{"id":1227526,"date":"2026-07-01T16:01:53","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:01:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T16:01:53","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:01:53","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01622"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-justification-de-la-troisieme-prolongation-par-les-diligences-de-ladministr\">I. La justification de la troisi\u00e8me prolongation par les diligences de l\u2019administration<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-leffectivite-des-diligences-face-a-lobstruction-de-letranger\">A. L\u2019effectivit\u00e9 des diligences face \u00e0 l\u2019obstruction de l\u2019\u00e9tranger<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-dincompatibilite-medicale-avec-le-maintien-en-retention\">B. L\u2019absence d\u2019incompatibilit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale avec le maintien en r\u00e9tention<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-loffice-du-juge-de-la-retention-en-matiere-de-droit-a-la-sante\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019office du juge de la r\u00e9tention en mati\u00e8re de droit \u00e0 la sant\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-un-controle-limite-a-lacces-aux-soins-en-centre-de-retention\">A. Un contr\u00f4le limit\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019acc\u00e8s aux soins en centre de r\u00e9tention<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-une-conception-restrictive-de-lincompatibilite-psychiatrique-confirmee-par-la-\">B. Une conception restrictive de l\u2019incompatibilit\u00e9 psychiatrique confirm\u00e9e par la jurisprudence<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 28 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers, a ordonn\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de la r\u00e9tention pour une dur\u00e9e de trente jours. La question pos\u00e9e \u00e9tait celle de la possibilit\u00e9 de prolonger au-del\u00e0 de soixante jours la mesure privative de libert\u00e9 d\u2019un \u00e9tranger ayant dissimul\u00e9 son identit\u00e9 et pr\u00e9sentant des troubles psychiatriques.<\/p>\n<p>Les faits sont les suivants. Un \u00e9tranger, se d\u00e9clarant sous une identit\u00e9 non v\u00e9rifi\u00e9e, a fait l\u2019objet d\u2019une mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement. Plac\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention, il a vu sa mesure prolong\u00e9e \u00e0 plusieurs reprises en raison de l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019obtenir un laissez-passer consulaire, les autorit\u00e9s alg\u00e9riennes n\u2019ayant pu identifier l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 du fait de sa dissimulation d\u2019identit\u00e9. Au cours de la r\u00e9tention, l\u2019\u00e9tranger a invoqu\u00e9 un trouble psychiatrique qu\u2019il estimait incompatible avec son maintien au centre de r\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n<p>La proc\u00e9dure a d\u00e9but\u00e9 par un placement initial, suivi de deux premi\u00e8res prolongations. Le pr\u00e9fet a saisi le juge aux fins d\u2019une troisi\u00e8me prolongation sur le fondement de l\u2019article L. 742-1 du Code de l\u2019entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d\u2019asile, en invoquant la dissimulation d\u2019identit\u00e9 et le d\u00e9faut de d\u00e9livrance des documents de voyage. L\u2019\u00e9tranger a contest\u00e9 la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure et soutenu que son \u00e9tat de sant\u00e9 psychique faisait obstacle \u00e0 la r\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit \u00e9tait donc double. D\u2019une part, les diligences de l\u2019administration \u00e9taient-elles suffisantes pour justifier une troisi\u00e8me prolongation ? D\u2019autre part, l\u2019existence de troubles psychiatriques \u00e9tait-elle de nature \u00e0 faire obstacle au maintien en r\u00e9tention ?<\/p>\n<p>Le juge a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 la requ\u00eate recevable et la proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9guli\u00e8re. Il a retenu que l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019ex\u00e9cuter l\u2019\u00e9loignement r\u00e9sultait de la dissimulation d\u2019identit\u00e9 par l\u2019\u00e9tranger et que les diligences consulaires \u00e9taient satisfactoires. S\u2019agissant de l\u2019\u00e9tat de sant\u00e9, il a estim\u00e9 que le trouble psychiatrique n\u2019\u00e9tait pas incompatible avec la r\u00e9tention d\u00e8s lors que l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 avait acc\u00e8s \u00e0 l\u2019unit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale du centre et qu\u2019il n\u2019\u00e9tablissait pas avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 emp\u00each\u00e9 d\u2019exercer ce droit. En cons\u00e9quence, il a ordonn\u00e9 la troisi\u00e8me prolongation pour trente jours.