{"id":1232614,"date":"2026-07-02T16:18:53","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:18:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:18:53","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:18:53","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-laffirmation-de-la-competence-du-juge-national-et-labsence-de-qualite-de-trans\">I. L&#8217;affirmation de la comp\u00e9tence du juge national et l&#8217;absence de qualit\u00e9 de transporteur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-rejet-de-lexception-dincompetence-fondee-sur-la-clause-attributive-de-jurid\">A. Le rejet de l&#8217;exception d&#8217;incomp\u00e9tence fond\u00e9e sur la clause attributive de juridiction<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-reconnaissance-de-labsence-de-qualite-de-transporteur-maritime-effectif-ou-\">B. La reconnaissance de l&#8217;absence de qualit\u00e9 de transporteur maritime effectif ou apparent<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-lapplication-du-regime-de-prescription-annale-et-labsence-de-mise-en-uvre-de-\">II. L&#8217;application du r\u00e9gime de prescription annale et l&#8217;absence de mise en \u0153uvre de la garantie d&#8217;assurance<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-fixation-du-point-de-depart-de-la-prescription-annale-au-30-juin-2022\">A. La fixation du point de d\u00e9part de la prescription annale au 30 juin 2022<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-condition-de-mise-en-uvre-de-la-garantie-dassurance-transport\">B. L&#8217;absence de condition de mise en \u0153uvre de la garantie d&#8217;assurance transport<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre a rendu le 10 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02024J00106) dans un litige relatif \u00e0 la perte de marchandises transport\u00e9es par voie maritime. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 demanderesse, r\u00e9ceptionnaire d&#8217;un conteneur en provenance du Br\u00e9sil, avait assign\u00e9 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise et son assureur pour obtenir r\u00e9paration du pr\u00e9judice subi. Cette d\u00e9cision soul\u00e8ve plusieurs questions juridiques fondamentales touchant \u00e0 la comp\u00e9tence territoriale, \u00e0 la qualit\u00e9 de transporteur maritime, \u00e0 la prescription annale et aux conditions de mise en \u0153uvre de la garantie d&#8217;assurance transport.<\/p>\n<p>En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, un conteneur avait \u00e9t\u00e9 charg\u00e9 au port de Paranagua au Br\u00e9sil sous un connaissement \u00e9mis par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de droit italien. \u00c0 l&#8217;arriv\u00e9e au Havre le 16 juin 2022, le conteneur s&#8217;est r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9 vide lors de son d\u00e9potage le 30 juin 2022. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9ceptionnaire a alors assign\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise, qu&#8217;elle consid\u00e9rait comme le transporteur maritime apparent, ainsi que son assureur, pour obtenir indemnisation. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise a soulev\u00e9 une exception d&#8217;incomp\u00e9tence au profit des tribunaux de Naples en se pr\u00e9valant d&#8217;une clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence figurant dans le connaissement, et a subsidiairement invoqu\u00e9 la prescription de l&#8217;action.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal s&#8217;est d&#8217;abord d\u00e9clar\u00e9 comp\u00e9tent pour statuer sur l&#8217;ensemble du litige. Il a ensuite jug\u00e9 que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas le transporteur maritime, ni effectif ni apparent, et que l&#8217;action dirig\u00e9e contre elle \u00e9tait prescrite depuis le 30 juin 2023. Enfin, il a d\u00e9bout\u00e9 la demanderesse de sa demande de garantie contre l&#8217;assureur, faute pour les conditions de la police d&#8217;\u00eatre r\u00e9unies. La solution retenue interroge tant sur le r\u00e9gime de l&#8217;exception d&#8217;incomp\u00e9tence en mati\u00e8re de transport maritime que sur l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation des conditions de mise en \u0153uvre de la garantie d&#8217;assurance.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-laffirmation-de-la-competence-du-juge-national-et-labsence-de-qualite-de-trans\">I. L&#8217;affirmation de la comp\u00e9tence du juge national et l&#8217;absence de qualit\u00e9 de transporteur<\/h2>\n<p>Le tribunal a successivement \u00e9cart\u00e9 l&#8217;exception d&#8217;incomp\u00e9tence soulev\u00e9e par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise et jug\u00e9 que celle-ci n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas le transporteur maritime. Cette double appr\u00e9ciation appelle une analyse distincte.