs\u00e9quent de soustraction \u00e0 l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision d\u2019\u00e9loignement &#8220;<\/em>. Il rel\u00e8ve que l\u2019administration a pris en compte la situation familiale de l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9, ce qui \u00e9carte toute erreur manifeste d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation. Le juge ajoute que, le risque \u00e9tant caract\u00e9ris\u00e9, il n\u2019y a pas lieu de se prononcer sur la menace pour l\u2019ordre public. Cette approche pragmatique confirme que le juge judiciaire exerce un contr\u00f4le effectif mais non exhaustif sur les motifs du placement. Il v\u00e9rifie la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du risque au regard des crit\u00e8res l\u00e9gaux sans substituer son appr\u00e9ciation \u00e0 celle de l\u2019administration.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-conditions-et-la-mise-en-uvre-de-la-prolongation-de-la-retention-administ\">II. Les conditions et la mise en \u0153uvre de la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative<\/h2>\n<p>La prolongation de la r\u00e9tention suppose que la proc\u00e9dure soit r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et que l\u2019\u00e9tranger ne puisse b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier d\u2019une mesure alternative. Le juge s\u2019assure du respect des droits de l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 et des conditions l\u00e9gales avant d\u2019ordonner la prolongation.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-verification-des-conditions-de-recevabilite-et-de-regularite-de-la-procedur\">A. La v\u00e9rification des conditions de recevabilit\u00e9 et de r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e d\u00e9clare la requ\u00eate en prolongation de l\u2019administration recevable. Elle motive cette recevabilit\u00e9 en relevant que la requ\u00eate est <em>&#8221; motiv\u00e9e, dat\u00e9e, sign\u00e9e et accompagn\u00e9e de toutes les pi\u00e8ces justificatives utiles dont la copie du registre pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l\u2019article L. 744-3 du CESEDA &#8220;<\/em>. Le juge s\u2019assure \u00e9galement que les droits de l\u2019\u00e9tranger ont \u00e9t\u00e9 respect\u00e9s : notification des droits, mise \u00e0 disposition des pi\u00e8ces, possibilit\u00e9 d\u2019\u00eatre assist\u00e9 d\u2019un interpr\u00e8te. Il constate que <em>&#8221; l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 s\u2019est vu notifier les droits qui lui sont reconnus conform\u00e9ment aux dispositions des articles L. 742-2, 743-9 et 743-24 du CESEDA &#8220;<\/em> et qu\u2019il a \u00e9t\u00e9 <em>&#8221; pleinement inform\u00e9 de ses droits et plac\u00e9 en \u00e9tat de les faire valoir \u00e0 compter de son arriv\u00e9e au lieu de r\u00e9tention &#8220;<\/em>. Ce contr\u00f4le strict de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale est une garantie essentielle pour l\u2019\u00e9tranger retenu. Il permet d\u2019\u00e9viter des prolongations fond\u00e9es sur une proc\u00e9dure vici\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-dassignation-a-residence-et-la-prolongation-ordonnee\">B. L\u2019absence d\u2019assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence et la prolongation ordonn\u00e9e<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence constitue une alternative \u00e0 la r\u00e9tention. Le CESEDA subordonne cette mesure \u00e0 la remise pr\u00e9alable d\u2019un passeport en cours de validit\u00e9. Le juge constate que <em>&#8221; la personne retenue ne remplit pas les conditions d\u2019une assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence, telles que fix\u00e9es par l\u2019article 552-4 du CESEDA, en ce sens qu\u2019elle n\u2019a pas pr\u00e9alablement remis \u00e0 un service de police ou \u00e0 une unit\u00e9 de gendarmerie un passeport en cours de validit\u00e9, quels que soient les m\u00e9rites de ses garanties de repr\u00e9sentation &#8220;<\/em>. La lettre de l\u2019article est ici appliqu\u00e9e strictement : sans passeport, l\u2019assignation est impossible, m\u00eame si l\u2019\u00e9tranger pr\u00e9sente des garanties de repr\u00e9sentation. Le juge constate ensuite que l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 ne pr\u00e9sente pas de garanties suffisantes pour l\u2019ex\u00e9cution de la mesure et que des mesures de surveillance sont n\u00e9cessaires. Il ordonne en cons\u00e9quence la prolongation de la r\u00e9tention pour vingt-six jours. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la logique du dispositif : la r\u00e9tention est une mesure de dernier recours, mais elle s\u2019impose lorsque l\u2019assignation n\u2019est pas l\u00e9galement possible et que le risque de soustraction persiste.