{"id":1228905,"date":"2026-07-02T00:20:44","date_gmt":"2026-07-01T22:20:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T00:23:15","modified_gmt":"2026-07-01T22:23:15","slug":"tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal judiciaire d&#8217;Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01834"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-un-controle-limite-des-irregularites-procedurales-au-regard-de-lexigence-dune-\">I. Un contr\u00f4le limit\u00e9 des irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s proc\u00e9durales au regard de l\u2019exigence d\u2019une atteinte substantielle<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-recevabilite-de-la-requete-et-loffice-du-juge-dans-le-controle-de-la-regula\">A. La recevabilit\u00e9 de la requ\u00eate et l\u2019office du juge dans le contr\u00f4le de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 formelle<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-in-concreto-des-nullites-la-necessite-dune-atteinte-concrete-aux\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation in concreto des nullit\u00e9s : la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d\u2019une atteinte concr\u00e8te aux droits<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-un-controle-de-fond-circonscrit-a-la-necessite-de-la-retention-et-aux-diligen\">II. Un contr\u00f4le de fond circonscrit \u00e0 la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de la r\u00e9tention et aux diligences de l\u2019administration<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-legalite-de-larrete-de-placement-labsence-de-garanties-de-representation-co\">A. La l\u00e9galit\u00e9 de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 de placement : l\u2019absence de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation comme crit\u00e8re d\u00e9terminant<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-le-caractere-suffisant-des-diligences-en-vue-de-leloignement-une-obligation-de\">B. Le caract\u00e8re suffisant des diligences en vue de l\u2019\u00e9loignement : une obligation de moyens imm\u00e9diatement mise en \u0153uvre<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01834). Cet arr\u00eat intervient dans le cadre d\u2019une demande de premi\u00e8re prolongation de la r\u00e9tention administrative d\u2019un \u00e9tranger plac\u00e9 au sein d\u2019un local de r\u00e9tention administrative (LRA) apr\u00e8s avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 gard\u00e9 \u00e0 vue pour non-respect d\u2019une interdiction de para\u00eetre. Le juge a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi par la pr\u00e9fecture d\u2019Indre-et-Loire sur le fondement de l\u2019article L.742-1 du CESEDA.<\/p>\n<p>Les faits sont les suivants. Le 24 mars 2026, l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 a fait l\u2019objet d\u2019un arr\u00eat\u00e9 portant obligation de quitter le territoire fran\u00e7ais, assorti d\u2019une interdiction de retour d\u2019un an. Le m\u00eame jour, il a \u00e9t\u00e9 plac\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention administrative au LRA de Tours, faute de centre de r\u00e9tention administrative (CRA) dans le d\u00e9partement et d\u2019escorte disponible. Le 28 mars 2026, il a \u00e9t\u00e9 transf\u00e9r\u00e9 vers le CRA d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans. Parall\u00e8lement, la pr\u00e9fecture a saisi les autorit\u00e9s consulaires alg\u00e9riennes d\u00e8s le 24 mars 2026 pour obtenir un laissez-passer consulaire.<\/p>\n<p>La proc\u00e9dure a donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 plusieurs moyens soulev\u00e9s par le conseil de l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9. Devant le juge, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 contest\u00e9es la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 du recours \u00e0 un interpr\u00e8te par t\u00e9l\u00e9phone lors de la garde \u00e0 vue, l\u2019absence d\u2019information des procureurs de la R\u00e9publique sur le transfert, l\u2019absence de justification du placement en LRA plut\u00f4t qu\u2019en CRA, l\u2019absence de convention avec une personne morale au LRA, et enfin la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 m\u00eame de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 de placement en r\u00e9tention administrative. Le juge a rejet\u00e9 l\u2019int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 des moyens, confirm\u00e9 le placement initial et ordonn\u00e9 une prolongation de vingt-six jours.