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-rejet-de-lexception-dincompetence-fondee-sur-la-clause-attributive-de-jurid\">A. Le rejet de l&#8217;exception d&#8217;incomp\u00e9tence fond\u00e9e sur la clause attributive de juridiction<\/h3>\n<p>La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise invoquait une clause attributive de comp\u00e9tence stipul\u00e9e dans les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales du connaissement, d\u00e9signant les tribunaux de Naples. Le tribunal a consid\u00e9r\u00e9 que cette clause \u00e9tait inopposable \u00e0 la demanderesse car la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise n&#8217;avait pas qualit\u00e9 pour s&#8217;en pr\u00e9valoir. Le transporteur maritime d\u00e9sign\u00e9 au connaissement \u00e9tait la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 italienne, entit\u00e9 juridique distincte de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise. Celle-ci n&#8217;intervenait qu&#8217;en qualit\u00e9 d&#8217;agent portuaire au Havre, comme le mentionnait d&#8217;ailleurs le connaissement. Le tribunal a jug\u00e9 que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise, n&#8217;\u00e9tant pas partie au contrat de transport, ne pouvait se pr\u00e9valoir d&#8217;une clause stipul\u00e9e dans l&#8217;int\u00e9r\u00eat d&#8217;un tiers.<\/p>\n<p>Cette solution est conforme au principe de l&#8217;effet relatif des clauses attributives de comp\u00e9tence. Comme l&#8217;a rappel\u00e9 la Cour de cassation, <em>&#8220;une convention attributive de juridiction en vertu de laquelle l&#8217;une des parties \u00e0 celle-ci ne peut saisir que le seul tribunal qu&#8217;elle d\u00e9signe, tandis qu&#8217;elle permet \u00e0 l&#8217;autre partie de saisir, outre ce tribunal, toute autre juridiction comp\u00e9tente, est valide&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68cab5b44c2b6787f70e5d3b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cass. 1\u00e8re civ., 17 septembre 2025, n\u00b023-18.785)<\/a><\/strong>. Toutefois, cette validit\u00e9 est subordonn\u00e9e \u00e0 la qualit\u00e9 de partie contractante de celui qui l&#8217;invoque. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas partie au contrat de transport, de sorte qu&#8217;elle ne pouvait utilement se pr\u00e9valoir de cette clause. Le tribunal a \u00e9galement \u00e9cart\u00e9 la th\u00e9orie de l&#8217;apparence, estimant que les actes accomplis par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise (facturation des frais locaux, liaison avec la demanderesse) relevaient des fonctions normales d&#8217;un agent maritime et non d&#8217;un transporteur apparent.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-reconnaissance-de-labsence-de-qualite-de-transporteur-maritime-effectif-ou-\">B. La reconnaissance de l&#8217;absence de qualit\u00e9 de transporteur maritime effectif ou apparent<\/h3>\n<p>Apr\u00e8s avoir \u00e9cart\u00e9 l&#8217;exception d&#8217;incomp\u00e9tence, le tribunal a examin\u00e9 le fond du litige. Il a constat\u00e9 que le connaissement d\u00e9signait express\u00e9ment comme transporteur maritime la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 italienne, et non la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise. Aucune r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 cette derni\u00e8re n&#8217;apparaissait au recto ni au verso du document. Le tribunal a relev\u00e9 que les op\u00e9rations de chargement, de transport et de transbordement avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 effectu\u00e9es par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 italienne et ses agents, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise n&#8217;intervenant qu&#8217;au Havre en qualit\u00e9 d&#8217;agent.<\/p>\n<p>La demanderesse invoquait la th\u00e9orie de l&#8217;apparence pour soutenir que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise s&#8217;\u00e9tait comport\u00e9e comme le transporteur maritime. Le tribunal a rejet\u00e9 cet argument en consid\u00e9rant que les \u00e9l\u00e9ments avanc\u00e9s ne constituaient qu&#8217;une liste de t\u00e2ches classiques effectu\u00e9es par un agent maritime. Il a notamment soulign\u00e9 que la facture \u00e9mise par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise concernait exclusivement les frais locaux de d\u00e9chargement, le fret maritime ayant \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9pay\u00e9 au Br\u00e9sil. Le tribunal a \u00e9galement relev\u00e9 que la demanderesse, qui importait du bois depuis au moins 2016, disposait d&#8217;une exp\u00e9rience suffisante pour conna\u00eetre l&#8217;organisation d&#8217;un transport maritime et ne pouvait s\u00e9rieusement confondre un agent avec un transporteur. Cette analyse conduit \u00e0 une distinction nette entre le transporteur effectif et son mandataire, le connaissement faisant foi entre les parties.