{"id":1227746,"date":"2026-07-01T16:51:35","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:51:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T16:58:39","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T14:58:39","slug":"cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/","title":{"rendered":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01727"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-de-la-recevabilite-de-la-mesure-dinstruction-in-futurum-nonobstan\">I. L&#8217;affirmation de la recevabilit\u00e9 de la mesure d&#8217;instruction in futurum nonobstant la clause contractuelle<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-rejet-de-la-fin-de-non-recevoir-tiree-de-lexistence-dune-convention-de-tier\">A. Le rejet de la fin de non-recevoir tir\u00e9e de l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une convention de tiers estimateur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-caracterisation-du-motif-legitime-par-lexistence-dindices-suffisants\">B. La caract\u00e9risation du motif l\u00e9gitime par l&#8217;existence d&#8217;indices suffisants<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-confirmation-des-limites-du-refere-face-aux-stipulations-contractuelles\">II. La confirmation des limites du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 face aux stipulations contractuelles<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-labsence-de-pouvoir-du-juge-des-referes-pour-designer-le-tiers-estimateur\">A. L&#8217;absence de pouvoir du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s pour d\u00e9signer le tiers estimateur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-limpossibilite-de-subordonner-lexpertise-a-la-fixation-prealable-du-prix\">B. L&#8217;impossibilit\u00e9 de subordonner l&#8217;expertise \u00e0 la fixation pr\u00e9alable du prix<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, chambre 2 section 2, a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l&#8217;articulation entre une clause de d\u00e9termination conventionnelle du prix par un tiers estimateur et la possibilit\u00e9 d&#8217;obtenir une mesure d&#8217;instruction in futurum. Des cessionnaires de parts sociales estimaient que les comptes de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sentaient des anomalies et sollicitaient une expertise sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Les c\u00e9dants leur opposaient que la clause de l&#8217;acte de cession renvoyant \u00e0 l&#8217;article 1592 du code civil pour la fixation du prix d\u00e9finitif rendait irrecevable une telle demande, per\u00e7ue comme un contournement de la proc\u00e9dure contractuelle.<\/p>\n<p>En premi\u00e8re instance, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s avait ordonn\u00e9 une expertise et rejet\u00e9 la demande de d\u00e9signation d&#8217;un tiers estimateur. Les c\u00e9dants, appelants, maintenaient leurs contestations, tandis que les cessionnaires concluaient \u00e0 la confirmation de l&#8217;ordonnance. La question de droit soumise \u00e0 la cour \u00e9tait double : d&#8217;une part, l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une clause de fixation du prix par un tiers estimateur fait-elle obstacle \u00e0 une demande d&#8217;expertise fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;article 145 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile ? D&#8217;autre part, le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s est-il comp\u00e9tent pour d\u00e9signer le tiers estimateur pr\u00e9vu par la convention des parties ? La cour a confirm\u00e9 l&#8217;ordonnance en toutes ses dispositions, rejetant la fin de non-recevoir et le bien-fond\u00e9 des contestations des appelants, et a dit n&#8217;y avoir lieu \u00e0 r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 sur la demande de d\u00e9signation du tiers estimateur.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-de-la-recevabilite-de-la-mesure-dinstruction-in-futurum-nonobstan\">I. L&#8217;affirmation de la recevabilit\u00e9 de la mesure d&#8217;instruction in futurum nonobstant la clause contractuelle<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-rejet-de-la-fin-de-non-recevoir-tiree-de-lexistence-dune-convention-de-tier\">A. Le rejet de la fin de non-recevoir tir\u00e9e de l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une convention de tiers estimateur<\/h3>\n<p>Les appelants soutenaient que la demande d&#8217;expertise \u00e9tait irrecevable car elle visait \u00e0 contourner la proc\u00e9dure conventionnelle de l&#8217;article 1592 du code civil et qu&#8217;elle \u00e9tait pr\u00e9matur\u00e9e avant la fixation du prix d\u00e9finitif. La cour \u00e9carte ces arguments en distinguant nettement l&#8217;objet de la mesure d&#8217;instruction de celui de la clause contractuelle. Elle rel\u00e8ve que <em>&#8221; le but poursuivi par les cessionnaires est distinct d&#8217;une d\u00e9termination du prix d\u00e9finitif et plus large &#8220;<\/em>. En effet, les cessionnaires entendaient obtenir des preuves sur des anomalies comptables susceptibles d&#8217;engager la responsabilit\u00e9 des c\u00e9dants ou de fonder une action en r\u00e9duction de prix, et non pas faire fixer le prix par le juge.<\/p>\n<p>La cour pr\u00e9cise que la clause de l&#8217;acte de cession, qui renvoie \u00e0 l&#8217;article 1592 du code civil, ne fait que prohiber une action en justice visant \u00e0 faire d\u00e9terminer judiciairement le prix. Elle n&#8217;interdit pas, en revanche, toute mesure d&#8217;instruction pr\u00e9paratoire \u00e0 un litige futur, quand bien m\u00eame ce litige pourrait conduire \u00e0 discuter les clauses relatives au prix. Ainsi, la cour affirme que <em>&#8221; cette clause n&#8217;instaurant donc aucune fin de non-recevoir privant l&#8217;adversaire de la possibilit\u00e9 de recourir \u00e0 une action sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 145 &#8220;<\/em>. Cette solution s&#8217;inscrit dans la ligne de la jurisprudence qui admet qu&#8217;une mesure d&#8217;instruction in futurum peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e m\u00eame en pr\u00e9sence de stipulations contractuelles, d\u00e8s lors qu&#8217;elle poursuit un but distinct et l\u00e9gitime.