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-justification-de-la-troisieme-prolongation-par-les-diligences-de-ladministr\">I. La justification de la troisi\u00e8me prolongation par les diligences de l\u2019administration<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-leffectivite-des-diligences-face-a-lobstruction-de-letranger\">A. L\u2019effectivit\u00e9 des diligences face \u00e0 l\u2019obstruction de l\u2019\u00e9tranger<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a fond\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision sur le constat que l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019ex\u00e9cuter la mesure d\u2019\u00e9loignement provenait de la dissimulation par l\u2019\u00e9tranger de sa v\u00e9ritable identit\u00e9. Cette obstruction a impos\u00e9 des recherches et des d\u00e9marches toujours en cours pour obtenir un laissez-passer consulaire. Les autorit\u00e9s alg\u00e9riennes, saisies d\u00e8s le 28 janvier 2026, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 relanc\u00e9es r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement, la derni\u00e8re relance datant du 23 mars 2026. Le juge a \u00e9galement relev\u00e9 que le refus de l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 de se pr\u00e9senter \u00e0 une audition le 18 f\u00e9vrier 2026 contribuait \u00e0 allonger la dur\u00e9e de la r\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n<p>Ce raisonnement s\u2019inscrit dans le droit fil de l\u2019article L. 741-3 du Code de l\u2019entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d\u2019asile, qui impose \u00e0 l\u2019administration d\u2019exercer toutes diligences n\u00e9cessaires au d\u00e9part de l\u2019\u00e9tranger. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, les relances consulaires et les tentatives d\u2019audition constituent des actes positifs. Le juge n\u2019exige pas une diligence parfaite, mais une diligence <em>&#8221; satisfactoire &#8220;<\/em> au regard des circonstances, ce qui correspond \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante en la mati\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-dincompatibilite-medicale-avec-le-maintien-en-retention\">B. L\u2019absence d\u2019incompatibilit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale avec le maintien en r\u00e9tention<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge a examin\u00e9 l\u2019argument tir\u00e9 des troubles psychiatriques de l\u2019\u00e9tranger. Il constate que le trouble invoqu\u00e9 n\u2019est pas incompatible avec la r\u00e9tention, car l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 a acc\u00e8s \u00e0 l\u2019unit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale du centre de r\u00e9tention administrative et aux soins qui y sont dispens\u00e9s. Aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment du dossier ne d\u00e9montre que l\u2019\u00e9tranger aurait demand\u00e9 son internement psychiatrique ou qu\u2019il serait en rupture de traitement. Le juge rappelle qu\u2019il appartient \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tranger de prouver qu\u2019il n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 mis en mesure d\u2019acc\u00e9der aux soins, et cite en ce sens un arr\u00eat de la Cour de cassation (Civ 1\u00e8re, 12 mai 2010, n\u00b009-12.877) : <em>&#8221; un acc\u00e8s aux soins est pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 s&#8217;il est \u00e9tabli que le centre de r\u00e9tention dispose d&#8217;un service m\u00e9dical comprenant une permanence infirmi\u00e8re &#8220;<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Cette pr\u00e9somption op\u00e8re un renversement de la charge de la preuve. L\u2019administration n\u2019a pas \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer que les soins sont effectivement prodigu\u00e9s ; il suffit que le centre offre une possibilit\u00e9 d\u2019acc\u00e8s. L\u2019\u00e9tranger qui invoque une incompatibilit\u00e9 doit \u00e9tablir une impossibilit\u00e9 concr\u00e8te, ce qui n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 fait.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-loffice-du-juge-de-la-retention-en-matiere-de-droit-a-la-sante\">II. La port\u00e9e de l\u2019office du juge de la r\u00e9tention en mati\u00e8re de droit \u00e0 la sant\u00e9<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-un-controle-limite-a-lacces-aux-soins-en-centre-de-retention\">A. Un contr\u00f4le limit\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019acc\u00e8s aux soins en centre de r\u00e9tention<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge de la r\u00e9tention, gardien de la libert\u00e9 individuelle, exerce un contr\u00f4le sur la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 de la mesure. Cependant, ce contr\u00f4le est limit\u00e9 lorsqu\u2019il s\u2019agit d\u2019appr\u00e9cier la compatibilit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e9tat de sant\u00e9 avec la r\u00e9tention. Il ne se substitue pas au m\u00e9decin et ne v\u00e9rifie pas la nature exacte de la pathologie. Il s\u2019assure seulement que l\u2019\u00e9tranger a \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9 de son droit de solliciter un m\u00e9decin et que le centre dispose d\u2019une structure m\u00e9dicale.