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-lapplication-du-regime-de-prescription-annale-et-labsence-de-mise-en-uvre-de-\">II. L&#8217;application du r\u00e9gime de prescription annale et l&#8217;absence de mise en \u0153uvre de la garantie d&#8217;assurance<\/h2>\n<p>Le tribunal a ensuite examin\u00e9 la prescription de l&#8217;action dirig\u00e9e contre la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise et les conditions de mise en \u0153uvre de la garantie de l&#8217;assureur. Sur ces deux points, la solution retenue est particuli\u00e8rement rigoureuse.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-fixation-du-point-de-depart-de-la-prescription-annale-au-30-juin-2022\">A. La fixation du point de d\u00e9part de la prescription annale au 30 juin 2022<\/h3>\n<p>La demanderesse avait assign\u00e9 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise le 28 juin 2024, soit plus de deux ans apr\u00e8s la constatation de l&#8217;absence de marchandise. Le tribunal a rappel\u00e9 que l&#8217;article 386 de la Convention de Bruxelles du 25 ao\u00fbt 1924 et l&#8217;article L. 5422-18 du Code des transports fixent le d\u00e9lai de prescription \u00e0 un an pour toute action en responsabilit\u00e9 contre le transporteur maritime. Il a fix\u00e9 le point de d\u00e9part de ce d\u00e9lai au 30 juin 2022, date \u00e0 laquelle le conteneur avait \u00e9t\u00e9 sorti du terminal pour d\u00e9potage et o\u00f9 l&#8217;absence de marchandise avait \u00e9t\u00e9 constat\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal a \u00e9cart\u00e9 la date du 16 juin 2022, correspondant au d\u00e9chargement du conteneur au Havre, en consid\u00e9rant les conditions particuli\u00e8res d&#8217;engorgement des terminaux portuaires apr\u00e8s la p\u00e9riode Covid. Il a jug\u00e9 qu&#8217;une sortie plus pr\u00e9coce du terminal n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas mat\u00e9riellement possible. L&#8217;assignation \u00e9tant intervenue le 28 juin 2024, l&#8217;action \u00e9tait prescrite depuis le 30 juin 2023. Le tribunal a ainsi fait une application stricte de la prescription annale, sans rechercher si un \u00e9v\u00e9nement interruptif avait pu survenir. Cette solution s&#8217;inscrit dans une jurisprudence constante selon laquelle <em>&#8220;le d\u00e9lai de prescription des actions contre le transporteur court \u00e0 compter du jour o\u00f9 les marchandises sont remises ou offertes au destinataire&#8221;<\/em> (art. R5422-26 du Code des transports). En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, la remise n&#8217;ayant pu avoir lieu avant le 30 juin 2022, c&#8217;est cette date qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 retenue.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-condition-de-mise-en-uvre-de-la-garantie-dassurance-transport\">B. L&#8217;absence de condition de mise en \u0153uvre de la garantie d&#8217;assurance transport<\/h3>\n<p>La demanderesse sollicitait \u00e9galement la garantie de son assureur sur le fondement d&#8217;une police d&#8217;assurance transport. Le tribunal a rejet\u00e9 cette demande en relevant que les conditions de garantie n&#8217;\u00e9taient pas r\u00e9unies. Il a constat\u00e9 que la marchandise n&#8217;avait jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 remise \u00e0 un transporteur professionnel, condition exig\u00e9e par les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales de la police. Le ticket de pes\u00e9e \u00e9tabli le 29 mars 2022 au terminal de Paranagua d\u00e9montrait que le conteneur \u00e9tait vide \u00e0 son entr\u00e9e sur le port, avec un poids de 3 700 kg correspondant \u00e0 la tare du conteneur.<\/p>\n<p>Le tribunal a \u00e9galement relev\u00e9 que la condition relative \u00e0 l&#8217;effraction du plomb n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas remplie, le conteneur \u00e9tant parvenu \u00e0 destination avec un plomb intact. L&#8217;expert avait conclu clairement \u00e0 un <em>&#8220;d\u00e9faut\/absence de chargement de la cargaison par le fournisseur&#8221;<\/em>. Dans ces conditions, la garantie de l&#8217;assureur ne pouvait \u00eatre mobilis\u00e9e, les marchandises n&#8217;ayant jamais \u00e9t\u00e9 prises en charge par le transporteur. Le tribunal a ainsi fait une application stricte de la police d&#8217;assurance, en rappelant que la couverture ne joue que pour les marchandises <em>&#8220;remises \u00e0 des professionnels du transport&#8221;<\/em>. Il a \u00e9galement \u00e9cart\u00e9 la demande reconventionnelle de l&#8217;assureur fond\u00e9e sur l&#8217;obligation de conservation des recours, d\u00e8s lors que la garantie n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas due.