{"id":1232597,"date":"2026-07-02T16:17:57","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:17:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:17:57","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:17:57","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-consecration-dun-delai-de-forclusion-assoupli-en-faveur-du-creancier-de-bon\">I. La cons\u00e9cration d&#8217;un d\u00e9lai de forclusion assoupli en faveur du cr\u00e9ancier de bonne foi<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-lappreciation-in-concreto-de-limpossibilite-de-connaitre-lobligation-du-debite\">A. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation in concreto de l&#8217;impossibilit\u00e9 de conna\u00eetre l&#8217;obligation du d\u00e9biteur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-neutralisation-de-lobstacle-tire-de-la-publicite-legale\">B. La neutralisation de l&#8217;obstacle tir\u00e9 de la publicit\u00e9 l\u00e9gale<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-un-releve-de-forclusion-rendu-automatique-par-lomission-du-debiteur-sur-la-li\">II. Un relev\u00e9 de forclusion rendu automatique par l&#8217;omission du d\u00e9biteur sur la liste<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-substitution-du-juge-commissaire-par-le-tribunal-et-lobjectivation-du-motif\">A. La substitution du juge-commissaire par le tribunal et l&#8217;objectivation du motif de relev\u00e9<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-portee-de-la-decision-responsabilisation-du-debiteur-et-protection-renforce\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision : responsabilisation du d\u00e9biteur et protection renforc\u00e9e du cr\u00e9ancier<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre, dans un jugement du 10 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F01052), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#8217;une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance du juge-commissaire ayant refus\u00e9 un relev\u00e9 de forclusion \u00e0 un cr\u00e9ancier. Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 cr\u00e9anci\u00e8re, titulaire d&#8217;une cr\u00e9ance de pr\u00eat et de fournitures, n&#8217;avait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9e de l&#8217;ouverture d&#8217;une proc\u00e9dure de redressement judiciaire \u00e0 l&#8217;encontre de son d\u00e9biteur, publi\u00e9e au BODACC le 11 ao\u00fbt 2024. Le d\u00e9biteur avait omis de porter cette cr\u00e9ance sur la liste pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l&#8217;article L.622-6 du code de commerce. La cr\u00e9anci\u00e8re n&#8217;a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 sa cr\u00e9ance que le 12 mars 2025, apr\u00e8s la conversion en liquidation judiciaire, puis a saisi le juge-commissaire d&#8217;une requ\u00eate en relev\u00e9 de forclusion le 29 juillet 2025. Par ordonnance du 15 octobre 2025, le juge-commissaire a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate, estimant que la cr\u00e9anci\u00e8re avait eu connaissance des difficult\u00e9s du d\u00e9biteur d\u00e8s les premiers impay\u00e9s du pr\u00eat et que le d\u00e9lai de six mois pour agir ne pouvait \u00eatre report\u00e9. La cr\u00e9anci\u00e8re a form\u00e9 opposition le 22 octobre 2025. Le liquidateur judiciaire soutenait que l&#8217;opposition \u00e9tait recevable, mais que la demande de relev\u00e9 de forclusion \u00e9tait irrecevable car form\u00e9e plus de six mois apr\u00e8s la publication, la cr\u00e9anci\u00e8re ayant eu connaissance des difficult\u00e9s d\u00e8s avril 2024. La cr\u00e9anci\u00e8re invoquait son ignorance totale de l&#8217;existence de la proc\u00e9dure collective, le d\u00e9biteur ayant continu\u00e9 \u00e0 honorer les \u00e9ch\u00e9ances et \u00e0 passer commande jusqu&#8217;en janvier 2025, et avait \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9ment omise de la liste des cr\u00e9anciers. La question de droit \u00e9tait de d\u00e9terminer si le cr\u00e9ancier omis de la liste par le d\u00e9biteur peut b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier de l&#8217;exception au d\u00e9lai de six mois pr\u00e9vue \u00e0 l&#8217;article L.622-26 alin\u00e9a 3 du code de commerce, lorsqu&#8217;il n&#8217;a pu conna\u00eetre l&#8217;obligation du d\u00e9biteur en raison du comportement de ce dernier. Le tribunal a jug\u00e9 que l&#8217;opposition \u00e9tait recevable, que la demande de relev\u00e9 de forclusion \u00e9tait recevable car non prescrite, et qu&#8217;elle \u00e9tait bien fond\u00e9e, relevant le cr\u00e9ancier de la forclusion et l&#8217;autorisant \u00e0 d\u00e9clarer sa cr\u00e9ance.