{"id":1232697,"date":"2026-07-02T16:26:44","date_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:26:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/"},"modified":"2026-07-02T16:26:44","modified_gmt":"2026-07-02T14:26:44","slug":"tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='article-content'>\n<style scoped>.toc-article{background:#f8f9fa;border:1px solid #e2e6ea;border-left:4px solid #2c5f8a;border-radius:6px;padding:20px 24px;margin:0 0 32px;font-size:15px;line-height:1.6}.toc-article p{margin:0 0 10px;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a1a}.toc-article ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding:0}.toc-article li.toc-h2{padding:4px 0}.toc-article li.toc-h3{padding:2px 0 2px 20px;font-size:14px}.toc-article a{color:#2c5f8a;text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px dotted #a0b4c8}.toc-article a:hover{color:#1a3d5c;border-bottom-color:#1a3d5c}<\/style>\n<nav class=\"toc-article\" role=\"navigation\" aria-label=\"Sommaire\">\n<p>Sommaire<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#i-la-confirmation-des-limites-du-pouvoir-juridictionnel-du-juge-des-referes\">I. La confirmation des limites du pouvoir juridictionnel du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-le-rappel-de-limpossibilite-de-prononcer-une-condamnation-au-paiement\">A. Le rappel de l&#8217;impossibilit\u00e9 de prononcer une condamnation au paiement<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-labsence-de-demande-de-renvoi-au-fond-dans-le-dispositif-des-parties\">B. L&#8217;absence de demande de renvoi au fond dans le dispositif des parties<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#ii-lexistence-dune-contestation-serieuse-justifiant-le-rejet-de-la-provision\">II. L&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse justifiant le rejet de la provision<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#a-la-reconnaissance-dun-vice-du-consentement-comme-contestation-serieuse\">A. La reconnaissance d&#8217;un vice du consentement comme contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h3\"><a href=\"#b-la-confirmation-dune-solution-prudente-en-matiere-de-provision\">B. La confirmation d&#8217;une solution prudente en mati\u00e8re de provision<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"toc-h2\"><a href=\"#fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/nav>\n<p>Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#8217;une demande de paiement d&#8217;une somme de 59 000 euros et, \u00e0 titre subsidiaire, d&#8217;une provision de 40 000 euros, form\u00e9e par une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 c\u00e9dante \u00e0 l&#8217;encontre de la caution d&#8217;une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 c\u00e9d\u00e9e. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SLM avait fait l&#8217;objet d&#8217;une cession de parts sociales par acte du 10 f\u00e9vrier 2025, auquel \u00e9tait annex\u00e9 un engagement de caution du d\u00e9fendeur \u00e0 hauteur de 59 000 euros. Le 25 ao\u00fbt 2025, une proc\u00e9dure de liquidation judiciaire a \u00e9t\u00e9 ouverte \u00e0 l&#8217;encontre de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SLM. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 c\u00e9dante a alors mis en demeure la caution, puis l&#8217;a assign\u00e9e en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p>Le d\u00e9fendeur a oppos\u00e9 l&#8217;incomp\u00e9tence du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s au motif de contestations s\u00e9rieuses. Il soutenait que l&#8217;acte de cession \u00e9tait entach\u00e9 de nullit\u00e9, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 c\u00e9dante ayant affirm\u00e9 de mani\u00e8re inexacte que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SLM n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas en cessation des paiements, alors que le tribunal avait fix\u00e9 cette date au 1er f\u00e9vrier 2025, ant\u00e9rieure \u00e0 la cession. Il en d\u00e9duisait la caducit\u00e9 du cautionnement, contrat accessoire. Il contestait \u00e9galement le quantum de l&#8217;obligation.<\/p>\n<p>La question de droit soumise au juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s \u00e9tait de savoir si, en pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;une contestation portant sur la validit\u00e9 du consentement donn\u00e9 par la caution \u00e0 son engagement en raison d&#8217;une affirmation inexacte sur la situation de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 c\u00e9d\u00e9e, l&#8217;obligation de paiement invoqu\u00e9e par le cr\u00e9ancier \u00e9tait ou non s\u00e9rieusement contestable au sens de l&#8217;article 873 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile. Par son ordonnance, le tribunal a dit n&#8217;y avoir lieu \u00e0 r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 sur la demande principale de condamnation, faute de pouvoir juridictionnel, et sur la demande subsidiaire de provision, en retenant l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse tenant au vice du consentement.