{"id":1228755,"date":"2026-07-01T23:53:20","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T21:53:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/"},"modified":"2026-07-01T23:53:20","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T21:53:20","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-labandon-du-regime-simplifie-justifie-par-les-perspectives-de-sanctions-person\">I. L\u2019abandon du r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9 justifi\u00e9 par les perspectives de sanctions personnelles<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-fondement-textuel-dune-decision-discretionnaire-mais-encadree\">A. Le fondement textuel d\u2019une d\u00e9cision discr\u00e9tionnaire mais encadr\u00e9e<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-perspective-de-sanctions-comme-indice-de-complexite-justifiant-le-retour-au\">B. La perspective de sanctions comme indice de complexit\u00e9 justifiant le retour au droit commun<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-la-decision-et-le-renforcement-des-prerogatives-du-liquidateur\">II. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision et le renforcement des pr\u00e9rogatives du liquidateur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-laffirmation-dun-controle-juridictionnel-souple-sur-la-qualification-de-simpli\">A. L\u2019affirmation d\u2019un contr\u00f4le juridictionnel souple sur la qualification de simplification<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-les-consequences-pratiques-de-la-sortie-du-regime-simplifie-sur-la-procedure\">B. Les cons\u00e9quences pratiques de la sortie du r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9 sur la proc\u00e9dure<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Par un jugement du 9 octobre 2025, le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exer\u00e7ant une activit\u00e9 de coiffure. Un liquidateur a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9sign\u00e9 pour conduire la proc\u00e9dure. Le liquidateur a ensuite saisi le tribunal d\u2019une requ\u00eate tendant \u00e0 ne plus faire application du r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9, au motif qu\u2019il \u00e9tudiait l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 de diligenter des sanctions personnelles ou patrimoniales \u00e0 l\u2019encontre du dirigeant de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice. Par jugement du 9 avril 2026, la m\u00eame juridiction a fait droit \u00e0 cette demande, a ordonn\u00e9 la sortie de la liquidation simplifi\u00e9e, a maintenu le juge-commissaire et le liquidateur, et a fix\u00e9 les d\u00e9lais de v\u00e9rification des cr\u00e9ances et de cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure. La question de droit soulev\u00e9e est celle des conditions dans lesquelles le tribunal peut, en cours de proc\u00e9dure, d\u00e9cider de ne plus faire application des d\u00e9rogations pr\u00e9vues pour la liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e, et notamment si la perspective d\u2019engager des sanctions contre le dirigeant constitue un motif suffisant pour justifier ce changement de r\u00e9gime. Le tribunal a r\u00e9pondu par l\u2019affirmative, en se fondant sur l\u2019article L. 644-6 du code de commerce et en constatant que les circonstances de l\u2019esp\u00e8ce rendaient n\u00e9cessaire l\u2019abandon du traitement simplifi\u00e9.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-labandon-du-regime-simplifie-justifie-par-les-perspectives-de-sanctions-person\">I. L\u2019abandon du r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9 justifi\u00e9 par les perspectives de sanctions personnelles<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-fondement-textuel-dune-decision-discretionnaire-mais-encadree\">A. Le fondement textuel d\u2019une d\u00e9cision discr\u00e9tionnaire mais encadr\u00e9e<\/h3>\n<p>L\u2019article L. 644-6 du code de commerce dispose que <em>&#8221; [\u00e0] tout moment, le tribunal peut d\u00e9cider, par un jugement sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9, de ne plus faire application des d\u00e9rogations pr\u00e9vues au pr\u00e9sent chapitre &#8220;<\/em>. Cette disposition conf\u00e8re au juge un pouvoir d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation souverain pour mettre fin \u00e0 la simplification de la proc\u00e9dure lorsqu\u2019il l\u2019estime opportun. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal a exactement rappel\u00e9 ce texte et l\u2019a appliqu\u00e9 en motivant sa d\u00e9cision par la circonstance que le liquidateur <em>&#8221; \u00e9tudie l\u2019opportunit\u00e9 de diligenter des sanctions personnelles et\/ou patrimoniales \u00e0 l\u2019encontre de [la dirigeante] &#8220;<\/em>. La motivation est ici sp\u00e9ciale au sens de l\u2019article : elle ne se contente pas d\u2019une formule de style, mais \u00e9voque une raison concr\u00e8te tenant \u00e0 la complexit\u00e9 nouvelle de la proc\u00e9dure. Comme l\u2019a rappel\u00e9 la Cour d\u2019appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union, <em>&#8221; l\u2019article L.644-6 du code de commerce pr\u00e9voit qu\u2019\u00e0 tout moment, le tribunal peut d\u00e9cider, par un jugement sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9 de ne plus faire application des d\u00e9rogations pr\u00e9vues au pr\u00e9sent chapitre &#8220;<\/em> (30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/00700). Le tribunal de Nanterre s\u2019inscrit donc dans cette lecture large du texte, qui autorise le juge \u00e0 adapter le r\u00e9gime proc\u00e9dural aux circonstances r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9es en cours de liquidation.