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit centrale est celle de l\u2019\u00e9tendue du contr\u00f4le du juge judiciaire sur la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure de r\u00e9tention administrative et sur les conditions de fond autorisant la prolongation de la mesure. En d\u2019autres termes, il s\u2019agissait de d\u00e9terminer si les irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s invoqu\u00e9es caract\u00e9risaient une atteinte substantielle aux droits de l\u2019\u00e9tranger au sens de l\u2019article L.743-12 du CESEDA et si la pr\u00e9fecture justifiait de diligences suffisantes pour obtenir l\u2019\u00e9loignement.<\/p>\n<p>La solution rendue par le juge est claire : il fait droit \u00e0 la demande de prolongation, estimant qu\u2019aucune des nullit\u00e9s soulev\u00e9es n\u2019a port\u00e9 une atteinte substantielle aux droits de l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 et que l\u2019administration a accompli les diligences n\u00e9cessaires d\u00e8s le placement. Le juge motive ainsi une lecture restrictive des conditions d\u2019annulation au profit de la continuit\u00e9 de la mesure.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-un-controle-limite-des-irregularites-procedurales-au-regard-de-lexigence-dune-\">I. Un contr\u00f4le limit\u00e9 des irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9s proc\u00e9durales au regard de l\u2019exigence d\u2019une atteinte substantielle<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-recevabilite-de-la-requete-et-loffice-du-juge-dans-le-controle-de-la-regula\">A. La recevabilit\u00e9 de la requ\u00eate et l\u2019office du juge dans le contr\u00f4le de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 formelle<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge rappelle d\u2019abord que, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article R.743-2 du CESEDA, la requ\u00eate doit \u00eatre motiv\u00e9e, dat\u00e9e, sign\u00e9e et accompagn\u00e9e des pi\u00e8ces utiles. Il rel\u00e8ve que le conseil de l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 ne soul\u00e8ve aucune irrecevabilit\u00e9 et que l\u2019examen du dossier n\u2019en r\u00e9v\u00e8le pas. Ce constat est important car il fixe le cadre du contr\u00f4le : le juge v\u00e9rifie d\u2019office la recevabilit\u00e9, mais en l\u2019esp\u00e8ce aucun obstacle de forme ne s\u2019oppose \u00e0 l\u2019examen au fond. Cette approche est classique et confirme la rigueur formelle exig\u00e9e de l\u2019administration.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-in-concreto-des-nullites-la-necessite-dune-atteinte-concrete-aux\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation in concreto des nullit\u00e9s : la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d\u2019une atteinte concr\u00e8te aux droits<\/h3>\n<p>Plusieurs moyens de nullit\u00e9 ont \u00e9t\u00e9 articul\u00e9s. Le premier porte sur l\u2019interpr\u00e8te par t\u00e9l\u00e9phone durant la garde \u00e0 vue. Le juge constate que l\u2019article 706-71 du code de proc\u00e9dure p\u00e9nale autorise ce recours en cas de n\u00e9cessit\u00e9. Bien que l\u2019administration n\u2019ait pas d\u00e9montr\u00e9 l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 mat\u00e9rielle de d\u00e9placement de l\u2019interpr\u00e8te, le juge \u00e9carte le moyen en application de l\u2019article L.743-12 du CESEDA : cette irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 n\u2019entra\u00eene la mainlev\u00e9e que si elle a port\u00e9 une atteinte substantielle aux droits. Or, l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 a pu comprendre ses droits et les exercer. Le juge reprend ainsi la logique de la jurisprudence d\u2019appui de la Cour d\u2019appel de Lyon du 7 janvier 2025, selon laquelle il faut <em>&#8221; caract\u00e9riser concr\u00e8tement une atteinte substantielle aux droits &#8220;<\/em> (n\u00b025\/00083). Cette exigence de concr\u00e9tisation limite le contentieux de la nullit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Le deuxi\u00e8me moyen concerne l\u2019absence d\u2019information des procureurs de la R\u00e9publique lors du transfert. Le juge v\u00e9rifie les pi\u00e8ces et constate que le procureur de Tours a \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9 du placement initial le 24 mars 2026, et que ceux de Tours et d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans ont \u00e9t\u00e9 avis\u00e9s du transfert par courriel du 28 mars 2026 \u00e0 10h31. Il \u00e9carte donc le moyen. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence de la Cour d\u2019appel de Rennes du 5 avril 2025, qui consid\u00e8re que la production d\u2019un <em>&#8221; mel &#8220;<\/em> suffit \u00e0 \u00e9tablir que la formalit\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9alis\u00e9e (n\u00b025\/00234). Le juge se montre pragmatique : l\u2019existence d\u2019une trace \u00e9crite emporte pr\u00e9somption de r\u00e9gularit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Le troisi\u00e8me moyen \u2013 l\u2019absence de justification du placement en LRA \u2013 est \u00e9cart\u00e9 au motif que l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 de placement mentionne express\u00e9ment l\u2019absence de CRA dans le d\u00e9partement et l\u2019impossibilit\u00e9 d\u2019organiser imm\u00e9diatement une escorte. Le juge estime que cette motivation est suffisante, sans exiger le d\u00e9tail des \u00e9v\u00e9nements ayant emp\u00each\u00e9 l\u2019escorte. Cette position est favorable \u00e0 l\u2019administration.