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-caracterisation-du-motif-legitime-par-lexistence-dindices-suffisants\">B. La caract\u00e9risation du motif l\u00e9gitime par l&#8217;existence d&#8217;indices suffisants<\/h3>\n<p>Les appelants contestaient \u00e9galement le bien-fond\u00e9 de la demande, arguant que les comptes avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 certifi\u00e9s et audit\u00e9s, et que les cessionnaires avaient eu pleine connaissance de la situation. La cour rappelle que, s&#8217;agissant d&#8217;une mesure fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;article 145, le demandeur doit seulement <em>&#8221; apporter des indices, ou un faisceau d&#8217;indices, d\u00e9montrant leur int\u00e9r\u00eat l\u00e9gitime &#8220;<\/em>. Elle insiste sur le fait que l&#8217;article 146 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile n&#8217;est pas applicable dans ce cadre, ce qui interdit au juge d&#8217;exiger la preuve des faits que la mesure doit \u00e9tablir.<\/p>\n<p>En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, les cessionnaires produisaient une attestation de leur expert-comptable faisant \u00e9tat de variations inexpliqu\u00e9es du chiffre d&#8217;affaires, de baisses de marge et d&#8217;incertitudes sur les comptes. La cour estime que ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments constituent des indices suffisants, d&#8217;autant que l&#8217;audit pr\u00e9alable avait \u00e9t\u00e9 malais\u00e9 et que les informations transmises \u00e9taient contest\u00e9es. Elle observe que <em>&#8221; trancher cette question exc\u00e8de les pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s &#8220;<\/em> et qu&#8217;un technicien doit examiner la sinc\u00e9rit\u00e9 des comptes. La mesure d&#8217;instruction est donc l\u00e9gitime et utile, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la condition pos\u00e9e par la jurisprudence selon laquelle le juge doit v\u00e9rifier l&#8217;utilit\u00e9 de la mesure pour la preuve de faits dont d\u00e9pendra un litige plausible.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-confirmation-des-limites-du-refere-face-aux-stipulations-contractuelles\">II. La confirmation des limites du r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 face aux stipulations contractuelles<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-labsence-de-pouvoir-du-juge-des-referes-pour-designer-le-tiers-estimateur\">A. L&#8217;absence de pouvoir du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s pour d\u00e9signer le tiers estimateur<\/h3>\n<p>Par voie reconventionnelle, les c\u00e9dants demandaient la d\u00e9signation d&#8217;un tiers estimateur sur le fondement de l&#8217;article 1592 du code civil, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la clause contractuelle. La cour examine d&#8217;office les fondements juridiques possibles, car les parties n&#8217;invoquaient aucun texte pr\u00e9cis pour fonder la comp\u00e9tence du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s. Elle \u00e9carte successivement l&#8217;article 145, puisque la demande ne vise pas \u00e0 conserver des preuves, puis l&#8217;article 835 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, aucun dommage imminent ou trouble manifestement illicite n&#8217;\u00e9tant all\u00e9gu\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Quant \u00e0 l&#8217;article 834, qui permet au pr\u00e9sident du tribunal judiciaire d&#8217;ordonner en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 des mesures que justifie l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un diff\u00e9rend, la cour le juge inapplicable faute d&#8217;urgence caract\u00e9ris\u00e9e. Les appelants se bornaient \u00e0 invoquer l&#8217;absence de fixation du prix depuis trois ans et la proc\u00e9dure collective d&#8217;un cessionnaire, mais ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments ne suffisent pas \u00e0 d\u00e9montrer l&#8217;urgence exig\u00e9e. La cour en d\u00e9duit qu&#8217;<em>&#8221; il n&#8217;entre pas dans les pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s de d\u00e9signer le tiers estimateur &#8220;<\/em>. Cette position est conforme \u00e0 la nature sp\u00e9cifique de la d\u00e9signation de l&#8217;article 1592, que la Cour de cassation qualifie de mesure sui generis, distincte des mesures d&#8217;instruction.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-limpossibilite-de-subordonner-lexpertise-a-la-fixation-prealable-du-prix\">B. L&#8217;impossibilit\u00e9 de subordonner l&#8217;expertise \u00e0 la fixation pr\u00e9alable du prix<\/h3>\n<p>Les appelants sollicitaient \u00e0 titre subsidiaire un am\u00e9nagement de la mesure d&#8217;expertise, afin que la d\u00e9termination du prix par le tiers estimateur soit un pr\u00e9alable \u00e0 la mise en \u0153uvre des op\u00e9rations d&#8217;expertise. La cour rejette cette demande en affirmant qu&#8217;<em>&#8221; aucun principe, qu&#8217;il r\u00e9sulte d&#8217;une disposition l\u00e9gale ou d&#8217;une r\u00e8gle jurisprudentielle, n&#8217;impose que soit fix\u00e9 le prix d\u00e9finitif pr\u00e9alablement \u00e0 une mesure d&#8217;instruction &#8220;<\/em>. Elle rappelle que les deux proc\u00e9dures poursuivent des finalit\u00e9s diff\u00e9rentes et que l&#8217;expertise judiciaire peut parfaitement se d\u00e9rouler parall\u00e8lement \u00e0 la mission du tiers estimateur.