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-perspective-de-sanctions-comme-indice-de-complexite-justifiant-le-retour-au\">B. La perspective de sanctions comme indice de complexit\u00e9 justifiant le retour au droit commun<\/h3>\n<p>La liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e est un r\u00e9gime d\u00e9rogatoire pr\u00e9vu pour les proc\u00e9dures de faible ampleur, o\u00f9 l\u2019actif est limit\u00e9 et le passif simple. Lorsque des sanctions personnelles ou patrimoniales sont envisag\u00e9es, la proc\u00e9dure gagne en complexit\u00e9 : il faut instruire une \u00e9ventuelle action en responsabilit\u00e9, v\u00e9rifier les comptes du dirigeant, et \u00e9ventuellement engager un contentieux devant la juridiction comp\u00e9tente. Ces op\u00e9rations d\u00e9passent le cadre de la gestion courante pour laquelle le r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 con\u00e7u. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le liquidateur n\u2019a pas encore d\u00e9clench\u00e9 les poursuites, mais la simple \u00e9tude de cette possibilit\u00e9 suffit, selon le tribunal, \u00e0 justifier la sortie du r\u00e9gime d\u00e9rogatoire. Le jugement retient ainsi un crit\u00e8re prospectif et non av\u00e9r\u00e9, ce qui est remarquable. La solution est prudente : elle \u00e9vite que le liquidateur soit entrav\u00e9 par les limites du r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9 (absence de v\u00e9rification approfondie des cr\u00e9ances, d\u00e9lais r\u00e9duits) alors qu\u2019il doit pr\u00e9parer un \u00e9ventuel contentieux. Le tribunal garantit ainsi l\u2019efficacit\u00e9 de la liquidation et la protection du gage commun des cr\u00e9anciers.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-la-decision-et-le-renforcement-des-prerogatives-du-liquidateur\">II. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision et le renforcement des pr\u00e9rogatives du liquidateur<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-laffirmation-dun-controle-juridictionnel-souple-sur-la-qualification-de-simpli\">A. L\u2019affirmation d\u2019un contr\u00f4le juridictionnel souple sur la qualification de simplification<\/h3>\n<p>En d\u00e9cidant que la simple perspective de sanctions justifie l\u2019abandon du r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9, le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre \u00e9largit la marge d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation du juge et du liquidateur. D\u00e9sormais, le seul fait que le liquidateur d\u00e9clare \u00e9tudier des actions personnelles ou patrimoniales est un motif suffisant, sans qu\u2019il soit besoin de d\u00e9montrer que ces actions sont certaines ou imminentes. Cette interpr\u00e9tation lib\u00e9rale de l\u2019article L. 644-6 conf\u00e8re au juge un v\u00e9ritable pouvoir d\u2019adaptation de la proc\u00e9dure aux circonstances changeantes de la liquidation. Elle s\u2019inscrit dans la logique de l\u2019article L. 644-6 qui permet au tribunal de <em>&#8221; d\u00e9cider \u00e0 tout moment &#8220;<\/em> de sortir du r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9. La motivation sp\u00e9ciale exig\u00e9e par la loi est ici satisfaite par l\u2019indication concr\u00e8te de la perspective de sanctions. La d\u00e9cision \u00e9vite ainsi une rigidit\u00e9 qui aurait pu nuire \u00e0 l\u2019efficacit\u00e9 des poursuites futures contre le dirigeant.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-les-consequences-pratiques-de-la-sortie-du-regime-simplifie-sur-la-procedure\">B. Les cons\u00e9quences pratiques de la sortie du r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9 sur la proc\u00e9dure<\/h3>\n<p>Une fois la d\u00e9cision prise, la liquidation poursuit son cours selon les r\u00e8gles de droit commun. Le jugement a fix\u00e9 un d\u00e9lai de vingt-quatre mois \u00e0 compter du jugement d\u2019ouverture pour la cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 la pratique. Il a \u00e9galement ordonn\u00e9 la publicit\u00e9 du pr\u00e9sent jugement et dit que les d\u00e9pens seraient employ\u00e9s en frais de liquidation. Surtout, le liquidateur doit d\u00e9sormais d\u00e9poser la liste des cr\u00e9ances d\u00e9clar\u00e9es avec ses propositions d\u2019admission ou de rejet dans un d\u00e9lai de douze mois suivant le terme du d\u00e9lai de d\u00e9claration, ce qui est caract\u00e9ristique de la proc\u00e9dure de droit commun, contrairement au r\u00e9gime simplifi\u00e9 o\u00f9 cette v\u00e9rification est all\u00e9g\u00e9e. Ce retour au droit commun garantit un meilleur contr\u00f4le du passif, indispensable en cas de poursuite du dirigeant. La Cour d\u2019appel de Grenoble a d\u2019ailleurs rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; [\u00e0] l\u2019expiration d\u2019un d\u00e9lai de deux ans \u00e0 compter du jugement de liquidation judiciaire, tout cr\u00e9ancier peut \u00e9galement saisir le tribunal aux fins de cl\u00f4ture de la proc\u00e9dure &#8220;<\/em> (6 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/02811), ce qui souligne l\u2019importance de la cl\u00f4ture comme \u00e9tape finale d\u2019une liquidation de droit commun. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal a fix\u00e9 ce d\u00e9lai de deux ans, assurant ainsi une dur\u00e9e raisonnable pour mener \u00e0 bien les \u00e9ventuelles actions en responsabilit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6813085f046d639136715cfa\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Saint-Denis de la R\u00e9union, le 30 avril 2025, n\u00b024\/00700<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a6f693ce90ac879b5804fc\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Grenoble, le 6 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b024\/02811<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006239029\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 644-6 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   A tout moment, le tribunal peut d\u00e9cider, par un jugement sp\u00e9cialement motiv\u00e9, de ne plus faire application des d\u00e9rogations pr\u00e9vues au pr\u00e9sent chapitre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Par un jugement du 9 octobre 