<\/p>\n<p>Enfin, le moyen tir\u00e9 de l\u2019absence de personne morale conventionn\u00e9e au LRA est rejet\u00e9 par une lecture litt\u00e9rale de l\u2019article R.744-21 : le texte permet aux retenus de <em>&#8221; b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier du concours d\u2019une personne morale &#8220;<\/em>, mais n\u2019impose pas la pr\u00e9sence physique. La remise d\u2019une liste de num\u00e9ros suffit \u00e0 garantir l\u2019exercice des droits. Le juge adopte une interpr\u00e9tation souple qui privil\u00e9gie l\u2019effectivit\u00e9 pratique sur la rigueur formelle.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-un-controle-de-fond-circonscrit-a-la-necessite-de-la-retention-et-aux-diligen\">II. Un contr\u00f4le de fond circonscrit \u00e0 la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de la r\u00e9tention et aux diligences de l\u2019administration<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-legalite-de-larrete-de-placement-labsence-de-garanties-de-representation-co\">A. La l\u00e9galit\u00e9 de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 de placement : l\u2019absence de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation comme crit\u00e8re d\u00e9terminant<\/h3>\n<p>Le juge examine ensuite la contestation de l\u2019arr\u00eat\u00e9 de placement. Il rappelle les conditions pos\u00e9es par les articles L.741-1 et L.741-4 du CESEDA, ainsi que la directive retour 2008\/115\/CE qui impose de privil\u00e9gier les mesures moins coercitives. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, l\u2019int\u00e9ress\u00e9 est d\u00e9pourvu de document de voyage, connu des services de police pour des condamnations en lien avec les stup\u00e9fiants, c\u00e9libataire, sans enfant, sans ressource et sans adresse pr\u00e9cise. Il ne fournit aucun justificatif \u00e0 l\u2019audience. Le juge en d\u00e9duit que la pr\u00e9fecture a correctement motiv\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision et n\u2019a commis aucune erreur d\u2019appr\u00e9ciation en consid\u00e9rant que l\u2019assignation \u00e0 r\u00e9sidence \u00e9tait insuffisante. Le contr\u00f4le du juge est ainsi limit\u00e9 \u00e0 la v\u00e9rification de la motivation en fait et en droit, sans substituer son appr\u00e9ciation \u00e0 celle de l\u2019administration.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-le-caractere-suffisant-des-diligences-en-vue-de-leloignement-une-obligation-de\">B. Le caract\u00e8re suffisant des diligences en vue de l\u2019\u00e9loignement : une obligation de moyens imm\u00e9diatement mise en \u0153uvre<\/h3>\n<p>Enfin, le juge v\u00e9rifie le fondement de la prolongation au regard de l\u2019article L.741-3 du CESEDA et de l\u2019article 15 de la directive retour. Il constate que la pr\u00e9fecture a saisi les autorit\u00e9s consulaires alg\u00e9riennes d\u00e8s le 24 mars 2026, soit le jour m\u00eame du placement, afin d\u2019obtenir un laissez-passer consulaire. Cette diligence imm\u00e9diate est jug\u00e9e suffisante pour une premi\u00e8re prolongation de vingt-six jours. Le juge ne se prononce pas sur l\u2019issue de cette d\u00e9marche, mais sur l\u2019effectivit\u00e9 des actes accomplis. Il applique ainsi une obligation de moyens sans exigence de r\u00e9sultat. La prolongation est donc accord\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f4ad9e76ec6bab6dfbab47\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rennes, le 5 avril 2025, n\u00b025\/00234<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/677f67a68c38f76f78303327\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Lyon, le 7 janvier 2025, n\u00b025\/00083<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000037667139\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 145-4 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La dur\u00e9e du contrat de location ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 neuf ans.<\/p>\n<p>Toutefois, le preneur a la facult\u00e9 de donner cong\u00e9 \u00e0 l&#8217;expiration d&#8217;une p\u00e9riode triennale, au moins six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance, par lettre recommand\u00e9e avec demande d&#8217;avis de r\u00e9ception ou par acte extrajudiciaire. Les baux conclus pour une dur\u00e9e sup\u00e9rieure \u00e0 neuf ans, les baux des locaux construits en vue d&#8217;une seule utilisation, les baux des locaux \u00e0 usage exclusif de bureaux et ceux des locaux de stockage mentionn\u00e9s au 3\u00b0 du III de l&#8217;article 231 ter du code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts peuvent comporter des stipulations contraires.