<\/p>\n<p>La cour souligne que la clause contractuelle n&#8217;\u00e9dicte pas la fixation pr\u00e9alable du prix comme condition \u00e0 toute action. En cons\u00e9quence, l&#8217;expertise conserve son autonomie : elle vise \u00e0 v\u00e9rifier la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des comptes contest\u00e9s, tandis que le tiers estimateur d\u00e9terminera le prix d\u00e9finitif sur la base de ces m\u00eames comptes, sans que l&#8217;une des proc\u00e9dures doive primer sur l&#8217;autre. Cette solution pr\u00e9serve l&#8217;effectivit\u00e9 de la mesure d&#8217;instruction in futurum, qui serait vid\u00e9e de son sens si elle devait attendre l&#8217;issue d&#8217;une proc\u00e9dure contractuelle dont les r\u00e9sultats sont pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment contest\u00e9s par les demandeurs \u00e0 l&#8217;expertise.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/681304f5e66d7f6b7b71ecad\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Paris, le 30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/11529<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6799c43e5331f58c9ee86fce\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Poitiers, le 28 janvier 2025, n\u00b024\/01332<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000051869339\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 145 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>S&#8217;il existe un motif l\u00e9gitime de conserver ou d&#8217;\u00e9tablir avant tout proc\u00e8s la preuve de faits dont pourrait d\u00e9pendre la solution d&#8217;un litige, les mesures d&#8217;instruction l\u00e9galement admissibles peuvent \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9es \u00e0 la demande de tout int\u00e9ress\u00e9, sur requ\u00eate ou en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>La juridiction territorialement comp\u00e9tente pour statuer sur une demande form\u00e9e en application du premier alin\u00e9a est, au choix du demandeur, celle susceptible de conna\u00eetre de l&#8217;affaire au fond ou, s&#8217;il y a lieu, celle dans le ressort de laquelle la mesure d&#8217;instruction doit \u00eatre ex\u00e9cut\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a, lorsque la mesure d&#8217;instruction porte sur un immeuble, la juridiction du lieu o\u00f9 est situ\u00e9 l&#8217;immeuble est seule comp\u00e9tente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000038799710\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1592 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Il peut cependant \u00eatre laiss\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;estimation d&#8217;un tiers ; si le tiers ne veut ou ne peut faire l&#8217;estimation, il n&#8217;y a point de vente, sauf estimation par un autre tiers.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410269\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 146 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Une mesure d&#8217;instruction ne peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e sur un fait que si la partie qui l&#8217;all\u00e8gue ne dispose pas d&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9ments suffisants pour le prouver.<\/p>\n<p>    En aucun cas une mesure d&#8217;instruction ne peut \u00eatre ordonn\u00e9e en vue de suppl\u00e9er la carence de la partie dans l&#8217;administration de la preuve.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042597284\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 835 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le pr\u00e9sident du tribunal judiciaire ou le juge des contentieux de la protection dans les limites de sa comp\u00e9tence peuvent toujours, m\u00eame en pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, prescrire en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 les mesures conservatoires ou de remise en \u00e9tat qui s&#8217;imposent, soit pour pr\u00e9venir un dommage imminent, soit pour faire cesser un trouble manifestement illicite.<\/p>\n<p>Dans les cas o\u00f9 l&#8217;existence de l&#8217;obligation n&#8217;est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable, ils peuvent accorder une provision au cr\u00e9ancier, ou ordonner l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution de l&#8217;obligation m\u00eame s&#8217;il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;une obligation de faire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"closing\" id=\"envoyer-pieces\" style=\"margin:48px 0 36px;padding:48px 36px;text-align:center;border-radius:24px;background:radial-gradient(circle at 50% 0%,rgba(0,0,204,0.08) 0%,transparent 60%),rgba(255,255,255,0.72);border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.08);\">\n<div class=\"closing-heading\" role=\"heading\" aria-level=\"2\" style=\"font-size:clamp(30px,4vw,44px);line-height:1.18;font-weight:700;margin:0 0 18px;letter-spacing:-0.022em;color:#1B1B1B;font-family:Lato,sans-serif;\">Envoyez vos pi\u00e8ces. Recevez une <span class=\"nowrap\" style=\"white-space:nowrap;\"><span class=\"tag\" style=\"display:inline-block;background:#0000CC;color:#fff;padding:2px 14px 5px;border-radius:10px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-0.005em;box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,204,.10);\">strat\u00e9gie<\/span>.<\/span><\/div>\n<p>Transmettez les pi\u00e8ces de votre dossier au cabinet. Ma\u00eetre Hassan KOHEN vous r\u00e9pond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une premi\u00e8re analyse strat\u00e9gique.