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-consecration-dun-delai-de-forclusion-assoupli-en-faveur-du-creancier-de-bon\">I. La cons\u00e9cration d&#8217;un d\u00e9lai de forclusion assoupli en faveur du cr\u00e9ancier de bonne foi<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-lappreciation-in-concreto-de-limpossibilite-de-connaitre-lobligation-du-debite\">A. L&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation in concreto de l&#8217;impossibilit\u00e9 de conna\u00eetre l&#8217;obligation du d\u00e9biteur<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a estim\u00e9 que le cr\u00e9ancier pouvait l\u00e9gitimement ignorer l&#8217;existence de la proc\u00e9dure collective, malgr\u00e9 quelques incidents de paiement. Il rel\u00e8ve que <em>&#8221; les mensualit\u00e9s ont toutes \u00e9t\u00e9 pay\u00e9es jusqu&#8217;au mois de f\u00e9vrier 2025 (date de la liquidation), certaines avec des incidents de paiement. Ceci montre que [le d\u00e9biteur] avait des difficult\u00e9s de tr\u00e9sorerie mais, vu de l&#8217;ext\u00e9rieur, rien d&#8217;alarmant puisque toutes les \u00e9ch\u00e9ances ont \u00e9t\u00e9 pay\u00e9es &#8220;<\/em>. De m\u00eame, les fournitures ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9gl\u00e9es jusqu&#8217;en janvier 2025. Le juge en d\u00e9duit que <em>&#8221; L&#8217;ENTREPOT, comme il l&#8217;affirme, pouvait ne pas \u00eatre au courant de la mise en r\u00e8glement judiciaire de [Etablissement 1] jusqu&#8217;\u00e0 la p\u00e9riode de fin janvier\/d\u00e9but f\u00e9vrier &#8220;<\/em>. Il \u00e9carte ainsi l&#8217;argument du juge-commissaire selon lequel les impay\u00e9s du pr\u00eat suffisaient \u00e0 caract\u00e9riser une connaissance pr\u00e9coce. Cette approche rejoint celle de la Cour d&#8217;appel de Chamb\u00e9ry qui rappelle que le d\u00e9lai d\u00e9rogatoire court <em>&#8221; \u00e0 compter de la date \u00e0 laquelle il est \u00e9tabli qu&#8217;il ne pouvait ignorer l&#8217;existence de sa cr\u00e9ance &#8220;<\/em> (CA Chamb\u00e9ry, 25 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/00970). Le tribunal op\u00e8re une distinction nette entre la simple difficult\u00e9 passag\u00e8re et la connaissance effective de l&#8217;ouverture d&#8217;une proc\u00e9dure collective. Il refuse de sanctionner le cr\u00e9ancier qui n&#8217;a pas consult\u00e9 le BODACC, estimant que <em>&#8221; la partie l\u00e9s\u00e9e lorsqu&#8217;il y a omission de d\u00e9clarer un cr\u00e9ancier par le d\u00e9biteur est \u00e9videmment le cr\u00e9ancier &#8220;<\/em>. La bonne foi de ce dernier est ainsi pr\u00e9serv\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-neutralisation-de-lobstacle-tire-de-la-publicite-legale\">B. La neutralisation de l&#8217;obstacle tir\u00e9 de la publicit\u00e9 l\u00e9gale<\/h3>\n<p>En reconnaissant que <em>&#8221; cette impossibilit\u00e9 n&#8217;est pas une impossibilit\u00e9 absolue &#8220;<\/em>, le tribunal \u00e9carte l&#8217;exigence d&#8217;une impossibilit\u00e9 mat\u00e9rielle totale. Il se concentre sur la situation concr\u00e8te du cr\u00e9ancier, qui n&#8217;avait aucune raison de suspecter une proc\u00e9dure compte tenu des paiements r\u00e9guliers. Cette solution s&#8217;inscrit dans la logique de l&#8217;article L.622-26 alin\u00e9a 3, qui vise \u00e0 prot\u00e9ger les cr\u00e9anciers non avertis. Le tribunal rejette implicitement l&#8217;id\u00e9e que la publication au BODACC suffirait \u00e0 faire courir le d\u00e9lai de mani\u00e8re automatique. Il consacre ainsi une lecture protective de l&#8217;exception, conforme \u00e0 l&#8217;objectif de ne pas p\u00e9naliser le cr\u00e9ancier qui n&#8217;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 plac\u00e9 en mesure d&#8217;agir. Le d\u00e9lai de six mois est report\u00e9 \u00e0 la date \u00e0 laquelle le cr\u00e9ancier a effectivement eu connaissance de sa cr\u00e9ance, soit en l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce f\u00e9vrier 2025. La requ\u00eate du 29 juillet 2025 \u00e9tant intervenue moins de six mois apr\u00e8s cette date, elle est d\u00e9clar\u00e9e recevable.