<\/p>\n<p>Le bailleur a la m\u00eame facult\u00e9, dans les formes et d\u00e9lai de l&#8217;article L. 145-9, s&#8217;il entend invoquer les dispositions des articles L. 145-18, L. 145-21, L. 145-23-1 et L. 145-24 afin de construire, de reconstruire ou de sur\u00e9lever l&#8217;immeuble existant, de r\u00e9affecter le local d&#8217;habitation accessoire \u00e0 cet usage, de transformer \u00e0 usage principal d&#8217;habitation un immeuble existant par reconstruction, r\u00e9novation ou r\u00e9habilitation ou d&#8217;ex\u00e9cuter des travaux prescrits ou autoris\u00e9s dans le cadre d&#8217;une op\u00e9ration de restauration immobili\u00e8re et en cas de d\u00e9molition de l&#8217;immeuble dans le cadre d&#8217;un projet de renouvellement urbain.<\/p>\n<p>Le preneur ayant demand\u00e9 \u00e0 b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier de ses droits \u00e0 la retraite du r\u00e9gime social auquel il est affili\u00e9 ou ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 admis au b\u00e9n\u00e9fice d&#8217;une pension d&#8217;invalidit\u00e9 attribu\u00e9e dans le cadre de ce r\u00e9gime social a la facult\u00e9 de donner cong\u00e9 dans les formes et d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a du pr\u00e9sent article. Il en est de m\u00eame pour ses ayants droit en cas de d\u00e9c\u00e8s du preneur.<\/p>\n<p>Les dispositions de l&#8217;alin\u00e9a pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent sont applicables \u00e0 l&#8217;associ\u00e9 unique d&#8217;une entreprise unipersonnelle \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e, ou au g\u00e9rant majoritaire depuis au moins deux ans d&#8217;une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 responsabilit\u00e9 limit\u00e9e, lorsque celle-ci est titulaire du bail.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000031012840\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 145-9 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Par d\u00e9rogation aux articles 1736 et 1737 du code civil, les baux de locaux soumis au pr\u00e9sent chapitre ne cessent que par l&#8217;effet d&#8217;un cong\u00e9 donn\u00e9 six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance ou d&#8217;une demande de renouvellement. <\/p>\n<p>A d\u00e9faut de cong\u00e9 ou de demande de renouvellement, le bail fait par \u00e9crit se prolonge tacitement au-del\u00e0 du terme fix\u00e9 par le contrat. Au cours de la tacite prolongation, le cong\u00e9 doit \u00eatre donn\u00e9 au moins six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance et pour le dernier jour du trimestre civil. <\/p>\n<p>Le bail dont la dur\u00e9e est subordonn\u00e9e \u00e0 un \u00e9v\u00e9nement dont la r\u00e9alisation autorise le bailleur \u00e0 demander la r\u00e9siliation ne cesse, au-del\u00e0 de la dur\u00e9e de neuf ans, que par l&#8217;effet d&#8217;une notification faite six mois \u00e0 l&#8217;avance et pour le dernier jour du trimestre civil. Cette notification doit mentionner la r\u00e9alisation de l&#8217;\u00e9v\u00e9nement pr\u00e9vu au contrat. <\/p>\n<p>S&#8217;agissant d&#8217;un bail comportant plusieurs p\u00e9riodes, si le bailleur d\u00e9nonce le bail \u00e0 la fin des neuf premi\u00e8res ann\u00e9es ou \u00e0 l&#8217;expiration de l&#8217;une des p\u00e9riodes suivantes, le cong\u00e9 doit \u00eatre donn\u00e9 dans les d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus \u00e0 l&#8217;alin\u00e9a premier ci-dessus. <\/p>\n<p>Le cong\u00e9 doit \u00eatre donn\u00e9 par acte extrajudiciaire. Il doit, \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9, pr\u00e9ciser les motifs pour lesquels il est donn\u00e9 et indiquer que le locataire qui entend, soit contester le cong\u00e9, soit demander le paiement d&#8217;une indemnit\u00e9 d&#8217;\u00e9viction, doit saisir le tribunal avant l&#8217;expiration d&#8217;un d\u00e9lai de deux ans \u00e0 compter de la date pour laquelle le cong\u00e9 a \u00e9t\u00e9 donn\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032041008\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1134 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">L&#8217;erreur sur les qualit\u00e9s essentielles du cocontractant n&#8217;est une cause de nullit\u00e9 que dans les contrats conclus en consid\u00e9ration de la personne. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000052086436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 741-1 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;autorit\u00e9 administrative peut placer en r\u00e9tention, pour une dur\u00e9e de quatre-vingt-seize heures, l&#8217;\u00e9tranger qui se trouve dans l&#8217;un des cas pr\u00e9vus \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 731-1 lorsqu&#8217;il ne pr\u00e9sente pas de garanties de repr\u00e9sentation effectives propres \u00e0 pr\u00e9venir un risque de soustraction \u00e0 l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution de la d\u00e9cision d&#8217;\u00e9loignement et qu&#8217;aucune autre mesure n&#8217;appara\u00eet suffisante \u00e0 garantir efficacement l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution effective de cette d\u00e9cision.<\/p>\n<p>Le risque mentionn\u00e9 au premier alin\u00e9a est appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 selon les m\u00eames crit\u00e8res que ceux pr\u00e9vus \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 612-3 ou au regard de la menace pour l&#8217;ordre public que l&#8217;\u00e9tranger repr\u00e9sente.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042775072\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 741-4 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>La d\u00e9cision de placement en r\u00e9tention prend en compte l&#8217;\u00e9tat de vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9 et tout handicap de l&#8217;\u00e9tranger.<br \/>Le handicap moteur, cognitif ou psychique et les besoins d&#8217;accompagnement de l&#8217;\u00e9tranger sont pris en compte pour d\u00e9terminer les conditions de son placement en r\u00e9tention.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000052086427\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 742-1 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le maintien en r\u00e9tention au-del\u00e0 de quatre-vingt-seize heures \u00e0 compter de la notification de la d\u00e9cision de placement initiale peut \u00eatre autoris\u00e9, dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues au pr\u00e9sent titre, par le magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire saisi \u00e0 cette fin par l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 administrative.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000048446968\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 743-12 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>En cas de violation des formes prescrites par la loi \u00e0 peine de nullit\u00e9 ou d&#8217;inobservation des formalit\u00e9s substantielles, le magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire saisi d&#8217;une demande sur ce motif ou qui rel\u00e8ve d&#8217;office une telle irr\u00e9gularit\u00e9 ne peut prononcer la mainlev\u00e9e du placement ou du maintien en r\u00e9tention que lorsque celle-ci a eu pour effet de porter substantiellement atteinte aux droits de l&#8217;\u00e9tranger dont l&#8217;effectivit\u00e9 n&#8217;a pu \u00eatre r\u00e9tablie par une r\u00e9gularisation intervenue avant la cl\u00f4ture des d\u00e9bats.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000049774244\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article R. 743-2 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>A peine d&#8217;irrecevabilit\u00e9, la requ\u00eate est motiv\u00e9e, dat\u00e9e et sign\u00e9e, selon le cas, par l&#8217;\u00e9tranger ou son repr\u00e9sentant ou par l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 administrative qui a ordonn\u00e9 le placement en r\u00e9tention. <\/p>\n<p>Lorsque la requ\u00eate est form\u00e9e par l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 administrative, elle est accompagn\u00e9e de toutes pi\u00e8ces justificatives utiles, notamment une copie du registre pr\u00e9vu \u00e0 l&#8217;article L. 744-2. <\/p>\n<p>Lorsque la requ\u00eate est form\u00e9e par l&#8217;\u00e9tranger ou son repr\u00e9sentant, la d\u00e9cision attaqu\u00e9e est produite par l&#8217;administration. Il en est de m\u00eame, sur la demande du magistrat du si\u00e8ge du tribunal judiciaire, de la copie du registre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000042775074\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 741-3 du Code de l&#8217;entr\u00e9e et du s\u00e9jour des \u00e9trangers et du droit d&#8217;asile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Un \u00e9tranger ne peut \u00eatre plac\u00e9 ou maintenu en r\u00e9tention que pour le temps strictement n\u00e9cessaire \u00e0 son d\u00e9part. L&#8217;administration exerce toute diligence \u00e0 cet effet.