{"id":1227593,"date":"2026-07-01T16:22:03","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:22:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T16:22:03","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:22:03","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05841"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-regularite-formelle-du-desistement-constatee-par-le-tribunal\">I. La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 formelle du d\u00e9sistement constat\u00e9e par le tribunal<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-manifestation-non-equivoque-de-la-volonte-du-demandeur\">A. La manifestation non \u00e9quivoque de la volont\u00e9 du demandeur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-role-de-lacceptation-du-defendeur-malgre-labsence-de-defense\">B. Le r\u00f4le de l\u2019acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur malgr\u00e9 l\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-les-effets-du-desistement-sur-linstance-et-laction\">II. Les effets du d\u00e9sistement sur l\u2019instance et l\u2019action<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lextinction-de-linstance-et-la-renonciation-au-droit-dagir\">A. L\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance et la renonciation au droit d\u2019agir<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-charge-des-frais-et-la-portee-de-la-solution-retenue\">B. La charge des frais et la port\u00e9e de la solution retenue<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement constatant un d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance et d&#8217;action (n\u00b0 RG 25\/05841). Le litige opposait un demandeur \u00e0 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de transport a\u00e9rien. Par acte introductif du 8 octobre 2025, le demandeur avait saisi la juridiction de proximit\u00e9. \u00c0 l\u2019audience du 27 mars 2026, il d\u00e9clara oralement se d\u00e9sister de sa demande en vue de mettre fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance et \u00e0 son action. La d\u00e9fenderesse, non comparante \u00e0 l\u2019audience, avait accept\u00e9 le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance et d\u2019action. Le tribunal constata cette double manifestation de volont\u00e9 et dit que les frais de l\u2019instance \u00e9teinte seraient support\u00e9s par le demandeur. La question de droit soulev\u00e9e est celle des conditions de validit\u00e9 du d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance et d\u2019action, notamment l\u2019exigence d\u2019acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur lorsque celui-ci n\u2019a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense. En retenant que le d\u00e9sistement \u00e9tait parfait par l\u2019acceptation de la d\u00e9fenderesse, le tribunal a appliqu\u00e9 les articles 394 et 395 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Il convient d\u2019expliquer le sens de cette solution avant d\u2019en appr\u00e9cier la port\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-regularite-formelle-du-desistement-constatee-par-le-tribunal\">I. La r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 formelle du d\u00e9sistement constat\u00e9e par le tribunal<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-manifestation-non-equivoque-de-la-volonte-du-demandeur\">A. La manifestation non \u00e9quivoque de la volont\u00e9 du demandeur<\/h3>\n<p>Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance est un acte unilat\u00e9ral par lequel le demandeur renonce \u00e0 poursuivre la proc\u00e9dure engag\u00e9e. L\u2019article 394 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile dispose que le demandeur peut se d\u00e9sister de sa demande en vue de mettre fin \u00e0 l\u2019instance. Cette facult\u00e9 suppose une volont\u00e9 claire et non \u00e9quivoque. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le demandeur a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 oralement \u00e0 l\u2019audience se d\u00e9sister de sa demande, en pr\u00e9cisant qu\u2019il entendait mettre fin tant \u00e0 l\u2019instance qu\u2019\u00e0 son action. Une d\u00e9claration orale en audience constitue une manifestation expresse de volont\u00e9, \u00e9quivalant \u00e0 un acte \u00e9crit. Le tribunal a pu valablement constater ce d\u00e9sistement, aucun \u00e9l\u00e9ment ne laissant supposer une quelconque ambigu\u00eft\u00e9. Aucune r\u00e9serve n\u2019ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 formul\u00e9e, la renonciation \u00e9tait pure et simple. Cette exigence de non-\u00e9quivoque est constante en jurisprudence, bien que la d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e n\u2019ait pas \u00e0 la rappeler explicitement.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-role-de-lacceptation-du-defendeur-malgre-labsence-de-defense\">B. Le r\u00f4le de l\u2019acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur malgr\u00e9 l\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense<\/h3>\n<p>Selon l\u2019article 395 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, le d\u00e9sistement n\u2019est parfait que par l\u2019acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur. Toutefois, une exception est pr\u00e9vue : cette acceptation n\u2019est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n\u2019a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, la d\u00e9fenderesse \u00e9tait non comparante et n\u2019avait donc \u00e9lev\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense. En principe, le d\u00e9sistement aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 parfait sans acceptation. Pourtant, le tribunal a express\u00e9ment constat\u00e9 que la d\u00e9fenderesse avait accept\u00e9 le d\u00e9sistement. Cette d\u00e9marche, bien que surabondante, n\u2019entache pas la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la d\u00e9cision. Elle peut s\u2019expliquer par un souci de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique : une acceptation, m\u00eame non requise, \u00e9carte toute contestation ult\u00e9rieure. La jurisprudence rappelle que <em>&#8220;le d\u00e9sistement n&#8217;est parfait que par l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6813085a046d639136715cae\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, 30 avril 2025, n\u00b021\/06828)<\/a><\/strong>, mais elle admet l\u2019exception. Le tribunal a donc fait preuve de prudence, sans violer la loi.