<\/p>\n<p>Cette approche est confirm\u00e9e par la jurisprudence r\u00e9cente. Dans un arr\u00eat du 27 f\u00e9vrier 2025 (n\u00b025\/00629), la Cour d\u2019appel d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans a jug\u00e9 qu\u2019<em>&#8221; un certificat m\u00e9dical produit ne permet pas d&#8217;\u00e9tablir une incompatibilit\u00e9 de l&#8217;\u00e9tat de sant\u00e9 avec la mesure de r\u00e9tention administrative dont il fait l&#8217;objet, celui-ci n&#8217;\u00e9voquant une incompatibilit\u00e9 qu&#8217;avec la mesure d&#8217;\u00e9loignement &#8220;<\/em>. De m\u00eame, la Cour d\u2019appel de Bordeaux, le 26 f\u00e9vrier 2025 (n\u00b025\/00045), a relev\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; l&#8217;int\u00e9ress\u00e9 ne pr\u00e9sente pas de symptomatologie psychotique ni de trouble de la repolarisation, n&#8217;a aucun ant\u00e9c\u00e9dent psychiatrique, le diagnostic clinique faisant seulement \u00e9tat de trouble de la personnalit\u00e9 de type antisocial &#8220;<\/em>. Ces d\u00e9cisions montrent que les juges du fond distinguent soigneusement l\u2019incompatibilit\u00e9 avec la r\u00e9tention de celle avec l\u2019\u00e9loignement, et qu\u2019ils exigent des \u00e9l\u00e9ments m\u00e9dicaux pr\u00e9cis pour \u00e9carter la pr\u00e9somption d\u2019acc\u00e8s aux soins.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-une-conception-restrictive-de-lincompatibilite-psychiatrique-confirmee-par-la-\">B. Une conception restrictive de l\u2019incompatibilit\u00e9 psychiatrique confirm\u00e9e par la jurisprudence<\/h3>\n<p>La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e s\u2019inscrit dans une tendance jurisprudentielle qui limite strictement les cas d\u2019incompatibilit\u00e9 psychiatrique avec la r\u00e9tention administrative. En effet, le simple fait d\u2019all\u00e9guer un trouble mental ne suffit pas ; il faut d\u00e9montrer que le trouble rend impossible le maintien en centre, notamment en raison d\u2019une impossibilit\u00e9 de soins adapt\u00e9s. Or, la pr\u00e9somption d\u2019acc\u00e8s aux soins, coupl\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019absence de demande d\u2019internement, conduit souvent au rejet de l\u2019exception.<\/p>\n<p>Cette position peut \u00eatre critiqu\u00e9e sur le plan de l\u2019effectivit\u00e9 des droits. Elle repose sur une vision formelle de l\u2019acc\u00e8s aux soins, qui ne tient pas compte des difficult\u00e9s pratiques rencontr\u00e9es par les personnes souffrant de troubles psychiatriques pour formuler une demande ou pour b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier d\u2019une prise en charge adapt\u00e9e. Toutefois, elle est conforme \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9conomie du contentieux de la r\u00e9tention, qui doit statuer rapidement et ne peut se transformer en une expertise m\u00e9dicale approfondie. En l\u2019\u00e9tat du droit positif, la d\u00e9cision du Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux est donc juridiquement fond\u00e9e et coh\u00e9rente avec la jurisprudence des cours d\u2019appel.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c154e2ca67901ed03a783b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, le 27 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/00629<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67c004f83b432426a05311ed\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Bordeaux, le 26 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b025\/00045<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 28 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers, a ordonn\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9581,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69d030c2cdc6046d470808f5","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69d030c2cdc6046d470808f5","_kj_judilibre_id":"69d030c2cdc6046d470808f5","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Meaux","_kj_chambre":"R\u00e9tention admin \u00e9trangers","_kj_rg":"26\/01622","_kj_date":"2026-03-28","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1227526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01622 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 28 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers, a ordonn\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01622\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 28 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers, a ordonn\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T14:01:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2076\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01622\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:01:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1475,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01622\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T14:01:53+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01622 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:01:53+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 28 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers, a ordonn\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":2076,\"height\":2768},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01622\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01622 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 28 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers, a ordonn\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01622","og_description":"Le 28 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers, a ordonn\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T14:01:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2076,"height":2768,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01622","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:01:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/"},"wordCount":1475,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01622","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-01T14:01:53+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01622 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:01:53+00:00","description":"Le 28 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers, a ordonn\u00e9 une troisi\u00e8me prolongation de...