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"closing\" id=\"envoyer-pieces\" style=\"margin:48px 0 36px;padding:48px 36px;text-align:center;border-radius:24px;background:radial-gradient(circle at 50% 0%,rgba(0,0,204,0.08) 0%,transparent 60%),rgba(255,255,255,0.72);border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.08);\">\n<div class=\"closing-heading\" role=\"heading\" aria-level=\"2\" style=\"font-size:clamp(30px,4vw,44px);line-height:1.18;font-weight:700;margin:0 0 18px;letter-spacing:-0.022em;color:#1B1B1B;font-family:Lato,sans-serif;\">Envoyez vos pi\u00e8ces. Recevez une <span class=\"nowrap\" style=\"white-space:nowrap;\"><span class=\"tag\" style=\"display:inline-block;background:#0000CC;color:#fff;padding:2px 14px 5px;border-radius:10px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-0.005em;box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,204,.10);\">strat\u00e9gie<\/span>.<\/span><\/div>\n<p>Transmettez les pi\u00e8ces de votre dossier au cabinet. Ma\u00eetre Hassan KOHEN vous r\u00e9pond personnellement sous 24 heures avec une premi\u00e8re analyse strat\u00e9gique.<\/p>\n<div class=\"cta-row\" style=\"display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:12px;justify-content:center;margin:24px 0;\"><a class=\"cta cta-primary\" href=\"tel:+33689113445\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:#0000CC;color:#ffffff;border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;box-shadow:0 10px 30px rgba(0,0,204,0.18);\">Appeler maintenant \u2192<\/a><a class=\"cta cta-secondary\" href=\"mailto:contact@kohenavocats.com?subject=Demande%20d%27analyse\" style=\"display:inline-block;padding:14px 26px;background:rgba(255,255,255,0.95);color:#1B1B1B;border:1px solid rgba(10,10,10,0.12);border-radius:10px;text-decoration:none;font-weight:700;\">\u00c9crire au cabinet<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"promises\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);gap:14px;max-width:880px;margin:30px auto 12px;font-size:14px;color:#4A4A4A;font-weight:700;\">\n<div class=\"promise\">Premi\u00e8re analyse offerte<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">R\u00e9ponse personnelle sous 24 h<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">100 % confidentiel<\/div>\n<div class=\"promise\">Jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 1 Go de pi\u00e8ces<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01834). Cet arr\u00eat&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9568,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69caeb4fcdc6046d478deaea","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69caeb4fcdc6046d478deaea","_kj_judilibre_id":"69caeb4fcdc6046d478deaea","_kj_jur":"Tribunal judiciaire","_kj_lieu":"Orl\u00e9ans","_kj_chambre":"RETENTION ADMINISTRATIVE","_kj_rg":"26\/01834","_kj_date":"2026-03-29","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,35581,6708,35583,6364,6991,6440],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1228905","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-droit-des-affaires","category-droit-penal","category-immobilier","category-penal","category-penal-2","category-tribunal-judiciaire"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal judiciaire d&#039;Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01834 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01834). Cet arr\u00eat...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal judiciaire d&#039;Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01834\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01834). Cet arr\u00eat...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T22:20:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-01T22:23:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6693\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4467\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal judiciaire d&#8217;Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01834\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T22:20:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T22:23:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2861,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Droit des affaires\",\"Droit P\u00e9nal\",\"Immobilier\",\"P\u00e9nal\",\"Penal\",\"Tribunal judiciaire\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal judiciaire d&#8217;Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01834\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Droit des affaires\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Droit P\u00e9nal\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Immobilier\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"P\u00e9nal\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Penal\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire\"}],\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire d'Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01834 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-01T22:20:44+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-01T22:23:15+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\\\/01834). Cet arr\u00eat...