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-un-releve-de-forclusion-rendu-automatique-par-lomission-du-debiteur-sur-la-li\">II. Un relev\u00e9 de forclusion rendu automatique par l&#8217;omission du d\u00e9biteur sur la liste<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-substitution-du-juge-commissaire-par-le-tribunal-et-lobjectivation-du-motif\">A. La substitution du juge-commissaire par le tribunal et l&#8217;objectivation du motif de relev\u00e9<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal constate que <em>&#8221; le d\u00e9biteur, [Etablissement 1], n&#8217;a pas port\u00e9 la cr\u00e9ance du pr\u00eat octroy\u00e9 par L&#8217;ENTREPOT sur la liste remise au mandataire judiciaire &#8220;<\/em>. Il souligne le caract\u00e8re certain et liquide de la cr\u00e9ance, et rel\u00e8ve que le d\u00e9biteur <em>&#8221; a pay\u00e9 les mensualit\u00e9s du pr\u00eat pendant toute la p\u00e9riode de redressement judiciaire &#8220;<\/em>, ce qui rend l&#8217;omission <em>&#8221; plus que probable [&#8230;] volontaire &#8220;<\/em>. Toutefois, il \u00e9carte toute recherche de l&#8217;intention du d\u00e9biteur en rappelant que <em>&#8221; le l\u00e9gislateur a lev\u00e9 un obstacle de la mise en \u0153uvre du relev\u00e9 de forclusion en supprimant, par l&#8217;ordonnance n\u00b0 2014-326 du 12 mars 2014, l&#8217;exigence d&#8217;une omission &#8220;<\/em>volontaire<em>&#8221; de la part du d\u00e9biteur &#8220;<\/em>. Il suffit donc d&#8217;une omission, m\u00eame n\u00e9gligente. Cette automaticit\u00e9 est confirm\u00e9e par la Cour d&#8217;appel de Versailles selon laquelle <em>&#8221; lorsqu&#8217;un d\u00e9biteur s&#8217;est abstenu d&#8217;\u00e9tablir la liste pr\u00e9vue au deuxi\u00e8me alin\u00e9a de l&#8217;article L.622-6 du code de commerce ou que, l&#8217;ayant \u00e9tablie, il a omis d&#8217;y mentionner un cr\u00e9ancier, le cr\u00e9ancier omis, qui sollicite un relev\u00e9 de forclusion, n&#8217;est pas tenu d&#8217;\u00e9tablir l&#8217;existence d&#8217;un lien de causalit\u00e9 entre cette omission et la tardivet\u00e9 de sa d\u00e9claration de cr\u00e9ance &#8220;<\/em> (CA Versailles, 4 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/02648). Ainsi, le tribunal applique un r\u00e9gime quasi automatique de relev\u00e9 de forclusion en cas d&#8217;omission, sans exiger de preuve suppl\u00e9mentaire.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-portee-de-la-decision-responsabilisation-du-debiteur-et-protection-renforce\">B. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision : responsabilisation du d\u00e9biteur et protection renforc\u00e9e du cr\u00e9ancier<\/h3>\n<p>En jugeant que la demande de relev\u00e9 de forclusion est bien fond\u00e9e du seul fait de l&#8217;omission, le tribunal consacre une solution protectrice du cr\u00e9ancier. Il met les frais de l&#8217;instance \u00e0 la charge du d\u00e9biteur en application de l&#8217;article R.622-25 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de commerce, pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment parce que celui-ci n&#8217;a pas mentionn\u00e9 la cr\u00e9ance sur la liste. Cette condamnation aux d\u00e9pens, incluant une somme liquid\u00e9e \u00e0 100 euros, renforce l&#8217;effet dissuasif de la solution. La d\u00e9cision s&#8217;inscrit dans un mouvement jurisprudentiel favorable aux cr\u00e9anciers omis, qui n&#8217;ont pas \u00e0 supporter les cons\u00e9quences de la carence du d\u00e9biteur. Elle pourrait conduire les mandataires judiciaires \u00e0 \u00eatre plus vigilants dans la v\u00e9rification de l&#8217;exhaustivit\u00e9 de la liste. \u00c0 l&#8217;inverse, elle all\u00e8ge consid\u00e9rablement la charge probatoire du cr\u00e9ancier, lequel n&#8217;a qu&#8217;\u00e0 d\u00e9montrer son omission pour \u00eatre relev\u00e9 de forclusion, sans avoir \u00e0 prouver que cette omission a caus\u00e9 son retard. Le tribunal affirme ainsi une logique de sanction objective de la faute du d\u00e9biteur, ind\u00e9pendante de toute consid\u00e9ration subjective. Cette port\u00e9e pratique est majeure pour la s\u00e9curisation des d\u00e9clarations de cr\u00e9ance dans les proc\u00e9dures collectives.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67a31f9cf1a54976865ca624\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Versailles, le 4 f\u00e9vrier 2025, n\u00b023\/02648<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e39cfd2b19620bb73a228f\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 25 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/00970<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045178124\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 622-6 du Code de commerce<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>D\u00e8s l&#8217;ouverture de la proc\u00e9dure, il est dress\u00e9 un inventaire du patrimoine du d\u00e9biteur qui constitue le gage de ses cr\u00e9anciers professionnels ainsi que des garanties qui le gr\u00e8vent. Cet inventaire, remis \u00e0 l&#8217;administrateur et au mandataire judiciaire, est compl\u00e9t\u00e9 par le d\u00e9biteur par la mention des biens qu&#8217;il d\u00e9tient susceptibles d&#8217;\u00eatre revendiqu\u00e9s par un tiers. Le d\u00e9biteur entrepreneur y fait en outre figurer les biens d\u00e9tenus dans le cadre de l&#8217;activit\u00e9 \u00e0 raison de laquelle la proc\u00e9dure a \u00e9t\u00e9 ouverte qui sont compris dans un autre de ses patrimoines et dont il est susceptible de demander la reprise dans les conditions pr\u00e9vues par l&#8217;article L. 624-19.