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp","width":2076,"height":2768},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01622\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01622"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-YCdjFYsEk9Q-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59kO","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1201363,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-27-mars-2026-n26-01603\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227526,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01603","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une ordonnance (n\u00b026\/01603)...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/roman-suslov-7jSq1rrpku0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1220382,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-27-mars-2026-n26-01611\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227526,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01611","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 27 mars 2026, le magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire de Meaux statuait en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative des \u00e9trangers (n\u00b0 26\/01611). Un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-ypy0AuAozUo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-ypy0AuAozUo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-ypy0AuAozUo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-ypy0AuAozUo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-ypy0AuAozUo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-ypy0AuAozUo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1227568,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-28-mars-2026-n26-01621\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227526,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 28 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01621","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 28 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux (chambre r\u00e9tention admin \u00e9trangers, n\u00b026\/01621) a ordonn\u00e9 la deuxi\u00e8me prolongation de la r\u00e9tention...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EpYGXgIeTTQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EpYGXgIeTTQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EpYGXgIeTTQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EpYGXgIeTTQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EpYGXgIeTTQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EpYGXgIeTTQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496746,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-30-novembre-2025-n25-04875\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227526,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 30 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/04875","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire, statuant comme juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention le 30 novembre 2025, examine une demande de prolongation de r\u00e9tention...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-69z5zredkrw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-69z5zredkrw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-69z5zredkrw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-69z5zredkrw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-69z5zredkrw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-69z5zredkrw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496825,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-29-novembre-2025-n25-04868\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227526,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 29 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/04868","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire du Mesnil-Amelot, statuant comme juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 novembre 2025. Il se pronon\u00e7ait...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/virginia-marinova-xqo5V5aU09g-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491889,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-meaux-le-15-novembre-2025-n25-04638\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227526,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Meaux, le 15 novembre 2025, n\u00b025\/04638","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire du Mesnil-Amelot, statuant le 15 novembre 2025, examine une demande de troisi\u00e8me prolongation de r\u00e9tention administrative. Le juge...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/peter-ivey-hansen-K3qrgjT7N2M-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1227526"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227526\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9581"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1227526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1227526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1227526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}