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-les-effets-du-desistement-sur-linstance-et-laction\">II. Les effets du d\u00e9sistement sur l\u2019instance et l\u2019action<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lextinction-de-linstance-et-la-renonciation-au-droit-dagir\">A. L\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance et la renonciation au droit d\u2019agir<\/h3>\n<p>Le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance emporte extinction de la proc\u00e9dure en cours. Il n\u2019\u00e9teint pas n\u00e9cessairement le droit lui-m\u00eame, sauf si le demandeur se d\u00e9siste \u00e9galement de son action. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal a constat\u00e9 un d\u00e9sistement <em>&#8220;d\u2019instance et d\u2019action&#8221;<\/em>. Cette formulation implique une renonciation au droit substantiel invoqu\u00e9, et non pas seulement \u00e0 la proc\u00e9dure. D\u00e8s lors, le demandeur ne pourra plus intenter une nouvelle action fond\u00e9e sur le m\u00eame objet. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 l\u2019effet attach\u00e9 au d\u00e9sistement d\u2019action, qui est irr\u00e9vocable. Le tribunal a donc mis un terme d\u00e9finitif au litige. La port\u00e9e de cette extinction est absolue : l\u2019autorit\u00e9 de la chose jug\u00e9e s\u2019attache au jugement qui constate le d\u00e9sistement, bien que celui-ci ne tranche pas le fond.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-charge-des-frais-et-la-portee-de-la-solution-retenue\">B. La charge des frais et la port\u00e9e de la solution retenue<\/h3>\n<p>Aux termes de l\u2019article 399 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, le d\u00e9sistement emporte, sauf convention contraire, soumission de payer les frais de l\u2019instance \u00e9teinte. Le tribunal a fait application de cette r\u00e8gle en mettant les frais \u00e0 la charge du demandeur. Aucune convention contraire n\u2019ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 all\u00e9gu\u00e9e, la solution est classique. Sur la port\u00e9e de cette d\u00e9cision, il convient de souligner qu\u2019elle s\u2019inscrit dans un contentieux de masse o\u00f9 les d\u00e9sistements sont fr\u00e9quents. Le tribunal a privil\u00e9gi\u00e9 une solution pragmatique en acceptant un d\u00e9sistement oral et en constatant une acceptation pourtant non n\u00e9cessaire. Cette approche t\u00e9moigne d\u2019une volont\u00e9 de faciliter l\u2019extinction des instances sans formalisme excessif. La Cour d\u2019appel de Bordeaux rappelle que <em>&#8220;le d\u00e9sistement de l&#8217;appel n&#8217;a besoin d&#8217;\u00eatre accept\u00e9 que s&#8217;il contient des r\u00e9serves ou si la partie \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9gard de laquelle il est fait a pr\u00e9alablement form\u00e9 un appel incident&#8221;<\/em> (10 avril 2025, n\u00b023\/00143). Transpos\u00e9e \u00e0 la premi\u00e8re instance, cette logique confirme que l\u2019acceptation n\u2019\u00e9tait pas indispensable en l\u2019absence de d\u00e9fense. La d\u00e9cision comment\u00e9e n\u2019innove donc pas, mais elle illustre la pratique des juridictions de proximit\u00e9 soucieuses d\u2019efficacit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6813085a046d639136715cae\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Aix-en-Provence, le 30 avril 2025, n\u00b021\/06828<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f8af5ab5ff6e72c9612566\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Bordeaux, le 10 avril 2025, n\u00b023\/00143<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410619\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 394 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le demandeur peut, en toute mati\u00e8re, se d\u00e9sister de sa demande en vue de mettre fin \u00e0 l&#8217;instance.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410620\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 395 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Le d\u00e9sistement n&#8217;est parfait que par l&#8217;acceptation du d\u00e9fendeur.<\/p>\n<p>    Toutefois, l&#8217;acceptation n&#8217;est pas n\u00e9cessaire si le d\u00e9fendeur n&#8217;a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 aucune d\u00e9fense au fond ou fin de non-recevoir au moment o\u00f9 le demandeur se d\u00e9siste.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410629\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 399 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le d\u00e9sistement emporte, sauf convention contraire, soumission de payer les frais de l&#8217;instance \u00e9teinte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement constatant un d\u00e9sistement d&#8217;instance et d&#8217;action (n\u00b0 RG&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9423,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"6a29b064cdc6046d47dc5025","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6a29b064cdc6046d47dc5025","_kj_judilibre_id":"6a29b064cdc6046d47dc5025","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Paris","_kj_chambre":"PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates","_kj_rg":"25\/05841","_kj_date":"2026-03-27","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1227593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05841 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement constatant un d\u00e9sistement d&#039;instance et d&#039;action (n\u00b0 RG...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05841\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement constatant un d\u00e9sistement d&#039;instance et d&#039;action (n\u00b0 RG...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T14:22:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3840\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2160\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05841\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:22:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1205,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05841\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T14:22:03+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05841 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:22:03+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement constatant un d\u00e9sistement d'instance et d'action (n\u00b0 RG...