{"id":1227591,"date":"2026-07-01T16:21:42","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:21:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T16:21:42","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:21:42","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05136"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-les-conditions-de-validite-du-desistement-dinstance\">I. Les conditions de validit\u00e9 du d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-manifestation-unilaterale-de-volonte-du-demandeur\">A. La manifestation unilat\u00e9rale de volont\u00e9 du demandeur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-defense-au-fond-ou-de-fin-de-non-recevoir-du-defendeur\">B. L&#8217;absence de d\u00e9fense au fond ou de fin de non-recevoir du d\u00e9fendeur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-effets-du-desistement-dinstance\">II. Les effets du d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lextinction-de-linstance\">A. L&#8217;extinction de l&#8217;instance<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-charge-des-frais-de-linstance-eteinte\">B. La charge des frais de l&#8217;instance \u00e9teinte<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, n\u00b025\/05136) a rendu une ordonnance de d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance. La demanderesse avait saisi la juridiction par acte introductif du 9 octobre 2025. \u00c0 l&#8217;audience, elle a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 oralement se d\u00e9sister de sa demande. La d\u00e9fenderesse, une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de transport a\u00e9rien, n&#8217;avait pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ni aucune fin de non-recevoir. Le tribunal a constat\u00e9 le d\u00e9sistement et dit que les frais de l&#8217;instance \u00e9teinte seraient support\u00e9s par la demanderesse, sauf convention contraire des parties.<\/p>\n<p>La proc\u00e9dure r\u00e9v\u00e8le que la demanderesse a pris l&#8217;initiative de mettre fin \u00e0 l&#8217;instance avant que la d\u00e9fenderesse n&#8217;ait d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 une quelconque d\u00e9fense. Aucune \u00e9criture au fond n&#8217;avait \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9e par la d\u00e9fenderesse au moment du d\u00e9sistement. La question de droit porte sur les conditions dans lesquelles un d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance est parfait, et plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment sur la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur lorsque celui-ci n&#8217;a pas encore pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 de d\u00e9fense. Le tribunal a r\u00e9pondu en appliquant les articles 394 et 395 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, constatant que l&#8217;absence de d\u00e9fense au fond ou de fin de non-recevoir dispensait le d\u00e9sistement de l&#8217;acceptation de la d\u00e9fenderesse. La solution retenue est donc celle de la perfection imm\u00e9diate du d\u00e9sistement.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-les-conditions-de-validite-du-desistement-dinstance\">I. Les conditions de validit\u00e9 du d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-manifestation-unilaterale-de-volonte-du-demandeur\">A. La manifestation unilat\u00e9rale de volont\u00e9 du demandeur<\/h3>\n<p>Le d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance est un acte par lequel le demandeur renonce \u00e0 poursuivre la proc\u00e9dure engag\u00e9e. L&#8217;article 394 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile dispose que le demandeur peut, en toute mati\u00e8re, se d\u00e9sister de sa demande en vue de mettre fin \u00e0 l&#8217;instance. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la demanderesse a exprim\u00e9 oralement sa volont\u00e9 de se d\u00e9sister \u00e0 l&#8217;audience. Cette manifestation de volont\u00e9 \u00e9tait claire, non \u00e9quivoque et imm\u00e9diatement port\u00e9e \u00e0 la connaissance du juge et de la partie adverse. Le tribunal a constat\u00e9 cette d\u00e9claration sans r\u00e9serve. La forme orale est admise, comme le rappelle la jurisprudence : la Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Synergie immobilier, repr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par son conseil a fait savoir qu&#8217;elle se d\u00e9sistait de ses demandes&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d1265608d5ab3983c0c4a8\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris, 11 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/18080)<\/a><\/strong>. Ici, l&#8217;expression orale \u00e0 l&#8217;audience \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 une d\u00e9claration formelle suffisante. Aucune condition de forme suppl\u00e9mentaire n&#8217;est exig\u00e9e pour que la volont\u00e9 de se d\u00e9sister soit valable. Le d\u00e9sistement est donc un acte unilat\u00e9ral du demandeur, mais sa perfection d\u00e9pend de l&#8217;attitude du d\u00e9fendeur.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-defense-au-fond-ou-de-fin-de-non-recevoir-du-defendeur\">B. L&#8217;absence de d\u00e9fense au fond ou de fin de non-recevoir du d\u00e9fendeur<\/h3>\n<p>L&#8217;article 395 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile subordonne la perfection du d\u00e9sistement \u00e0 l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur, sauf si celui-ci n&#8217;a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste. Cette exception est pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment appliqu\u00e9e dans la d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e. La d\u00e9fenderesse n&#8217;avait d\u00e9pos\u00e9 aucune conclusion au fond ni soulev\u00e9 aucune fin de non-recevoir avant l&#8217;audience de d\u00e9sistement. Le tribunal constate express\u00e9ment ce fait. La Cour d&#8217;appel de Caen a jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;l&#8217;acceptation n&#8217;est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n&#8217;a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/681306b68cc74354d6647571\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Caen, 30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/02381)<\/a><\/strong>. Cette solution \u00e9vite de bloquer le d\u00e9sistement par une inertie du d\u00e9fendeur qui n&#8217;a pas encore particip\u00e9 activement \u00e0 l&#8217;instance. Le l\u00e9gislateur a ainsi pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 que l&#8217;absence de d\u00e9fense implique un d\u00e9sint\u00e9r\u00eat du d\u00e9fendeur pour la poursuite du proc\u00e8s, ce qui rend inutile son acceptation. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la condition \u00e9tait remplie, le d\u00e9sistement \u00e9tait donc parfait d\u00e8s la d\u00e9claration de la demanderesse.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-effets-du-desistement-dinstance\">II. Les effets du d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lextinction-de-linstance\">A. L&#8217;extinction de l&#8217;instance<\/h3>\n<p>Le d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance entra\u00eene l&#8217;extinction imm\u00e9diate de la proc\u00e9dure. Le juge n&#8217;a pas \u00e0 statuer au fond, il se borne \u00e0 constater le d\u00e9sistement et \u00e0 en tirer les cons\u00e9quences. L&#8217;ordonnance du tribunal judiciaire de Paris <em>&#8220;Constate que la demanderesse a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 [&#8230;] se d\u00e9sister de sa demande en vue de mettre fin \u00e0 l&#8217;instance&#8221;<\/em>. Cette constatation met un terme \u00e0 la juridiction saisie. L&#8217;instance est \u00e9teinte, ce qui signifie que les actes de proc\u00e9dure d\u00e9j\u00e0 accomplis perdent leur effet. Le d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance n&#8217;\u00e9quivaut pas \u00e0 un d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;action : le demandeur conserve la possibilit\u00e9 d&#8217;introduire une nouvelle instance sur le m\u00eame fondement, sauf prescription \u00e9ventuelle. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la demanderesse a renonc\u00e9 \u00e0 la seule instance en cours. La Cour d&#8217;appel de Paris distingue bien les deux notions lorsque le d\u00e9sistement est intervenu avant toute d\u00e9fense. L&#8217;extinction de l&#8217;instance est donc une cons\u00e9quence automatique du constat judiciaire de la volont\u00e9 de se d\u00e9sister, sans qu&#8217;il soit besoin d&#8217;une d\u00e9cision contradictoire plus approfondie.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-charge-des-frais-de-linstance-eteinte\">B. La charge des frais de l&#8217;instance \u00e9teinte<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 que <em>&#8220;les frais de l&#8217;instance \u00e9teinte seront support\u00e9s par la demanderesse, sauf convention contraire des parties&#8221;<\/em>. Cette solution est conforme au principe g\u00e9n\u00e9ral selon lequel le demandeur qui se d\u00e9siste assume les d\u00e9pens de l&#8217;instance qu&#8217;il a lui-m\u00eame initi\u00e9e. L&#8217;article 399 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile dispose que le d\u00e9sistement emporte, sauf convention contraire, soumission de payer les frais de l&#8217;instance \u00e9teinte. Le juge applique cette r\u00e8gle sans avoir \u00e0 motiver davantage. La mention <em>&#8220;sauf convention contraire des parties&#8221;<\/em> ouvre la possibilit\u00e9 d&#8217;un accord amiable sur la r\u00e9partition des frais, mais en l&#8217;absence d&#8217;un tel accord, la charge incombe \u00e0 la demanderesse. Cette d\u00e9cision est \u00e9quitable car elle \u00e9vite que le d\u00e9fendeur, qui n&#8217;a pas eu \u00e0 se d\u00e9fendre, supporte les frais d&#8217;une proc\u00e9dure qu&#8217;il n&#8217;a pas provoqu\u00e9e. La solution s&#8217;inscrit dans la logique du d\u00e9sistement unilat\u00e9ral : celui qui a mis en mouvement l&#8217;instance doit en supporter le co\u00fbt lorsqu&#8217;il y met fin sans attendre une d\u00e9cision au fond.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d1265608d5ab3983c0c4a8\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 11 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/18080<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/681306b68cc74354d6647571\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Caen, le 30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/02381<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410619\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 394 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le demandeur peut, en toute mati\u00e8re, se d\u00e9sister de sa demande en vue de mettre fin \u00e0 l&#8217;instance.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410620\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 395 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Le d\u00e9sistement n&#8217;est parfait que par l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur.<\/p>\n<p>    Toutefois, l&#8217;acceptation n&#8217;est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n&#8217;a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410629\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 399 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le d\u00e9sistement emporte, sauf convention contraire, soumission de payer les frais de l&#8217;instance \u00e9teinte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, n\u00b025\/05136) a rendu une ordonnance de d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance. La demanderesse&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9578,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"6a29b01fcdc6046d47dc4ba1","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6a29b01fcdc6046d47dc4ba1","_kj_judilibre_id":"6a29b01fcdc6046d47dc4ba1","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Paris","_kj_chambre":"PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates","_kj_rg":"25\/05136","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1227591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05136 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, n\u00b025\/05136) a rendu une ordonnance de d\u00e9sistement d&#039;instance. La demanderesse...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05136\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, n\u00b025\/05136) a rendu une ordonnance de d\u00e9sistement d&#039;instance. La demanderesse...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T14:21:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4126\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"5790\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05136\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:21:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1304,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05136\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T14:21:42+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05136 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:21:42+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, n\u00b025\\\/05136) a rendu une ordonnance de d\u00e9sistement d'instance. La demanderesse...