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6693,\"height\":4467},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal judiciaire d&rsquo;Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\\\/01834\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal judiciaire d'Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01834 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01834). Cet arr\u00eat...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal judiciaire d'Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01834","og_description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01834). Cet arr\u00eat...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-01T22:20:44+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-01T22:23:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6693,"height":4467,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal judiciaire d&#8217;Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01834","datePublished":"2026-07-01T22:20:44+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-01T22:23:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/"},"wordCount":2861,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Droit des affaires","Droit P\u00e9nal","Immobilier","P\u00e9nal","Penal","Tribunal judiciaire"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal judiciaire d&#8217;Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01834","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Droit des affaires"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Droit P\u00e9nal"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Immobilier"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"P\u00e9nal"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Penal"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal judiciaire"}],"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/","name":"Tribunal judiciaire d'Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01834 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-01T22:20:44+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-01T22:23:15+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal judiciaire d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, statuant en mati\u00e8re de r\u00e9tention administrative, a rendu une ordonnance le 29 mars 2026 (n\u00b026\/01834). Cet arr\u00eat...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp","width":6693,"height":4467},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-dorleans-le-29-mars-2026-n26-01834\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal judiciaire d&rsquo;Orl\u00e9ans, le 29 mars 2026, n\u00b026\/01834"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-C3aPAKHj558-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-59H3","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":446886,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-le-16-aout-2025-n25-04014\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228905,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire, le 16 ao\u00fbt 2025, n\u00b025\/04014","author":"","date":"5 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour d\u2019appel de N\u00eemes, statuant en formation de juge des libert\u00e9s et de la d\u00e9tention, a rendu le 16 ao\u00fbt 2025 une ordonnance prolongeant la r\u00e9tention...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amir-mortezaie-bKLKnHSwk4A-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":449209,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-judiciaire-le-8-aout-2025-n25-01215\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228905,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal judiciaire, le 8 ao\u00fbt 2025, n\u00b025\/01215","author":"","date":"5 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal judiciaire de Beauvais, statuant en date du 8 ao\u00fbt 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019un contr\u00f4le de plein droit de l\u2019hospitalisation compl\u00e8te sous...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/osarugue-igbinoba-GtkcrFqc5hE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/osarugue-igbinoba-GtkcrFqc5hE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/osarugue-igbinoba-GtkcrFqc5hE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/osarugue-igbinoba-GtkcrFqc5hE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/osarugue-igbinoba-GtkcrFqc5hE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/osarugue-igbinoba-GtkcrFqc5hE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":458804,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-lyon-11-12-2025-n-24ly03364\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228905,"position":2},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de LYON \u2013 11\/12\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24LY03364","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour administrative d'appel de Lyon, dans son arr\u00eat du 11 d\u00e9cembre 2025, d\u00e9finit les obligations de l'autorit\u00e9 administrative face aux condamnations...