<\/p>\n<p>Le jugement du Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre du 10 avril 2026 illustre la rigueur avec laquelle les juridictions nationales appliquent les r\u00e8gles de comp\u00e9tence et de prescription en mati\u00e8re de transport maritime. En \u00e9cartant les tentatives de la demanderesse de faire endosser \u00e0 un simple agent la responsabilit\u00e9 d&#8217;un transporteur, et en faisant une application stricte des conditions de garantie de la police d&#8217;assurance, le tribunal a pr\u00e9serv\u00e9 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique des op\u00e9rateurs du commerce international. La d\u00e9cision rappelle que le connaissement reste le document central pour identifier le transporteur, et que la prescription annale constitue un d\u00e9lai imp\u00e9ratif que le r\u00e9ceptionnaire doit imp\u00e9rativement respecter.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67820aabd30fbdc4c17b9c73\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel d\u2019Orl\u00e9ans, le 9 janvier 2025, n\u00b023\/01633<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/68cab5b44c2b6787f70e5d3b\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cass. Premi\u00e8re chambre civile, le 17 septembre 2025, n\u00b023-18.785<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000023080072\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article L. 5422-18 du Code des transports<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>L&#8217;action contre le transporteur \u00e0 raison de pertes ou dommages se prescrit par un an. Ce d\u00e9lai peut \u00eatre prolong\u00e9 par un accord conclu entre les parties post\u00e9rieurement \u00e0 l&#8217;\u00e9v\u00e9nement qui a donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 l&#8217;action.<br \/> Les actions r\u00e9cursoires peuvent \u00eatre intent\u00e9es, m\u00eame apr\u00e8s les d\u00e9lais pr\u00e9vus par les dispositions de l&#8217;alin\u00e9a pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent, pendant trois mois \u00e0 compter du jour de l&#8217;exercice de l&#8217;action contre la personne garantie ou du jour o\u00f9 celle-ci a, \u00e0 l&#8217;amiable, r\u00e9gl\u00e9 la r\u00e9clamation.<br \/> Quel que soit son fondement, l&#8217;action en responsabilit\u00e9 contre le transporteur \u00e0 raison de pertes ou dommages ne peut \u00eatre exerc\u00e9e que dans les conditions et limites fix\u00e9es par les dispositions de la pr\u00e9sente section.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre a rendu le 10 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02024J00106) dans un litige relatif \u00e0 la perte de marchandises&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":9687,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69da4968cdc6046d47e0589e","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69da4968cdc6046d47e0589e","_kj_judilibre_id":"69da4968cdc6046d47e0589e","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"2024J00106","_kj_date":"2026-04-10","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre a rendu le 10 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02024J00106) dans un litige relatif \u00e0 la perte de marchandises...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre a rendu le 10 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02024J00106) dans un litige relatif \u00e0 la perte de marchandises...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:18:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"6000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"4000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:18:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1921,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:18:53+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:18:53+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre a rendu le 10 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02024J00106) dans un litige relatif \u00e0 la perte de marchandises...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":6000,\"height\":4000},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre a rendu le 10 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02024J00106) dans un litige relatif \u00e0 la perte de marchandises...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106","og_description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre a rendu le 10 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02024J00106) dans un litige relatif \u00e0 la perte de marchandises...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:18:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":6000,"height":4000,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:18:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/"},"wordCount":1921,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:18:53+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:18:53+00:00","description":"Le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques du Havre a rendu le 10 avril 2026 un jugement (n\u00b02024J00106) dans un litige relatif \u00e0 la perte de marchandises...