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"i-la-confirmation-des-limites-du-pouvoir-juridictionnel-du-juge-des-referes\">I. La confirmation des limites du pouvoir juridictionnel du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-le-rappel-de-limpossibilite-de-prononcer-une-condamnation-au-paiement\">A. Le rappel de l&#8217;impossibilit\u00e9 de prononcer une condamnation au paiement<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal rappelle d&#8217;embl\u00e9e un principe fondamental de la proc\u00e9dure civile : les pouvoirs du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s sont limit\u00e9s par les textes. Il \u00e9nonce que le code de proc\u00e9dure civile permet au juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s d&#8217;allouer une provision, mais en aucun cas de condamner une partie au paiement d&#8217;une somme d&#8217;argent. Cette distinction est essentielle. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante demandait \u00e0 titre principal la condamnation de la caution \u00e0 payer 59 000 euros. Or, une telle demande exc\u00e8de la comp\u00e9tence du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, qui ne peut trancher au fond une obligation litigieuse. Le tribunal \u00e9carte donc cette pr\u00e9tention en disant n&#8217;y avoir lieu \u00e0 r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9. Il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;une application classique de l&#8217;article 873 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui ne conf\u00e8re au juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s qu&#8217;un pouvoir provisoire. La rigueur du tribunal sur ce point \u00e9vite tout glissement vers un jugement au fond d\u00e9guis\u00e9, pr\u00e9servant ainsi la r\u00e9partition des comp\u00e9tences entre le juge de l&#8217;urgence et le juge du principal.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-labsence-de-demande-de-renvoi-au-fond-dans-le-dispositif-des-parties\">B. L&#8217;absence de demande de renvoi au fond dans le dispositif des parties<\/h3>\n<p>La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante avait sugg\u00e9r\u00e9, dans ses moyens, que la juridiction renvoie l&#8217;affaire au fond si elle s&#8217;estimait incomp\u00e9tente. Le tribunal oppose une fin de non-recevoir proc\u00e9durale. Il rappelle, en se r\u00e9f\u00e9rant \u00e0 la jurisprudence constante, que le juge ne peut se prononcer que sur les demandes figurant dans le dispositif des conclusions des parties. En l&#8217;esp\u00e8ce, le dispositif de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante ne contenait aucune demande de renvoi devant la formation de jugement ordinaire. Le d\u00e9fendeur non plus. Le tribunal refuse donc de statuer sur ce point, appliquant strictement le principe de l&#8217;effet d\u00e9volutif de la demande. Cette solution est conforme \u00e0 l&#8217;exigence de loyaut\u00e9 proc\u00e9durale et \u00e9vite que le juge ne suppl\u00e9e la carence des parties. Elle renforce la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique en obligeant chaque partie \u00e0 formuler clairement ses pr\u00e9tentions.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"ii-lexistence-dune-contestation-serieuse-justifiant-le-rejet-de-la-provision\">II. L&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse justifiant le rejet de la provision<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<h3 id=\"a-la-reconnaissance-dun-vice-du-consentement-comme-contestation-serieuse\">A. La reconnaissance d&#8217;un vice du consentement comme contestation s\u00e9rieuse<\/h3>\n<p>Le tribunal se concentre ensuite sur la demande subsidiaire de provision de 40 000 euros. Il applique l&#8217;article 873 alin\u00e9a 2 du code de proc\u00e9dure civile, qui conditionne l&#8217;octroi d&#8217;une provision \u00e0 l&#8217;absence de contestation s\u00e9rieuse. Le d\u00e9fendeur produisait trois pi\u00e8ces : l&#8217;acte de cession mentionnant une d\u00e9claration de la c\u00e9dante selon laquelle la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 SLM n&#8217;\u00e9tait pas en cessation des paiements, le jugement fixant la date de cessation des paiements au 1er f\u00e9vrier 2025, soit ant\u00e9rieure \u00e0 l&#8217;acte, et le jugement rejetant la tierce opposition de la c\u00e9dante. De ces \u00e9l\u00e9ments, le tribunal d\u00e9duit que la caution est fond\u00e9e \u00e0 soutenir que son consentement a \u00e9t\u00e9 donn\u00e9 sur la foi d&#8217;une affirmation inexacte. Il rel\u00e8ve que l&#8217;acte de cession n&#8217;a certes pas \u00e9t\u00e9 annul\u00e9, mais estime que cette seule circonstance n&#8217;\u00e9carte pas la contestation s\u00e9rieuse. En effet, le vice du consentement, s&#8217;il est \u00e9tabli, affecte la validit\u00e9 m\u00eame de l&#8217;engagement de caution, obligation accessoire. Cette analyse rejoint la solution retenue par la Cour d&#8217;appel de Rennes, selon laquelle <em>&#8220;est oppos\u00e9e par l&#8217;assureur une contestation s\u00e9rieuse sur l&#8217;obligation de l&#8217;assureur de r\u00e9gler les indemnit\u00e9s&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e4e9ba310ca50852f74053\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Rennes, 26 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/04327)<\/a><\/strong>. De m\u00eame, <em>&#8220;les demandes de paiement d&#8217;une provision se heurtent \u00e0 des contestations s\u00e9rieuses qu&#8217;il n&#8217;appartient pas au juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s de trancher&#8221;<\/em> <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e63e62ed04dc45c79a99e2\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">(Cour d&#8217;appel de Rennes, 25 mars 2025, n\u00b023\/07037)<\/a><\/strong>. Le tribunal applique ici une logique identique : la contestation sur la validit\u00e9 du cautionnement est suffisamment s\u00e9rieuse pour faire obstacle \u00e0 la provision.