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3840,\"height\":2160},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\\\/05841\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05841 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement constatant un d\u00e9sistement d'instance et d'action (n\u00b0 RG...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05841","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement constatant un d\u00e9sistement d'instance et d'action (n\u00b0 RG...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T14:22:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3840,"height":2160,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05841","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:22:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/"},"wordCount":1205,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05841","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-01T14:22:03+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05841 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:22:03+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 un jugement constatant un d\u00e9sistement d'instance et d'action (n\u00b0 RG...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp","width":3840,"height":2160},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05841\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05841"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/shubham-dhage-ICCn56-jyuw-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59lT","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":456735,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-paris-28-01-2026-n-24pa01905\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227593,"position":0},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de PARIS \u2013 28\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 24PA01905","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d'appel a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d'un pourvoi contre un jugement ayant rejet\u00e9 une demande d'annulation partielle d'une mise en demeure. Cette...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":457466,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-paris-08-01-2026-n-25pa03124\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227593,"position":1},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de PARIS \u2013 08\/01\/2026 \u2013 n\u00b0 25PA03124","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Paris a rendu le 8 janvier 2026 un arr\u00eat concernant la mise en \u0153uvre du d\u00e9sistement d'office des requ\u00e9rants. Des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/deniz-demirci-wrMPwcYTRpc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1227610,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-paris-le-27-mars-2026-n25-05839\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227593,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, le 27 mars 2026, n\u00b025\/05839","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans sa formation PCP JTJ proxi requ\u00eates, a rendu le 27 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision constatant le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance et...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1209494,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-creteil-le-7-avril-2026-n2025f01193\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227593,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cr\u00e9teil, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01193","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Cr\u00e9teil, par un jugement du 7 avril 2026 (n\u00b0 RG 2025F01193), a constat\u00e9 l\u2019extinction de l\u2019instance et s\u2019est d\u00e9clar\u00e9 dessaisi en...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-AUDG_Ja0MOU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-AUDG_Ja0MOU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-AUDG_Ja0MOU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-AUDG_Ja0MOU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-AUDG_Ja0MOU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/mathias-reding-AUDG_Ja0MOU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1091410,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-bastia-le-20-mars-2026-n2024j00358\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227593,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Bastia, le 20 mars 2026, n\u00b02024J00358","author":"Kohen","date":"13 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Bastia a rendu le 20 mars 2026 une d\u00e9cision statuant sur une demande de d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance (n\u00b02024J00358). Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/andre-benz-AiORnUT6sC0-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201507,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-3-avril-2026-n2025107619\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227593,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02025107619","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le jugement rendu le 3 avril 2026 par le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris (chambre 1-12, RG n\u00b02025107619) porte sur le d\u00e9sistement d\u2019instance...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-NkmP4u5P1PM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-NkmP4u5P1PM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-NkmP4u5P1PM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-NkmP4u5P1PM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-NkmP4u5P1PM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-cortes-NkmP4u5P1PM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1227593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227593\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9423"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1227593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1227593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1227593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}