{"id":1232662,"date":"2026-07-02T16:21:48","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:21:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:21:48","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:21:48","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&#8217;annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-consecration-de-la-regularite-des-procedures-de-decheance-du-terme\">I. La cons\u00e9cration de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des proc\u00e9dures de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-validation-de-la-mise-en-demeure-prealable-et-du-prononce-de-la-decheance\">A. La validation de la mise en demeure pr\u00e9alable et du prononc\u00e9 de la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-determination-precise-du-montant-de-la-creance\">B. La d\u00e9termination pr\u00e9cise du montant de la cr\u00e9ance<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-la-portee-de-la-decision-face-aux-exigences-de-preuve-et-de-contradictoire\">II. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision face aux exigences de preuve et de contradictoire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-loffice-du-juge-en-labsence-du-defendeur\">A. L\u2019office du juge en l\u2019absence du d\u00e9fendeur<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-lappreciation-des-interets-et-accessoires\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation des int\u00e9r\u00eats et accessoires<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 10 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce d&#8217;Annecy, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, a condamn\u00e9 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice au paiement de sommes dues au titre d\u2019un compte courant professionnel et d\u2019un pr\u00eat, apr\u00e8s que la banque eut prononc\u00e9 la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme. Une banque avait consenti \u00e0 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 exer\u00e7ant une activit\u00e9 de peinture et r\u00e9novation un pr\u00eat professionnel de 15 000 euros le 5 juin 2024, ainsi qu\u2019un compte courant ouvert le 22 mars 2024. \u00c0 la suite de plusieurs \u00e9ch\u00e9ances impay\u00e9es, la banque adressa \u00e0 la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 une lettre recommand\u00e9e du 17 septembre 2025 d\u00e9non\u00e7ant les concours, puis une mise en demeure du 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025 pronon\u00e7ant la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 ne r\u00e9gla pas les sommes r\u00e9clam\u00e9es. La banque assigna la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 devant le tribunal de commerce. Celle-ci, bien que r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement assign\u00e9e, ne compara\u00eet pas et ne se fait pas repr\u00e9senter. La question de droit soumise au tribunal \u00e9tait de savoir si la proc\u00e9dure de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme \u00e9tait r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et si les cr\u00e9ances, tant au titre du compte courant qu\u2019au titre du pr\u00eat, \u00e9taient fond\u00e9es en leur montant. Le tribunal a fait droit aux demandes de la banque pour le compte courant, condamnant la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 2 622,36 euros avec int\u00e9r\u00eats au taux l\u00e9gal, et pour le pr\u00eat \u00e0 12 323,85 euros avec int\u00e9r\u00eats au taux major\u00e9 de 7,2 %, ramenant le montant sollicit\u00e9 de 12 377,18 euros \u00e0 la somme effectivement justifi\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-consecration-de-la-regularite-des-procedures-de-decheance-du-terme\">I. La cons\u00e9cration de la r\u00e9gularit\u00e9 des proc\u00e9dures de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-validation-de-la-mise-en-demeure-prealable-et-du-prononce-de-la-decheance\">A. La validation de la mise en demeure pr\u00e9alable et du prononc\u00e9 de la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a estim\u00e9 que la banque avait respect\u00e9 ses obligations l\u00e9gales et contractuelles en adressant une mise en demeure pr\u00e9alable avant de prononcer la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme. La banque produisait un courrier du 17 septembre 2025 mettant en demeure la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de r\u00e9gulariser trois \u00e9ch\u00e9ances impay\u00e9es sous trente jours, puis une lettre du 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025 pronon\u00e7ant la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme. Le tribunal a relev\u00e9 que la mise en demeure du 17 septembre \u00e9tait revenue avec la mention <em>&#8221; pli avis\u00e9 le 23\/09 non r\u00e9clam\u00e9 &#8220;<\/em>, mais que la lettre de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du 3 d\u00e9cembre avait \u00e9t\u00e9 distribu\u00e9e le 5 d\u00e9cembre 2025. Cette proc\u00e9dure s\u2019inscrit dans le respect des clauses contractuelles et des principes g\u00e9n\u00e9raux. La Cour d\u2019appel de Chamb\u00e9ry a jug\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme est r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement intervenue pour ce contrat de pr\u00eat par les courriers recommand\u00e9s en date du 18 f\u00e9vrier 2020 lesquels avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9s d\u2019une mise en demeure par lettres recommand\u00e9es avec avis de r\u00e9ception en date du 30 janvier 2020 r\u00e9ceptionn\u00e9e le 4 f\u00e9vrier 2020 &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f8af54b5ff6e72c961250a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Chamb\u00e9ry, 10 avril 2025, n\u00b023\/00487)<\/a><\/strong>. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal a implicitement suivi cette logique, validant la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance malgr\u00e9 le d\u00e9faut de r\u00e9clamation du premier courrier, d\u00e8s lors que la mise en demeure ult\u00e9rieure a \u00e9t\u00e9 distribu\u00e9e. Le contrat de pr\u00eat pr\u00e9voyait en outre une clause d\u2019exigibilit\u00e9 imm\u00e9diate apr\u00e8s mise en demeure, ce que la Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a \u00e9galement admis : <em>&#8221; il est pr\u00e9vu que le contrat est r\u00e9sili\u00e9 et que les sommes deviennent exigibles huit jours apr\u00e8s une simple lettre recommand\u00e9e avec accus\u00e9 de r\u00e9ception en cas de d\u00e9faut de paiement d\u2019une \u00e9ch\u00e9ance &#8220;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d90fce8fc4591307a3426f\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon, 13 mars 2025, n\u00b022\/00928)<\/a><\/strong>. Le tribunal a donc fait une application rigoureuse des stipulations contractuelles.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-determination-precise-du-montant-de-la-creance\">B. La d\u00e9termination pr\u00e9cise du montant de la cr\u00e9ance<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal n\u2019a pas accord\u00e9 le montant exact sollicit\u00e9 par la banque au titre du pr\u00eat. La banque demandait 12 377,18 euros, mais le tribunal a ramen\u00e9 cette somme \u00e0 12 323,85 euros. Pour ce faire, il a d\u00e9compos\u00e9 les \u00e9l\u00e9ments de la cr\u00e9ance : les cinq \u00e9ch\u00e9ances impay\u00e9es de juillet \u00e0 novembre 2025 (5 x 356 euros = 1 780 euros), les int\u00e9r\u00eats de retard de 72,56 euros, le capital restant d\u00fb de 9 972,69 euros apr\u00e8s l\u2019\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du 11 novembre 2025, et l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de 5 % pr\u00e9vue au contrat, soit 498,60 euros. Le tribunal a ainsi op\u00e9r\u00e9 un contr\u00f4le effectif du montant r\u00e9clam\u00e9, v\u00e9rifiant que la cr\u00e9ance \u00e9tait certaine, liquide et exigible. Pour le compte courant, il a pareillement retenu le solde d\u00e9biteur de 2 615,44 euros au 21 novembre 2025, major\u00e9 des int\u00e9r\u00eats jusqu\u2019au d\u00e9compte du 26 d\u00e9cembre 2025, aboutissant \u00e0 2 622,36 euros. Le tribunal a donc exerc\u00e9 son office en vertu de l\u2019article 472 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui impose de ne faire droit \u00e0 la demande que si elle est r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, recevable et bien fond\u00e9e. En l\u2019absence de tout contradictoire, le juge doit s\u2019assurer de la justification des cr\u00e9ances. La Cour d\u2019appel de Dijon a rappel\u00e9 que <em>&#8221; la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme \u00e9tait, par cons\u00e9quent, acquise \u00e0 la date du 8 juillet 2016 &#8220;<\/em>, mais que le montant doit \u00eatre prouv\u00e9. Ici, le tribunal a exig\u00e9 des pi\u00e8ces justificatives et les a analys\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-la-portee-de-la-decision-face-aux-exigences-de-preuve-et-de-contradictoire\">II. La port\u00e9e de la d\u00e9cision face aux exigences de preuve et de contradictoire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-loffice-du-juge-en-labsence-du-defendeur\">A. L\u2019office du juge en l\u2019absence du d\u00e9fendeur<\/h3>\n<p>Le d\u00e9faut de comparution de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice n\u2019a pas conduit le tribunal \u00e0 admettre automatiquement les pr\u00e9tentions de la banque. Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l\u2019article 472 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile, le juge a statu\u00e9 sur le fond et n\u2019a fait droit \u00e0 la demande que dans la mesure o\u00f9 elle lui a paru r\u00e9guli\u00e8re et bien fond\u00e9e. Cette exigence est d\u2019autant plus importante en mati\u00e8re de d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme et de calcul d\u2019int\u00e9r\u00eats. Le tribunal a v\u00e9rifi\u00e9 la production de la convention de compte courant, du contrat de pr\u00eat, des mises en demeure et des relev\u00e9s. Il a ainsi \u00e9vit\u00e9 de se contenter des seules affirmations de la banque. En cela, la d\u00e9cision s\u2019inscrit dans une tradition jurisprudentielle protectrice du d\u00e9biteur d\u00e9faillant : le juge ne peut se dispenser d\u2019un contr\u00f4le m\u00eame minimal. La Cour d\u2019appel de Chamb\u00e9ry avait valid\u00e9 la d\u00e9ch\u00e9ance du terme en se fondant sur les pi\u00e8ces vers\u00e9es, d\u00e9montrant que le juge doit s\u2019appuyer sur des \u00e9l\u00e9ments objectifs. En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le tribunal a exig\u00e9 que la banque produise le d\u00e9compte pr\u00e9cis, le tableau d\u2019amortissement et les courriers, ce qu\u2019elle a fait. Le jugement marque donc un \u00e9quilibre entre la protection du cr\u00e9ancier et le respect des r\u00e8gles de preuve.