<\/p>\n<div class=\"cta-row\" style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:12px;justify-content:center;margin:24px 0;\"><a class=\"cta cta-primary\" href=\"tel:+33689113445\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:#0000CC;color:#ffffff;border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;box-shadow:0 10px 30px rgba(0,0,204,0.18);\">Appeler maintenant \u2192<\/a><a class=\"cta cta-secondary\" href=\"mailto:contact@kohenavocats.com?subject=Demande%20d%27analyse\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:rgba(255,255,255,0.95);color:#1B1B1B;border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.12);border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;\">\u00c9crire au cabinet<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"promises\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);gap:14px;max-width:880px;margin:30px auto 12px;font-size:14px;color:#4A4A4A;font-weight:700;\">\n<div class=\"promise\">Premi\u00e8re analyse offerte<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">R\u00e9ponse personnelle sous 24 h<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">100 % confidentiel<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">Jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 1 Go de pi\u00e8ces<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, chambre 2 section 2, a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l&#8217;articulation entre une clause de d\u00e9termination&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9635,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f440cccdc6046d472e5915","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f440cccdc6046d472e5915","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f440cccdc6046d472e5915","_kj_jur":"Cour d'appel","_kj_lieu":"Douai","_kj_chambre":"CHAMBRE 2 SECTION 2","_kj_rg":"25\/01727","_kj_date":"2026-04-30","_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6455,6454,35581],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1227746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cour-dappel","category-decisions-juridiques","category-droit-des-affaires"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cour d&#039;appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01727 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour d&#039;appel de Douai, chambre 2 section 2, a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l&#039;articulation entre une clause de d\u00e9termination...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cour d&#039;appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01727\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour d&#039;appel de Douai, chambre 2 section 2, a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l&#039;articulation entre une clause de d\u00e9termination...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T14:51:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T14:58:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"6000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/01727\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:51:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T14:58:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1859,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"Cour d'appel\",\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Droit des affaires\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/01727\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Droit des affaires\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/\",\"name\":\"Cour d'appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/01727 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T14:51:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T14:58:39+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel de Douai, chambre 2 section 2, a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l'articulation entre une clause de d\u00e9termination...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4000,\"height\":6000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\\\/01727\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cour d'appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01727 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel de Douai, chambre 2 section 2, a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l'articulation entre une clause de d\u00e9termination...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cour d'appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01727","og_description":"Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel de Douai, chambre 2 section 2, a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l'articulation entre une clause de d\u00e9termination...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T14:51:35+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-01T14:58:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4000,"height":6000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01727","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:51:35+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-01T14:58:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/"},"wordCount":1859,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["Cour d'appel","D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Droit des affaires"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01727","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cour d'appel"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Droit des affaires"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/","name":"Cour d'appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01727 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T14:51:35+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-01T14:58:39+00:00","description":"Le 30 avril 2026, la Cour d'appel de Douai, chambre 2 section 2, a rendu une d\u00e9cision relative \u00e0 l'articulation entre une clause de d\u00e9termination...