<\/p>\n<h3 id=\"b-la-confirmation-dune-solution-prudente-en-matiere-de-provision\">B. La confirmation d&#8217;une solution prudente en mati\u00e8re de provision<\/h3>\n<p>En retenant l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, le tribunal refuse de faire droit \u00e0 la demande de provision. Cette d\u00e9cision est prudente et conforme \u00e0 la fonction du juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s, qui ne doit pas anticiper le jugement au fond. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 c\u00e9dante se voyait opposer un argument de poids : elle avait elle-m\u00eame, dans l&#8217;acte de cession, garanti l&#8217;absence de cessation des paiements, ce que contredisait la date de cessation retenue par le tribunal. Le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne pouvait, sans exc\u00e9der ses pouvoirs, trancher cette question de validit\u00e9 du consentement, qui rel\u00e8ve du juge du fond. Il a donc correctement appliqu\u00e9 le crit\u00e8re de la contestation s\u00e9rieuse. En rejetant la provision, il pr\u00e9serve les droits du d\u00e9fendeur sans pr\u00e9juger de l&#8217;issue du proc\u00e8s principal. Cette solution s&#8217;inscrit dans une jurisprudence bien \u00e9tablie qui fait de l&#8217;existence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse un obstacle dirimant \u00e0 toute mesure provisoire de paiement. Elle garantit que le juge des r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9s ne se substitue pas au juge du fond dans l&#8217;appr\u00e9ciation de la validit\u00e9 des actes juridiques.<\/p>\n<p><h2 id=\"jurisprudences-utilisees-pour-enrichir-le-commentaire\">Jurisprudences utilis\u00e9es pour enrichir le commentaire<\/h2>\n<p><\/p>\n<ul class=\"jurisprudences-rag-sources\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e4e9ba310ca50852f74053\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rennes, le 26 mars 2025, n\u00b024\/04327<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/67e63e62ed04dc45c79a99e2\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Cour d&#x27;appel de Rennes, le 25 mars 2025, n\u00b023\/07037<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<style scoped>.fondements-juridiques{margin:40px 0 0;padding:0}.fondements-juridiques>h2{font-size:22px;color:#1a1a1a;border-bottom:2px solid #2c5f8a;padding-bottom:10px;margin-bottom:20px}.fj-article{background:#fdfdfd;border:1px solid #e8e8e8;border-radius:6px;padding:20px;margin-bottom:16px}.fj-article h3{font-size:17px;color:#2c5f8a;margin:0 0 12px;font-weight:600}.fj-texte{font-size:15px;line-height:1.7;color:#333}.fj-texte p{margin:8px 0}.fj-badge{font-size:11px;padding:2px 8px;border-radius:3px;margin-left:8px;font-weight:500;vertical-align:middle}.fj-en-vigueur{background:#e8f5e9;color:#2e7d32}.fj-abroge{background:#ffebee;color:#c62828}.fj-modifie{background:#fff3e0;color:#e65100}<\/style>\n<section class=\"fondements-juridiques\">\n<h2 id=\"fondements-juridiques\">Fondements juridiques<\/h2>\n<div class=\"fj-article\">\n<h3><a href=\"https:\/\/www.legifrance.gouv.fr\/codes\/article_lc\/LEGIARTI000006411463\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Article 873 du Code de proc\u00e9dure civile<\/a> <span class=\"fj-badge fj-en-vigueur\">En vigueur<\/span><\/h3>\n<div class=\"fj-texte\">\n<p>   Le pr\u00e9sident peut, dans les m\u00eames limites, et m\u00eame en pr\u00e9sence d&#8217;une contestation s\u00e9rieuse, prescrire en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 les mesures conservatoires ou de remise en \u00e9tat qui s&#8217;imposent, soit pour pr\u00e9venir un dommage imminent, soit pour faire cesser un trouble manifestement illicite.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   Dans les cas o\u00f9 l&#8217;existence de l&#8217;obligation n&#8217;est pas s\u00e9rieusement contestable, il peut accorder une provision au cr\u00e9ancier, ou ordonner l&#8217;ex\u00e9cution de l&#8217;obligation m\u00eame s&#8217;il s&#8217;agit d&#8217;une obligation de faire.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#8217;une demande de paiement d&#8217;une somme de 59 000 euros et, \u00e0 titre&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":232070755,"featured_media":4770,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_kj_source_type":"judilibre","_kj_official_id":"6a2ed3afcdc6046d4747a69e","_kj_official_url":"https:\/\/www.courdecassation.fr\/decision\/6a2ed3afcdc6046d4747a69e","_kj_judilibre_id":"6a2ed3afcdc6046d4747a69e","_kj_jur":"Tribunal de commerce","_kj_lieu":"Montpellier","_kj_chambre":"R E F E R E et Proc\u00e9dure acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e au fond","_kj_rg":"2026000542","_kj_date":"2026-04-09","_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6454,7207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1232697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-decisions-juridiques","category-tribunal-de-commerce"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.9 (Yoast SEO v27.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#039;une demande de paiement d&#039;une somme de 59 000 euros et, \u00e0 titre...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d&#039;une demande de paiement d&#039;une somme de 59 000 euros et, \u00e0 titre...