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-lappreciation-des-interets-et-accessoires\">B. L\u2019appr\u00e9ciation des int\u00e9r\u00eats et accessoires<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal a distingu\u00e9 le taux applicable au capital et aux int\u00e9r\u00eats. Pour le compte courant, il a accord\u00e9 les int\u00e9r\u00eats au taux l\u00e9gal \u00e0 compter du 26 d\u00e9cembre 2025 sur le principal de 2 615,44 euros. Pour le pr\u00eat, il a retenu un taux de 7,2 %, correspondant au taux contractuel de 4,20 % major\u00e9 de trois points pour les sommes exigibles non pay\u00e9es \u00e0 bonne date, conform\u00e9ment aux stipulations du contrat. Il a pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 que cette majoration s\u2019applique \u00e0 compter du 3 d\u00e9cembre 2025 sur le principal de 11 482,42 euros, soit le capital restant d\u00fb apr\u00e8s la derni\u00e8re \u00e9ch\u00e9ance pay\u00e9e, excluant la capitalisation des int\u00e9r\u00eats avant un an. Cette solution respecte les dispositions des articles 1103 et 1104 du Code civil sur la force obligatoire des contrats et la bonne foi. Le tribunal a \u00e9galement accord\u00e9 l\u2019indemnit\u00e9 de 5 % pr\u00e9vue au contrat, qu\u2019il a calcul\u00e9e sur le capital restant d\u00fb (498,60 euros). En mati\u00e8re de frais, il a r\u00e9duit la demande au titre de l\u2019article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile de 2 000 \u00e0 1 000 euros, estimant que les \u00e9l\u00e9ments fournis justifiaient cette somme. L\u2019ex\u00e9cution provisoire a \u00e9t\u00e9 ordonn\u00e9e, ce qui permet \u00e0 la banque de recouvrer rapidement sa cr\u00e9ance, et l\u2019ex\u00e9cution forc\u00e9e a \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9vue en cas de non-paiement dans les trente jours. La d\u00e9cision illustre ainsi une application classique mais rigoureuse des r\u00e8gles contractuelles et proc\u00e9durales, renfor\u00e7ant la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique des relations bancaires tout en pr\u00e9servant un contr\u00f4le judiciaire effectif.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67f8af54b5ff6e72c961250a\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Chamb\u00e9ry, le 10 avril 2025, n\u00b023\/00487<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67d90fce8fc4591307a3426f\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Dijon, le 13 mars 2025, n\u00b022\/00928<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032040777\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1103 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">Les contrats l\u00e9galement form\u00e9s tiennent lieu de loi \u00e0 ceux qui les ont faits. <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000032040772\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 1104 du Code civil<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Les contrats doivent \u00eatre n\u00e9goci\u00e9s, form\u00e9s et ex\u00e9cut\u00e9s de bonne foi. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> Cette disposition est d&#8217;ordre public. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006410732\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 472 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">   Si le d\u00e9fendeur ne compara\u00eet pas, il est n\u00e9anmoins statu\u00e9 sur le fond.<\/p>\n<p>    Le juge ne fait droit \u00e0 la demande que dans la mesure o\u00f9 il l&#8217;estime r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, recevable et bien fond\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000045268436\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 700 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>Le juge condamne la partie tenue aux d\u00e9pens ou qui perd son proc\u00e8s \u00e0 payer :<\/p>\n<p>1\u00b0 A l&#8217;autre partie la somme qu&#8217;il d\u00e9termine, au titre des frais expos\u00e9s et non compris dans les d\u00e9pens ;<\/p>\n<p>2\u00b0 Et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, \u00e0 l&#8217;avocat du b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide juridictionnelle partielle ou totale une somme au titre des honoraires et frais, non compris dans les d\u00e9pens, que le b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaire de l&#8217;aide aurait expos\u00e9s s&#8217;il n&#8217;avait pas eu cette aide. Dans ce cas, il est proc\u00e9d\u00e9 comme il est dit aux  alin\u00e9as 3 et 4 de l&#8217;article 37 de la loi n\u00b0 91-647 du 10 juillet 1991 .<\/p>\n<p>Dans tous les cas, le juge tient compte de l&#8217;\u00e9quit\u00e9 ou de la situation \u00e9conomique de la partie condamn\u00e9e. Il peut, m\u00eame d&#8217;office, pour des raisons tir\u00e9es des m\u00eames consid\u00e9rations, dire qu&#8217;il n&#8217;y a pas lieu \u00e0 ces condamnations.<\/p>\n<p>Les parties peuvent produire les justificatifs des sommes qu&#8217;elles demandent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> La somme allou\u00e9e au titre du 2\u00b0 ne peut \u00eatre inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la part contributive de l&#8217;Etat major\u00e9e de 50 %.