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp","width":4000,"height":6000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-avril-2026-n25-01727\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cour d&rsquo;appel de Douai, le 30 avril 2026, n\u00b025\/01727"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/lala-azizli-oAaj82io-2k-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59om","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":733655,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-janvier-2026-n24-01677\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227746,"position":0},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 30 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01677","author":"Kohen","date":"28 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour d'appel de Douai, dans son arr\u00eat du 30 janvier 2026, a partiellement infirm\u00e9 le jugement prud'homal sur la reclassification d'un pompier...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jianxiang-wu-TQEfLtojDQA-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":733923,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-janvier-2026-n24-01914\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227746,"position":1},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 30 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/01914","author":"Kohen","date":"28 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour d\u2019appel de Douai, dans un arr\u00eat du 30 janvier 2026, infirme le jugement prud\u2019homal et annule une rupture conventionnelle sign\u00e9e le jour du retour...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":726211,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-5-fevrier-2026-n24-01244\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227746,"position":2},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 5 f\u00e9vrier 2026, n\u00b024\/01244","author":"Kohen","date":"28 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour d'appel de Douai, dans son arr\u00eat du 5 f\u00e9vrier 2026, a confirm\u00e9 le jugement commercial tout en y ajoutant des pr\u00e9cisions. Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 acheteuse de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/bastien-nvs-SkgPTTk_eXE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/bastien-nvs-SkgPTTk_eXE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/bastien-nvs-SkgPTTk_eXE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/bastien-nvs-SkgPTTk_eXE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/bastien-nvs-SkgPTTk_eXE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/bastien-nvs-SkgPTTk_eXE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":733800,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-janvier-2026-n24-00922\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227746,"position":3},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 30 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/00922","author":"Kohen","date":"28 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. L'absence de discrimination en raison de l'\u00e9tat de sant\u00e9 La salari\u00e9e soutenait que la concomitance entre son retour d'arr\u00eat maladie et l'engagement de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pramod-tiwari-fcMI6xvRcYE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":705845,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-douai-01-04-2026-n-25da00164\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227746,"position":4},"title":"CAA &#8211; CAA de DOUAI &#8211; 01\/04\/2026 &#8211; n\u00b0 25DA00164","author":"Kohen","date":"27 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d'appel de Lille, dans un arr\u00eat du 1er avril 2026, annule un jugement du tribunal administratif refusant de reconna\u00eetre un recours...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/tingey-injury-law-firm-nSpj-Z12lX0-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/tingey-injury-law-firm-nSpj-Z12lX0-unsplash.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/tingey-injury-law-firm-nSpj-Z12lX0-unsplash.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/tingey-injury-law-firm-nSpj-Z12lX0-unsplash.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/tingey-injury-law-firm-nSpj-Z12lX0-unsplash.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/tingey-injury-law-firm-nSpj-Z12lX0-unsplash.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":734073,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-de-douai-le-30-janvier-2026-n24-00294\/","url_meta":{"origin":1227746,"position":5},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel de Douai, le 30 janvier 2026, n\u00b024\/00294","author":"Kohen","date":"28 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour d\u2019appel de Douai, dans un arr\u00eat du 30 janvier 2026, \u00e9tait saisie d\u2019un litige relatif au non-respect des temps de pause par un employeur. Un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/real_-jansen-vGG8w7zDoMw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/real_-jansen-vGG8w7zDoMw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/real_-jansen-vGG8w7zDoMw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/real_-jansen-vGG8w7zDoMw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/real_-jansen-vGG8w7zDoMw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/real_-jansen-vGG8w7zDoMw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1227746"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227746\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1227760,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1227746\/revisions\/1227760"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9635"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1227746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1227746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1227746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}