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-02T14:26:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"4420\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2957\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kohen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\"},\"headline\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:26:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1468,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\",\"Tribunal de commerce\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/#respond\"]}],\"citation\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542\",\"about\":[{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"D\u00e9cisions juridiques\"},{\"@type\":\"Thing\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce\"}],\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-02T14:26:44+00:00\",\"speakable\":{\"@type\":\"SpeakableSpecification\",\"cssSelector\":[\".article-content > p:first-of-type\"]}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-02T14:26:44+00:00\",\"description\":\"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande de paiement d'une somme de 59 000 euros et, \u00e0 titre...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/08\\\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp\",\"width\":4420,\"height\":2957},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"description\":\"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kohen Avocats\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/05\\\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Kohen Avocats\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751\",\"name\":\"Kohen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kohen\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/hassan-kohen-448548192\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/@Kohen-Avocats\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/kohenavocats.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/kohenmlk\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","description":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande de paiement d'une somme de 59 000 euros et, \u00e0 titre...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542","og_description":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande de paiement d'une somme de 59 000 euros et, \u00e0 titre...","og_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/","og_site_name":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","article_published_time":"2026-07-02T14:26:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":4420,"height":2957,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Kohen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kohen","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/"},"author":{"name":"Kohen","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751"},"headline":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:26:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/"},"wordCount":1468,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp","articleSection":["D\u00e9cisions juridiques","Tribunal de commerce"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/#respond"]}],"citation":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Tribunal de commerce"}],"dateModified":"2026-07-02T14:26:44+00:00","speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":[".article-content > p:first-of-type"]}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/","name":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542 - Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat en droit p\u00e9nal \u00e0 Paris","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp","datePublished":"2026-07-02T14:26:44+00:00","description":"Le 9 avril 2026, le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, statuant en r\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, a \u00e9t\u00e9 saisi d'une demande de paiement d'une somme de 59 000 euros et, \u00e0 titre...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp","width":4420,"height":2957},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-9-avril-2026-n2026000542\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/criminal-law-attorneys-in-paris-counsel-and-strategic-defense\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 9 avril 2026, n\u00b02026000542"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","name":"Kohen Avocats","description":"Ma\u00eetre Hassan Kohen, avocat p\u00e9naliste \u00e0 Paris, intervient exclusivement en droit p\u00e9nal pour la d\u00e9fense des particuliers, notamment en mati\u00e8re d\u2019accusations de viol. Il assure un accompagnement rigoureux d\u00e8s la garde \u00e0 vue jusqu\u2019\u00e0 la Cour d\u2019assises, veillant au strict respect des garanties proc\u00e9durales.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Kohen Avocats","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Logo-Kohen-1000.webp","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Kohen Avocats"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/761c9ba54fa1ca84d405cef0831ff751","name":"Kohen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/1c5e76ef76bbbfdd2b4da984e2bf2fa4056fd51a27d25ce2c332047f1dfd6e00?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Kohen"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/hassan-kohen-448548192\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@Kohen-Avocats"],"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/author\/kohenmlk\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/thomas-kelley-HBANPxXi3aQ-unsplash.webp","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peCrII-5aGd","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":493029,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-10-novembre-2025-n2025014154\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232697,"position":0},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 10 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025014154","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 10 novembre 2025, ouvre une liquidation judiciaire. Le d\u00e9biteur, une soci\u00e9t\u00e9, en a fait la demande. Le juge...