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67aee49874f5133eff49cf50\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/00227<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a4554b7c4e388cdacfc69f\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 5 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/00226<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042775048\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 742-2 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;\u00e9tranger est maintenu \u00e0 disposition de la justice, dans des conditions fix\u00e9es par le procureur de la R\u00e9publique, pendant le temps strictement n\u00e9cessaire \u00e0 la tenue de l&#8217;audience et au prononc\u00e9 de l&#8217;ordonnance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042775564\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 612-3 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le risque mentionn\u00e9 au 3\u00b0 de l&#8217;article L. 612-2 peut \u00eatre regard\u00e9 comme \u00e9tabli, sauf circonstance particuli\u00e8re, dans les cas suivants :<br \/>1\u00b0 L&#8217;\u00e9tranger, qui ne peut justifier \u00eatre entr\u00e9 r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement sur le territoire fran\u00e7ais, n&#8217;a pas sollicit\u00e9 la d\u00e9livrance d&#8217;un titre de s\u00e9jour ;<br \/>2\u00b0 L&#8217;\u00e9tranger s&#8217;est maintenu sur le territoire fran\u00e7ais au-del\u00e0 de la dur\u00e9e de validit\u00e9 de son visa ou, s&#8217;il n&#8217;est pas soumis \u00e0 l&#8217;obligation du visa, \u00e0 l&#8217;expiration d&#8217;un d\u00e9lai de trois mois \u00e0 compter de son entr\u00e9e en France, sans avoir sollicit\u00e9 la d\u00e9livrance d&#8217;un titre de s\u00e9jour ;<br \/>3\u00b0 L&#8217;\u00e9tranger s&#8217;est maintenu sur le territoire fran\u00e7ais plus d&#8217;un mois apr\u00e8s l&#8217;expiration de son titre de s\u00e9jour, du document provisoire d\u00e9livr\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;occasion d&#8217;une demande de titre de s\u00e9jour ou de son autorisation provisoire de s\u00e9jour, sans en avoir demand\u00e9 le renouvellement ;<br \/>4\u00b0 L&#8217;\u00e9tranger a explicitement d\u00e9clar\u00e9 son intention de ne pas se conformer \u00e0 son obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais ;<br \/>5\u00b0 L&#8217;\u00e9tranger s&#8217;est soustrait \u00e0 l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution d&#8217;une pr\u00e9c\u00e9dente mesure d&#8217;\u00e9loignement ;<br \/>6\u00b0 L&#8217;\u00e9tranger, entr\u00e9 irr\u00e9guli\u00e8rement sur le territoire de l&#8217;un des \u00c9tats avec lesquels s&#8217;applique l&#8217;acquis de Schengen, fait l&#8217;objet d&#8217;une d\u00e9cision d&#8217;\u00e9loignement ex\u00e9cutoire prise par l&#8217;un des \u00c9tats ou s&#8217;est maintenu sur le territoire d&#8217;un de ces \u00c9tats sans justifier d&#8217;un droit de s\u00e9jour ;<br \/>7\u00b0 L&#8217;\u00e9tranger a contrefait, falsifi\u00e9 ou \u00e9tabli sous un autre nom que le sien un titre de s\u00e9jour ou un document d&#8217;identit\u00e9 ou de voyage ou a fait usage d&#8217;un tel titre ou document ;<br \/>8\u00b0 L&#8217;\u00e9tranger ne pr\u00e9sente pas de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation suffisantes, notamment parce qu&#8217;il ne peut pr\u00e9senter des documents d&#8217;identit\u00e9 ou de voyage en cours de validit\u00e9, qu&#8217;il a refus\u00e9 de communiquer les renseignements permettant d&#8217;\u00e9tablir son identit\u00e9 ou sa situation au regard du droit de circulation et de s\u00e9jour ou a communiqu\u00e9 des renseignements inexacts, qu&#8217;il a refus\u00e9 de se soumettre aux op\u00e9rations de relev\u00e9 d&#8217;empreintes digitales ou de prise de photographie pr\u00e9vues au 3\u00b0 de l&#8217;article L. 142-1, qu&#8217;il ne justifie pas d&#8217;une r\u00e9sidence effective et permanente dans un local affect\u00e9 \u00e0 son habitation principale ou qu&#8217;il s&#8217;est pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment soustrait aux obligations pr\u00e9vues aux articles L. 721-6 \u00e0 L. 721-8, L. 731-1, L. 731-3, L. 733-1 \u00e0 L. 733-4, L. 733-6, L. 743-13 \u00e0 L. 743-15 et L. 751-5.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042774937\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 744-3 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les conditions d&#8217;accessibilit\u00e9 adapt\u00e9es aux lieux de r\u00e9tention sont pr\u00e9cis\u00e9es par d\u00e9cret en Conseil d&#8217;Etat.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par une d\u00e9cision rendue le 29 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4740,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69cac524cdc6046d478b23ac","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69cac524cdc6046d478b23ac","_kj_judilibre_id":"69cac524cdc6046d478b23ac","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Lyon","_kj_chambre":"J.L.D.","_kj_rg":"26\/01019","_kj_date":"2026-03-29","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1227525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par une d\u00e9cision rendue le 29 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par une d\u00e9cision rendue le 29 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T14:01:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01019\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:01:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2205,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01019\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T14:01:44+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:01:44+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par une