<\/p>\n<p>Le d\u00e9biteur remet \u00e0 l&#8217;administrateur et au mandataire judiciaire, pour les besoins de l&#8217;exercice de leur mandat, la liste de ses cr\u00e9anciers, du montant de ses dettes et des principaux contrats en cours. Il les informe des instances en cours auxquelles il est partie.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;administrateur ou, s&#8217;il n&#8217;en a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 nomm\u00e9, le mandataire judiciaire peut, nonobstant toute disposition l\u00e9gislative ou r\u00e9glementaire contraire, obtenir communication par les administrations et organismes publics, les organismes de pr\u00e9voyance et de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sociale, les \u00e9tablissements de cr\u00e9dit, les soci\u00e9t\u00e9s de financement, les \u00e9tablissements de monnaie \u00e9lectronique, les \u00e9tablissements de paiement ainsi que les services charg\u00e9s de centraliser les risques bancaires et les incidents de paiement, des renseignements de nature \u00e0 lui donner une exacte information sur la situation patrimoniale du d\u00e9biteur.<\/p>\n<p>Lorsque le d\u00e9biteur exerce une profession lib\u00e9rale soumise \u00e0 un statut l\u00e9gislatif ou r\u00e9glementaire ou dont le titre est prot\u00e9g\u00e9, l&#8217;inventaire est dress\u00e9 en pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;un repr\u00e9sentant de l&#8217;ordre professionnel ou de l&#8217;autorit\u00e9 comp\u00e9tente dont, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, il rel\u00e8ve. En aucun cas l&#8217;inventaire ne peut porter atteinte au secret professionnel si le d\u00e9biteur y est soumis.<\/p>\n<p>L&#8217;absence d&#8217;inventaire ne fait pas obstacle \u00e0 l&#8217;exercice des actions en revendication ou en restitution.<\/p>\n<p>Un d\u00e9cret en Conseil d&#8217;Etat fixe les conditions d&#8217;application du pr\u00e9sent article.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre, dans un jugement du 10 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F01052), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#8217;une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance du&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9566,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69da88fdcdc6046d47e86542","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69da88fdcdc6046d47e86542","_kj_judilibre_id":"69da88fdcdc6046d47e86542","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"2025F01052","_kj_date":"2026-04-10","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre, dans un jugement du 10 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F01052), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#039;une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance du...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre, dans un jugement du 10 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F01052), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#039;une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance du...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:17:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"3078\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"3847\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:17:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1931,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:17:57+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:17:57+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre, dans un jugement du 10 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F01052), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance du...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":3078,\"height\":3847},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre, dans un jugement du 10 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F01052), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance du...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052","og_description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre, dans un jugement du 10 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F01052), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance du...