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Juridictions administratives&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Juridictions administratives","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/juridictions-administratives\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/fabian-mardi-tQuEvmj83U4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/fabian-mardi-tQuEvmj83U4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/fabian-mardi-tQuEvmj83U4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/fabian-mardi-tQuEvmj83U4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/fabian-mardi-tQuEvmj83U4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/fabian-mardi-tQuEvmj83U4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":442673,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-dappel-le-30-octobre-2025-n24-09846\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228905,"position":3},"title":"Cour d&#8217;appel, le 30 octobre 2025, n\u00b024\/09846","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La Cour d\u2019appel de Paris, dans un arr\u00eat du 30 octobre 2025, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisie d\u2019un litige relatif au recouvrement d\u2019une astreinte d\u2019urbanisme. Une personne,...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour d'appel&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour d'appel","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-dappel\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/claudio-testa-iqeG5xA96M4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/claudio-testa-iqeG5xA96M4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/claudio-testa-iqeG5xA96M4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/claudio-testa-iqeG5xA96M4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/claudio-testa-iqeG5xA96M4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/claudio-testa-iqeG5xA96M4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":441747,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/cour-de-cassation-le-28-janvier-2026-n24-50-030\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228905,"position":4},"title":"Cour de cassation, le 28 janvier 2026, n\u00b024-50.030","author":"","date":"4 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Un \u00e9tranger condamn\u00e9 pour des actes de terrorisme et frapp\u00e9 d\u2019une interdiction judiciaire du territoire fut plac\u00e9 en r\u00e9tention administrative. Le juge des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cour de cassation&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cour de cassation","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/cour-de-cassation\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daphne-be-frenchie-atTJIQ5kk3E-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daphne-be-frenchie-atTJIQ5kk3E-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daphne-be-frenchie-atTJIQ5kk3E-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daphne-be-frenchie-atTJIQ5kk3E-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daphne-be-frenchie-atTJIQ5kk3E-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/daphne-be-frenchie-atTJIQ5kk3E-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":460322,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-caa-de-nancy-12-11-2025-n-24nc00460\/","url_meta":{"origin":1228905,"position":5},"title":"CAA \u2013 CAA de NANCY \u2013 12\/11\/2025 \u2013 n\u00b0 24NC00460","author":"Kohen","date":"7 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un arr\u00eat du 12 novembre 2025, la cour administrative d'appel de Nancy se prononce sur la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 d'un refus de s\u00e9jour oppos\u00e9 \u00e0 un ressortissant...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Droit P\u00e9nal&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Droit P\u00e9nal","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/droit-penal\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/zyanya-citlalli-6tRLEZ6yZ7M-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1228905"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228905\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1228933,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228905\/revisions\/1228933"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9568"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1228905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1228905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1228905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}