d\u00e9cision rendue le 29 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6000,\"height\":4000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par une d\u00e9cision rendue le 29 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01019","og_description":"Par une d\u00e9cision rendue le 29 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T14:01:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6000,"height":4000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01019","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:01:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/"},"wordCount":2205,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01019","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-01T14:01:44+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:01:44+00:00","description":"Par une d\u00e9cision rendue le 29 mars 2026, le juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention du tribunal judiciaire de Lyon a statu\u00e9 sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du placement en...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp","width":6000,"height":4000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lyon-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01019\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lyon, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59kN","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1211617,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-versailles-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00206\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227525,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Versailles, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00206","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Introduction sans titre. I. Les conditions de l'homologation de l'accord transactionnel A. L'interdiction pour le juge de modifier les termes de l'accord...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/haut-risque-JoyJpFZM-ZE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1218826,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-lille-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00395\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227525,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00395","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Lille, statuant en qualit\u00e9 de juge de l'ex\u00e9cution le 27 mars 2026 (n\u00b025\/00395), \u00e9tait saisi d'une demande de d\u00e9lais pour quitter...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/aakash-dhage-nARm1vWkl1I-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1205136,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-strasbourg-le-27-mars-2026-n25-09273\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227525,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/09273","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Strasbourg (11\u00e8me civ. S1) a rendu une d\u00e9cision sur une demande en paiement form\u00e9e par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de location...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/lisa-IfngoxB5ORA-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441807,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n23-20-245\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227525,"position":3},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b023-20.245","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Il r\u00e9sulte de la loi des 2-17 mars 1791, des principes de la libert\u00e9 du commerce et de l'industrie et de la libre concurrence ainsi que de l'article 1382,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/daniele-d-andreti-mGH4FxehE2s-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":492360,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-marseille-le-13-novembre-2025-n25-02521\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227525,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Marseille, le 13 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/02521","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 10 mars 2026, examine une demande indemnitaire li\u00e9e \u00e0 un trouble de jouissance locative. Suite \u00e0 un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/nelson-ricardo-7L4Yr-xfHE0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496372,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-bordeaux-le-1-decembre-2025-n25-00399\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227525,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Bordeaux, le 1 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b025\/00399","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 15 janvier 2026, statue sur une fin de non-recevoir tir\u00e9e de la forclusion. Des copropri\u00e9taires contestent des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alexander-mils-JveCFfribI8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1227525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227525\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1227525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1227525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1227525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}