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tobias-keller-2ecH5Lw3zSk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tobias-keller-2ecH5Lw3zSk-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tobias-keller-2ecH5Lw3zSk-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tobias-keller-2ecH5Lw3zSk-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tobias-keller-2ecH5Lw3zSk-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/tobias-keller-2ecH5Lw3zSk-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493277,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-7-novembre-2025-n2025013788\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232697,"position":1},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 7 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025013788","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 7 novembre 2025, ouvre une liquidation judiciaire. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse, non comparante, est en cessation...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-gJ9Y6Ip-X4o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-gJ9Y6Ip-X4o-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-gJ9Y6Ip-X4o-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-gJ9Y6Ip-X4o-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-gJ9Y6Ip-X4o-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/planet-volumes-gJ9Y6Ip-X4o-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":493097,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-10-novembre-2025-n2025013708\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232697,"position":2},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 10 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025013708","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 10 novembre 2025, se prononce sur une demande d\u2019ouverture de liquidation judiciaire. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante est...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/capricorn-song-nHiROCMVloE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/capricorn-song-nHiROCMVloE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/capricorn-song-nHiROCMVloE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/capricorn-song-nHiROCMVloE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/capricorn-song-nHiROCMVloE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/capricorn-song-nHiROCMVloE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":496955,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-28-novembre-2025-n2025013783\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232697,"position":3},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 28 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025013783","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, par jugement du 28 novembre 2025, a statu\u00e9 sur une demande en enrichissement injustifi\u00e9. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 gestionnaire...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/margaret-jaszowska-iJ4qhyNQEjE-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":491436,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-montpellier-le-17-novembre-2025-n2025012817\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232697,"position":4},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 17 novembre 2025, n\u00b02025012817","author":"Kohen","date":"8 April 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le Tribunal de commerce de Montpellier, le 17 novembre 2025, ouvre une liquidation judiciaire simplifi\u00e9e. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante est en cessation des...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/ayush-kumar-lRZ-KmsecQ-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1209466,"url":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/tribunal-de-commerce-de-creteil-le-7-avril-2026-n2025f01633\/","url_meta":{"origin":1232697,"position":5},"title":"Tribunal de commerce de Cr\u00e9teil, le 7 avril 2026, n\u00b02025F01633","author":"Kohen","date":"28 June 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Le jugement rendu par le Tribunal de commerce de Cr\u00e9teil le 7 avril 2026, dans l'affaire n\u00b02025F01633, illustre une application concr\u00e8te du principe de la...","rel":"","context":"In &quot;D\u00e9cisions juridiques&quot;","block_context":{"text":"D\u00e9cisions juridiques","link":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/category\/decisions-juridiques\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/kohenavocats.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/getty-images-xD4-IJN1DF8-unsplash.webp?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/232070755"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1232697"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1232697\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4770"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1232697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1232697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kohenavocats.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1232697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}