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp","width":6000,"height":4000},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-le-10-avril-2026-n2024j00106\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02024J00106"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/bhavik-nasit-otN0Zt25rIk-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aES","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":1234124,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-bastia-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00038\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232614,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Bastia, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00038","author":"Kohen","date":"2 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"I. La qualification de mesure d\u2019administration judiciaire, obstacle aux voies de recours A. La jonction d\u2019instances, acte de gestion du service de la...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amy-gatenby-jwNtJHycBnw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amy-gatenby-jwNtJHycBnw-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amy-gatenby-jwNtJHycBnw-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amy-gatenby-jwNtJHycBnw-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amy-gatenby-jwNtJHycBnw-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/amy-gatenby-jwNtJHycBnw-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1227358,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-rennes-le-9-avril-2026-n2025f00086\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232614,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Rennes, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F00086","author":"Kohen","date":"1 July 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Rennes, premi\u00e8re chambre, a rendu un jugement sur opposition \u00e0 une ordonnance d'injonction de payer. Une...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/alex-shuper-EZXV2WaHn_8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201556,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-pau-le-3-avril-2026-n2024004424\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232614,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Pau, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02024004424","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Par un jugement du 1er octobre 2024, le tribunal de commerce de Pau a prononc\u00e9 la liquidation judiciaire d'une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exer\u00e7ant une activit\u00e9 de pose, mise...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/kris-atomic-6xJ9GUbbFEo-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1201511,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-paris-le-3-avril-2026-n2025061315\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232614,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Paris, le 3 avril 2026, n\u00b02025061315","author":"Kohen","date":"27 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le 3 avril 2026, le Tribunal des activit\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques de Paris, statuant en formation coll\u00e9giale, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d\u2019une demande d\u2019homologation d\u2019un accord...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/henry-be-Pg63JThyCg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":498050,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-villefranche-sur-saone-tarare-le-27-novembre-2025-n2025f00594\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232614,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Villefranche-sur-Sa\u00f4ne &#8211; Tarare, le 27 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025F00594","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Villefranche-Tarare, le vingt-sept novembre deux mille vingt-cinq, statue sur la cl\u00f4ture d\u2019une liquidation judiciaire...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/chris-lawton-zvKx6ixUhWQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":490417,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-nimes-le-19-novembre-2025-n2025f00243\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232614,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de N\u00eemes, le 19 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025F00243","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le tribunal de commerce de N\u00eemes, statuant le 1er avril 2025, a examin\u00e9 la cl\u00f4ture d\u2019une liquidation judiciaire. Le liquidateur a indiqu\u00e9 que la cl\u00f4ture...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/mohamed-nohassi-Qi-Qyp5vc3o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232614"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232614\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9687"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}