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4126,\"height\":5790},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05136\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05136 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, n\u00b025\/05136) a rendu une ordonnance de d\u00e9sistement d'instance. La demanderesse...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05136","og_description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, n\u00b025\/05136) a rendu une ordonnance de d\u00e9sistement d'instance. La demanderesse...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T14:21:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4126,"height":5790,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05136","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:21:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/"},"wordCount":1304,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05136","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-01T14:21:42+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05136 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:21:42+00:00","description":"Le 27 mars 2026, le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, n\u00b025\/05136) a rendu une ordonnance de d\u00e9sistement d'instance. La demanderesse...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp","width":4126,"height":5790},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05136\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05136"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-f0bBY9zK6xg-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59lR","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":494090,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-29-octobre-2025-n19-02594\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227591,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 29 octobre 2025, n\u00b019\/02594","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, statuant en mati\u00e8re sociale, a rendu un jugement le vingt-neuf octobre deux mille vingt-cinq. L\u2019affaire concernait un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-bUC0D8FFwAA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-bUC0D8FFwAA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-bUC0D8FFwAA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-bUC0D8FFwAA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-bUC0D8FFwAA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/pascal-bernardon-bUC0D8FFwAA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201347,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nantes-le-27-mars-2026-n25-00427\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227591,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nantes, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/00427","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Nantes, dans sa formation de la protection sociale, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement (n\u00b025\/00427) qui interroge la...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-vGTXy8FS7b0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495256,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-3-decembre-2025-n22-01444\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227591,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b022\/01444","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Cr\u00e9teil, dans un jugement du 11 mars 2024, statue sur une demande de r\u00e9vision du taux d\u2019incapacit\u00e9 permanente partielle. La...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/adam-ling-qmEbuqzB6L0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":495437,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-rennes-le-2-decembre-2025-n2025l01309\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227591,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Rennes, le 2 d\u00e9cembre 2025, n\u00b02025L01309","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Rennes, statuant le 3 mars 2026, a prononc\u00e9 une mesure de faillite personnelle assortie d'une interdiction de g\u00e9rer de quinze...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/tim-schmidbauer-EnC5f7At4ac-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/tim-schmidbauer-EnC5f7At4ac-unsplash-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/tim-schmidbauer-EnC5f7At4ac-unsplash-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/tim-schmidbauer-EnC5f7At4ac-unsplash-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/tim-schmidbauer-EnC5f7At4ac-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/tim-schmidbauer-EnC5f7At4ac-unsplash-1.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1221411,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-rennes-le-29-avril-2026-n23-04349\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227591,"position":4},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Rennes, le 29 avril 2026, n\u00b023\/04349","author":"Kohen","date":"30 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 29 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel de Rennes (9\u00e8me Ch S\u00e9curit\u00e9 Sociale, n\u00b023\/04349) a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l'opposabilit\u00e9 du taux d'incapacit\u00e9...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/martin-martz-vy6eb3gscTk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/martin-martz-vy6eb3gscTk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/martin-martz-vy6eb3gscTk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/martin-martz-vy6eb3gscTk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/martin-martz-vy6eb3gscTk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/martin-martz-vy6eb3gscTk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":456735,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-paris-28-01-2026-n-24pa01905\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227591,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de PARIS \u2013 28\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 24PA01905","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d'appel a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d'un pourvoi contre un jugement ayant rejet\u00e9 une demande d'annulation partielle d'une mise en demeure. Cette...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1227591"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227591\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9578"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1227591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1227591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1227591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}