2025, le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4769,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69f1120acdc6046d47e2d2f4","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69f1120acdc6046d47e2d2f4","_kj_judilibre_id":"69f1120acdc6046d47e2d2f4","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre","_kj_chambre":"9\u00e8me chambre","_kj_rg":"2026L00717","_kj_date":"2026-04-09","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1228755","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Par un jugement du 9 octobre 2025, le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Par un jugement du 9 octobre 2025, le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T21:53:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3264\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2448\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T21:53:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1330,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T21:53:20+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T21:53:20+00:00\",\"description\":\"Par un jugement du 9 octobre 2025, le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3264,\"height\":2448},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Par un jugement du 9 octobre 2025, le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717","og_description":"Par un jugement du 9 octobre 2025, le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T21:53:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3264,"height":2448,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717","datePublished":"2026-07-01T21:53:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/"},"wordCount":1330,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-01T21:53:20+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T21:53:20+00:00","description":"Par un jugement du 9 octobre 2025, le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp","width":3264,"height":2448},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-9-avril-2026-n2026l00717\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026L00717"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/jamieson-gordon-07cvLApfFvU-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59ED","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":494446,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-27-octobre-2025-n2025r00819\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228755,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 27 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025R00819","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 27 octobre 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande de provision. La requ\u00e9rante,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tomas-williams-0i38SCsSxJc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494534,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-28-octobre-2025-n2025r01008\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228755,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 28 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025R01008","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 28 octobre 2025, examine une demande en r\u00e9tractation. Des travailleurs...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alexandre-brondino-jCxM7spcAWY-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494442,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-27-octobre-2025-n2025r00887\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228755,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 27 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025R00887","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, par ordonnance de r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 du 27 octobre 2025, statue sur une demande de provision. Une pharmacie demande...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/billy-chester-vvk9VoMTUwg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":494764,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nanterre-le-27-octobre-2025-n2025r00725\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228755,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Nanterre, le 27 octobre 2025, n\u00b02025R00725","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a rendu une ordonnance le 27 octobre 2025. Le mandataire liquidateur d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-kDU9CJEIJpM-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":489930,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-20-novembre-2025-n24-00046\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228755,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 20 novembre 2025, n\u00b024\/00046","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 le 20 novembre 2025, se prononce sur une exception d'incomp\u00e9tence territoriale. Le litige oppose un...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/anita-austvika-EGIB8EITeJo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491852,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-de-nanterre-le-17-novembre-2025-n22-00974\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228755,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire de Nanterre, le 17 novembre 2025, n\u00b022\/00974","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal judiciaire de Paris, dans un jugement du 10 juillet 2024, statue sur une demande en inopposabilit\u00e9 d'une d\u00e9cision de prise en charge d'une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/alice-P1D60RN7KuQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228755","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1228755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228755\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1228755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1228755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1228755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}