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:17:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":3078,"height":3847,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:17:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/"},"wordCount":1931,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:17:57+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:17:57+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre, dans un jugement du 10 avril 2026 (n\u00b02025F01052), a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance du...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp","width":3078,"height":3847},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2025f01052\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01052"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/victor-V67qmAIxyvI-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aEB","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":498050,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-villefranche-sur-saone-tarare-le-27-novembre-2025-n2025f00594\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232597,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Villefranche-sur-Sa\u00f4ne &#8211; Tarare, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025F00594","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Villefranche-Tarare, le vingt-sept novembre deux mille vingt-cinq, statue sur la cl\u00f4ture d\u2019une liquidation judiciaire...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1227358,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-rennes-le-9-avril-2026-n2025f00086\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232597,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Rennes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00086","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Rennes, premi\u00e8re chambre, a rendu un jugement sur opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance d'injonction de payer. Une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201556,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-pau-le-3-avril-2026-n2024004424\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232597,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Pau, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02024004424","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un jugement du 1er octobre 2024, le tribunal de commerce de Pau a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire d'une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exer\u00e7ant une activit\u00e9 de pose, mise...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201511,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-3-avril-2026-n2025061315\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232597,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02025061315","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 3 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en formation coll\u00e9giale, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019homologation d\u2019un accord...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":490417,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nimes-le-19-novembre-2025-n2025f00243\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232597,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de N\u00eemes, le 19 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025F00243","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal de commerce de N\u00eemes, statuant le 1er avril 2025, a examin\u00e9 la cl\u00f4ture d\u2019une liquidation judiciaire. Le liquidateur a indiqu\u00e9 que la cl\u00f4ture...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":490860,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-bourges-le-18-novembre-2025-n2024f03546\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232597,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Bourges, le 18 novembre 2025, n\u00b02024F03546","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal de commerce de Bourges, statuant le 18 novembre 2025, se prononce sur une demande de cl\u00f4ture d'une liquidation judiciaire. Le liquidateur...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leo-serrat-jxLd50GtR0c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leo-serrat-jxLd50GtR0c-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leo-serrat-jxLd50GtR0c-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leo-serrat-jxLd50GtR0c-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leo-serrat-jxLd50GtR0c-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/leo-serrat-jxLd50GtR0c-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232597\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9566"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}