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 10 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce d&#8217;Annecy, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, a condamn\u00e9 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice au paiement de sommes&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":3884,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"69da219ecdc6046d47ddcc46","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/69da219ecdc6046d47ddcc46","_kj_judilibre_id":"69da219ecdc6046d47ddcc46","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Annecy","_kj_chambre":"","_kj_rg":"2026J00019","_kj_date":"2026-04-10","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232662","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&#039;annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 10 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce d&#039;Annecy, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, a condamn\u00e9 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice au paiement de sommes...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&#039;annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 10 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce d&#039;Annecy, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, a condamn\u00e9 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice au paiement de sommes...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:21:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4288\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2848\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&#8217;annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:21:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1863,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&#8217;annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:21:48+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D'annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:21:48+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 10 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce d'Annecy, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, a condamn\u00e9 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice au paiement de sommes...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/07\\\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp\",\"width\":4288,\"height\":2848},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&rsquo;annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D'annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 10 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce d'Annecy, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, a condamn\u00e9 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice au paiement de sommes...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D'annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019","og_description":"Le 10 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce d'Annecy, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, a condamn\u00e9 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice au paiement de sommes...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:21:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4288,"height":2848,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&#8217;annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:21:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/"},"wordCount":1863,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&#8217;annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:21:48+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D'annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:21:48+00:00","description":"Le 10 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce d'Annecy, statuant par jugement r\u00e9put\u00e9 contradictoire, a condamn\u00e9 une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9bitrice au paiement de sommes...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp","width":4288,"height":2848},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-commerce-dannecy-le-10-avril-2026-n2026j00019\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Commerce D&rsquo;annecy, le 10 avril 2026, n\u00b02026J00019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/alex-block-PdDBTrkGYLo-unsplash-1.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aFE","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":706722,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-de-douai-le-19-fevrier-2026-n25da01220\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232662,"position":0},"title":"CAA de DOUAI, le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026, n\u00b025DA01220","author":"Kohen","date":"27 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d'appel de Douai, dans un arr\u00eat du 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026, a annul\u00e9 le jugement du tribunal administratif de Rouen ainsi que l'arr\u00eat\u00e9...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;CAA de DOUAI&quot;","block_context":{"text":"CAA de DOUAI","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/caa-de-douai\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/inaki-del-olmo-NIJuEQw0RKg-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":706782,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-de-lyon-le-19-fevrier-2026-n25ly00065\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232662,"position":1},"title":"CAA de LYON, le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026, n\u00b025LY00065","author":"Kohen","date":"27 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Lyon, dans un arr\u00eat du 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026, a rejet\u00e9 la requ\u00eate d\u2019une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 p\u00e9titionnaire contestant le refus...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;CAA de LYON&quot;","block_context":{"text":"CAA de LYON","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/caa-de-lyon\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/pawel-czerwinski-lH8vmlCC1JU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":706776,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-de-lyon-le-19-fevrier-2026-n24ly02966\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232662,"position":2},"title":"CAA de LYON, le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026, n\u00b024LY02966","author":"Kohen","date":"27 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d'appel de Lyon a rendu un arr\u00eat le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026 relatif au refus de titre de s\u00e9jour d'une ressortissante albanaise. La...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;CAA de LYON&quot;","block_context":{"text":"CAA de LYON","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/caa-de-lyon\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-C4bN-gxQQig-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-C4bN-gxQQig-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-C4bN-gxQQig-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-C4bN-gxQQig-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-C4bN-gxQQig-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-C4bN-gxQQig-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":706765,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-de-nancy-le-19-fevrier-2026-n24nc00611\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232662,"position":3},"title":"CAA de NANCY, le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026, n\u00b024NC00611","author":"Kohen","date":"27 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Nancy a rendu le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026 un arr\u00eat rejetant la requ\u00eate de contribuables contestant leur imposition sur le...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;CAA de NANCY&quot;","block_context":{"text":"CAA de NANCY","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/caa-de-nancy\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/milica-spasojevic-m3AU71mq7tc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/milica-spasojevic-m3AU71mq7tc-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/milica-spasojevic-m3AU71mq7tc-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/milica-spasojevic-m3AU71mq7tc-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/milica-spasojevic-m3AU71mq7tc-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/milica-spasojevic-m3AU71mq7tc-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":706797,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-de-lyon-le-19-fevrier-2026-n25ly02044\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232662,"position":4},"title":"CAA de LYON, le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026, n\u00b025LY02044","author":"Kohen","date":"27 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Lyon a rendu un arr\u00eat le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026 relatif \u00e0 un recours en rectification d\u2019erreur mat\u00e9rielle. Une ressortissante...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;CAA de LYON&quot;","block_context":{"text":"CAA de LYON","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/caa-de-lyon\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-k-mPdxzDX68vU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-k-mPdxzDX68vU-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-k-mPdxzDX68vU-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-k-mPdxzDX68vU-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-k-mPdxzDX68vU-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/luis-k-mPdxzDX68vU-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":706754,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/caa-de-lyon-le-19-fevrier-2026-n24ly03153\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232662,"position":5},"title":"CAA de LYON, le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026, n\u00b024LY03153","author":"Kohen","date":"27 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"La cour administrative d\u2019appel de Lyon a rendu le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2026 un arr\u00eat confirmant le rejet de la demande de d\u00e9charge fiscale form\u00e9e par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;CAA de LYON&quot;","block_context":{"text":"CAA de LYON","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/caa-de-lyon\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-ZNmyInkVSl4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-ZNmyInkVSl4-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-ZNmyInkVSl4-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-ZNmyInkVSl4-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-ZNmyInkVSl4-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/rafael-garcin-ZNmyInkVSl4-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232662"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232662\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232662"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}